A Response to "Dewey and Vygotsky: Society, Experience, and Inquiry in Educational Practice"
In the May 2001 Educational Researcher, Michael Glassman presented an interesting comparison between the theories of two towering figures in educational thought, John Dewey and Lev Vygotsky. However, Glassman, in his use of the project approach (Katz & Chard, 1989) to make Dewey's theory op...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Educational researcher 2002-06, Vol.31 (5), p.21-23 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 23 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 21 |
| container_title | Educational researcher |
| container_volume | 31 |
| creator | O'Brien, Leigh M. |
| description | In the May 2001 Educational Researcher, Michael Glassman presented an interesting comparison between the theories of two towering figures in educational thought, John Dewey and Lev Vygotsky. However, Glassman, in his use of the project approach (Katz & Chard, 1989) to make Dewey's theory operational, misstates several points. This is unfortunate for at least two reasons. First, Glassman's description of "Dewey-inspired" education is problematic in that it calls into question the premises for his comparison of Dewey and Vygotsky's ideas. Second, and more troublingly, this interpretation perpetuates historical misunderstandings, misuses, and critiques of Dewey's theory and related practices. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3102/0013189X031005021 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_216905374</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ651524</ericid><jstor_id>3594424</jstor_id><sage_id>10.3102_0013189X031005021</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3594424</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-6628e9e06429053fc35b3d32c65cd6fe9ae5c654dc44a8a6c481bd8be62b45063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QPAQeu7WfLvrrdSqFUHxix6EJZudLVvrpk226P57s1bqwYunTHifeZIZhI4pGXBK2CkhlNM4mZJwI5IwuoM6NOEyCuF0F3XaPGqBfXTg_ZwESLC4g16H-AH80lYecG1x7wI-oMG6yvFLM7O1f2vO8aM1JdRNH48_l-BKqAz0v5FJtVqXrsFlhcf52ui6tJVe4HunTV0a6B2ivUIvPBz9nF30fDl-Gl1Ht3dXk9HwNjKcx3WkFIshAaIES4jkheEy4zlnRkmTqwISDTLUIjdC6FgrI2Ka5XEGimVCEsW7qLfxLp1drcHX6dyuXfiKTxlVrfNMBIhuIOOs9w6KdOnKd-2alJK03WH6Z4eh52TTE8Y2W358oySVrFUONrHXM_h98x--ua-t2wq5TIQIvi-hWIJy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216905374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Response to "Dewey and Vygotsky: Society, Experience, and Inquiry in Educational Practice"</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>O'Brien, Leigh M.</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Leigh M.</creatorcontrib><description>In the May 2001 Educational Researcher, Michael Glassman presented an interesting comparison between the theories of two towering figures in educational thought, John Dewey and Lev Vygotsky. However, Glassman, in his use of the project approach (Katz & Chard, 1989) to make Dewey's theory operational, misstates several points. This is unfortunate for at least two reasons. First, Glassman's description of "Dewey-inspired" education is problematic in that it calls into question the premises for his comparison of Dewey and Vygotsky's ideas. Second, and more troublingly, this interpretation perpetuates historical misunderstandings, misuses, and critiques of Dewey's theory and related practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-189X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-102X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3102/0013189X031005021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: American Educational Research Association</publisher><subject>Adults ; Chard ; Children ; Children & youth ; Communities ; Curricula ; Democracy ; Dewey (John) ; Early childhood education ; Education ; Educational Philosophy ; Educational Practices ; Educational research ; Educational Researchers ; Educational Theories ; Elementary Secondary Education ; English teacher education ; Laboratories ; Pedagogy ; Preschool Children ; Process Product Relationship ; Researchers ; School age children ; Society ; Teacher Role ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching methods ; Vygotsky (Lev S) ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Educational researcher, 2002-06, Vol.31 (5), p.21-23</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 American Educational Research Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Educational Research Association Jun/Jul 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-6628e9e06429053fc35b3d32c65cd6fe9ae5c654dc44a8a6c481bd8be62b45063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-6628e9e06429053fc35b3d32c65cd6fe9ae5c654dc44a8a6c481bd8be62b45063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3594424$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3594424$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ651524$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Leigh M.</creatorcontrib><title>A Response to "Dewey and Vygotsky: Society, Experience, and Inquiry in Educational Practice"</title><title>Educational researcher</title><description>In the May 2001 Educational Researcher, Michael Glassman presented an interesting comparison between the theories of two towering figures in educational thought, John Dewey and Lev Vygotsky. However, Glassman, in his use of the project approach (Katz & Chard, 1989) to make Dewey's theory operational, misstates several points. This is unfortunate for at least two reasons. First, Glassman's description of "Dewey-inspired" education is problematic in that it calls into question the premises for his comparison of Dewey and Vygotsky's ideas. Second, and more troublingly, this interpretation perpetuates historical misunderstandings, misuses, and critiques of Dewey's theory and related practices.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Chard</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Dewey (John)</subject><subject>Early childhood education</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Philosophy</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Educational research</subject><subject>Educational Researchers</subject><subject>Educational Theories</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>English teacher education</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Preschool Children</subject><subject>Process Product Relationship</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>School age children</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Teacher Role</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Vygotsky (Lev S)</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0013-189X</issn><issn>1935-102X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QPAQeu7WfLvrrdSqFUHxix6EJZudLVvrpk226P57s1bqwYunTHifeZIZhI4pGXBK2CkhlNM4mZJwI5IwuoM6NOEyCuF0F3XaPGqBfXTg_ZwESLC4g16H-AH80lYecG1x7wI-oMG6yvFLM7O1f2vO8aM1JdRNH48_l-BKqAz0v5FJtVqXrsFlhcf52ui6tJVe4HunTV0a6B2ivUIvPBz9nF30fDl-Gl1Ht3dXk9HwNjKcx3WkFIshAaIES4jkheEy4zlnRkmTqwISDTLUIjdC6FgrI2Ka5XEGimVCEsW7qLfxLp1drcHX6dyuXfiKTxlVrfNMBIhuIOOs9w6KdOnKd-2alJK03WH6Z4eh52TTE8Y2W358oySVrFUONrHXM_h98x--ua-t2wq5TIQIvi-hWIJy</recordid><startdate>200206</startdate><enddate>200206</enddate><creator>O'Brien, Leigh M.</creator><general>American Educational Research Association</general><general>Sage Publications</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200206</creationdate><title>A Response to "Dewey and Vygotsky: Society, Experience, and Inquiry in Educational Practice"</title><author>O'Brien, Leigh M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-6628e9e06429053fc35b3d32c65cd6fe9ae5c654dc44a8a6c481bd8be62b45063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Chard</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Dewey (John)</topic><topic>Early childhood education</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Philosophy</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Educational research</topic><topic>Educational Researchers</topic><topic>Educational Theories</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>English teacher education</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Preschool Children</topic><topic>Process Product Relationship</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>School age children</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Teacher Role</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Vygotsky (Lev S)</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Leigh M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Educational researcher</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Brien, Leigh M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ651524</ericid><atitle>A Response to "Dewey and Vygotsky: Society, Experience, and Inquiry in Educational Practice"</atitle><jtitle>Educational researcher</jtitle><date>2002-06</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>21-23</pages><issn>0013-189X</issn><eissn>1935-102X</eissn><abstract>In the May 2001 Educational Researcher, Michael Glassman presented an interesting comparison between the theories of two towering figures in educational thought, John Dewey and Lev Vygotsky. However, Glassman, in his use of the project approach (Katz & Chard, 1989) to make Dewey's theory operational, misstates several points. This is unfortunate for at least two reasons. First, Glassman's description of "Dewey-inspired" education is problematic in that it calls into question the premises for his comparison of Dewey and Vygotsky's ideas. Second, and more troublingly, this interpretation perpetuates historical misunderstandings, misuses, and critiques of Dewey's theory and related practices.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>American Educational Research Association</pub><doi>10.3102/0013189X031005021</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0013-189X |
| ispartof | Educational researcher, 2002-06, Vol.31 (5), p.21-23 |
| issn | 0013-189X 1935-102X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_216905374 |
| source | Access via SAGE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Adults Chard Children Children & youth Communities Curricula Democracy Dewey (John) Early childhood education Education Educational Philosophy Educational Practices Educational research Educational Researchers Educational Theories Elementary Secondary Education English teacher education Laboratories Pedagogy Preschool Children Process Product Relationship Researchers School age children Society Teacher Role Teachers Teaching Teaching methods Vygotsky (Lev S) Young Children |
| title | A Response to "Dewey and Vygotsky: Society, Experience, and Inquiry in Educational Practice" |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A43%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Response%20to%20%22Dewey%20and%20Vygotsky:%20Society,%20Experience,%20and%20Inquiry%20in%20Educational%20Practice%22&rft.jtitle=Educational%20researcher&rft.au=O'Brien,%20Leigh%20M.&rft.date=2002-06&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=21-23&rft.issn=0013-189X&rft.eissn=1935-102X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3102/0013189X031005021&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3594424%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216905374&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ651524&rft_jstor_id=3594424&rft_sage_id=10.3102_0013189X031005021&rfr_iscdi=true |