On the Vague Meaning of "Gender" in Education Research: The Problem, Its Sources, and Recommendations for Practice
Writers for both academic and popular audiences often use the term gender when considering differences between the educational experiences of male and female students, and the distinction often appears to be based on a traditional understanding of the term sex. The authors of this article argue that...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Educational researcher 2008-08, Vol.37 (6), p.343-350 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 350 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 343 |
container_title | Educational researcher |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Glasser, Howard M. Smith, John P. |
description | Writers for both academic and popular audiences often use the term gender when considering differences between the educational experiences of male and female students, and the distinction often appears to be based on a traditional understanding of the term sex. The authors of this article argue that gender and sex should be distinguished more clearly in education research and that the pattern of unclear, conflated, and even synonymous use of the terms has slowed progress in understanding how gender influences students' educational experiences. The authors present evidence of conflated use, review the wide diversity in orienting perspectives and definitions of gender, show how current American Psychological Association publication guidelines fail to provide clear guidance on the use of the terms, and make recommendations for improving research practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3102/0013189X08323718 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_216901625</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ810034</ericid><jstor_id>25209010</jstor_id><sage_id>10.3102_0013189X08323718</sage_id><sourcerecordid>25209010</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-b7db30b82764923163d1db2827c5c755af4b96860d4f127c1f1f0ae6cd2c2f543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKt7Fwqh647eJPN0J6XWSqWiVbobMnm0U-ykJjML_70ZRyq4cBVuznfOuVyEzglcMQL0GoAwkmZLSBllCUkPUI9kLAq8tjxEvVYOWv0YnTi3AYAopGkP2XmF67XCb3zVKPyoeFVWK2w0HkxUJZUd4LLCY9kIXpemws_KKW7F-gYvvOnJmuJdbYd4Wjv8YhorlBtiXknPCbPd-oRvm8PaWE9zUZdCnaIjzd-dOvt5--j1brwY3Qez-WQ6up0FgtG0DopEFgyKlCZxmFFGYiaJLKifRSSSKOI6LLI4jUGGmvhPookGrmIhqaA6ClkfDbrcnTUfjXJ1vvErVr4ypyTOgMQ08hB0kLDGOat0vrPlltvPnEDeHjb_e1hvuegsypZij48fUgLA2tqgkx1fqd_Kf-IuO37jamP3eTSi4HcE9gVv54lP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216901625</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the Vague Meaning of "Gender" in Education Research: The Problem, Its Sources, and Recommendations for Practice</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Glasser, Howard M. ; Smith, John P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Glasser, Howard M. ; Smith, John P.</creatorcontrib><description>Writers for both academic and popular audiences often use the term gender when considering differences between the educational experiences of male and female students, and the distinction often appears to be based on a traditional understanding of the term sex. The authors of this article argue that gender and sex should be distinguished more clearly in education research and that the pattern of unclear, conflated, and even synonymous use of the terms has slowed progress in understanding how gender influences students' educational experiences. The authors present evidence of conflated use, review the wide diversity in orienting perspectives and definitions of gender, show how current American Psychological Association publication guidelines fail to provide clear guidance on the use of the terms, and make recommendations for improving research practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-189X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-102X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3102/0013189X08323718</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Associative processes ; Biological gender ; Definitions ; Education ; Educational Experience ; Educational Research ; Educational Researchers ; Females ; Gender construction ; Gender Differences ; Gender identity ; Gender Issues ; Gender roles ; Gender studies ; Grammatical gender ; Individualized Instruction ; Mathematics education ; Men ; Psychology ; Queer theory ; R&D ; Research & development ; Research Methodology ; Research News and Comment ; Sex ; Sexuality ; Students ; Studies ; Teaching Methods ; Vocabulary</subject><ispartof>Educational researcher, 2008-08, Vol.37 (6), p.343-350</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 American Educational Research Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Educational Research Association Aug/Sep 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-b7db30b82764923163d1db2827c5c755af4b96860d4f127c1f1f0ae6cd2c2f543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-b7db30b82764923163d1db2827c5c755af4b96860d4f127c1f1f0ae6cd2c2f543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25209010$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25209010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ810034$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Glasser, Howard M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, John P.</creatorcontrib><title>On the Vague Meaning of "Gender" in Education Research: The Problem, Its Sources, and Recommendations for Practice</title><title>Educational researcher</title><description>Writers for both academic and popular audiences often use the term gender when considering differences between the educational experiences of male and female students, and the distinction often appears to be based on a traditional understanding of the term sex. The authors of this article argue that gender and sex should be distinguished more clearly in education research and that the pattern of unclear, conflated, and even synonymous use of the terms has slowed progress in understanding how gender influences students' educational experiences. The authors present evidence of conflated use, review the wide diversity in orienting perspectives and definitions of gender, show how current American Psychological Association publication guidelines fail to provide clear guidance on the use of the terms, and make recommendations for improving research practice.</description><subject>Associative processes</subject><subject>Biological gender</subject><subject>Definitions</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Experience</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Educational Researchers</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender construction</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Gender identity</subject><subject>Gender Issues</subject><subject>Gender roles</subject><subject>Gender studies</subject><subject>Grammatical gender</subject><subject>Individualized Instruction</subject><subject>Mathematics education</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Queer theory</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Research News and Comment</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sexuality</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><issn>0013-189X</issn><issn>1935-102X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKt7Fwqh647eJPN0J6XWSqWiVbobMnm0U-ykJjML_70ZRyq4cBVuznfOuVyEzglcMQL0GoAwkmZLSBllCUkPUI9kLAq8tjxEvVYOWv0YnTi3AYAopGkP2XmF67XCb3zVKPyoeFVWK2w0HkxUJZUd4LLCY9kIXpemws_KKW7F-gYvvOnJmuJdbYd4Wjv8YhorlBtiXknPCbPd-oRvm8PaWE9zUZdCnaIjzd-dOvt5--j1brwY3Qez-WQ6up0FgtG0DopEFgyKlCZxmFFGYiaJLKifRSSSKOI6LLI4jUGGmvhPookGrmIhqaA6ClkfDbrcnTUfjXJ1vvErVr4ypyTOgMQ08hB0kLDGOat0vrPlltvPnEDeHjb_e1hvuegsypZij48fUgLA2tqgkx1fqd_Kf-IuO37jamP3eTSi4HcE9gVv54lP</recordid><startdate>20080801</startdate><enddate>20080801</enddate><creator>Glasser, Howard M.</creator><creator>Smith, John P.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>American Educational Research Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080801</creationdate><title>On the Vague Meaning of "Gender" in Education Research: The Problem, Its Sources, and Recommendations for Practice</title><author>Glasser, Howard M. ; Smith, John P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-b7db30b82764923163d1db2827c5c755af4b96860d4f127c1f1f0ae6cd2c2f543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Associative processes</topic><topic>Biological gender</topic><topic>Definitions</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Experience</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Educational Researchers</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender construction</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Gender identity</topic><topic>Gender Issues</topic><topic>Gender roles</topic><topic>Gender studies</topic><topic>Grammatical gender</topic><topic>Individualized Instruction</topic><topic>Mathematics education</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Queer theory</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Research News and Comment</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sexuality</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glasser, Howard M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, John P.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Educational researcher</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glasser, Howard M.</au><au>Smith, John P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ810034</ericid><atitle>On the Vague Meaning of "Gender" in Education Research: The Problem, Its Sources, and Recommendations for Practice</atitle><jtitle>Educational researcher</jtitle><date>2008-08-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>350</epage><pages>343-350</pages><issn>0013-189X</issn><eissn>1935-102X</eissn><abstract>Writers for both academic and popular audiences often use the term gender when considering differences between the educational experiences of male and female students, and the distinction often appears to be based on a traditional understanding of the term sex. The authors of this article argue that gender and sex should be distinguished more clearly in education research and that the pattern of unclear, conflated, and even synonymous use of the terms has slowed progress in understanding how gender influences students' educational experiences. The authors present evidence of conflated use, review the wide diversity in orienting perspectives and definitions of gender, show how current American Psychological Association publication guidelines fail to provide clear guidance on the use of the terms, and make recommendations for improving research practice.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.3102/0013189X08323718</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-189X |
ispartof | Educational researcher, 2008-08, Vol.37 (6), p.343-350 |
issn | 0013-189X 1935-102X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_216901625 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; SAGE Complete |
subjects | Associative processes Biological gender Definitions Education Educational Experience Educational Research Educational Researchers Females Gender construction Gender Differences Gender identity Gender Issues Gender roles Gender studies Grammatical gender Individualized Instruction Mathematics education Men Psychology Queer theory R&D Research & development Research Methodology Research News and Comment Sex Sexuality Students Studies Teaching Methods Vocabulary |
title | On the Vague Meaning of "Gender" in Education Research: The Problem, Its Sources, and Recommendations for Practice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T05%3A17%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20Vague%20Meaning%20of%20%22Gender%22%20in%20Education%20Research:%20The%20Problem,%20Its%20Sources,%20and%20Recommendations%20for%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Educational%20researcher&rft.au=Glasser,%20Howard%20M.&rft.date=2008-08-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=350&rft.pages=343-350&rft.issn=0013-189X&rft.eissn=1935-102X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3102/0013189X08323718&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25209010%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216901625&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ810034&rft_jstor_id=25209010&rft_sage_id=10.3102_0013189X08323718&rfr_iscdi=true |