No [One] Way to Treat a Text: Donaldson and the Criticism of Engagement
Two large topics of necessary interest to all those concerned with the critical legacy of E. Talbot Donaldson are patristics and patriarchy. Hanning argues that the link between these two topics is Donaldson's dedication to (or embrace of) what Hanning calls a criticism of engagement and that a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Chaucer review 2007-01, Vol.41 (3), p.261-270 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 270 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 261 |
| container_title | The Chaucer review |
| container_volume | 41 |
| creator | Hanning, Robert W. |
| description | Two large topics of necessary interest to all those concerned with the critical legacy of E. Talbot Donaldson are patristics and patriarchy. Hanning argues that the link between these two topics is Donaldson's dedication to (or embrace of) what Hanning calls a criticism of engagement and that an important part of Donaldson's critical practice was what Robert Payne has defined as "the true Aristotelian appeal from ethos, the rhetor's calculated representation of his own character as a part of his material for persuasion," that is, the way in which an orator includes within his (or, pace Payne and Aristotle, her) persuasive speeches a construction of self, a persona, designed to stimulate in the audience trust of the speaker. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1353/cr.2007.0006 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_216738467</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25094363</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25094363</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-b594eafe52caa78680977a0ae29124275c9585ac112a40ac9e7f937550f156173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1LAzEQxYMoWKs3r0Lw7NZ8bjbepNYqFHuw4kEkjGm27tLdaJKC_e_dpVI8DTPz3pvhh9A5JSPKJb-2YcQIUSNCSH6ABlSyIhOMiEM06EY665bsGJ3EWPetEHqApk8ev81b945fYYuTx4vgIGHAC_eTbvCdb2G9jL7F0C5x-nR4HKpU2So22Jd40q5g5RrXplN0VMI6urO_OkQv95PF-CGbzaeP49tZZlmRp-xDauGgdJJZAFXkBdFKAQHHNGWCKWm1LCRYShkIAlY7VWqupCQllTlVfIgud7lfwX9vXEym9pvQPRkNo7nihch70dVOZIOPMbjSfIWqgbA1lJielLHB9KRMT6qTi31m7WxqNtH9jyVUc_Pc0-xhEsUJy6nobBc7Wx2TD_sTTHZoec75L7fSckA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216738467</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>No [One] Way to Treat a Text: Donaldson and the Criticism of Engagement</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Hanning, Robert W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hanning, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><description>Two large topics of necessary interest to all those concerned with the critical legacy of E. Talbot Donaldson are patristics and patriarchy. Hanning argues that the link between these two topics is Donaldson's dedication to (or embrace of) what Hanning calls a criticism of engagement and that an important part of Donaldson's critical practice was what Robert Payne has defined as "the true Aristotelian appeal from ethos, the rhetor's calculated representation of his own character as a part of his material for persuasion," that is, the way in which an orator includes within his (or, pace Payne and Aristotle, her) persuasive speeches a construction of self, a persona, designed to stimulate in the audience trust of the speaker.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-2002</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1528-4204</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-4204</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/cr.2007.0006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press</publisher><subject>Chaucer, Geoffrey (1340?-1400) ; Church fathers ; Donaldson, E Talbot ; Literary criticism ; Medieval literature ; Medieval poetry ; Middle Ages ; Narrative poetry ; Persona ; Poetry ; Reading ; Religious poetry ; Subjectivity</subject><ispartof>The Chaucer review, 2007-01, Vol.41 (3), p.261-270</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 The Pennsylvania State University</rights><rights>Copyright © 2007 The Pennsylvania State University.</rights><rights>Copyright Pennsylvania State University Press 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25094363$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25094363$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,27900,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hanning, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><title>No [One] Way to Treat a Text: Donaldson and the Criticism of Engagement</title><title>The Chaucer review</title><description>Two large topics of necessary interest to all those concerned with the critical legacy of E. Talbot Donaldson are patristics and patriarchy. Hanning argues that the link between these two topics is Donaldson's dedication to (or embrace of) what Hanning calls a criticism of engagement and that an important part of Donaldson's critical practice was what Robert Payne has defined as "the true Aristotelian appeal from ethos, the rhetor's calculated representation of his own character as a part of his material for persuasion," that is, the way in which an orator includes within his (or, pace Payne and Aristotle, her) persuasive speeches a construction of self, a persona, designed to stimulate in the audience trust of the speaker.</description><subject>Chaucer, Geoffrey (1340?-1400)</subject><subject>Church fathers</subject><subject>Donaldson, E Talbot</subject><subject>Literary criticism</subject><subject>Medieval literature</subject><subject>Medieval poetry</subject><subject>Middle Ages</subject><subject>Narrative poetry</subject><subject>Persona</subject><subject>Poetry</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Religious poetry</subject><subject>Subjectivity</subject><issn>0009-2002</issn><issn>1528-4204</issn><issn>1528-4204</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkM1LAzEQxYMoWKs3r0Lw7NZ8bjbepNYqFHuw4kEkjGm27tLdaJKC_e_dpVI8DTPz3pvhh9A5JSPKJb-2YcQIUSNCSH6ABlSyIhOMiEM06EY665bsGJ3EWPetEHqApk8ev81b945fYYuTx4vgIGHAC_eTbvCdb2G9jL7F0C5x-nR4HKpU2So22Jd40q5g5RrXplN0VMI6urO_OkQv95PF-CGbzaeP49tZZlmRp-xDauGgdJJZAFXkBdFKAQHHNGWCKWm1LCRYShkIAlY7VWqupCQllTlVfIgud7lfwX9vXEym9pvQPRkNo7nihch70dVOZIOPMbjSfIWqgbA1lJielLHB9KRMT6qTi31m7WxqNtH9jyVUc_Pc0-xhEsUJy6nobBc7Wx2TD_sTTHZoec75L7fSckA</recordid><startdate>20070101</startdate><enddate>20070101</enddate><creator>Hanning, Robert W.</creator><general>The Pennsylvania State University Press</general><general>Penn State University Press</general><general>Pennsylvania State University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070101</creationdate><title>No [One] Way to Treat a Text: Donaldson and the Criticism of Engagement</title><author>Hanning, Robert W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-b594eafe52caa78680977a0ae29124275c9585ac112a40ac9e7f937550f156173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Chaucer, Geoffrey (1340?-1400)</topic><topic>Church fathers</topic><topic>Donaldson, E Talbot</topic><topic>Literary criticism</topic><topic>Medieval literature</topic><topic>Medieval poetry</topic><topic>Middle Ages</topic><topic>Narrative poetry</topic><topic>Persona</topic><topic>Poetry</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Religious poetry</topic><topic>Subjectivity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hanning, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Chaucer review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hanning, Robert W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>No [One] Way to Treat a Text: Donaldson and the Criticism of Engagement</atitle><jtitle>The Chaucer review</jtitle><date>2007-01-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>261</spage><epage>270</epage><pages>261-270</pages><issn>0009-2002</issn><issn>1528-4204</issn><eissn>1528-4204</eissn><abstract>Two large topics of necessary interest to all those concerned with the critical legacy of E. Talbot Donaldson are patristics and patriarchy. Hanning argues that the link between these two topics is Donaldson's dedication to (or embrace of) what Hanning calls a criticism of engagement and that an important part of Donaldson's critical practice was what Robert Payne has defined as "the true Aristotelian appeal from ethos, the rhetor's calculated representation of his own character as a part of his material for persuasion," that is, the way in which an orator includes within his (or, pace Payne and Aristotle, her) persuasive speeches a construction of self, a persona, designed to stimulate in the audience trust of the speaker.</abstract><cop>University Park</cop><pub>The Pennsylvania State University Press</pub><doi>10.1353/cr.2007.0006</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0009-2002 |
| ispartof | The Chaucer review, 2007-01, Vol.41 (3), p.261-270 |
| issn | 0009-2002 1528-4204 1528-4204 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_216738467 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Chaucer, Geoffrey (1340?-1400) Church fathers Donaldson, E Talbot Literary criticism Medieval literature Medieval poetry Middle Ages Narrative poetry Persona Poetry Reading Religious poetry Subjectivity |
| title | No [One] Way to Treat a Text: Donaldson and the Criticism of Engagement |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A18%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=No%20%5BOne%5D%20Way%20to%20Treat%20a%20Text:%20Donaldson%20and%20the%20Criticism%20of%20Engagement&rft.jtitle=The%20Chaucer%20review&rft.au=Hanning,%20Robert%20W.&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=261&rft.epage=270&rft.pages=261-270&rft.issn=0009-2002&rft.eissn=1528-4204&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/cr.2007.0006&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25094363%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216738467&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25094363&rfr_iscdi=true |