Comparative study on energy absorbing behavior of stiff and flexible composites under low velocity impact
This paper deals with the comparative study on the energy absorbing behaviour of the flexible composites with that of stiff composites aiming at automobile cladding application. Two types of composites namely Jute-Epoxy (JE) laminate and Jute-Rubber-Jute (JRJ) sandwich are chosen for the purpose of...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | 2057 |
creator | Mahesh, Vishwas Joladarashi, Sharnappa Kulkarni, Satyabodh M. |
description | This paper deals with the comparative study on the energy absorbing behaviour of the flexible composites with that of stiff composites aiming at automobile cladding application. Two types of composites namely Jute-Epoxy (JE) laminate and Jute-Rubber-Jute (JRJ) sandwich are chosen for the purpose of study under impact velocity varying from 2.5 m/s to 10 m/s. The study is carried out using commercially available finite element simulation software. The energy absorption and damage behavior of both the composites are studied. From the results, it was found that JRJ sandwich absorbs almost 54%, 51.2%, 58.1% and 61.78% more energy compared to JE laminate for impact velocity of 2.5 m/s, 5 m/s, 7.5 m/s and 10 m/s respectively and exhibits compliant nature as opposed to JE laminate which exhibits brittle nature. The energy absorption ratio of JRJ sandwich is more compared to JE laminate. Thus, the JRJ sandwich composites are expected to provide better energy absorption, reduce damage propagation under low velocity impact, thereby making them a potential material for automobile structural protective claddings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1063/1.5085596 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2166238012</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2166238012</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p253t-cf0115162020acddbc18affdc524a8506046e5766c45cbb3404731e2fe9624ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1LxDAQBuAgCq6rB_9BwJvQNZM0aXuUxS9Y8KLgLaRpsmbpNjVpq_33Rlzw5mkuD_POvAhdAlkBEewGVpyUnFfiCC2Ac8gKAeIYLQip8ozm7O0UncW4I4RWRVEukFv7fa-CGtxkcBzGZsa-w6YzYTtjVUcfatdtcW3e1eR8wN4m5azFqmuwbc2Xq1uDdVrioxtMxGPXmIBb_4kn03rthhm7lKCHc3RiVRvNxWEu0ev93cv6Mds8PzytbzdZTzkbMm0JAAdBCSVKN02toVTWNprTXJWcCJILwwshdM51XbOc5AUDQ62pRBKGLdHV794--I_RxEHu_Bi6FCkpCEFZSYAmdf2rYjoxfe872Qe3V2GWQORPlRLkocr_8OTDH5R9Y9k3yk52Gw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>2166238012</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Comparative study on energy absorbing behavior of stiff and flexible composites under low velocity impact</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><creator>Mahesh, Vishwas ; Joladarashi, Sharnappa ; Kulkarni, Satyabodh M.</creator><contributor>Doddamani, Mrityunjay R. ; Kumar, G. C. Mohan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mahesh, Vishwas ; Joladarashi, Sharnappa ; Kulkarni, Satyabodh M. ; Doddamani, Mrityunjay R. ; Kumar, G. C. Mohan</creatorcontrib><description>This paper deals with the comparative study on the energy absorbing behaviour of the flexible composites with that of stiff composites aiming at automobile cladding application. Two types of composites namely Jute-Epoxy (JE) laminate and Jute-Rubber-Jute (JRJ) sandwich are chosen for the purpose of study under impact velocity varying from 2.5 m/s to 10 m/s. The study is carried out using commercially available finite element simulation software. The energy absorption and damage behavior of both the composites are studied. From the results, it was found that JRJ sandwich absorbs almost 54%, 51.2%, 58.1% and 61.78% more energy compared to JE laminate for impact velocity of 2.5 m/s, 5 m/s, 7.5 m/s and 10 m/s respectively and exhibits compliant nature as opposed to JE laminate which exhibits brittle nature. The energy absorption ratio of JRJ sandwich is more compared to JE laminate. Thus, the JRJ sandwich composites are expected to provide better energy absorption, reduce damage propagation under low velocity impact, thereby making them a potential material for automobile structural protective claddings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.5085596</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Cladding ; Claddings ; Comparative studies ; Crashworthiness ; Damage assessment ; Energy ; Energy absorption ; Finite element method ; Impact damage ; Impact strength ; Impact velocity ; Jute ; Polymer matrix composites ; Propagation velocity ; Rubber ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>AIP conference proceedings, 2019, Vol.2057 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2018 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/acp/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/1.5085596$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,778,782,787,788,792,4500,23917,23918,25127,27911,27912,76139</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Doddamani, Mrityunjay R.</contributor><contributor>Kumar, G. C. Mohan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mahesh, Vishwas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joladarashi, Sharnappa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulkarni, Satyabodh M.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative study on energy absorbing behavior of stiff and flexible composites under low velocity impact</title><title>AIP conference proceedings</title><description>This paper deals with the comparative study on the energy absorbing behaviour of the flexible composites with that of stiff composites aiming at automobile cladding application. Two types of composites namely Jute-Epoxy (JE) laminate and Jute-Rubber-Jute (JRJ) sandwich are chosen for the purpose of study under impact velocity varying from 2.5 m/s to 10 m/s. The study is carried out using commercially available finite element simulation software. The energy absorption and damage behavior of both the composites are studied. From the results, it was found that JRJ sandwich absorbs almost 54%, 51.2%, 58.1% and 61.78% more energy compared to JE laminate for impact velocity of 2.5 m/s, 5 m/s, 7.5 m/s and 10 m/s respectively and exhibits compliant nature as opposed to JE laminate which exhibits brittle nature. The energy absorption ratio of JRJ sandwich is more compared to JE laminate. Thus, the JRJ sandwich composites are expected to provide better energy absorption, reduce damage propagation under low velocity impact, thereby making them a potential material for automobile structural protective claddings.</description><subject>Cladding</subject><subject>Claddings</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Crashworthiness</subject><subject>Damage assessment</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy absorption</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Impact damage</subject><subject>Impact strength</subject><subject>Impact velocity</subject><subject>Jute</subject><subject>Polymer matrix composites</subject><subject>Propagation velocity</subject><subject>Rubber</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNp90E1LxDAQBuAgCq6rB_9BwJvQNZM0aXuUxS9Y8KLgLaRpsmbpNjVpq_33Rlzw5mkuD_POvAhdAlkBEewGVpyUnFfiCC2Ac8gKAeIYLQip8ozm7O0UncW4I4RWRVEukFv7fa-CGtxkcBzGZsa-w6YzYTtjVUcfatdtcW3e1eR8wN4m5azFqmuwbc2Xq1uDdVrioxtMxGPXmIBb_4kn03rthhm7lKCHc3RiVRvNxWEu0ev93cv6Mds8PzytbzdZTzkbMm0JAAdBCSVKN02toVTWNprTXJWcCJILwwshdM51XbOc5AUDQ62pRBKGLdHV794--I_RxEHu_Bi6FCkpCEFZSYAmdf2rYjoxfe872Qe3V2GWQORPlRLkocr_8OTDH5R9Y9k3yk52Gw</recordid><startdate>20190111</startdate><enddate>20190111</enddate><creator>Mahesh, Vishwas</creator><creator>Joladarashi, Sharnappa</creator><creator>Kulkarni, Satyabodh M.</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190111</creationdate><title>Comparative study on energy absorbing behavior of stiff and flexible composites under low velocity impact</title><author>Mahesh, Vishwas ; Joladarashi, Sharnappa ; Kulkarni, Satyabodh M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p253t-cf0115162020acddbc18affdc524a8506046e5766c45cbb3404731e2fe9624ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cladding</topic><topic>Claddings</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Crashworthiness</topic><topic>Damage assessment</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy absorption</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Impact damage</topic><topic>Impact strength</topic><topic>Impact velocity</topic><topic>Jute</topic><topic>Polymer matrix composites</topic><topic>Propagation velocity</topic><topic>Rubber</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahesh, Vishwas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joladarashi, Sharnappa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulkarni, Satyabodh M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahesh, Vishwas</au><au>Joladarashi, Sharnappa</au><au>Kulkarni, Satyabodh M.</au><au>Doddamani, Mrityunjay R.</au><au>Kumar, G. C. Mohan</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Comparative study on energy absorbing behavior of stiff and flexible composites under low velocity impact</atitle><btitle>AIP conference proceedings</btitle><date>2019-01-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>2057</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>This paper deals with the comparative study on the energy absorbing behaviour of the flexible composites with that of stiff composites aiming at automobile cladding application. Two types of composites namely Jute-Epoxy (JE) laminate and Jute-Rubber-Jute (JRJ) sandwich are chosen for the purpose of study under impact velocity varying from 2.5 m/s to 10 m/s. The study is carried out using commercially available finite element simulation software. The energy absorption and damage behavior of both the composites are studied. From the results, it was found that JRJ sandwich absorbs almost 54%, 51.2%, 58.1% and 61.78% more energy compared to JE laminate for impact velocity of 2.5 m/s, 5 m/s, 7.5 m/s and 10 m/s respectively and exhibits compliant nature as opposed to JE laminate which exhibits brittle nature. The energy absorption ratio of JRJ sandwich is more compared to JE laminate. Thus, the JRJ sandwich composites are expected to provide better energy absorption, reduce damage propagation under low velocity impact, thereby making them a potential material for automobile structural protective claddings.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/1.5085596</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-243X |
ispartof | AIP conference proceedings, 2019, Vol.2057 (1) |
issn | 0094-243X 1551-7616 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2166238012 |
source | AIP Journals Complete |
subjects | Cladding Claddings Comparative studies Crashworthiness Damage assessment Energy Energy absorption Finite element method Impact damage Impact strength Impact velocity Jute Polymer matrix composites Propagation velocity Rubber Velocity |
title | Comparative study on energy absorbing behavior of stiff and flexible composites under low velocity impact |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T02%3A35%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Comparative%20study%20on%20energy%20absorbing%20behavior%20of%20stiff%20and%20flexible%20composites%20under%20low%20velocity%20impact&rft.btitle=AIP%20conference%20proceedings&rft.au=Mahesh,%20Vishwas&rft.date=2019-01-11&rft.volume=2057&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.5085596&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E2166238012%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2166238012&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |