Feed intake of progeny of contrasting sire and dam breed and dam origin

Feed intake of progeny of contrasting sire and dam breed and dam origin

The objective of this study was to determine if differences in feed intake during the growing phase existed between progeny generated from Aberdeen Angus (AA) and Limousin (LM) sires mated to dairy beef crossbreed (n=61; DBX) and beef (n=48; B) cows. The DBX and B cows were sired by AA and LM. A tot...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2018-12, Vol.96, p.105-106
Hauptverfasser: Prendiville, R, Williams, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Animals
Beef
Beef cattle
Breeding of animals
Data processing
Dry matter
Feeds
Gender
Genetic crosses
Grass silage
Grasses
Offspring
Progeny
Silage
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 106
container_issue
container_start_page 105
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 96
creator Prendiville, R
Williams, M
description The objective of this study was to determine if differences in feed intake during the growing phase existed between progeny generated from Aberdeen Angus (AA) and Limousin (LM) sires mated to dairy beef crossbreed (n=61; DBX) and beef (n=48; B) cows. The DBX and B cows were sired by AA and LM. A total of 109 weaned, spring-born heifers (n=52) and steers (n=57) with a mean (SD) bodyweight (BW) of 309 (51.0) kg were randomly allocated to a pen by gender and BW. Animals were housed in slatted floor pens, offered 2.8 m^sup 2^ per animal and fed individually using CalanBroadbent gates. Animals were offered grass silage to appetite during the 90 day test period, supplemented with 1.8 kg of concentrate DM daily and refusals were recorded daily. Data were analysed using mixed models in SAS PROC MIXED. Fixed effects included in the model were sex, dam type, sire breed, dam sire breed, shed, date, BW and two-way and three-way interactions between sire breed and dam sire breed and sire breed, dam sire breed and dam type, respectively. Grass silage dry matter intake (DMI) was similar (P=0.8184) for heifers and steers; 4.29 and 4.28 kg; respectively. The DMI was greater for progeny generated from AA than LM sires, 4.39 and 4.18 kg (P
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2166302108</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2166302108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_21663021083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNTksKwjAUDKJgrd7hgetCPqTUtVg9gPsSzWtJ1RdN0oW3twXdu5oZ5sPMWCa01IUSpZqzjHMpiqoScslWMfacC6l3OmPHGtGCo2RuCL6FZ_Ad0nuiV08pmJgcdRBdQDBkwZoHXMLU-SkfXOdozRatuUfcfDFn2_pw3p-KcfA1YExN74dAo9VIUZZqvMMr9V_qA5dEPA0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2166302108</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feed intake of progeny of contrasting sire and dam breed and dam origin</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Prendiville, R ; Williams, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Prendiville, R ; Williams, M</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to determine if differences in feed intake during the growing phase existed between progeny generated from Aberdeen Angus (AA) and Limousin (LM) sires mated to dairy beef crossbreed (n=61; DBX) and beef (n=48; B) cows. The DBX and B cows were sired by AA and LM. A total of 109 weaned, spring-born heifers (n=52) and steers (n=57) with a mean (SD) bodyweight (BW) of 309 (51.0) kg were randomly allocated to a pen by gender and BW. Animals were housed in slatted floor pens, offered 2.8 m^sup 2^ per animal and fed individually using CalanBroadbent gates. Animals were offered grass silage to appetite during the 90 day test period, supplemented with 1.8 kg of concentrate DM daily and refusals were recorded daily. Data were analysed using mixed models in SAS PROC MIXED. Fixed effects included in the model were sex, dam type, sire breed, dam sire breed, shed, date, BW and two-way and three-way interactions between sire breed and dam sire breed and sire breed, dam sire breed and dam type, respectively. Grass silage dry matter intake (DMI) was similar (P=0.8184) for heifers and steers; 4.29 and 4.28 kg; respectively. The DMI was greater for progeny generated from AA than LM sires, 4.39 and 4.18 kg (P&lt;0.001). No difference in DMI was observed between progeny of DBX and B cows. An interaction (P&lt;0.001) between sire breed and dam sire breed for DMI was observed; 4.44, 4.34, 4.30 and 4.06 kg for AA*AA, AA*LM, LM*AA and LM*LM, respectively. An interaction (P&lt;0.001) between sire breed, dam sire breed and dam type for DMI was observed; 4.47, 4.40, 4.45, 4.24, 4.32, 4.27, 4.00 and 4.12 kg for AA*AA B, AA*AA DBX, AA*LM B, AA*LM DBX, LM*AA B, LM*AA DBX, and LM*LM B and LM*LM DBX, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Beef ; Beef cattle ; Breeding of animals ; Data processing ; Dry matter ; Feeds ; Gender ; Genetic crosses ; Grass silage ; Grasses ; Offspring ; Progeny ; Silage</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2018-12, Vol.96, p.105-106</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press Dec 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prendiville, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, M</creatorcontrib><title>Feed intake of progeny of contrasting sire and dam breed and dam origin</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>The objective of this study was to determine if differences in feed intake during the growing phase existed between progeny generated from Aberdeen Angus (AA) and Limousin (LM) sires mated to dairy beef crossbreed (n=61; DBX) and beef (n=48; B) cows. The DBX and B cows were sired by AA and LM. A total of 109 weaned, spring-born heifers (n=52) and steers (n=57) with a mean (SD) bodyweight (BW) of 309 (51.0) kg were randomly allocated to a pen by gender and BW. Animals were housed in slatted floor pens, offered 2.8 m^sup 2^ per animal and fed individually using CalanBroadbent gates. Animals were offered grass silage to appetite during the 90 day test period, supplemented with 1.8 kg of concentrate DM daily and refusals were recorded daily. Data were analysed using mixed models in SAS PROC MIXED. Fixed effects included in the model were sex, dam type, sire breed, dam sire breed, shed, date, BW and two-way and three-way interactions between sire breed and dam sire breed and sire breed, dam sire breed and dam type, respectively. Grass silage dry matter intake (DMI) was similar (P=0.8184) for heifers and steers; 4.29 and 4.28 kg; respectively. The DMI was greater for progeny generated from AA than LM sires, 4.39 and 4.18 kg (P&lt;0.001). No difference in DMI was observed between progeny of DBX and B cows. An interaction (P&lt;0.001) between sire breed and dam sire breed for DMI was observed; 4.44, 4.34, 4.30 and 4.06 kg for AA*AA, AA*LM, LM*AA and LM*LM, respectively. An interaction (P&lt;0.001) between sire breed, dam sire breed and dam type for DMI was observed; 4.47, 4.40, 4.45, 4.24, 4.32, 4.27, 4.00 and 4.12 kg for AA*AA B, AA*AA DBX, AA*LM B, AA*LM DBX, LM*AA B, LM*AA DBX, and LM*LM B and LM*LM DBX, respectively.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Beef cattle</subject><subject>Breeding of animals</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Genetic crosses</subject><subject>Grass silage</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Progeny</subject><subject>Silage</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNTksKwjAUDKJgrd7hgetCPqTUtVg9gPsSzWtJ1RdN0oW3twXdu5oZ5sPMWCa01IUSpZqzjHMpiqoScslWMfacC6l3OmPHGtGCo2RuCL6FZ_Ad0nuiV08pmJgcdRBdQDBkwZoHXMLU-SkfXOdozRatuUfcfDFn2_pw3p-KcfA1YExN74dAo9VIUZZqvMMr9V_qA5dEPA0</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Prendiville, R</creator><creator>Williams, M</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>Feed intake of progeny of contrasting sire and dam breed and dam origin</title><author>Prendiville, R ; Williams, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_21663021083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Beef cattle</topic><topic>Breeding of animals</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Genetic crosses</topic><topic>Grass silage</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Progeny</topic><topic>Silage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prendiville, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, M</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prendiville, R</au><au>Williams, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feed intake of progeny of contrasting sire and dam breed and dam origin</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>96</volume><spage>105</spage><epage>106</epage><pages>105-106</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to determine if differences in feed intake during the growing phase existed between progeny generated from Aberdeen Angus (AA) and Limousin (LM) sires mated to dairy beef crossbreed (n=61; DBX) and beef (n=48; B) cows. The DBX and B cows were sired by AA and LM. A total of 109 weaned, spring-born heifers (n=52) and steers (n=57) with a mean (SD) bodyweight (BW) of 309 (51.0) kg were randomly allocated to a pen by gender and BW. Animals were housed in slatted floor pens, offered 2.8 m^sup 2^ per animal and fed individually using CalanBroadbent gates. Animals were offered grass silage to appetite during the 90 day test period, supplemented with 1.8 kg of concentrate DM daily and refusals were recorded daily. Data were analysed using mixed models in SAS PROC MIXED. Fixed effects included in the model were sex, dam type, sire breed, dam sire breed, shed, date, BW and two-way and three-way interactions between sire breed and dam sire breed and sire breed, dam sire breed and dam type, respectively. Grass silage dry matter intake (DMI) was similar (P=0.8184) for heifers and steers; 4.29 and 4.28 kg; respectively. The DMI was greater for progeny generated from AA than LM sires, 4.39 and 4.18 kg (P&lt;0.001). No difference in DMI was observed between progeny of DBX and B cows. An interaction (P&lt;0.001) between sire breed and dam sire breed for DMI was observed; 4.44, 4.34, 4.30 and 4.06 kg for AA*AA, AA*LM, LM*AA and LM*LM, respectively. An interaction (P&lt;0.001) between sire breed, dam sire breed and dam type for DMI was observed; 4.47, 4.40, 4.45, 4.24, 4.32, 4.27, 4.00 and 4.12 kg for AA*AA B, AA*AA DBX, AA*LM B, AA*LM DBX, LM*AA B, LM*AA DBX, and LM*LM B and LM*LM DBX, respectively.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2018-12, Vol.96, p.105-106
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2166302108
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); PubMed Central
subjects Animals
Beef
Beef cattle
Breeding of animals
Data processing
Dry matter
Feeds
Gender
Genetic crosses
Grass silage
Grasses
Offspring
Progeny
Silage
title Feed intake of progeny of contrasting sire and dam breed and dam origin
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T07%3A51%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feed%20intake%20of%20progeny%20of%20contrasting%20sire%20and%20dam%20breed%20and%20dam%20origin&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Prendiville,%20R&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=96&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=106&rft.pages=105-106&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2166302108%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2166302108&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true