A review of the Audit Judgment Symposium: 1983-1992; Discussion
The nature and extent of the USC-Deloitte & Touche Audit Judgment Symposium's (AJS) contributions to auditing and audit judgment research are reviewed. The research methods include historical assessment, content analysis of presented papers, and the development of a taxonomy for identifying...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Auditing : a journal of practice and theory 1993-01, Vol.12, p.3 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 3 |
| container_title | Auditing : a journal of practice and theory |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | Mock, Theodore J Watkins, Paul R Caster, Paul Pincus, Karen Edwards, Ward |
| description | The nature and extent of the USC-Deloitte & Touche Audit Judgment Symposium's (AJS) contributions to auditing and audit judgment research are reviewed. The research methods include historical assessment, content analysis of presented papers, and the development of a taxonomy for identifying and assessing research issues, research methods, and related issues. It is concluded that the AJS has met or exceeded the goals set by the organizers of the symposium. The level of interaction and cross-fertilization of research ideas and endeavors has been very fruitful. In a discussion paper, Edwards notes that the cognitive illusions familiar from behavioral decision theory research affect auditors as well as students, but auditors are better at minimizing the impact of those effects than are student subjects. The Mock and colleagues paper did not address this in detail. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_216739774</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>7585291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p544-b5adc6f344354b71d16d3896b1604e0cc6f1d7b76f1be2bd8d10e8dd6edbbbab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjc1KxDAYRYMoWEffIbgP5P9LdCFl1FEZcOHsh6Zfqh3sj02j-PYWdO_qLO7hniNSCGMcA-_FMSm4BMe4cvyUnKV04JyDdVCQm5JO8bONX3Ro6PwWaZmxnelTxtcu9jN9-e7GIbW5u6LCO8WE9_Ka3rapzim1Q39OTprqPcWLP67I7v5ut35g2-fN47rcstFozYKpsLaN0loZHUCgsKict0FYriOvl00gBFgQogzoUPDoEG3EEEIV1Ipc_t6O0_CRY5r3hyFP_VLcS2FBeQD9rwTGSvUDf1hPvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216737562</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A review of the Audit Judgment Symposium: 1983-1992; Discussion</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Mock, Theodore J ; Watkins, Paul R ; Caster, Paul ; Pincus, Karen ; Edwards, Ward</creator><creatorcontrib>Mock, Theodore J ; Watkins, Paul R ; Caster, Paul ; Pincus, Karen ; Edwards, Ward</creatorcontrib><description>The nature and extent of the USC-Deloitte & Touche Audit Judgment Symposium's (AJS) contributions to auditing and audit judgment research are reviewed. The research methods include historical assessment, content analysis of presented papers, and the development of a taxonomy for identifying and assessing research issues, research methods, and related issues. It is concluded that the AJS has met or exceeded the goals set by the organizers of the symposium. The level of interaction and cross-fertilization of research ideas and endeavors has been very fruitful. In a discussion paper, Edwards notes that the cognitive illusions familiar from behavioral decision theory research affect auditors as well as students, but auditors are better at minimizing the impact of those effects than are student subjects. The Mock and colleagues paper did not address this in detail.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-0380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-7991</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sarasota: American Accounting Association</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Auditing ; Auditors ; Audits ; Classification ; Conferences ; Content analysis ; Decision making ; Judgments ; Objectives ; Research methodology ; Researchers ; Techniques ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Auditing : a journal of practice and theory, 1993-01, Vol.12, p.3</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Accounting Association 1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mock, Theodore J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkins, Paul R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caster, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pincus, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Ward</creatorcontrib><title>A review of the Audit Judgment Symposium: 1983-1992; Discussion</title><title>Auditing : a journal of practice and theory</title><description>The nature and extent of the USC-Deloitte & Touche Audit Judgment Symposium's (AJS) contributions to auditing and audit judgment research are reviewed. The research methods include historical assessment, content analysis of presented papers, and the development of a taxonomy for identifying and assessing research issues, research methods, and related issues. It is concluded that the AJS has met or exceeded the goals set by the organizers of the symposium. The level of interaction and cross-fertilization of research ideas and endeavors has been very fruitful. In a discussion paper, Edwards notes that the cognitive illusions familiar from behavioral decision theory research affect auditors as well as students, but auditors are better at minimizing the impact of those effects than are student subjects. The Mock and colleagues paper did not address this in detail.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Auditing</subject><subject>Auditors</subject><subject>Audits</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Conferences</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Judgments</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Techniques</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>0278-0380</issn><issn>1558-7991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjc1KxDAYRYMoWEffIbgP5P9LdCFl1FEZcOHsh6Zfqh3sj02j-PYWdO_qLO7hniNSCGMcA-_FMSm4BMe4cvyUnKV04JyDdVCQm5JO8bONX3Ro6PwWaZmxnelTxtcu9jN9-e7GIbW5u6LCO8WE9_Ka3rapzim1Q39OTprqPcWLP67I7v5ut35g2-fN47rcstFozYKpsLaN0loZHUCgsKict0FYriOvl00gBFgQogzoUPDoEG3EEEIV1Ipc_t6O0_CRY5r3hyFP_VLcS2FBeQD9rwTGSvUDf1hPvw</recordid><startdate>19930101</startdate><enddate>19930101</enddate><creator>Mock, Theodore J</creator><creator>Watkins, Paul R</creator><creator>Caster, Paul</creator><creator>Pincus, Karen</creator><creator>Edwards, Ward</creator><general>American Accounting Association</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930101</creationdate><title>A review of the Audit Judgment Symposium: 1983-1992; Discussion</title><author>Mock, Theodore J ; Watkins, Paul R ; Caster, Paul ; Pincus, Karen ; Edwards, Ward</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p544-b5adc6f344354b71d16d3896b1604e0cc6f1d7b76f1be2bd8d10e8dd6edbbbab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Auditing</topic><topic>Auditors</topic><topic>Audits</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Conferences</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Judgments</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Techniques</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mock, Theodore J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkins, Paul R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caster, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pincus, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Ward</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Auditing : a journal of practice and theory</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mock, Theodore J</au><au>Watkins, Paul R</au><au>Caster, Paul</au><au>Pincus, Karen</au><au>Edwards, Ward</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A review of the Audit Judgment Symposium: 1983-1992; Discussion</atitle><jtitle>Auditing : a journal of practice and theory</jtitle><date>1993-01-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>12</volume><spage>3</spage><pages>3-</pages><issn>0278-0380</issn><eissn>1558-7991</eissn><abstract>The nature and extent of the USC-Deloitte & Touche Audit Judgment Symposium's (AJS) contributions to auditing and audit judgment research are reviewed. The research methods include historical assessment, content analysis of presented papers, and the development of a taxonomy for identifying and assessing research issues, research methods, and related issues. It is concluded that the AJS has met or exceeded the goals set by the organizers of the symposium. The level of interaction and cross-fertilization of research ideas and endeavors has been very fruitful. In a discussion paper, Edwards notes that the cognitive illusions familiar from behavioral decision theory research affect auditors as well as students, but auditors are better at minimizing the impact of those effects than are student subjects. The Mock and colleagues paper did not address this in detail.</abstract><cop>Sarasota</cop><pub>American Accounting Association</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0278-0380 |
| ispartof | Auditing : a journal of practice and theory, 1993-01, Vol.12, p.3 |
| issn | 0278-0380 1558-7991 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_216739774 |
| source | Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Accounting Auditing Auditors Audits Classification Conferences Content analysis Decision making Judgments Objectives Research methodology Researchers Techniques Trends |
| title | A review of the Audit Judgment Symposium: 1983-1992; Discussion |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T23%3A23%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20review%20of%20the%20Audit%20Judgment%20Symposium:%201983-1992;%20Discussion&rft.jtitle=Auditing%20:%20a%20journal%20of%20practice%20and%20theory&rft.au=Mock,%20Theodore%20J&rft.date=1993-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=3&rft.pages=3-&rft.issn=0278-0380&rft.eissn=1558-7991&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E7585291%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216737562&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |