Minority (dis)advantage in population games
We identify a novel ‘cultural red king effect’ that, in many cases, results in stable arrangements which are to the detriment of minority groups. In particular, we show inequalities disadvantaging minority groups can naturally arise under an adaptive process when minority and majority members must r...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Synthese (Dordrecht) 2019-01, Vol.196 (1), p.413-427 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 427 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 413 |
| container_title | Synthese (Dordrecht) |
| container_volume | 196 |
| creator | Bruner, Justin P. |
| description | We identify a novel ‘cultural red king effect’ that, in many cases, results in stable arrangements which are to the detriment of minority groups. In particular, we show inequalities disadvantaging minority groups can naturally arise under an adaptive process when minority and majority members must routinely determine how to divide resources amongst themselves. We contend that these results show how inequalities disadvantaging minorities can likely arise by dint of their relative size and need not be a result of either explicit nor implicit prejudices, nor due to intrinsic differences between minority and majority members. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11229-017-1487-8 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2168445555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48704138</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48704138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-69f2dfc304ecf63ad2694a883be2ac7b2eefbed48dd90679833b29de9927c42a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOI4-gAuh4EaR6MllclnK4A1G3Og6pE1aOsw0NWmFeXszVHTn2ZzF-b__wIfQOYFbAiDvEiGUagxEYsKVxOoAzchCMgxa8EM0A2AaS7WQx-gkpTUAIYLDDN28tl2I7bArrlybrq37st1gG1-0XdGHftzYoQ1d0ditT6foqLab5M9-9hx9PD68L5_x6u3pZXm_whVjasBC19TVFQPuq1ow66jQ3CrFSk9tJUvqfV16x5VzGoTUirGSaue1prLi1LI5upx6-xg-R58Gsw5j7PJLQ4lQnC_y5BSZUlUMKUVfmz62Wxt3hoDZOzGTE5OdmL0TozJDJyblbNf4-Nf8H3QxQes0hPj7JR-BE6bYNyXwbPo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2168445555</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Minority (dis)advantage in population games</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Bruner, Justin P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bruner, Justin P.</creatorcontrib><description>We identify a novel ‘cultural red king effect’ that, in many cases, results in stable arrangements which are to the detriment of minority groups. In particular, we show inequalities disadvantaging minority groups can naturally arise under an adaptive process when minority and majority members must routinely determine how to divide resources amongst themselves. We contend that these results show how inequalities disadvantaging minorities can likely arise by dint of their relative size and need not be a result of either explicit nor implicit prejudices, nor due to intrinsic differences between minority and majority members.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-7857</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11229-017-1487-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Adjustment ; Cultural identity ; Distributive justice ; Education ; Epistemology ; Game theory ; Inequality ; Logic ; Metaphysics ; Minority & ethnic groups ; Minority groups ; Norms ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Language ; Philosophy of Science ; REGULAR ARTICLES ; Social philosophy</subject><ispartof>Synthese (Dordrecht), 2019-01, Vol.196 (1), p.413-427</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2017</rights><rights>Synthese is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-69f2dfc304ecf63ad2694a883be2ac7b2eefbed48dd90679833b29de9927c42a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-69f2dfc304ecf63ad2694a883be2ac7b2eefbed48dd90679833b29de9927c42a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48704138$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48704138$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27344,27924,27925,33774,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bruner, Justin P.</creatorcontrib><title>Minority (dis)advantage in population games</title><title>Synthese (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Synthese</addtitle><description>We identify a novel ‘cultural red king effect’ that, in many cases, results in stable arrangements which are to the detriment of minority groups. In particular, we show inequalities disadvantaging minority groups can naturally arise under an adaptive process when minority and majority members must routinely determine how to divide resources amongst themselves. We contend that these results show how inequalities disadvantaging minorities can likely arise by dint of their relative size and need not be a result of either explicit nor implicit prejudices, nor due to intrinsic differences between minority and majority members.</description><subject>Adjustment</subject><subject>Cultural identity</subject><subject>Distributive justice</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Metaphysics</subject><subject>Minority & ethnic groups</subject><subject>Minority groups</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Language</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><subject>REGULAR ARTICLES</subject><subject>Social philosophy</subject><issn>0039-7857</issn><issn>1573-0964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOI4-gAuh4EaR6MllclnK4A1G3Og6pE1aOsw0NWmFeXszVHTn2ZzF-b__wIfQOYFbAiDvEiGUagxEYsKVxOoAzchCMgxa8EM0A2AaS7WQx-gkpTUAIYLDDN28tl2I7bArrlybrq37st1gG1-0XdGHftzYoQ1d0ditT6foqLab5M9-9hx9PD68L5_x6u3pZXm_whVjasBC19TVFQPuq1ow66jQ3CrFSk9tJUvqfV16x5VzGoTUirGSaue1prLi1LI5upx6-xg-R58Gsw5j7PJLQ4lQnC_y5BSZUlUMKUVfmz62Wxt3hoDZOzGTE5OdmL0TozJDJyblbNf4-Nf8H3QxQes0hPj7JR-BE6bYNyXwbPo</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Bruner, Justin P.</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Minority (dis)advantage in population games</title><author>Bruner, Justin P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-69f2dfc304ecf63ad2694a883be2ac7b2eefbed48dd90679833b29de9927c42a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adjustment</topic><topic>Cultural identity</topic><topic>Distributive justice</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Metaphysics</topic><topic>Minority & ethnic groups</topic><topic>Minority groups</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Language</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><topic>REGULAR ARTICLES</topic><topic>Social philosophy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bruner, Justin P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Access via Art, Design & Architecture Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bruner, Justin P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Minority (dis)advantage in population games</atitle><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Synthese</stitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>196</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>413</spage><epage>427</epage><pages>413-427</pages><issn>0039-7857</issn><eissn>1573-0964</eissn><abstract>We identify a novel ‘cultural red king effect’ that, in many cases, results in stable arrangements which are to the detriment of minority groups. In particular, we show inequalities disadvantaging minority groups can naturally arise under an adaptive process when minority and majority members must routinely determine how to divide resources amongst themselves. We contend that these results show how inequalities disadvantaging minorities can likely arise by dint of their relative size and need not be a result of either explicit nor implicit prejudices, nor due to intrinsic differences between minority and majority members.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s11229-017-1487-8</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0039-7857 |
| ispartof | Synthese (Dordrecht), 2019-01, Vol.196 (1), p.413-427 |
| issn | 0039-7857 1573-0964 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2168445555 |
| source | SpringerNature Journals; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Adjustment Cultural identity Distributive justice Education Epistemology Game theory Inequality Logic Metaphysics Minority & ethnic groups Minority groups Norms Philosophy Philosophy of Language Philosophy of Science REGULAR ARTICLES Social philosophy |
| title | Minority (dis)advantage in population games |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T06%3A52%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minority%20(dis)advantage%20in%20population%20games&rft.jtitle=Synthese%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Bruner,%20Justin%20P.&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=196&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=413&rft.epage=427&rft.pages=413-427&rft.issn=0039-7857&rft.eissn=1573-0964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11229-017-1487-8&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48704138%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2168445555&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48704138&rfr_iscdi=true |