On the Vague Meaning of "Gender" in Education Research: The Problem, Its Sources, and Recommendations for Practice

Writers for both academic and popular audiences often use the term gender when considering differences between the educational experiences of male and female students, and the distinction often appears to be based on a traditional understanding of the term sex. The authors of this article argue that...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educational researcher 2008-08, Vol.37 (6), p.343-350
Hauptverfasser: Glasser, Howard M., Smith, John P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 350
container_issue 6
container_start_page 343
container_title Educational researcher
container_volume 37
creator Glasser, Howard M.
Smith, John P.
description Writers for both academic and popular audiences often use the term gender when considering differences between the educational experiences of male and female students, and the distinction often appears to be based on a traditional understanding of the term sex. The authors of this article argue that gender and sex should be distinguished more clearly in education research and that the pattern of unclear, conflated, and even synonymous use of the terms has slowed progress in understanding how gender influences students' educational experiences. The authors present evidence of conflated use, review the wide diversity in orienting perspectives and definitions of gender, show how current American Psychological Association publication guidelines fail to provide clear guidance on the use of the terms, and make recommendations for improving research practice.
doi_str_mv 10.3102/0013189X08323718
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_216901625</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ810034</ericid><jstor_id>25209010</jstor_id><sage_id>10.3102_0013189X08323718</sage_id><sourcerecordid>25209010</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-b7db30b82764923163d1db2827c5c755af4b96860d4f127c1f1f0ae6cd2c2f543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKt7Fwqh647eJPN0J6XWSqWiVbobMnm0U-ykJjML_70ZRyq4cBVuznfOuVyEzglcMQL0GoAwkmZLSBllCUkPUI9kLAq8tjxEvVYOWv0YnTi3AYAopGkP2XmF67XCb3zVKPyoeFVWK2w0HkxUJZUd4LLCY9kIXpemws_KKW7F-gYvvOnJmuJdbYd4Wjv8YhorlBtiXknPCbPd-oRvm8PaWE9zUZdCnaIjzd-dOvt5--j1brwY3Qez-WQ6up0FgtG0DopEFgyKlCZxmFFGYiaJLKifRSSSKOI6LLI4jUGGmvhPookGrmIhqaA6ClkfDbrcnTUfjXJ1vvErVr4ypyTOgMQ08hB0kLDGOat0vrPlltvPnEDeHjb_e1hvuegsypZij48fUgLA2tqgkx1fqd_Kf-IuO37jamP3eTSi4HcE9gVv54lP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216901625</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the Vague Meaning of "Gender" in Education Research: The Problem, Its Sources, and Recommendations for Practice</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Glasser, Howard M. ; Smith, John P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Glasser, Howard M. ; Smith, John P.</creatorcontrib><description>Writers for both academic and popular audiences often use the term gender when considering differences between the educational experiences of male and female students, and the distinction often appears to be based on a traditional understanding of the term sex. The authors of this article argue that gender and sex should be distinguished more clearly in education research and that the pattern of unclear, conflated, and even synonymous use of the terms has slowed progress in understanding how gender influences students' educational experiences. The authors present evidence of conflated use, review the wide diversity in orienting perspectives and definitions of gender, show how current American Psychological Association publication guidelines fail to provide clear guidance on the use of the terms, and make recommendations for improving research practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-189X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-102X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3102/0013189X08323718</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Associative processes ; Biological gender ; Definitions ; Education ; Educational Experience ; Educational Research ; Educational Researchers ; Females ; Gender construction ; Gender Differences ; Gender identity ; Gender Issues ; Gender roles ; Gender studies ; Grammatical gender ; Individualized Instruction ; Mathematics education ; Men ; Psychology ; Queer theory ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Research Methodology ; Research News and Comment ; Sex ; Sexuality ; Students ; Studies ; Teaching Methods ; Vocabulary</subject><ispartof>Educational researcher, 2008-08, Vol.37 (6), p.343-350</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 American Educational Research Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Educational Research Association Aug/Sep 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-b7db30b82764923163d1db2827c5c755af4b96860d4f127c1f1f0ae6cd2c2f543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-b7db30b82764923163d1db2827c5c755af4b96860d4f127c1f1f0ae6cd2c2f543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25209010$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25209010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ810034$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Glasser, Howard M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, John P.</creatorcontrib><title>On the Vague Meaning of "Gender" in Education Research: The Problem, Its Sources, and Recommendations for Practice</title><title>Educational researcher</title><description>Writers for both academic and popular audiences often use the term gender when considering differences between the educational experiences of male and female students, and the distinction often appears to be based on a traditional understanding of the term sex. The authors of this article argue that gender and sex should be distinguished more clearly in education research and that the pattern of unclear, conflated, and even synonymous use of the terms has slowed progress in understanding how gender influences students' educational experiences. The authors present evidence of conflated use, review the wide diversity in orienting perspectives and definitions of gender, show how current American Psychological Association publication guidelines fail to provide clear guidance on the use of the terms, and make recommendations for improving research practice.</description><subject>Associative processes</subject><subject>Biological gender</subject><subject>Definitions</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Experience</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Educational Researchers</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender construction</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Gender identity</subject><subject>Gender Issues</subject><subject>Gender roles</subject><subject>Gender studies</subject><subject>Grammatical gender</subject><subject>Individualized Instruction</subject><subject>Mathematics education</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Queer theory</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Research News and Comment</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sexuality</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><issn>0013-189X</issn><issn>1935-102X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKt7Fwqh647eJPN0J6XWSqWiVbobMnm0U-ykJjML_70ZRyq4cBVuznfOuVyEzglcMQL0GoAwkmZLSBllCUkPUI9kLAq8tjxEvVYOWv0YnTi3AYAopGkP2XmF67XCb3zVKPyoeFVWK2w0HkxUJZUd4LLCY9kIXpemws_KKW7F-gYvvOnJmuJdbYd4Wjv8YhorlBtiXknPCbPd-oRvm8PaWE9zUZdCnaIjzd-dOvt5--j1brwY3Qez-WQ6up0FgtG0DopEFgyKlCZxmFFGYiaJLKifRSSSKOI6LLI4jUGGmvhPookGrmIhqaA6ClkfDbrcnTUfjXJ1vvErVr4ypyTOgMQ08hB0kLDGOat0vrPlltvPnEDeHjb_e1hvuegsypZij48fUgLA2tqgkx1fqd_Kf-IuO37jamP3eTSi4HcE9gVv54lP</recordid><startdate>20080801</startdate><enddate>20080801</enddate><creator>Glasser, Howard M.</creator><creator>Smith, John P.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>American Educational Research Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080801</creationdate><title>On the Vague Meaning of "Gender" in Education Research: The Problem, Its Sources, and Recommendations for Practice</title><author>Glasser, Howard M. ; Smith, John P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-b7db30b82764923163d1db2827c5c755af4b96860d4f127c1f1f0ae6cd2c2f543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Associative processes</topic><topic>Biological gender</topic><topic>Definitions</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Experience</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Educational Researchers</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender construction</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Gender identity</topic><topic>Gender Issues</topic><topic>Gender roles</topic><topic>Gender studies</topic><topic>Grammatical gender</topic><topic>Individualized Instruction</topic><topic>Mathematics education</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Queer theory</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Research News and Comment</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sexuality</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glasser, Howard M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, John P.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Educational researcher</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glasser, Howard M.</au><au>Smith, John P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ810034</ericid><atitle>On the Vague Meaning of "Gender" in Education Research: The Problem, Its Sources, and Recommendations for Practice</atitle><jtitle>Educational researcher</jtitle><date>2008-08-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>350</epage><pages>343-350</pages><issn>0013-189X</issn><eissn>1935-102X</eissn><abstract>Writers for both academic and popular audiences often use the term gender when considering differences between the educational experiences of male and female students, and the distinction often appears to be based on a traditional understanding of the term sex. The authors of this article argue that gender and sex should be distinguished more clearly in education research and that the pattern of unclear, conflated, and even synonymous use of the terms has slowed progress in understanding how gender influences students' educational experiences. The authors present evidence of conflated use, review the wide diversity in orienting perspectives and definitions of gender, show how current American Psychological Association publication guidelines fail to provide clear guidance on the use of the terms, and make recommendations for improving research practice.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.3102/0013189X08323718</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-189X
ispartof Educational researcher, 2008-08, Vol.37 (6), p.343-350
issn 0013-189X
1935-102X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_216901625
source Jstor Complete Legacy; SAGE Complete
subjects Associative processes
Biological gender
Definitions
Education
Educational Experience
Educational Research
Educational Researchers
Females
Gender construction
Gender Differences
Gender identity
Gender Issues
Gender roles
Gender studies
Grammatical gender
Individualized Instruction
Mathematics education
Men
Psychology
Queer theory
R&D
Research & development
Research Methodology
Research News and Comment
Sex
Sexuality
Students
Studies
Teaching Methods
Vocabulary
title On the Vague Meaning of "Gender" in Education Research: The Problem, Its Sources, and Recommendations for Practice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T05%3A17%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20Vague%20Meaning%20of%20%22Gender%22%20in%20Education%20Research:%20The%20Problem,%20Its%20Sources,%20and%20Recommendations%20for%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Educational%20researcher&rft.au=Glasser,%20Howard%20M.&rft.date=2008-08-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=350&rft.pages=343-350&rft.issn=0013-189X&rft.eissn=1935-102X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3102/0013189X08323718&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25209010%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216901625&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ810034&rft_jstor_id=25209010&rft_sage_id=10.3102_0013189X08323718&rfr_iscdi=true