Potential of Lactobacillus plantarum IBB 3036 and Lactobacillus salivarius IBB 3154 to persistence in chicken after in ovo delivery
The aim of this study was to characterize and compare selected Lactobacillus strains originating from different environments (cow milk and hen feces) with respect to their applicative potential to colonize gastrointestinal track of chickens before hatching from an egg. In vitro phenotypic characteri...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | MicrobiologyOpen (Weinheim) 2019-01, Vol.8 (1) |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | MicrobiologyOpen (Weinheim) |
| container_volume | 8 |
| creator | Aleksandrzak‐Piekarczyk, Tamara Puzia, Weronika Żylińska, Joanna Cieśla, Jarosław Gulewicz, Krzysztof A. Bardowski, Jacek K. Górecki, Roman K. |
| description | The aim of this study was to characterize and compare selected
Lactobacillus
strains originating from different environments (cow milk and hen feces) with respect to their applicative potential to colonize gastrointestinal track of chickens before hatching from an egg.
In vitro
phenotypic characterization of lactobacilli strains included the investigation of the important prerequisites for persistence in gastrointestinal tract, such as a capability to survive in the presence of bile salts and at low
pH
, enzymatic and sugar metabolic profiles, adhesion abilities, and resistance to osmolytes, temperature, and antibiotics. Regarding the resistance of lactobacilli to most of the various stress factors tested, the milk isolate
Lactobacillus plantarum
IBB
3036 showed better abilities than the chicken feces isolate
Lactobacillus salivarius
IBB
3154. However, regarding the acidification tolerance and adherence ability,
L. salivarius
IBB
3154 revealed better characteristics. Use of these two selected lactobacilli isolates together with proper prebiotics resulted in the preparation of two S1 and S2 bioformulations, which were injected
in ovo
into hen Cobb500
FF
fertilized eggs. Furthermore,
in vivo
tests assessing the persistence of
L. plantarum
IBB
3036 and
L. salivarius
IBB
3154 in the chicken gastrointestinal tract was monitored by
PCR
‐based classical and quantitative techniques and revealed the presence of both strains in fecal samples collected 3 days after hatching. Subsequently, the number of
L. salivarius
IBB
3154 increased significantly in the chicken intestine, whereas the presence of
L. plantarum
IBB
3036 was gradually decreased. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/mbo3.620 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2169144453</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2169144453</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1003-797fedb7c1ff66958249092c8270c8abd005237c1a434e3b379e866b5169f8e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWGrBnxDw4mVrvjbZPdqitVDQg55DNptg6nazJtlCz_5xU-tBnMsMM8-8w7wAXGM0xwiRu13j6ZwTdAYmBLGyqCoizv_Ul2AW4xblEIhwhifg68Un0yenOugt3CidfKO067oxwqFTfVJh3MH1YgEpohyqvv0HRdW5vQoulz8ULhlMHg4mRBeztDbQ9VC_O_1heqhsMuHY8HsPW5NXTThcgQurumhmv3kK3h4fXpdPxeZ5tV7ebwqdn6OFqIU1bSM0tpbzuqwIq1FNdP4L6Uo1LUIloXmsGGWGNlTUpuK8KTGvbWUEnYKbk-4Q_OdoYpJbP4Y-n5QkM5gxVtJM3Z4oHXyMwVg5BLdT4SAxkkeX5dFlmV2m3wq8bek</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2169144453</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Potential of Lactobacillus plantarum IBB 3036 and Lactobacillus salivarius IBB 3154 to persistence in chicken after in ovo delivery</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Aleksandrzak‐Piekarczyk, Tamara ; Puzia, Weronika ; Żylińska, Joanna ; Cieśla, Jarosław ; Gulewicz, Krzysztof A. ; Bardowski, Jacek K. ; Górecki, Roman K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Aleksandrzak‐Piekarczyk, Tamara ; Puzia, Weronika ; Żylińska, Joanna ; Cieśla, Jarosław ; Gulewicz, Krzysztof A. ; Bardowski, Jacek K. ; Górecki, Roman K.</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to characterize and compare selected
Lactobacillus
strains originating from different environments (cow milk and hen feces) with respect to their applicative potential to colonize gastrointestinal track of chickens before hatching from an egg.
In vitro
phenotypic characterization of lactobacilli strains included the investigation of the important prerequisites for persistence in gastrointestinal tract, such as a capability to survive in the presence of bile salts and at low
pH
, enzymatic and sugar metabolic profiles, adhesion abilities, and resistance to osmolytes, temperature, and antibiotics. Regarding the resistance of lactobacilli to most of the various stress factors tested, the milk isolate
Lactobacillus plantarum
IBB
3036 showed better abilities than the chicken feces isolate
Lactobacillus salivarius
IBB
3154. However, regarding the acidification tolerance and adherence ability,
L. salivarius
IBB
3154 revealed better characteristics. Use of these two selected lactobacilli isolates together with proper prebiotics resulted in the preparation of two S1 and S2 bioformulations, which were injected
in ovo
into hen Cobb500
FF
fertilized eggs. Furthermore,
in vivo
tests assessing the persistence of
L. plantarum
IBB
3036 and
L. salivarius
IBB
3154 in the chicken gastrointestinal tract was monitored by
PCR
‐based classical and quantitative techniques and revealed the presence of both strains in fecal samples collected 3 days after hatching. Subsequently, the number of
L. salivarius
IBB
3154 increased significantly in the chicken intestine, whereas the presence of
L. plantarum
IBB
3036 was gradually decreased.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-8827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-8827</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.620</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Acidification ; Antibiotics ; Bacteria ; Bile salts ; Biocompatibility ; Biomedical materials ; Birds ; Chickens ; Cow's milk ; Drug resistance ; Eggs ; Feces ; Gastrointestinal system ; Gastrointestinal tract ; Hatching ; Immune system ; In vivo methods and tests ; Intestine ; Lactobacilli ; Lactobacillus ; Lactobacillus plantarum ; Microorganisms ; Milk ; Poultry ; Prebiotics ; Probiotics ; Salts ; Sugar</subject><ispartof>MicrobiologyOpen (Weinheim), 2019-01, Vol.8 (1)</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1003-797fedb7c1ff66958249092c8270c8abd005237c1a434e3b379e866b5169f8e73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1003-797fedb7c1ff66958249092c8270c8abd005237c1a434e3b379e866b5169f8e73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4725-760X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aleksandrzak‐Piekarczyk, Tamara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puzia, Weronika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Żylińska, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cieśla, Jarosław</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulewicz, Krzysztof A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardowski, Jacek K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Górecki, Roman K.</creatorcontrib><title>Potential of Lactobacillus plantarum IBB 3036 and Lactobacillus salivarius IBB 3154 to persistence in chicken after in ovo delivery</title><title>MicrobiologyOpen (Weinheim)</title><description>The aim of this study was to characterize and compare selected
Lactobacillus
strains originating from different environments (cow milk and hen feces) with respect to their applicative potential to colonize gastrointestinal track of chickens before hatching from an egg.
In vitro
phenotypic characterization of lactobacilli strains included the investigation of the important prerequisites for persistence in gastrointestinal tract, such as a capability to survive in the presence of bile salts and at low
pH
, enzymatic and sugar metabolic profiles, adhesion abilities, and resistance to osmolytes, temperature, and antibiotics. Regarding the resistance of lactobacilli to most of the various stress factors tested, the milk isolate
Lactobacillus plantarum
IBB
3036 showed better abilities than the chicken feces isolate
Lactobacillus salivarius
IBB
3154. However, regarding the acidification tolerance and adherence ability,
L. salivarius
IBB
3154 revealed better characteristics. Use of these two selected lactobacilli isolates together with proper prebiotics resulted in the preparation of two S1 and S2 bioformulations, which were injected
in ovo
into hen Cobb500
FF
fertilized eggs. Furthermore,
in vivo
tests assessing the persistence of
L. plantarum
IBB
3036 and
L. salivarius
IBB
3154 in the chicken gastrointestinal tract was monitored by
PCR
‐based classical and quantitative techniques and revealed the presence of both strains in fecal samples collected 3 days after hatching. Subsequently, the number of
L. salivarius
IBB
3154 increased significantly in the chicken intestine, whereas the presence of
L. plantarum
IBB
3036 was gradually decreased.</description><subject>Acidification</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bile salts</subject><subject>Biocompatibility</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Cow's milk</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal system</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal tract</subject><subject>Hatching</subject><subject>Immune system</subject><subject>In vivo methods and tests</subject><subject>Intestine</subject><subject>Lactobacilli</subject><subject>Lactobacillus</subject><subject>Lactobacillus plantarum</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Milk</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Prebiotics</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Salts</subject><subject>Sugar</subject><issn>2045-8827</issn><issn>2045-8827</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWGrBnxDw4mVrvjbZPdqitVDQg55DNptg6nazJtlCz_5xU-tBnMsMM8-8w7wAXGM0xwiRu13j6ZwTdAYmBLGyqCoizv_Ul2AW4xblEIhwhifg68Un0yenOugt3CidfKO067oxwqFTfVJh3MH1YgEpohyqvv0HRdW5vQoulz8ULhlMHg4mRBeztDbQ9VC_O_1heqhsMuHY8HsPW5NXTThcgQurumhmv3kK3h4fXpdPxeZ5tV7ebwqdn6OFqIU1bSM0tpbzuqwIq1FNdP4L6Uo1LUIloXmsGGWGNlTUpuK8KTGvbWUEnYKbk-4Q_OdoYpJbP4Y-n5QkM5gxVtJM3Z4oHXyMwVg5BLdT4SAxkkeX5dFlmV2m3wq8bek</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Aleksandrzak‐Piekarczyk, Tamara</creator><creator>Puzia, Weronika</creator><creator>Żylińska, Joanna</creator><creator>Cieśla, Jarosław</creator><creator>Gulewicz, Krzysztof A.</creator><creator>Bardowski, Jacek K.</creator><creator>Górecki, Roman K.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4725-760X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Potential of Lactobacillus plantarum IBB 3036 and Lactobacillus salivarius IBB 3154 to persistence in chicken after in ovo delivery</title><author>Aleksandrzak‐Piekarczyk, Tamara ; Puzia, Weronika ; Żylińska, Joanna ; Cieśla, Jarosław ; Gulewicz, Krzysztof A. ; Bardowski, Jacek K. ; Górecki, Roman K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1003-797fedb7c1ff66958249092c8270c8abd005237c1a434e3b379e866b5169f8e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acidification</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bile salts</topic><topic>Biocompatibility</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Cow's milk</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal system</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal tract</topic><topic>Hatching</topic><topic>Immune system</topic><topic>In vivo methods and tests</topic><topic>Intestine</topic><topic>Lactobacilli</topic><topic>Lactobacillus</topic><topic>Lactobacillus plantarum</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Milk</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Prebiotics</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Salts</topic><topic>Sugar</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aleksandrzak‐Piekarczyk, Tamara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puzia, Weronika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Żylińska, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cieśla, Jarosław</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulewicz, Krzysztof A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardowski, Jacek K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Górecki, Roman K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>MicrobiologyOpen (Weinheim)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aleksandrzak‐Piekarczyk, Tamara</au><au>Puzia, Weronika</au><au>Żylińska, Joanna</au><au>Cieśla, Jarosław</au><au>Gulewicz, Krzysztof A.</au><au>Bardowski, Jacek K.</au><au>Górecki, Roman K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Potential of Lactobacillus plantarum IBB 3036 and Lactobacillus salivarius IBB 3154 to persistence in chicken after in ovo delivery</atitle><jtitle>MicrobiologyOpen (Weinheim)</jtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>2045-8827</issn><eissn>2045-8827</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to characterize and compare selected
Lactobacillus
strains originating from different environments (cow milk and hen feces) with respect to their applicative potential to colonize gastrointestinal track of chickens before hatching from an egg.
In vitro
phenotypic characterization of lactobacilli strains included the investigation of the important prerequisites for persistence in gastrointestinal tract, such as a capability to survive in the presence of bile salts and at low
pH
, enzymatic and sugar metabolic profiles, adhesion abilities, and resistance to osmolytes, temperature, and antibiotics. Regarding the resistance of lactobacilli to most of the various stress factors tested, the milk isolate
Lactobacillus plantarum
IBB
3036 showed better abilities than the chicken feces isolate
Lactobacillus salivarius
IBB
3154. However, regarding the acidification tolerance and adherence ability,
L. salivarius
IBB
3154 revealed better characteristics. Use of these two selected lactobacilli isolates together with proper prebiotics resulted in the preparation of two S1 and S2 bioformulations, which were injected
in ovo
into hen Cobb500
FF
fertilized eggs. Furthermore,
in vivo
tests assessing the persistence of
L. plantarum
IBB
3036 and
L. salivarius
IBB
3154 in the chicken gastrointestinal tract was monitored by
PCR
‐based classical and quantitative techniques and revealed the presence of both strains in fecal samples collected 3 days after hatching. Subsequently, the number of
L. salivarius
IBB
3154 increased significantly in the chicken intestine, whereas the presence of
L. plantarum
IBB
3036 was gradually decreased.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/mbo3.620</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4725-760X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2045-8827 |
| ispartof | MicrobiologyOpen (Weinheim), 2019-01, Vol.8 (1) |
| issn | 2045-8827 2045-8827 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2169144453 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Acidification Antibiotics Bacteria Bile salts Biocompatibility Biomedical materials Birds Chickens Cow's milk Drug resistance Eggs Feces Gastrointestinal system Gastrointestinal tract Hatching Immune system In vivo methods and tests Intestine Lactobacilli Lactobacillus Lactobacillus plantarum Microorganisms Milk Poultry Prebiotics Probiotics Salts Sugar |
| title | Potential of Lactobacillus plantarum IBB 3036 and Lactobacillus salivarius IBB 3154 to persistence in chicken after in ovo delivery |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A49%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potential%20of%20Lactobacillus%20plantarum%20IBB%203036%20and%20Lactobacillus%20salivarius%20IBB%203154%20to%20persistence%20in%20chicken%20after%20in%20ovo%20delivery&rft.jtitle=MicrobiologyOpen%20(Weinheim)&rft.au=Aleksandrzak%E2%80%90Piekarczyk,%20Tamara&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=2045-8827&rft.eissn=2045-8827&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mbo3.620&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2169144453%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2169144453&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |