REDUCED IMPACT OF DIABETES CLINIC REFERRAL ON HIGH-FREQUENCY EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT USERS
Objective: The patterns of emergency department (ED) visits in patients with diabetes are not well understood. The Emergency Department Diabetes Rapid-referral Program (EDRP) allows direct booking of ED patients presenting with urgent diabetes needs into a diabetes specialty clinic within 1 day of E...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Endocrine practice 2018-12, Vol.24 (12), p.1043 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1043 |
container_title | Endocrine practice |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Blair, Rachel A Palermo, Nadine E Modzelewski, Katherine L Alexanian, Sara M Baker, William E Simonson, Donald C McDonnell, Marie E |
description | Objective: The patterns of emergency department (ED) visits in patients with diabetes are not well understood. The Emergency Department Diabetes Rapid-referral Program (EDRP) allows direct booking of ED patients presenting with urgent diabetes needs into a diabetes specialty clinic within 1 day of ED discharge. The objective of this secondary analysis was to examine characteristics of patients with diabetes who have frequent ED visits and determine reasons for revisits. Methods: A single-center analysis was conducted comparing patients referred to the EDRP (n = 420) to historical unexposed controls (n = 791). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in each frequency group of ED revisits (none, 1 to 3 [infrequent], 4 to 10 [frequent], or >10 [superfrequent]) in the year after the ED index visit. Secondary outcomes were hospitalization rates and International Classification of Diseases–Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnoses at ED revisits. Results: Superfrequent users, responsible for >20% of total ED visits, made up small but not significantly different proportions of EDRP and control populations, 3.6% and 5.2%, respectively. Superfrequent groups had lower hospital admission rates at ED revisits compared to frequent groups. Mental health disorders (including substance abuse) were the primary, secondary, or tertiary ICD-9 codes in 30.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27.7% to 33.5%) and 6.6% (95% CI, 5.1% to 8.2%) in the superfrequent and infrequent groups, respectively. Conclusion: Direct access to diabetes specialty care from the ED is effective in reducing ED recidivism but not amongst a small subgroup of superfrequent ED users. This group was more likely to have mental health disorders recorded at ED revisits, suggesting that more comprehensive approaches are needed for this population. (Endocr Pract. 2018;24:1043-1050) |
doi_str_mv | 10.4158/EP/-2018-0161 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2165595905</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2165595905</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_21655959053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNij2LwkAUAJfDg1PP8voH1qvvJVnJlnHzYhZMjJsNepVc4RUifkX_vyL-AKsZmBHih3AUkYrHXI1lgBRLpAl9iC7pMJJBhGHn4SpEGWtaf4le2-4QA9QUd8XKcdoYTsEWVWI8LDJIbTJlzzWYuS2tAccZO5fMYVFCbme5zBwvGy7NL3DBbva0lKvE-YJLD03Nrv4Wn_9_-3Y7eLEvhhl7k8vT5Xi-bdvrZne8XQ6PtAloopRWGlX43nUHpgI-hw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2165595905</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>REDUCED IMPACT OF DIABETES CLINIC REFERRAL ON HIGH-FREQUENCY EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT USERS</title><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Blair, Rachel A ; Palermo, Nadine E ; Modzelewski, Katherine L ; Alexanian, Sara M ; Baker, William E ; Simonson, Donald C ; McDonnell, Marie E</creator><creatorcontrib>Blair, Rachel A ; Palermo, Nadine E ; Modzelewski, Katherine L ; Alexanian, Sara M ; Baker, William E ; Simonson, Donald C ; McDonnell, Marie E</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: The patterns of emergency department (ED) visits in patients with diabetes are not well understood. The Emergency Department Diabetes Rapid-referral Program (EDRP) allows direct booking of ED patients presenting with urgent diabetes needs into a diabetes specialty clinic within 1 day of ED discharge. The objective of this secondary analysis was to examine characteristics of patients with diabetes who have frequent ED visits and determine reasons for revisits. Methods: A single-center analysis was conducted comparing patients referred to the EDRP (n = 420) to historical unexposed controls (n = 791). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in each frequency group of ED revisits (none, 1 to 3 [infrequent], 4 to 10 [frequent], or >10 [superfrequent]) in the year after the ED index visit. Secondary outcomes were hospitalization rates and International Classification of Diseases–Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnoses at ED revisits. Results: Superfrequent users, responsible for >20% of total ED visits, made up small but not significantly different proportions of EDRP and control populations, 3.6% and 5.2%, respectively. Superfrequent groups had lower hospital admission rates at ED revisits compared to frequent groups. Mental health disorders (including substance abuse) were the primary, secondary, or tertiary ICD-9 codes in 30.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27.7% to 33.5%) and 6.6% (95% CI, 5.1% to 8.2%) in the superfrequent and infrequent groups, respectively. Conclusion: Direct access to diabetes specialty care from the ED is effective in reducing ED recidivism but not amongst a small subgroup of superfrequent ED users. This group was more likely to have mental health disorders recorded at ED revisits, suggesting that more comprehensive approaches are needed for this population. (Endocr Pract. 2018;24:1043-1050)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1530-891X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-2403</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4158/EP/-2018-0161</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Jacksonville: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Ambulatory care ; Classification ; Departments ; Diabetes ; Drug abuse ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency services ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Intervention ; Mental disorders ; Mental health care ; Population ; Socioeconomic factors ; Studies ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Endocrine practice, 2018-12, Vol.24 (12), p.1043</ispartof><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Dec 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2165595905?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,64385,64389,72469</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blair, Rachel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palermo, Nadine E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modzelewski, Katherine L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexanian, Sara M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, William E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonson, Donald C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonnell, Marie E</creatorcontrib><title>REDUCED IMPACT OF DIABETES CLINIC REFERRAL ON HIGH-FREQUENCY EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT USERS</title><title>Endocrine practice</title><description>Objective: The patterns of emergency department (ED) visits in patients with diabetes are not well understood. The Emergency Department Diabetes Rapid-referral Program (EDRP) allows direct booking of ED patients presenting with urgent diabetes needs into a diabetes specialty clinic within 1 day of ED discharge. The objective of this secondary analysis was to examine characteristics of patients with diabetes who have frequent ED visits and determine reasons for revisits. Methods: A single-center analysis was conducted comparing patients referred to the EDRP (n = 420) to historical unexposed controls (n = 791). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in each frequency group of ED revisits (none, 1 to 3 [infrequent], 4 to 10 [frequent], or >10 [superfrequent]) in the year after the ED index visit. Secondary outcomes were hospitalization rates and International Classification of Diseases–Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnoses at ED revisits. Results: Superfrequent users, responsible for >20% of total ED visits, made up small but not significantly different proportions of EDRP and control populations, 3.6% and 5.2%, respectively. Superfrequent groups had lower hospital admission rates at ED revisits compared to frequent groups. Mental health disorders (including substance abuse) were the primary, secondary, or tertiary ICD-9 codes in 30.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27.7% to 33.5%) and 6.6% (95% CI, 5.1% to 8.2%) in the superfrequent and infrequent groups, respectively. Conclusion: Direct access to diabetes specialty care from the ED is effective in reducing ED recidivism but not amongst a small subgroup of superfrequent ED users. This group was more likely to have mental health disorders recorded at ED revisits, suggesting that more comprehensive approaches are needed for this population. (Endocr Pract. 2018;24:1043-1050)</description><subject>Ambulatory care</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Drug abuse</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency services</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health care</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1530-891X</issn><issn>1934-2403</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqNij2LwkAUAJfDg1PP8voH1qvvJVnJlnHzYhZMjJsNepVc4RUifkX_vyL-AKsZmBHih3AUkYrHXI1lgBRLpAl9iC7pMJJBhGHn4SpEGWtaf4le2-4QA9QUd8XKcdoYTsEWVWI8LDJIbTJlzzWYuS2tAccZO5fMYVFCbme5zBwvGy7NL3DBbva0lKvE-YJLD03Nrv4Wn_9_-3Y7eLEvhhl7k8vT5Xi-bdvrZne8XQ6PtAloopRWGlX43nUHpgI-hw</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Blair, Rachel A</creator><creator>Palermo, Nadine E</creator><creator>Modzelewski, Katherine L</creator><creator>Alexanian, Sara M</creator><creator>Baker, William E</creator><creator>Simonson, Donald C</creator><creator>McDonnell, Marie E</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>REDUCED IMPACT OF DIABETES CLINIC REFERRAL ON HIGH-FREQUENCY EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT USERS</title><author>Blair, Rachel A ; Palermo, Nadine E ; Modzelewski, Katherine L ; Alexanian, Sara M ; Baker, William E ; Simonson, Donald C ; McDonnell, Marie E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_21655959053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory care</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Drug abuse</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency services</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health care</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blair, Rachel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palermo, Nadine E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modzelewski, Katherine L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexanian, Sara M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, William E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonson, Donald C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonnell, Marie E</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Endocrine practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blair, Rachel A</au><au>Palermo, Nadine E</au><au>Modzelewski, Katherine L</au><au>Alexanian, Sara M</au><au>Baker, William E</au><au>Simonson, Donald C</au><au>McDonnell, Marie E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>REDUCED IMPACT OF DIABETES CLINIC REFERRAL ON HIGH-FREQUENCY EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT USERS</atitle><jtitle>Endocrine practice</jtitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1043</spage><pages>1043-</pages><issn>1530-891X</issn><eissn>1934-2403</eissn><abstract>Objective: The patterns of emergency department (ED) visits in patients with diabetes are not well understood. The Emergency Department Diabetes Rapid-referral Program (EDRP) allows direct booking of ED patients presenting with urgent diabetes needs into a diabetes specialty clinic within 1 day of ED discharge. The objective of this secondary analysis was to examine characteristics of patients with diabetes who have frequent ED visits and determine reasons for revisits. Methods: A single-center analysis was conducted comparing patients referred to the EDRP (n = 420) to historical unexposed controls (n = 791). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in each frequency group of ED revisits (none, 1 to 3 [infrequent], 4 to 10 [frequent], or >10 [superfrequent]) in the year after the ED index visit. Secondary outcomes were hospitalization rates and International Classification of Diseases–Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnoses at ED revisits. Results: Superfrequent users, responsible for >20% of total ED visits, made up small but not significantly different proportions of EDRP and control populations, 3.6% and 5.2%, respectively. Superfrequent groups had lower hospital admission rates at ED revisits compared to frequent groups. Mental health disorders (including substance abuse) were the primary, secondary, or tertiary ICD-9 codes in 30.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27.7% to 33.5%) and 6.6% (95% CI, 5.1% to 8.2%) in the superfrequent and infrequent groups, respectively. Conclusion: Direct access to diabetes specialty care from the ED is effective in reducing ED recidivism but not amongst a small subgroup of superfrequent ED users. This group was more likely to have mental health disorders recorded at ED revisits, suggesting that more comprehensive approaches are needed for this population. (Endocr Pract. 2018;24:1043-1050)</abstract><cop>Jacksonville</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><doi>10.4158/EP/-2018-0161</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1530-891X |
ispartof | Endocrine practice, 2018-12, Vol.24 (12), p.1043 |
issn | 1530-891X 1934-2403 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2165595905 |
source | ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Ambulatory care Classification Departments Diabetes Drug abuse Emergency medical care Emergency services Hospitalization Hospitals Intervention Mental disorders Mental health care Population Socioeconomic factors Studies Systematic review |
title | REDUCED IMPACT OF DIABETES CLINIC REFERRAL ON HIGH-FREQUENCY EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT USERS |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T04%3A57%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=REDUCED%20IMPACT%20OF%20DIABETES%20CLINIC%20REFERRAL%20ON%20HIGH-FREQUENCY%20EMERGENCY%20DEPARTMENT%20USERS&rft.jtitle=Endocrine%20practice&rft.au=Blair,%20Rachel%20A&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1043&rft.pages=1043-&rft.issn=1530-891X&rft.eissn=1934-2403&rft_id=info:doi/10.4158/EP/-2018-0161&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2165595905%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2165595905&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |