Supersonic Retropropulsion Computational Fluid Dynamics Validation with Langley 4×4 Foot Test Data

Supersonic Retropropulsion Computational Fluid Dynamics Validation with Langley 4×4 Foot Test Data

Validation of computational fluid dynamics for supersonic retropropulsion is shown through the comparison of three Navier-Stokes solvers and wind-tunnel test results. The test was designed specifically for computational fluid dynamics validation and was conducted in the NASA Langley Research Center...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of spacecraft and rockets 2014-05, Vol.51 (3), p.693-714
Hauptverfasser: Schauerhamer, Daniel Guy, Zarchi, Kerry A., Kleb, William L., Carlson, Jan-Reneé, Edquist, Karl. T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Computational fluid dynamics
Fluid dynamics
Nozzles
Solvers
Wind tunnel testing
Wind tunnels
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 714
container_issue 3
container_start_page 693
container_title Journal of spacecraft and rockets
container_volume 51
creator Schauerhamer, Daniel Guy
Zarchi, Kerry A.
Kleb, William L.
Carlson, Jan-Reneé
Edquist, Karl. T.
description Validation of computational fluid dynamics for supersonic retropropulsion is shown through the comparison of three Navier-Stokes solvers and wind-tunnel test results. The test was designed specifically for computational fluid dynamics validation and was conducted in the NASA Langley Research Center supersonic 4×4 foot Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel. The test includes variations in the number of nozzles, Mach and Reynolds numbers, thrust coefficient, and angles of orientation. Code-to-code and code-to-test comparisons are encouraging, and possible error sources are discussed. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Presented as Paper 2012-0864 at the AIAA 50th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Nashville, TN, 9-12 January 2012
doi_str_mv 10.2514/1.A32693
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2167824297</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2167824297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c198t-a9d793ea81c5f56129630e160b159c032c06c4045a8892c2129464f781feed023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN1KwzAUgIMoOKfgIwS88aYzJ39NLsdmVRgIOr0NMU21o2tqkyJ7Eh_IF7M6r4UD58D5OD8fQudAZlQAv4LZnFGp2QGagGAsk7nmh2hCCKUZl4Ico5MYN4SAVFJPkHscOt_H0NYOP_jUh26MoYl1aPEibLsh2TTWtsFFM9QlXu5au61dxM-2qcvfHv6o0xte2fa18TvMvz45LkJIeO1jwkub7Ck6qmwT_dlfnqKn4nq9uM1W9zd3i_kqc6BVyqwuc828VeBEJSRQLRnxIMkLCO0Io45IxwkXVilNHR0BLnmVK6i8LwllU3Sxnzv-8D6M280mDP14ezQUZK4opzr_jwIhmBJcj_qm6HJPuT7E2PvKdH29tf3OADE_og2YvWj2DYWAbqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1553854969</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Supersonic Retropropulsion Computational Fluid Dynamics Validation with Langley 4×4 Foot Test Data</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Schauerhamer, Daniel Guy ; Zarchi, Kerry A. ; Kleb, William L. ; Carlson, Jan-Reneé ; Edquist, Karl. T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schauerhamer, Daniel Guy ; Zarchi, Kerry A. ; Kleb, William L. ; Carlson, Jan-Reneé ; Edquist, Karl. T.</creatorcontrib><description>Validation of computational fluid dynamics for supersonic retropropulsion is shown through the comparison of three Navier-Stokes solvers and wind-tunnel test results. The test was designed specifically for computational fluid dynamics validation and was conducted in the NASA Langley Research Center supersonic 4×4 foot Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel. The test includes variations in the number of nozzles, Mach and Reynolds numbers, thrust coefficient, and angles of orientation. Code-to-code and code-to-test comparisons are encouraging, and possible error sources are discussed. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Presented as Paper 2012-0864 at the AIAA 50th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Nashville, TN, 9-12 January 2012</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4650</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-6794</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/1.A32693</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Computational fluid dynamics ; Fluid dynamics ; Nozzles ; Solvers ; Wind tunnel testing ; Wind tunnels</subject><ispartof>Journal of spacecraft and rockets, 2014-05, Vol.51 (3), p.693-714</ispartof><rights>This material is declared a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Copies of this paper may be made for personal or internal use, on condition that the copier pay the $10.00 per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923; include the code 1533-6794/14 and $10.00 in correspondence with the CCC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c198t-a9d793ea81c5f56129630e160b159c032c06c4045a8892c2129464f781feed023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c198t-a9d793ea81c5f56129630e160b159c032c06c4045a8892c2129464f781feed023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schauerhamer, Daniel Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarchi, Kerry A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleb, William L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Jan-Reneé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edquist, Karl. T.</creatorcontrib><title>Supersonic Retropropulsion Computational Fluid Dynamics Validation with Langley 4×4 Foot Test Data</title><title>Journal of spacecraft and rockets</title><description>Validation of computational fluid dynamics for supersonic retropropulsion is shown through the comparison of three Navier-Stokes solvers and wind-tunnel test results. The test was designed specifically for computational fluid dynamics validation and was conducted in the NASA Langley Research Center supersonic 4×4 foot Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel. The test includes variations in the number of nozzles, Mach and Reynolds numbers, thrust coefficient, and angles of orientation. Code-to-code and code-to-test comparisons are encouraging, and possible error sources are discussed. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Presented as Paper 2012-0864 at the AIAA 50th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Nashville, TN, 9-12 January 2012</description><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Nozzles</subject><subject>Solvers</subject><subject>Wind tunnel testing</subject><subject>Wind tunnels</subject><issn>0022-4650</issn><issn>1533-6794</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kN1KwzAUgIMoOKfgIwS88aYzJ39NLsdmVRgIOr0NMU21o2tqkyJ7Eh_IF7M6r4UD58D5OD8fQudAZlQAv4LZnFGp2QGagGAsk7nmh2hCCKUZl4Ico5MYN4SAVFJPkHscOt_H0NYOP_jUh26MoYl1aPEibLsh2TTWtsFFM9QlXu5au61dxM-2qcvfHv6o0xte2fa18TvMvz45LkJIeO1jwkub7Ck6qmwT_dlfnqKn4nq9uM1W9zd3i_kqc6BVyqwuc828VeBEJSRQLRnxIMkLCO0Io45IxwkXVilNHR0BLnmVK6i8LwllU3Sxnzv-8D6M280mDP14ezQUZK4opzr_jwIhmBJcj_qm6HJPuT7E2PvKdH29tf3OADE_og2YvWj2DYWAbqA</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Schauerhamer, Daniel Guy</creator><creator>Zarchi, Kerry A.</creator><creator>Kleb, William L.</creator><creator>Carlson, Jan-Reneé</creator><creator>Edquist, Karl. T.</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Supersonic Retropropulsion Computational Fluid Dynamics Validation with Langley 4×4 Foot Test Data</title><author>Schauerhamer, Daniel Guy ; Zarchi, Kerry A. ; Kleb, William L. ; Carlson, Jan-Reneé ; Edquist, Karl. T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c198t-a9d793ea81c5f56129630e160b159c032c06c4045a8892c2129464f781feed023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Nozzles</topic><topic>Solvers</topic><topic>Wind tunnel testing</topic><topic>Wind tunnels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schauerhamer, Daniel Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarchi, Kerry A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleb, William L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Jan-Reneé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edquist, Karl. T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of spacecraft and rockets</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schauerhamer, Daniel Guy</au><au>Zarchi, Kerry A.</au><au>Kleb, William L.</au><au>Carlson, Jan-Reneé</au><au>Edquist, Karl. T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Supersonic Retropropulsion Computational Fluid Dynamics Validation with Langley 4×4 Foot Test Data</atitle><jtitle>Journal of spacecraft and rockets</jtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>693</spage><epage>714</epage><pages>693-714</pages><issn>0022-4650</issn><eissn>1533-6794</eissn><abstract>Validation of computational fluid dynamics for supersonic retropropulsion is shown through the comparison of three Navier-Stokes solvers and wind-tunnel test results. The test was designed specifically for computational fluid dynamics validation and was conducted in the NASA Langley Research Center supersonic 4×4 foot Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel. The test includes variations in the number of nozzles, Mach and Reynolds numbers, thrust coefficient, and angles of orientation. Code-to-code and code-to-test comparisons are encouraging, and possible error sources are discussed. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Presented as Paper 2012-0864 at the AIAA 50th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Nashville, TN, 9-12 January 2012</abstract><cop>Reston</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/1.A32693</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4650
ispartof Journal of spacecraft and rockets, 2014-05, Vol.51 (3), p.693-714
issn 0022-4650
1533-6794
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2167824297
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Computational fluid dynamics
Fluid dynamics
Nozzles
Solvers
Wind tunnel testing
Wind tunnels
title Supersonic Retropropulsion Computational Fluid Dynamics Validation with Langley 4×4 Foot Test Data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T10%3A08%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supersonic%20Retropropulsion%20Computational%20Fluid%20Dynamics%20Validation%20with%20Langley%204%C3%974%20Foot%20Test%20Data&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20spacecraft%20and%20rockets&rft.au=Schauerhamer,%20Daniel%20Guy&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=693&rft.epage=714&rft.pages=693-714&rft.issn=0022-4650&rft.eissn=1533-6794&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/1.A32693&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2167824297%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1553854969&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true