Depositional environments and sources for the middle Eocene Fulra Limestone Formation, Kachchh Basin, western India: Evidences from facies analysis, mineralogy, and geochemistry

The middle Eocene Fulra Limestone Formation of the Kachchh Basin, western India was investigated to interpret depositional environments and sources of limestones based on facies analysis, mineralogy, and major, trace, and rare earth elements (REEs) geochemistry. Facies stacking pattern of the Fulra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geological journal (Chichester, England) England), 2019-01, Vol.54 (1), p.62-82
Hauptverfasser: Srivastava, V. K., Singh, B. P., Patranabis‐Deb, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 82
container_issue 1
container_start_page 62
container_title Geological journal (Chichester, England)
container_volume 54
creator Srivastava, V. K.
Singh, B. P.
Patranabis‐Deb, S.
description The middle Eocene Fulra Limestone Formation of the Kachchh Basin, western India was investigated to interpret depositional environments and sources of limestones based on facies analysis, mineralogy, and major, trace, and rare earth elements (REEs) geochemistry. Facies stacking pattern of the Fulra Limestone Formation exhibits an overall shallowing‐upward sedimentary succession developed in the middle to inner ramp to lagoonal set‐up. Staining of the thin sections and X‐ray diffraction patterns show dominance of calcite mineral. The CaO, ranging from 40.45% to 49.69%, is the dominant oxide among the major oxides followed by SiO2 (4.04–10.3%). The dominance of CaO over MgO suggests that the major mineral phase has been calcite and no dolomitization occurred during the deposition of the Fulra limestone. The low proportion of SiO2 and Al2O3 suggests low siliciclastic input during the precipitation of the Fulra limestone that is confirmed by the positive correlation of ∑REE with Al2O3, Fe2O3, Ni, Th, Sc, and Y and the negative correlation of SiO2, Al2O3, and Sr with CaO. The average value of REE contents in the Fulra Limestone Formation are lower (*16.02 ppm) than the average value of typical marine carbonates (*28 ppm). The Post‐Archean Australian Shale‐normalized REE + Y patterns of the Fulra limestone exhibit seawater like shale‐normalized REE + Y pattern, whereas slightly lower average value of Y/Ho ratio (34.60) than the typical seawater value (~44–74) suggests modification of the seawater, to some extent, by input of freshwater in a coastal environment. The REEs of the Fulra Limestone Formation have similarity with the carbonates of the Arabian Sea and/or shallow marine carbonates with exception of a few elements. It is envisaged from this study that the Fulra limestone was deposited in a shallow marine to coastal set‐up where mixing of the continental material in seawater was feasible.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/gj.3154
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2164116871</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2164116871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3454-7ff4a4c6765814cedafbc8a438af2716043b450b784fde21561d80f1a17ebd4f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu2zAQRYmiBeomRX-BQBddxE44EvVIdnk4j9ZAN-1aGJNDi4ZEOqScQJ-VPwxld9vVzAAH917MZewbiHMQIrvYbM9zKOQHNgNxebkAkcuPbCZElaW9EJ_Zlxi3QgAICTP2dkc7H-1gvcOOk3uxwbue3BA5Os2j3wdFkRsf-NAS763WHfGlV-SI3--7gHxle4qDn24fepyk5vwXqla1Lb_BaNP5mggKjj85bfGKL1-sJncQDr7nBpWlyRC7Mdo4TzaOAnZ-M84PMTbkVUu9jUMYT9kng12kr__mCft7v_xz-7hY_X54ur1eLTCXhVxUxkiUqqzKogapSKNZqxplXqPJKiiFzNeyEOuqlkZTBkUJuhYGECpaa2nyE_b9qLsL_nmf8jfb9IwUMTYZlBKgrCtI1I8jpYKPMZBpdsH2GMYGRDP10Wy2zdRHIs-O5KvtaPwf1jz8PNDvVxiN-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2164116871</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Depositional environments and sources for the middle Eocene Fulra Limestone Formation, Kachchh Basin, western India: Evidences from facies analysis, mineralogy, and geochemistry</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Srivastava, V. K. ; Singh, B. P. ; Patranabis‐Deb, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Srivastava, V. K. ; Singh, B. P. ; Patranabis‐Deb, S.</creatorcontrib><description>The middle Eocene Fulra Limestone Formation of the Kachchh Basin, western India was investigated to interpret depositional environments and sources of limestones based on facies analysis, mineralogy, and major, trace, and rare earth elements (REEs) geochemistry. Facies stacking pattern of the Fulra Limestone Formation exhibits an overall shallowing‐upward sedimentary succession developed in the middle to inner ramp to lagoonal set‐up. Staining of the thin sections and X‐ray diffraction patterns show dominance of calcite mineral. The CaO, ranging from 40.45% to 49.69%, is the dominant oxide among the major oxides followed by SiO2 (4.04–10.3%). The dominance of CaO over MgO suggests that the major mineral phase has been calcite and no dolomitization occurred during the deposition of the Fulra limestone. The low proportion of SiO2 and Al2O3 suggests low siliciclastic input during the precipitation of the Fulra limestone that is confirmed by the positive correlation of ∑REE with Al2O3, Fe2O3, Ni, Th, Sc, and Y and the negative correlation of SiO2, Al2O3, and Sr with CaO. The average value of REE contents in the Fulra Limestone Formation are lower (*16.02 ppm) than the average value of typical marine carbonates (*28 ppm). The Post‐Archean Australian Shale‐normalized REE + Y patterns of the Fulra limestone exhibit seawater like shale‐normalized REE + Y pattern, whereas slightly lower average value of Y/Ho ratio (34.60) than the typical seawater value (~44–74) suggests modification of the seawater, to some extent, by input of freshwater in a coastal environment. The REEs of the Fulra Limestone Formation have similarity with the carbonates of the Arabian Sea and/or shallow marine carbonates with exception of a few elements. It is envisaged from this study that the Fulra limestone was deposited in a shallow marine to coastal set‐up where mixing of the continental material in seawater was feasible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0072-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1034</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/gj.3154</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Liverpool: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aluminum oxide ; Calcite ; Calcium oxide ; Carbonates ; Chemical analysis ; Coastal environments ; Coastal zone ; Correlation ; Diffraction patterns ; Dolomitization ; Dominance ; Earth ; Ecological succession ; Eocene ; facies analysis ; Freshwater ; Fulra Limestone Formation ; Geochemistry ; Inland water environment ; Isotopes ; Kachchh ; Limestone ; Mineralogy ; Oxides ; Rare earth elements ; Seawater ; Sedimentary environments ; Sedimentary facies ; Sedimentary rocks ; Shale ; Silica ; Silicon dioxide ; Water analysis ; western India ; X-ray diffraction</subject><ispartof>Geological journal (Chichester, England), 2019-01, Vol.54 (1), p.62-82</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3454-7ff4a4c6765814cedafbc8a438af2716043b450b784fde21561d80f1a17ebd4f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3454-7ff4a4c6765814cedafbc8a438af2716043b450b784fde21561d80f1a17ebd4f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5383-5269</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fgj.3154$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fgj.3154$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Srivastava, V. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, B. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patranabis‐Deb, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Depositional environments and sources for the middle Eocene Fulra Limestone Formation, Kachchh Basin, western India: Evidences from facies analysis, mineralogy, and geochemistry</title><title>Geological journal (Chichester, England)</title><description>The middle Eocene Fulra Limestone Formation of the Kachchh Basin, western India was investigated to interpret depositional environments and sources of limestones based on facies analysis, mineralogy, and major, trace, and rare earth elements (REEs) geochemistry. Facies stacking pattern of the Fulra Limestone Formation exhibits an overall shallowing‐upward sedimentary succession developed in the middle to inner ramp to lagoonal set‐up. Staining of the thin sections and X‐ray diffraction patterns show dominance of calcite mineral. The CaO, ranging from 40.45% to 49.69%, is the dominant oxide among the major oxides followed by SiO2 (4.04–10.3%). The dominance of CaO over MgO suggests that the major mineral phase has been calcite and no dolomitization occurred during the deposition of the Fulra limestone. The low proportion of SiO2 and Al2O3 suggests low siliciclastic input during the precipitation of the Fulra limestone that is confirmed by the positive correlation of ∑REE with Al2O3, Fe2O3, Ni, Th, Sc, and Y and the negative correlation of SiO2, Al2O3, and Sr with CaO. The average value of REE contents in the Fulra Limestone Formation are lower (*16.02 ppm) than the average value of typical marine carbonates (*28 ppm). The Post‐Archean Australian Shale‐normalized REE + Y patterns of the Fulra limestone exhibit seawater like shale‐normalized REE + Y pattern, whereas slightly lower average value of Y/Ho ratio (34.60) than the typical seawater value (~44–74) suggests modification of the seawater, to some extent, by input of freshwater in a coastal environment. The REEs of the Fulra Limestone Formation have similarity with the carbonates of the Arabian Sea and/or shallow marine carbonates with exception of a few elements. It is envisaged from this study that the Fulra limestone was deposited in a shallow marine to coastal set‐up where mixing of the continental material in seawater was feasible.</description><subject>Aluminum oxide</subject><subject>Calcite</subject><subject>Calcium oxide</subject><subject>Carbonates</subject><subject>Chemical analysis</subject><subject>Coastal environments</subject><subject>Coastal zone</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Diffraction patterns</subject><subject>Dolomitization</subject><subject>Dominance</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Ecological succession</subject><subject>Eocene</subject><subject>facies analysis</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fulra Limestone Formation</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Inland water environment</subject><subject>Isotopes</subject><subject>Kachchh</subject><subject>Limestone</subject><subject>Mineralogy</subject><subject>Oxides</subject><subject>Rare earth elements</subject><subject>Seawater</subject><subject>Sedimentary environments</subject><subject>Sedimentary facies</subject><subject>Sedimentary rocks</subject><subject>Shale</subject><subject>Silica</subject><subject>Silicon dioxide</subject><subject>Water analysis</subject><subject>western India</subject><subject>X-ray diffraction</subject><issn>0072-1050</issn><issn>1099-1034</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kctu2zAQRYmiBeomRX-BQBddxE44EvVIdnk4j9ZAN-1aGJNDi4ZEOqScQJ-VPwxld9vVzAAH917MZewbiHMQIrvYbM9zKOQHNgNxebkAkcuPbCZElaW9EJ_Zlxi3QgAICTP2dkc7H-1gvcOOk3uxwbue3BA5Os2j3wdFkRsf-NAS763WHfGlV-SI3--7gHxle4qDn24fepyk5vwXqla1Lb_BaNP5mggKjj85bfGKL1-sJncQDr7nBpWlyRC7Mdo4TzaOAnZ-M84PMTbkVUu9jUMYT9kng12kr__mCft7v_xz-7hY_X54ur1eLTCXhVxUxkiUqqzKogapSKNZqxplXqPJKiiFzNeyEOuqlkZTBkUJuhYGECpaa2nyE_b9qLsL_nmf8jfb9IwUMTYZlBKgrCtI1I8jpYKPMZBpdsH2GMYGRDP10Wy2zdRHIs-O5KvtaPwf1jz8PNDvVxiN-w</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Srivastava, V. K.</creator><creator>Singh, B. P.</creator><creator>Patranabis‐Deb, S.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5383-5269</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Depositional environments and sources for the middle Eocene Fulra Limestone Formation, Kachchh Basin, western India: Evidences from facies analysis, mineralogy, and geochemistry</title><author>Srivastava, V. K. ; Singh, B. P. ; Patranabis‐Deb, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3454-7ff4a4c6765814cedafbc8a438af2716043b450b784fde21561d80f1a17ebd4f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aluminum oxide</topic><topic>Calcite</topic><topic>Calcium oxide</topic><topic>Carbonates</topic><topic>Chemical analysis</topic><topic>Coastal environments</topic><topic>Coastal zone</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Diffraction patterns</topic><topic>Dolomitization</topic><topic>Dominance</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Ecological succession</topic><topic>Eocene</topic><topic>facies analysis</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fulra Limestone Formation</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Inland water environment</topic><topic>Isotopes</topic><topic>Kachchh</topic><topic>Limestone</topic><topic>Mineralogy</topic><topic>Oxides</topic><topic>Rare earth elements</topic><topic>Seawater</topic><topic>Sedimentary environments</topic><topic>Sedimentary facies</topic><topic>Sedimentary rocks</topic><topic>Shale</topic><topic>Silica</topic><topic>Silicon dioxide</topic><topic>Water analysis</topic><topic>western India</topic><topic>X-ray diffraction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Srivastava, V. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, B. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patranabis‐Deb, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Geological journal (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Srivastava, V. K.</au><au>Singh, B. P.</au><au>Patranabis‐Deb, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Depositional environments and sources for the middle Eocene Fulra Limestone Formation, Kachchh Basin, western India: Evidences from facies analysis, mineralogy, and geochemistry</atitle><jtitle>Geological journal (Chichester, England)</jtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>62</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>62-82</pages><issn>0072-1050</issn><eissn>1099-1034</eissn><abstract>The middle Eocene Fulra Limestone Formation of the Kachchh Basin, western India was investigated to interpret depositional environments and sources of limestones based on facies analysis, mineralogy, and major, trace, and rare earth elements (REEs) geochemistry. Facies stacking pattern of the Fulra Limestone Formation exhibits an overall shallowing‐upward sedimentary succession developed in the middle to inner ramp to lagoonal set‐up. Staining of the thin sections and X‐ray diffraction patterns show dominance of calcite mineral. The CaO, ranging from 40.45% to 49.69%, is the dominant oxide among the major oxides followed by SiO2 (4.04–10.3%). The dominance of CaO over MgO suggests that the major mineral phase has been calcite and no dolomitization occurred during the deposition of the Fulra limestone. The low proportion of SiO2 and Al2O3 suggests low siliciclastic input during the precipitation of the Fulra limestone that is confirmed by the positive correlation of ∑REE with Al2O3, Fe2O3, Ni, Th, Sc, and Y and the negative correlation of SiO2, Al2O3, and Sr with CaO. The average value of REE contents in the Fulra Limestone Formation are lower (*16.02 ppm) than the average value of typical marine carbonates (*28 ppm). The Post‐Archean Australian Shale‐normalized REE + Y patterns of the Fulra limestone exhibit seawater like shale‐normalized REE + Y pattern, whereas slightly lower average value of Y/Ho ratio (34.60) than the typical seawater value (~44–74) suggests modification of the seawater, to some extent, by input of freshwater in a coastal environment. The REEs of the Fulra Limestone Formation have similarity with the carbonates of the Arabian Sea and/or shallow marine carbonates with exception of a few elements. It is envisaged from this study that the Fulra limestone was deposited in a shallow marine to coastal set‐up where mixing of the continental material in seawater was feasible.</abstract><cop>Liverpool</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/gj.3154</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5383-5269</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0072-1050
ispartof Geological journal (Chichester, England), 2019-01, Vol.54 (1), p.62-82
issn 0072-1050
1099-1034
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2164116871
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aluminum oxide
Calcite
Calcium oxide
Carbonates
Chemical analysis
Coastal environments
Coastal zone
Correlation
Diffraction patterns
Dolomitization
Dominance
Earth
Ecological succession
Eocene
facies analysis
Freshwater
Fulra Limestone Formation
Geochemistry
Inland water environment
Isotopes
Kachchh
Limestone
Mineralogy
Oxides
Rare earth elements
Seawater
Sedimentary environments
Sedimentary facies
Sedimentary rocks
Shale
Silica
Silicon dioxide
Water analysis
western India
X-ray diffraction
title Depositional environments and sources for the middle Eocene Fulra Limestone Formation, Kachchh Basin, western India: Evidences from facies analysis, mineralogy, and geochemistry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T16%3A53%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Depositional%20environments%20and%20sources%20for%20the%20middle%20Eocene%20Fulra%20Limestone%20Formation,%20Kachchh%20Basin,%20western%20India:%20Evidences%20from%20facies%20analysis,%20mineralogy,%20and%20geochemistry&rft.jtitle=Geological%20journal%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=Srivastava,%20V.%20K.&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=62&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=62-82&rft.issn=0072-1050&rft.eissn=1099-1034&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/gj.3154&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2164116871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2164116871&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true