Impacts of Flow and Tracer Release Unsteadiness on Tracer Analysis of Water and Wastewater Treatment Facilities

AbstractComputational fluid dynamics (CFD) was used to investigate how residence time analysis based on passive tracer transport in environmental and chemical engineering fluid systems can be significantly affected by flow or tracer release unsteadiness. The unsteadiness may be caused by intermitten...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2019-04, Vol.145 (4)
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Jie, Pierre, Kiesha C, Tejada-Martinez, Andres E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page
container_title Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 145
creator Zhang, Jie
Pierre, Kiesha C
Tejada-Martinez, Andres E
description AbstractComputational fluid dynamics (CFD) was used to investigate how residence time analysis based on passive tracer transport in environmental and chemical engineering fluid systems can be significantly affected by flow or tracer release unsteadiness. The unsteadiness may be caused by intermittent influent flow, time-varying operations, and nonuniform tracer release profiles. Oftentimes these unsteady conditions are considered negligible and their impact on residence time analysis is not considered. Systems analyzed included a full-scale stabilization pond, a full-scale oxidation ditch, and full-scale and lab-scale baffled tanks. In the case of the stabilization pond, it was found that time-dependent inflow based on realistic water consumption pattern does not significantly affect mean residence time (MRT) but does have a nonnegligible effect on baffling factor θ10 relative to constant inflow. In the case of a surface aerated oxidation ditch, aerator speed was found to have a nonnegligible impact on MRT, and thus it is recommended that CFD tracer studies should consider changes in aerator speed during daily cycles of operation. The slug and step methods were considered for tracer analysis in baffled contactors. It was found that the tracer release time in the slug method should be kept at less than 5% of the theoretical residence time in order to obtain accurate measurements of residence time characteristics. Furthermore, residence time distribution obtained from tracer analysis based on the step method can be affected by the initial transient and subsequent fluctuations in the time series of injected tracer concentration that often characterizes physical experiments.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001569
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2168026289</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2168026289</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-5ed4d90b04a18ab0d180c8b0006d5ce7f55c12f673b619562538564027d325673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1rwjAUhsPYYM7tP5TtZruoy0eTNrsT0SkIg00Rr8IxTaFSW5dExH-_1I_talchb97ncPIg9Ehwj2BBXp_7X4Phy3jZIzJhcSox7mGMCRfyCnV-s2vUwSljsUyovEV3zq1DJxEy66BmstmC9i5qimhUNfsI6jyaWdDGRp-mMuBMNK-dN5CXtXGhV1-e-zVUB1ce0QX4kLTsAkJ5f7zOrAG_MbWPRqDLqvSlcffopoDKmYfz2UXz0XA2GMfTj_fJoD-NgbHUx9zkSS7xCidAMljhnGRYZ6vwN5FzbdKCc01oIVK2EkRyQTnLuEgwTXNGeYi76Ok0d2ub751xXq2bnQ0bO0WJyDAVNJOh9XZqads4Z02htrbcgD0oglUrWKlWsBovVStTtTLVWXCAxQkGp83f-Av5P_gDMP5-_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2168026289</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impacts of Flow and Tracer Release Unsteadiness on Tracer Analysis of Water and Wastewater Treatment Facilities</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Zhang, Jie ; Pierre, Kiesha C ; Tejada-Martinez, Andres E</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jie ; Pierre, Kiesha C ; Tejada-Martinez, Andres E</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractComputational fluid dynamics (CFD) was used to investigate how residence time analysis based on passive tracer transport in environmental and chemical engineering fluid systems can be significantly affected by flow or tracer release unsteadiness. The unsteadiness may be caused by intermittent influent flow, time-varying operations, and nonuniform tracer release profiles. Oftentimes these unsteady conditions are considered negligible and their impact on residence time analysis is not considered. Systems analyzed included a full-scale stabilization pond, a full-scale oxidation ditch, and full-scale and lab-scale baffled tanks. In the case of the stabilization pond, it was found that time-dependent inflow based on realistic water consumption pattern does not significantly affect mean residence time (MRT) but does have a nonnegligible effect on baffling factor θ10 relative to constant inflow. In the case of a surface aerated oxidation ditch, aerator speed was found to have a nonnegligible impact on MRT, and thus it is recommended that CFD tracer studies should consider changes in aerator speed during daily cycles of operation. The slug and step methods were considered for tracer analysis in baffled contactors. It was found that the tracer release time in the slug method should be kept at less than 5% of the theoretical residence time in order to obtain accurate measurements of residence time characteristics. Furthermore, residence time distribution obtained from tracer analysis based on the step method can be affected by the initial transient and subsequent fluctuations in the time series of injected tracer concentration that often characterizes physical experiments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-9429</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7900</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001569</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Aeration ; Chemical engineering ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Computer applications ; Contactors ; Dynamics ; Fluid dynamics ; Hydrodynamics ; Impact analysis ; Inflow ; Influents ; Methods ; Organic chemistry ; Oxidation ; Ponds ; Profiles ; Residence time ; Residence time distribution ; Scale (corrosion) ; Stabilization ; Stabilization ponds ; Tanks ; Technical Papers ; Time dependence ; Tracers ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment ; Water analysis ; Water consumption ; Water treatment</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.), 2019-04, Vol.145 (4)</ispartof><rights>2019 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-5ed4d90b04a18ab0d180c8b0006d5ce7f55c12f673b619562538564027d325673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-5ed4d90b04a18ab0d180c8b0006d5ce7f55c12f673b619562538564027d325673</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0906-0099</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001569$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001569$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,76193,76201</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierre, Kiesha C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tejada-Martinez, Andres E</creatorcontrib><title>Impacts of Flow and Tracer Release Unsteadiness on Tracer Analysis of Water and Wastewater Treatment Facilities</title><title>Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>AbstractComputational fluid dynamics (CFD) was used to investigate how residence time analysis based on passive tracer transport in environmental and chemical engineering fluid systems can be significantly affected by flow or tracer release unsteadiness. The unsteadiness may be caused by intermittent influent flow, time-varying operations, and nonuniform tracer release profiles. Oftentimes these unsteady conditions are considered negligible and their impact on residence time analysis is not considered. Systems analyzed included a full-scale stabilization pond, a full-scale oxidation ditch, and full-scale and lab-scale baffled tanks. In the case of the stabilization pond, it was found that time-dependent inflow based on realistic water consumption pattern does not significantly affect mean residence time (MRT) but does have a nonnegligible effect on baffling factor θ10 relative to constant inflow. In the case of a surface aerated oxidation ditch, aerator speed was found to have a nonnegligible impact on MRT, and thus it is recommended that CFD tracer studies should consider changes in aerator speed during daily cycles of operation. The slug and step methods were considered for tracer analysis in baffled contactors. It was found that the tracer release time in the slug method should be kept at less than 5% of the theoretical residence time in order to obtain accurate measurements of residence time characteristics. Furthermore, residence time distribution obtained from tracer analysis based on the step method can be affected by the initial transient and subsequent fluctuations in the time series of injected tracer concentration that often characterizes physical experiments.</description><subject>Aeration</subject><subject>Chemical engineering</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Contactors</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Inflow</subject><subject>Influents</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Ponds</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><subject>Residence time</subject><subject>Residence time distribution</subject><subject>Scale (corrosion)</subject><subject>Stabilization</subject><subject>Stabilization ponds</subject><subject>Tanks</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><subject>Time dependence</subject><subject>Tracers</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Water analysis</subject><subject>Water consumption</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><issn>0733-9429</issn><issn>1943-7900</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1rwjAUhsPYYM7tP5TtZruoy0eTNrsT0SkIg00Rr8IxTaFSW5dExH-_1I_talchb97ncPIg9Ehwj2BBXp_7X4Phy3jZIzJhcSox7mGMCRfyCnV-s2vUwSljsUyovEV3zq1DJxEy66BmstmC9i5qimhUNfsI6jyaWdDGRp-mMuBMNK-dN5CXtXGhV1-e-zVUB1ce0QX4kLTsAkJ5f7zOrAG_MbWPRqDLqvSlcffopoDKmYfz2UXz0XA2GMfTj_fJoD-NgbHUx9zkSS7xCidAMljhnGRYZ6vwN5FzbdKCc01oIVK2EkRyQTnLuEgwTXNGeYi76Ok0d2ub751xXq2bnQ0bO0WJyDAVNJOh9XZqads4Z02htrbcgD0oglUrWKlWsBovVStTtTLVWXCAxQkGp83f-Av5P_gDMP5-_Q</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Zhang, Jie</creator><creator>Pierre, Kiesha C</creator><creator>Tejada-Martinez, Andres E</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0906-0099</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>Impacts of Flow and Tracer Release Unsteadiness on Tracer Analysis of Water and Wastewater Treatment Facilities</title><author>Zhang, Jie ; Pierre, Kiesha C ; Tejada-Martinez, Andres E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-5ed4d90b04a18ab0d180c8b0006d5ce7f55c12f673b619562538564027d325673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aeration</topic><topic>Chemical engineering</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Contactors</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Inflow</topic><topic>Influents</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Ponds</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><topic>Residence time</topic><topic>Residence time distribution</topic><topic>Scale (corrosion)</topic><topic>Stabilization</topic><topic>Stabilization ponds</topic><topic>Tanks</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><topic>Time dependence</topic><topic>Tracers</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Water analysis</topic><topic>Water consumption</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierre, Kiesha C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tejada-Martinez, Andres E</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Jie</au><au>Pierre, Kiesha C</au><au>Tejada-Martinez, Andres E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impacts of Flow and Tracer Release Unsteadiness on Tracer Analysis of Water and Wastewater Treatment Facilities</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>145</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>0733-9429</issn><eissn>1943-7900</eissn><abstract>AbstractComputational fluid dynamics (CFD) was used to investigate how residence time analysis based on passive tracer transport in environmental and chemical engineering fluid systems can be significantly affected by flow or tracer release unsteadiness. The unsteadiness may be caused by intermittent influent flow, time-varying operations, and nonuniform tracer release profiles. Oftentimes these unsteady conditions are considered negligible and their impact on residence time analysis is not considered. Systems analyzed included a full-scale stabilization pond, a full-scale oxidation ditch, and full-scale and lab-scale baffled tanks. In the case of the stabilization pond, it was found that time-dependent inflow based on realistic water consumption pattern does not significantly affect mean residence time (MRT) but does have a nonnegligible effect on baffling factor θ10 relative to constant inflow. In the case of a surface aerated oxidation ditch, aerator speed was found to have a nonnegligible impact on MRT, and thus it is recommended that CFD tracer studies should consider changes in aerator speed during daily cycles of operation. The slug and step methods were considered for tracer analysis in baffled contactors. It was found that the tracer release time in the slug method should be kept at less than 5% of the theoretical residence time in order to obtain accurate measurements of residence time characteristics. Furthermore, residence time distribution obtained from tracer analysis based on the step method can be affected by the initial transient and subsequent fluctuations in the time series of injected tracer concentration that often characterizes physical experiments.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001569</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0906-0099</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-9429
ispartof Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.), 2019-04, Vol.145 (4)
issn 0733-9429
1943-7900
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2168026289
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects Aeration
Chemical engineering
Computational fluid dynamics
Computer applications
Contactors
Dynamics
Fluid dynamics
Hydrodynamics
Impact analysis
Inflow
Influents
Methods
Organic chemistry
Oxidation
Ponds
Profiles
Residence time
Residence time distribution
Scale (corrosion)
Stabilization
Stabilization ponds
Tanks
Technical Papers
Time dependence
Tracers
Wastewater
Wastewater treatment
Water analysis
Water consumption
Water treatment
title Impacts of Flow and Tracer Release Unsteadiness on Tracer Analysis of Water and Wastewater Treatment Facilities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T10%3A32%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impacts%20of%20Flow%20and%20Tracer%20Release%20Unsteadiness%20on%20Tracer%20Analysis%20of%20Water%20and%20Wastewater%20Treatment%20Facilities&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydraulic%20engineering%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Zhang,%20Jie&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=145&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=0733-9429&rft.eissn=1943-7900&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001569&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2168026289%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2168026289&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true