GAO Report to the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives
Foreign students and scholars make substantial contributions to US research efforts and technology development. However, according to a federal government intelligence assessment, access to sensitive US technology by those students and faculty members has imposed a significant but unquantifiable cos...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of research administration 2007-04, Vol.38 (1), p.88 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 88 |
| container_title | The journal of research administration |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | Slocum, J Michael |
| description | Foreign students and scholars make substantial contributions to US research efforts and technology development. However, according to a federal government intelligence assessment, access to sensitive US technology by those students and faculty members has imposed a significant but unquantifiable cost to the US. The House Judiciary Committee asked Government Accountability Office (GAO) to review how academic institutions and the US government protect against the illegal disclosure of such information. In its report to the Committee, GAO first described the universities' approach to research. GAO did find that the universities were taking steps to comply, or adjust to avoid having to comply, with the export regulations. GAO also found that the Department of State does not target universities for compliance and has not visited a university. To avoid being caught unprepared, senior management at all academic institutions should assure that they have a compliance system in place. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_216587399</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1352029431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2165873993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjU31jU3NDBhYeA0NDW21DU0tTTgYOAqLs4yMDA0A8pyMri5O_orBKUW5BeVKJTkK5RkpCo45-fmZpaUpKYq5OeBBbxKUzKTMxOLKnUUPPJLi4HiaSAtRanFqXkliSWZZanFPAysaYk5xam8UJqbQcnNNcTZQ7egKL-wNLW4JD4rv7QoDygVbwS02cLc2NLSmChFAMmOO3o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216587399</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>GAO Report to the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Slocum, J Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Slocum, J Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Foreign students and scholars make substantial contributions to US research efforts and technology development. However, according to a federal government intelligence assessment, access to sensitive US technology by those students and faculty members has imposed a significant but unquantifiable cost to the US. The House Judiciary Committee asked Government Accountability Office (GAO) to review how academic institutions and the US government protect against the illegal disclosure of such information. In its report to the Committee, GAO first described the universities' approach to research. GAO did find that the universities were taking steps to comply, or adjust to avoid having to comply, with the export regulations. GAO also found that the Department of State does not target universities for compliance and has not visited a university. To avoid being caught unprepared, senior management at all academic institutions should assure that they have a compliance system in place.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1539-1590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2573-7104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Society of Research Administrators</publisher><subject>Academic disciplines ; Access control ; Annual Reports ; College campuses ; Committees ; Compliance ; Departments ; Disclosure ; Enrollment ; Enrollments ; Export controls ; Exports ; Federal regulation ; Foreign Nationals ; Foreign students ; Government (Administrative Body) ; Government grants ; Guidance ; Laboratories ; National security ; Noncitizens ; Research Administration ; Trends ; Universities ; University research</subject><ispartof>The journal of research administration, 2007-04, Vol.38 (1), p.88</ispartof><rights>Copyright Society of Research Administrators Spring 2007</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Slocum, J Michael</creatorcontrib><title>GAO Report to the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives</title><title>The journal of research administration</title><description>Foreign students and scholars make substantial contributions to US research efforts and technology development. However, according to a federal government intelligence assessment, access to sensitive US technology by those students and faculty members has imposed a significant but unquantifiable cost to the US. The House Judiciary Committee asked Government Accountability Office (GAO) to review how academic institutions and the US government protect against the illegal disclosure of such information. In its report to the Committee, GAO first described the universities' approach to research. GAO did find that the universities were taking steps to comply, or adjust to avoid having to comply, with the export regulations. GAO also found that the Department of State does not target universities for compliance and has not visited a university. To avoid being caught unprepared, senior management at all academic institutions should assure that they have a compliance system in place.</description><subject>Academic disciplines</subject><subject>Access control</subject><subject>Annual Reports</subject><subject>College campuses</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Disclosure</subject><subject>Enrollment</subject><subject>Enrollments</subject><subject>Export controls</subject><subject>Exports</subject><subject>Federal regulation</subject><subject>Foreign Nationals</subject><subject>Foreign students</subject><subject>Government (Administrative Body)</subject><subject>Government grants</subject><subject>Guidance</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>National security</subject><subject>Noncitizens</subject><subject>Research Administration</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>University research</subject><issn>1539-1590</issn><issn>2573-7104</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjU31jU3NDBhYeA0NDW21DU0tTTgYOAqLs4yMDA0A8pyMri5O_orBKUW5BeVKJTkK5RkpCo45-fmZpaUpKYq5OeBBbxKUzKTMxOLKnUUPPJLi4HiaSAtRanFqXkliSWZZanFPAysaYk5xam8UJqbQcnNNcTZQ7egKL-wNLW4JD4rv7QoDygVbwS02cLc2NLSmChFAMmOO3o</recordid><startdate>20070401</startdate><enddate>20070401</enddate><creator>Slocum, J Michael</creator><general>Society of Research Administrators</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070401</creationdate><title>GAO Report to the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives</title><author>Slocum, J Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2165873993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Academic disciplines</topic><topic>Access control</topic><topic>Annual Reports</topic><topic>College campuses</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Disclosure</topic><topic>Enrollment</topic><topic>Enrollments</topic><topic>Export controls</topic><topic>Exports</topic><topic>Federal regulation</topic><topic>Foreign Nationals</topic><topic>Foreign students</topic><topic>Government (Administrative Body)</topic><topic>Government grants</topic><topic>Guidance</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>National security</topic><topic>Noncitizens</topic><topic>Research Administration</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>University research</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Slocum, J Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The journal of research administration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Slocum, J Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>GAO Report to the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives</atitle><jtitle>The journal of research administration</jtitle><date>2007-04-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>88</spage><pages>88-</pages><issn>1539-1590</issn><eissn>2573-7104</eissn><abstract>Foreign students and scholars make substantial contributions to US research efforts and technology development. However, according to a federal government intelligence assessment, access to sensitive US technology by those students and faculty members has imposed a significant but unquantifiable cost to the US. The House Judiciary Committee asked Government Accountability Office (GAO) to review how academic institutions and the US government protect against the illegal disclosure of such information. In its report to the Committee, GAO first described the universities' approach to research. GAO did find that the universities were taking steps to comply, or adjust to avoid having to comply, with the export regulations. GAO also found that the Department of State does not target universities for compliance and has not visited a university. To avoid being caught unprepared, senior management at all academic institutions should assure that they have a compliance system in place.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Society of Research Administrators</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1539-1590 |
| ispartof | The journal of research administration, 2007-04, Vol.38 (1), p.88 |
| issn | 1539-1590 2573-7104 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_216587399 |
| source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Academic disciplines Access control Annual Reports College campuses Committees Compliance Departments Disclosure Enrollment Enrollments Export controls Exports Federal regulation Foreign Nationals Foreign students Government (Administrative Body) Government grants Guidance Laboratories National security Noncitizens Research Administration Trends Universities University research |
| title | GAO Report to the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T04%3A25%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=GAO%20Report%20to%20the%20Committee%20on%20the%20Judiciary,%20House%20of%20Representatives&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20research%20administration&rft.au=Slocum,%20J%20Michael&rft.date=2007-04-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=88&rft.pages=88-&rft.issn=1539-1590&rft.eissn=2573-7104&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1352029431%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216587399&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |