Impacts of Flow and Tracer Release Unsteadiness on Tracer Analysis of Water and Wastewater Treatment Facilities
AbstractComputational fluid dynamics (CFD) was used to investigate how residence time analysis based on passive tracer transport in environmental and chemical engineering fluid systems can be significantly affected by flow or tracer release unsteadiness. The unsteadiness may be caused by intermitten...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2019-04, Vol.145 (4) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 145 |
creator | Zhang, Jie Pierre, Kiesha C Tejada-Martinez, Andres E |
description | AbstractComputational fluid dynamics (CFD) was used to investigate how residence time analysis based on passive tracer transport in environmental and chemical engineering fluid systems can be significantly affected by flow or tracer release unsteadiness. The unsteadiness may be caused by intermittent influent flow, time-varying operations, and nonuniform tracer release profiles. Oftentimes these unsteady conditions are considered negligible and their impact on residence time analysis is not considered. Systems analyzed included a full-scale stabilization pond, a full-scale oxidation ditch, and full-scale and lab-scale baffled tanks. In the case of the stabilization pond, it was found that time-dependent inflow based on realistic water consumption pattern does not significantly affect mean residence time (MRT) but does have a nonnegligible effect on baffling factor θ10 relative to constant inflow. In the case of a surface aerated oxidation ditch, aerator speed was found to have a nonnegligible impact on MRT, and thus it is recommended that CFD tracer studies should consider changes in aerator speed during daily cycles of operation. The slug and step methods were considered for tracer analysis in baffled contactors. It was found that the tracer release time in the slug method should be kept at less than 5% of the theoretical residence time in order to obtain accurate measurements of residence time characteristics. Furthermore, residence time distribution obtained from tracer analysis based on the step method can be affected by the initial transient and subsequent fluctuations in the time series of injected tracer concentration that often characterizes physical experiments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001569 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2168026289</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2168026289</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-5ed4d90b04a18ab0d180c8b0006d5ce7f55c12f673b619562538564027d325673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1rwjAUhsPYYM7tP5TtZruoy0eTNrsT0SkIg00Rr8IxTaFSW5dExH-_1I_talchb97ncPIg9Ehwj2BBXp_7X4Phy3jZIzJhcSox7mGMCRfyCnV-s2vUwSljsUyovEV3zq1DJxEy66BmstmC9i5qimhUNfsI6jyaWdDGRp-mMuBMNK-dN5CXtXGhV1-e-zVUB1ce0QX4kLTsAkJ5f7zOrAG_MbWPRqDLqvSlcffopoDKmYfz2UXz0XA2GMfTj_fJoD-NgbHUx9zkSS7xCidAMljhnGRYZ6vwN5FzbdKCc01oIVK2EkRyQTnLuEgwTXNGeYi76Ok0d2ub751xXq2bnQ0bO0WJyDAVNJOh9XZqads4Z02htrbcgD0oglUrWKlWsBovVStTtTLVWXCAxQkGp83f-Av5P_gDMP5-_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2168026289</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impacts of Flow and Tracer Release Unsteadiness on Tracer Analysis of Water and Wastewater Treatment Facilities</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Zhang, Jie ; Pierre, Kiesha C ; Tejada-Martinez, Andres E</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jie ; Pierre, Kiesha C ; Tejada-Martinez, Andres E</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractComputational fluid dynamics (CFD) was used to investigate how residence time analysis based on passive tracer transport in environmental and chemical engineering fluid systems can be significantly affected by flow or tracer release unsteadiness. The unsteadiness may be caused by intermittent influent flow, time-varying operations, and nonuniform tracer release profiles. Oftentimes these unsteady conditions are considered negligible and their impact on residence time analysis is not considered. Systems analyzed included a full-scale stabilization pond, a full-scale oxidation ditch, and full-scale and lab-scale baffled tanks. In the case of the stabilization pond, it was found that time-dependent inflow based on realistic water consumption pattern does not significantly affect mean residence time (MRT) but does have a nonnegligible effect on baffling factor θ10 relative to constant inflow. In the case of a surface aerated oxidation ditch, aerator speed was found to have a nonnegligible impact on MRT, and thus it is recommended that CFD tracer studies should consider changes in aerator speed during daily cycles of operation. The slug and step methods were considered for tracer analysis in baffled contactors. It was found that the tracer release time in the slug method should be kept at less than 5% of the theoretical residence time in order to obtain accurate measurements of residence time characteristics. Furthermore, residence time distribution obtained from tracer analysis based on the step method can be affected by the initial transient and subsequent fluctuations in the time series of injected tracer concentration that often characterizes physical experiments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-9429</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7900</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001569</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Aeration ; Chemical engineering ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Computer applications ; Contactors ; Dynamics ; Fluid dynamics ; Hydrodynamics ; Impact analysis ; Inflow ; Influents ; Methods ; Organic chemistry ; Oxidation ; Ponds ; Profiles ; Residence time ; Residence time distribution ; Scale (corrosion) ; Stabilization ; Stabilization ponds ; Tanks ; Technical Papers ; Time dependence ; Tracers ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment ; Water analysis ; Water consumption ; Water treatment</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.), 2019-04, Vol.145 (4)</ispartof><rights>2019 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-5ed4d90b04a18ab0d180c8b0006d5ce7f55c12f673b619562538564027d325673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-5ed4d90b04a18ab0d180c8b0006d5ce7f55c12f673b619562538564027d325673</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0906-0099</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001569$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001569$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,76193,76201</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierre, Kiesha C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tejada-Martinez, Andres E</creatorcontrib><title>Impacts of Flow and Tracer Release Unsteadiness on Tracer Analysis of Water and Wastewater Treatment Facilities</title><title>Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>AbstractComputational fluid dynamics (CFD) was used to investigate how residence time analysis based on passive tracer transport in environmental and chemical engineering fluid systems can be significantly affected by flow or tracer release unsteadiness. The unsteadiness may be caused by intermittent influent flow, time-varying operations, and nonuniform tracer release profiles. Oftentimes these unsteady conditions are considered negligible and their impact on residence time analysis is not considered. Systems analyzed included a full-scale stabilization pond, a full-scale oxidation ditch, and full-scale and lab-scale baffled tanks. In the case of the stabilization pond, it was found that time-dependent inflow based on realistic water consumption pattern does not significantly affect mean residence time (MRT) but does have a nonnegligible effect on baffling factor θ10 relative to constant inflow. In the case of a surface aerated oxidation ditch, aerator speed was found to have a nonnegligible impact on MRT, and thus it is recommended that CFD tracer studies should consider changes in aerator speed during daily cycles of operation. The slug and step methods were considered for tracer analysis in baffled contactors. It was found that the tracer release time in the slug method should be kept at less than 5% of the theoretical residence time in order to obtain accurate measurements of residence time characteristics. Furthermore, residence time distribution obtained from tracer analysis based on the step method can be affected by the initial transient and subsequent fluctuations in the time series of injected tracer concentration that often characterizes physical experiments.</description><subject>Aeration</subject><subject>Chemical engineering</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Contactors</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Inflow</subject><subject>Influents</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Ponds</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><subject>Residence time</subject><subject>Residence time distribution</subject><subject>Scale (corrosion)</subject><subject>Stabilization</subject><subject>Stabilization ponds</subject><subject>Tanks</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><subject>Time dependence</subject><subject>Tracers</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Water analysis</subject><subject>Water consumption</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><issn>0733-9429</issn><issn>1943-7900</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1rwjAUhsPYYM7tP5TtZruoy0eTNrsT0SkIg00Rr8IxTaFSW5dExH-_1I_talchb97ncPIg9Ehwj2BBXp_7X4Phy3jZIzJhcSox7mGMCRfyCnV-s2vUwSljsUyovEV3zq1DJxEy66BmstmC9i5qimhUNfsI6jyaWdDGRp-mMuBMNK-dN5CXtXGhV1-e-zVUB1ce0QX4kLTsAkJ5f7zOrAG_MbWPRqDLqvSlcffopoDKmYfz2UXz0XA2GMfTj_fJoD-NgbHUx9zkSS7xCidAMljhnGRYZ6vwN5FzbdKCc01oIVK2EkRyQTnLuEgwTXNGeYi76Ok0d2ub751xXq2bnQ0bO0WJyDAVNJOh9XZqads4Z02htrbcgD0oglUrWKlWsBovVStTtTLVWXCAxQkGp83f-Av5P_gDMP5-_Q</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Zhang, Jie</creator><creator>Pierre, Kiesha C</creator><creator>Tejada-Martinez, Andres E</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0906-0099</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>Impacts of Flow and Tracer Release Unsteadiness on Tracer Analysis of Water and Wastewater Treatment Facilities</title><author>Zhang, Jie ; Pierre, Kiesha C ; Tejada-Martinez, Andres E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-5ed4d90b04a18ab0d180c8b0006d5ce7f55c12f673b619562538564027d325673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aeration</topic><topic>Chemical engineering</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Contactors</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Inflow</topic><topic>Influents</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Ponds</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><topic>Residence time</topic><topic>Residence time distribution</topic><topic>Scale (corrosion)</topic><topic>Stabilization</topic><topic>Stabilization ponds</topic><topic>Tanks</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><topic>Time dependence</topic><topic>Tracers</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Water analysis</topic><topic>Water consumption</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierre, Kiesha C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tejada-Martinez, Andres E</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Jie</au><au>Pierre, Kiesha C</au><au>Tejada-Martinez, Andres E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impacts of Flow and Tracer Release Unsteadiness on Tracer Analysis of Water and Wastewater Treatment Facilities</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>145</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>0733-9429</issn><eissn>1943-7900</eissn><abstract>AbstractComputational fluid dynamics (CFD) was used to investigate how residence time analysis based on passive tracer transport in environmental and chemical engineering fluid systems can be significantly affected by flow or tracer release unsteadiness. The unsteadiness may be caused by intermittent influent flow, time-varying operations, and nonuniform tracer release profiles. Oftentimes these unsteady conditions are considered negligible and their impact on residence time analysis is not considered. Systems analyzed included a full-scale stabilization pond, a full-scale oxidation ditch, and full-scale and lab-scale baffled tanks. In the case of the stabilization pond, it was found that time-dependent inflow based on realistic water consumption pattern does not significantly affect mean residence time (MRT) but does have a nonnegligible effect on baffling factor θ10 relative to constant inflow. In the case of a surface aerated oxidation ditch, aerator speed was found to have a nonnegligible impact on MRT, and thus it is recommended that CFD tracer studies should consider changes in aerator speed during daily cycles of operation. The slug and step methods were considered for tracer analysis in baffled contactors. It was found that the tracer release time in the slug method should be kept at less than 5% of the theoretical residence time in order to obtain accurate measurements of residence time characteristics. Furthermore, residence time distribution obtained from tracer analysis based on the step method can be affected by the initial transient and subsequent fluctuations in the time series of injected tracer concentration that often characterizes physical experiments.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001569</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0906-0099</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0733-9429 |
ispartof | Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.), 2019-04, Vol.145 (4) |
issn | 0733-9429 1943-7900 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2168026289 |
source | American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014 |
subjects | Aeration Chemical engineering Computational fluid dynamics Computer applications Contactors Dynamics Fluid dynamics Hydrodynamics Impact analysis Inflow Influents Methods Organic chemistry Oxidation Ponds Profiles Residence time Residence time distribution Scale (corrosion) Stabilization Stabilization ponds Tanks Technical Papers Time dependence Tracers Wastewater Wastewater treatment Water analysis Water consumption Water treatment |
title | Impacts of Flow and Tracer Release Unsteadiness on Tracer Analysis of Water and Wastewater Treatment Facilities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T10%3A32%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impacts%20of%20Flow%20and%20Tracer%20Release%20Unsteadiness%20on%20Tracer%20Analysis%20of%20Water%20and%20Wastewater%20Treatment%20Facilities&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydraulic%20engineering%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Zhang,%20Jie&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=145&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=0733-9429&rft.eissn=1943-7900&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001569&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2168026289%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2168026289&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |