Comparative study on energy absorbing behavior of stiff and flexible composites under low velocity impact

This paper deals with the comparative study on the energy absorbing behaviour of the flexible composites with that of stiff composites aiming at automobile cladding application. Two types of composites namely Jute-Epoxy (JE) laminate and Jute-Rubber-Jute (JRJ) sandwich are chosen for the purpose of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Mahesh, Vishwas, Joladarashi, Sharnappa, Kulkarni, Satyabodh M.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume 2057
creator Mahesh, Vishwas
Joladarashi, Sharnappa
Kulkarni, Satyabodh M.
description This paper deals with the comparative study on the energy absorbing behaviour of the flexible composites with that of stiff composites aiming at automobile cladding application. Two types of composites namely Jute-Epoxy (JE) laminate and Jute-Rubber-Jute (JRJ) sandwich are chosen for the purpose of study under impact velocity varying from 2.5 m/s to 10 m/s. The study is carried out using commercially available finite element simulation software. The energy absorption and damage behavior of both the composites are studied. From the results, it was found that JRJ sandwich absorbs almost 54%, 51.2%, 58.1% and 61.78% more energy compared to JE laminate for impact velocity of 2.5 m/s, 5 m/s, 7.5 m/s and 10 m/s respectively and exhibits compliant nature as opposed to JE laminate which exhibits brittle nature. The energy absorption ratio of JRJ sandwich is more compared to JE laminate. Thus, the JRJ sandwich composites are expected to provide better energy absorption, reduce damage propagation under low velocity impact, thereby making them a potential material for automobile structural protective claddings.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/1.5085596
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2166238012</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2166238012</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p253t-cf0115162020acddbc18affdc524a8506046e5766c45cbb3404731e2fe9624ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1LxDAQBuAgCq6rB_9BwJvQNZM0aXuUxS9Y8KLgLaRpsmbpNjVpq_33Rlzw5mkuD_POvAhdAlkBEewGVpyUnFfiCC2Ac8gKAeIYLQip8ozm7O0UncW4I4RWRVEukFv7fa-CGtxkcBzGZsa-w6YzYTtjVUcfatdtcW3e1eR8wN4m5azFqmuwbc2Xq1uDdVrioxtMxGPXmIBb_4kn03rthhm7lKCHc3RiVRvNxWEu0ev93cv6Mds8PzytbzdZTzkbMm0JAAdBCSVKN02toVTWNprTXJWcCJILwwshdM51XbOc5AUDQ62pRBKGLdHV794--I_RxEHu_Bi6FCkpCEFZSYAmdf2rYjoxfe872Qe3V2GWQORPlRLkocr_8OTDH5R9Y9k3yk52Gw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>2166238012</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Comparative study on energy absorbing behavior of stiff and flexible composites under low velocity impact</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><creator>Mahesh, Vishwas ; Joladarashi, Sharnappa ; Kulkarni, Satyabodh M.</creator><contributor>Doddamani, Mrityunjay R. ; Kumar, G. C. Mohan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mahesh, Vishwas ; Joladarashi, Sharnappa ; Kulkarni, Satyabodh M. ; Doddamani, Mrityunjay R. ; Kumar, G. C. Mohan</creatorcontrib><description>This paper deals with the comparative study on the energy absorbing behaviour of the flexible composites with that of stiff composites aiming at automobile cladding application. Two types of composites namely Jute-Epoxy (JE) laminate and Jute-Rubber-Jute (JRJ) sandwich are chosen for the purpose of study under impact velocity varying from 2.5 m/s to 10 m/s. The study is carried out using commercially available finite element simulation software. The energy absorption and damage behavior of both the composites are studied. From the results, it was found that JRJ sandwich absorbs almost 54%, 51.2%, 58.1% and 61.78% more energy compared to JE laminate for impact velocity of 2.5 m/s, 5 m/s, 7.5 m/s and 10 m/s respectively and exhibits compliant nature as opposed to JE laminate which exhibits brittle nature. The energy absorption ratio of JRJ sandwich is more compared to JE laminate. Thus, the JRJ sandwich composites are expected to provide better energy absorption, reduce damage propagation under low velocity impact, thereby making them a potential material for automobile structural protective claddings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.5085596</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Cladding ; Claddings ; Comparative studies ; Crashworthiness ; Damage assessment ; Energy ; Energy absorption ; Finite element method ; Impact damage ; Impact strength ; Impact velocity ; Jute ; Polymer matrix composites ; Propagation velocity ; Rubber ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>AIP conference proceedings, 2019, Vol.2057 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2018 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/acp/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/1.5085596$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,778,782,787,788,792,4500,23917,23918,25127,27911,27912,76139</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Doddamani, Mrityunjay R.</contributor><contributor>Kumar, G. C. Mohan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mahesh, Vishwas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joladarashi, Sharnappa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulkarni, Satyabodh M.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative study on energy absorbing behavior of stiff and flexible composites under low velocity impact</title><title>AIP conference proceedings</title><description>This paper deals with the comparative study on the energy absorbing behaviour of the flexible composites with that of stiff composites aiming at automobile cladding application. Two types of composites namely Jute-Epoxy (JE) laminate and Jute-Rubber-Jute (JRJ) sandwich are chosen for the purpose of study under impact velocity varying from 2.5 m/s to 10 m/s. The study is carried out using commercially available finite element simulation software. The energy absorption and damage behavior of both the composites are studied. From the results, it was found that JRJ sandwich absorbs almost 54%, 51.2%, 58.1% and 61.78% more energy compared to JE laminate for impact velocity of 2.5 m/s, 5 m/s, 7.5 m/s and 10 m/s respectively and exhibits compliant nature as opposed to JE laminate which exhibits brittle nature. The energy absorption ratio of JRJ sandwich is more compared to JE laminate. Thus, the JRJ sandwich composites are expected to provide better energy absorption, reduce damage propagation under low velocity impact, thereby making them a potential material for automobile structural protective claddings.</description><subject>Cladding</subject><subject>Claddings</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Crashworthiness</subject><subject>Damage assessment</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy absorption</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Impact damage</subject><subject>Impact strength</subject><subject>Impact velocity</subject><subject>Jute</subject><subject>Polymer matrix composites</subject><subject>Propagation velocity</subject><subject>Rubber</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNp90E1LxDAQBuAgCq6rB_9BwJvQNZM0aXuUxS9Y8KLgLaRpsmbpNjVpq_33Rlzw5mkuD_POvAhdAlkBEewGVpyUnFfiCC2Ac8gKAeIYLQip8ozm7O0UncW4I4RWRVEukFv7fa-CGtxkcBzGZsa-w6YzYTtjVUcfatdtcW3e1eR8wN4m5azFqmuwbc2Xq1uDdVrioxtMxGPXmIBb_4kn03rthhm7lKCHc3RiVRvNxWEu0ev93cv6Mds8PzytbzdZTzkbMm0JAAdBCSVKN02toVTWNprTXJWcCJILwwshdM51XbOc5AUDQ62pRBKGLdHV794--I_RxEHu_Bi6FCkpCEFZSYAmdf2rYjoxfe872Qe3V2GWQORPlRLkocr_8OTDH5R9Y9k3yk52Gw</recordid><startdate>20190111</startdate><enddate>20190111</enddate><creator>Mahesh, Vishwas</creator><creator>Joladarashi, Sharnappa</creator><creator>Kulkarni, Satyabodh M.</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190111</creationdate><title>Comparative study on energy absorbing behavior of stiff and flexible composites under low velocity impact</title><author>Mahesh, Vishwas ; Joladarashi, Sharnappa ; Kulkarni, Satyabodh M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p253t-cf0115162020acddbc18affdc524a8506046e5766c45cbb3404731e2fe9624ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cladding</topic><topic>Claddings</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Crashworthiness</topic><topic>Damage assessment</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy absorption</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Impact damage</topic><topic>Impact strength</topic><topic>Impact velocity</topic><topic>Jute</topic><topic>Polymer matrix composites</topic><topic>Propagation velocity</topic><topic>Rubber</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahesh, Vishwas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joladarashi, Sharnappa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulkarni, Satyabodh M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahesh, Vishwas</au><au>Joladarashi, Sharnappa</au><au>Kulkarni, Satyabodh M.</au><au>Doddamani, Mrityunjay R.</au><au>Kumar, G. C. Mohan</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Comparative study on energy absorbing behavior of stiff and flexible composites under low velocity impact</atitle><btitle>AIP conference proceedings</btitle><date>2019-01-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>2057</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>This paper deals with the comparative study on the energy absorbing behaviour of the flexible composites with that of stiff composites aiming at automobile cladding application. Two types of composites namely Jute-Epoxy (JE) laminate and Jute-Rubber-Jute (JRJ) sandwich are chosen for the purpose of study under impact velocity varying from 2.5 m/s to 10 m/s. The study is carried out using commercially available finite element simulation software. The energy absorption and damage behavior of both the composites are studied. From the results, it was found that JRJ sandwich absorbs almost 54%, 51.2%, 58.1% and 61.78% more energy compared to JE laminate for impact velocity of 2.5 m/s, 5 m/s, 7.5 m/s and 10 m/s respectively and exhibits compliant nature as opposed to JE laminate which exhibits brittle nature. The energy absorption ratio of JRJ sandwich is more compared to JE laminate. Thus, the JRJ sandwich composites are expected to provide better energy absorption, reduce damage propagation under low velocity impact, thereby making them a potential material for automobile structural protective claddings.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/1.5085596</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-243X
ispartof AIP conference proceedings, 2019, Vol.2057 (1)
issn 0094-243X
1551-7616
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2166238012
source AIP Journals Complete
subjects Cladding
Claddings
Comparative studies
Crashworthiness
Damage assessment
Energy
Energy absorption
Finite element method
Impact damage
Impact strength
Impact velocity
Jute
Polymer matrix composites
Propagation velocity
Rubber
Velocity
title Comparative study on energy absorbing behavior of stiff and flexible composites under low velocity impact
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T02%3A35%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Comparative%20study%20on%20energy%20absorbing%20behavior%20of%20stiff%20and%20flexible%20composites%20under%20low%20velocity%20impact&rft.btitle=AIP%20conference%20proceedings&rft.au=Mahesh,%20Vishwas&rft.date=2019-01-11&rft.volume=2057&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.5085596&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E2166238012%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2166238012&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true