Best Scale for Detecting the Effects of Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering on Surface Temperature
Stratospheric sulfate aerosol injection (SAI) has been proposed as a way to geoengineer climate. While swift global mean surface cooling is generally expected from tropical SAI, the regional impacts of such perturbation on near‐surface air temperature (SAT) are projected to be spatially inhomogeneou...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Earth's future 2018-12, Vol.6 (12), p.1660-1671 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1671 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1660 |
container_title | Earth's future |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Lo, Y. T. E. Charlton‐Perez, Andrew J. Highwood, Eleanor J. Lott, Fraser C. |
description | Stratospheric sulfate aerosol injection (SAI) has been proposed as a way to geoengineer climate. While swift global mean surface cooling is generally expected from tropical SAI, the regional impacts of such perturbation on near‐surface air temperature (SAT) are projected to be spatially inhomogeneous. By using existing simulations from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project G4 scenario, where 5 Tg/year of sulfur dioxide (SO2) is injected into the tropical stratosphere to offset some of the warming in a midrange representative greenhouse gas concentration pathway (RCP4.5) between 2020 and 2070, we examine the regional detectability of the SAI surface cooling effect and attempt to find the best spatial scale for potential SAI monitoring. We use optimal fingerprint detection and attribution techniques to estimate the time horizon over which the SAI surface cooling effect would be detected after implementation in 2020 on subglobal scales, ranging from the near‐global in situ observational coverage down to subcontinental regions. We show that using the spatiotemporal SAT pattern across the Northern and Southern extratropics and the Tropics, and across the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, as well as averaging SATs over the whole globe robustly result in successful SAI detection within 10 years of geoengineering implementation in a majority of the included plausible geoengineering realizations. However, detecting the SAI effect on SAT within the first decade of implementation would be more challenging on subcontinental scales.
Plain Language Summary
It has been proposed that we could mimic explosive volcanic eruptions and inject sulfur dioxide gas into the upper atmosphere to cool Earth's surface. Climate models suggest that implementing this technology in the Tropics could lower global average temperature quickly, but it could cool some places more than the others. We use computer simulations of a midrange global warming scenario where this technology has been implemented, to estimate the time needed for its surface cooling effect to be detected over a range of regions of different sizes and locations. We find that we would have the highest chance to detect the cooling effect if we considered the space‐time cooling pattern across the extratropics and the Tropics, or across the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, or if we averaged all surface temperature measurements over the globe. Smaller areas are less likely to show detectable surface cooling effec |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2018EF000933 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2163993823</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2163993823</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2587-e3981d8c91b8aa6f2b65c3e109d567e470097054f5a4ec996607d31ce9eb80e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PAjEQhhujiQS5-QOaeHW1H7vb9oi4oAmJB_C8KWUKi8t2bXdj-PcU8cDJ08xknvl4X4TuKXmihKlnRqgspoQQxfkVGjDOZJIyIa4v8ls0CmFHTpAgPBMD9PUCocMLo2vA1nn8Ch2Yrmo2uNsCLqyNVcDO4kXndedCuwVfGbzoa6s7wGPwLrgaz8BBs6kaiN0465pIeKsN4CXsW4ijvYc7dGN1HWD0F4foc1osJ2_J_GP2PhnPE8MyKRLgStK1NIqupNa5Zas8MxwoUessF5CK3--z1GY6BaNUnhOx5tSAgpUkQPgQPZz3tt5991FfuXO9b-LJktGcK8Ul45F6PFMmSggebNn6aq_9oaSkPDlaXjoacXrGf6oaDv-yZTFdslQKfgQeA3ZZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2163993823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Best Scale for Detecting the Effects of Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering on Surface Temperature</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Lo, Y. T. E. ; Charlton‐Perez, Andrew J. ; Highwood, Eleanor J. ; Lott, Fraser C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lo, Y. T. E. ; Charlton‐Perez, Andrew J. ; Highwood, Eleanor J. ; Lott, Fraser C.</creatorcontrib><description>Stratospheric sulfate aerosol injection (SAI) has been proposed as a way to geoengineer climate. While swift global mean surface cooling is generally expected from tropical SAI, the regional impacts of such perturbation on near‐surface air temperature (SAT) are projected to be spatially inhomogeneous. By using existing simulations from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project G4 scenario, where 5 Tg/year of sulfur dioxide (SO2) is injected into the tropical stratosphere to offset some of the warming in a midrange representative greenhouse gas concentration pathway (RCP4.5) between 2020 and 2070, we examine the regional detectability of the SAI surface cooling effect and attempt to find the best spatial scale for potential SAI monitoring. We use optimal fingerprint detection and attribution techniques to estimate the time horizon over which the SAI surface cooling effect would be detected after implementation in 2020 on subglobal scales, ranging from the near‐global in situ observational coverage down to subcontinental regions. We show that using the spatiotemporal SAT pattern across the Northern and Southern extratropics and the Tropics, and across the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, as well as averaging SATs over the whole globe robustly result in successful SAI detection within 10 years of geoengineering implementation in a majority of the included plausible geoengineering realizations. However, detecting the SAI effect on SAT within the first decade of implementation would be more challenging on subcontinental scales.
Plain Language Summary
It has been proposed that we could mimic explosive volcanic eruptions and inject sulfur dioxide gas into the upper atmosphere to cool Earth's surface. Climate models suggest that implementing this technology in the Tropics could lower global average temperature quickly, but it could cool some places more than the others. We use computer simulations of a midrange global warming scenario where this technology has been implemented, to estimate the time needed for its surface cooling effect to be detected over a range of regions of different sizes and locations. We find that we would have the highest chance to detect the cooling effect if we considered the space‐time cooling pattern across the extratropics and the Tropics, or across the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, or if we averaged all surface temperature measurements over the globe. Smaller areas are less likely to show detectable surface cooling effects within the first decade of implementation of this technology.
Key Points
Large‐scale spatiotemporal surface temperature patterns and the global temperature average are best for early geoengineering monitoring
Reduced global coverage in in situ surface temperature observations increases the chance of detection in the first 5 years of implementation
Challenging geoengineering detection in surface temperature on subcontinental scales</description><identifier>ISSN: 2328-4277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2328-4277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2018EF000933</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Aerosol effects ; Aerosols ; Air temperature ; Atmospheric models ; Climate change ; Climate models ; Computer simulation ; Cooling ; Cooling effects ; detection ; Earth surface ; Geoengineering ; Global temperatures ; Global warming ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Hemispheres ; Mathematical models ; optimal fingerprint ; Stratosphere ; Stratospheric sulfate ; Stratospheric warming ; Sulfates ; Sulfur ; Sulfur dioxide ; Surface cooling ; Surface temperature ; Surface temperature measurements ; Surface-air temperature relationships ; Technology ; Temperature ; Temperature effects ; Temperature measurement ; Tropical environments ; Upper atmosphere ; Volcanic eruption effects ; Volcanic eruptions</subject><ispartof>Earth's future, 2018-12, Vol.6 (12), p.1660-1671</ispartof><rights>2018. The Authors.</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2587-e3981d8c91b8aa6f2b65c3e109d567e470097054f5a4ec996607d31ce9eb80e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2587-e3981d8c91b8aa6f2b65c3e109d567e470097054f5a4ec996607d31ce9eb80e03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2460-2546 ; 0000-0002-7389-7272 ; 0000-0001-8179-6220 ; 0000-0001-5184-4156</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2018EF000933$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2018EF000933$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lo, Y. T. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charlton‐Perez, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Highwood, Eleanor J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lott, Fraser C.</creatorcontrib><title>Best Scale for Detecting the Effects of Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering on Surface Temperature</title><title>Earth's future</title><description>Stratospheric sulfate aerosol injection (SAI) has been proposed as a way to geoengineer climate. While swift global mean surface cooling is generally expected from tropical SAI, the regional impacts of such perturbation on near‐surface air temperature (SAT) are projected to be spatially inhomogeneous. By using existing simulations from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project G4 scenario, where 5 Tg/year of sulfur dioxide (SO2) is injected into the tropical stratosphere to offset some of the warming in a midrange representative greenhouse gas concentration pathway (RCP4.5) between 2020 and 2070, we examine the regional detectability of the SAI surface cooling effect and attempt to find the best spatial scale for potential SAI monitoring. We use optimal fingerprint detection and attribution techniques to estimate the time horizon over which the SAI surface cooling effect would be detected after implementation in 2020 on subglobal scales, ranging from the near‐global in situ observational coverage down to subcontinental regions. We show that using the spatiotemporal SAT pattern across the Northern and Southern extratropics and the Tropics, and across the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, as well as averaging SATs over the whole globe robustly result in successful SAI detection within 10 years of geoengineering implementation in a majority of the included plausible geoengineering realizations. However, detecting the SAI effect on SAT within the first decade of implementation would be more challenging on subcontinental scales.
Plain Language Summary
It has been proposed that we could mimic explosive volcanic eruptions and inject sulfur dioxide gas into the upper atmosphere to cool Earth's surface. Climate models suggest that implementing this technology in the Tropics could lower global average temperature quickly, but it could cool some places more than the others. We use computer simulations of a midrange global warming scenario where this technology has been implemented, to estimate the time needed for its surface cooling effect to be detected over a range of regions of different sizes and locations. We find that we would have the highest chance to detect the cooling effect if we considered the space‐time cooling pattern across the extratropics and the Tropics, or across the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, or if we averaged all surface temperature measurements over the globe. Smaller areas are less likely to show detectable surface cooling effects within the first decade of implementation of this technology.
Key Points
Large‐scale spatiotemporal surface temperature patterns and the global temperature average are best for early geoengineering monitoring
Reduced global coverage in in situ surface temperature observations increases the chance of detection in the first 5 years of implementation
Challenging geoengineering detection in surface temperature on subcontinental scales</description><subject>Aerosol effects</subject><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Air temperature</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Cooling</subject><subject>Cooling effects</subject><subject>detection</subject><subject>Earth surface</subject><subject>Geoengineering</subject><subject>Global temperatures</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Hemispheres</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>optimal fingerprint</subject><subject>Stratosphere</subject><subject>Stratospheric sulfate</subject><subject>Stratospheric warming</subject><subject>Sulfates</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>Sulfur dioxide</subject><subject>Surface cooling</subject><subject>Surface temperature</subject><subject>Surface temperature measurements</subject><subject>Surface-air temperature relationships</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Temperature measurement</subject><subject>Tropical environments</subject><subject>Upper atmosphere</subject><subject>Volcanic eruption effects</subject><subject>Volcanic eruptions</subject><issn>2328-4277</issn><issn>2328-4277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1PAjEQhhujiQS5-QOaeHW1H7vb9oi4oAmJB_C8KWUKi8t2bXdj-PcU8cDJ08xknvl4X4TuKXmihKlnRqgspoQQxfkVGjDOZJIyIa4v8ls0CmFHTpAgPBMD9PUCocMLo2vA1nn8Ch2Yrmo2uNsCLqyNVcDO4kXndedCuwVfGbzoa6s7wGPwLrgaz8BBs6kaiN0465pIeKsN4CXsW4ijvYc7dGN1HWD0F4foc1osJ2_J_GP2PhnPE8MyKRLgStK1NIqupNa5Zas8MxwoUessF5CK3--z1GY6BaNUnhOx5tSAgpUkQPgQPZz3tt5991FfuXO9b-LJktGcK8Ul45F6PFMmSggebNn6aq_9oaSkPDlaXjoacXrGf6oaDv-yZTFdslQKfgQeA3ZZ</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Lo, Y. T. E.</creator><creator>Charlton‐Perez, Andrew J.</creator><creator>Highwood, Eleanor J.</creator><creator>Lott, Fraser C.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2460-2546</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7389-7272</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8179-6220</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5184-4156</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Best Scale for Detecting the Effects of Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering on Surface Temperature</title><author>Lo, Y. T. E. ; Charlton‐Perez, Andrew J. ; Highwood, Eleanor J. ; Lott, Fraser C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2587-e3981d8c91b8aa6f2b65c3e109d567e470097054f5a4ec996607d31ce9eb80e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aerosol effects</topic><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Air temperature</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Cooling</topic><topic>Cooling effects</topic><topic>detection</topic><topic>Earth surface</topic><topic>Geoengineering</topic><topic>Global temperatures</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Hemispheres</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>optimal fingerprint</topic><topic>Stratosphere</topic><topic>Stratospheric sulfate</topic><topic>Stratospheric warming</topic><topic>Sulfates</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>Sulfur dioxide</topic><topic>Surface cooling</topic><topic>Surface temperature</topic><topic>Surface temperature measurements</topic><topic>Surface-air temperature relationships</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Temperature measurement</topic><topic>Tropical environments</topic><topic>Upper atmosphere</topic><topic>Volcanic eruption effects</topic><topic>Volcanic eruptions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lo, Y. T. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charlton‐Perez, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Highwood, Eleanor J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lott, Fraser C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Earth's future</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lo, Y. T. E.</au><au>Charlton‐Perez, Andrew J.</au><au>Highwood, Eleanor J.</au><au>Lott, Fraser C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Best Scale for Detecting the Effects of Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering on Surface Temperature</atitle><jtitle>Earth's future</jtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1660</spage><epage>1671</epage><pages>1660-1671</pages><issn>2328-4277</issn><eissn>2328-4277</eissn><abstract>Stratospheric sulfate aerosol injection (SAI) has been proposed as a way to geoengineer climate. While swift global mean surface cooling is generally expected from tropical SAI, the regional impacts of such perturbation on near‐surface air temperature (SAT) are projected to be spatially inhomogeneous. By using existing simulations from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project G4 scenario, where 5 Tg/year of sulfur dioxide (SO2) is injected into the tropical stratosphere to offset some of the warming in a midrange representative greenhouse gas concentration pathway (RCP4.5) between 2020 and 2070, we examine the regional detectability of the SAI surface cooling effect and attempt to find the best spatial scale for potential SAI monitoring. We use optimal fingerprint detection and attribution techniques to estimate the time horizon over which the SAI surface cooling effect would be detected after implementation in 2020 on subglobal scales, ranging from the near‐global in situ observational coverage down to subcontinental regions. We show that using the spatiotemporal SAT pattern across the Northern and Southern extratropics and the Tropics, and across the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, as well as averaging SATs over the whole globe robustly result in successful SAI detection within 10 years of geoengineering implementation in a majority of the included plausible geoengineering realizations. However, detecting the SAI effect on SAT within the first decade of implementation would be more challenging on subcontinental scales.
Plain Language Summary
It has been proposed that we could mimic explosive volcanic eruptions and inject sulfur dioxide gas into the upper atmosphere to cool Earth's surface. Climate models suggest that implementing this technology in the Tropics could lower global average temperature quickly, but it could cool some places more than the others. We use computer simulations of a midrange global warming scenario where this technology has been implemented, to estimate the time needed for its surface cooling effect to be detected over a range of regions of different sizes and locations. We find that we would have the highest chance to detect the cooling effect if we considered the space‐time cooling pattern across the extratropics and the Tropics, or across the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, or if we averaged all surface temperature measurements over the globe. Smaller areas are less likely to show detectable surface cooling effects within the first decade of implementation of this technology.
Key Points
Large‐scale spatiotemporal surface temperature patterns and the global temperature average are best for early geoengineering monitoring
Reduced global coverage in in situ surface temperature observations increases the chance of detection in the first 5 years of implementation
Challenging geoengineering detection in surface temperature on subcontinental scales</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2018EF000933</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2460-2546</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7389-7272</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8179-6220</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5184-4156</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2328-4277 |
ispartof | Earth's future, 2018-12, Vol.6 (12), p.1660-1671 |
issn | 2328-4277 2328-4277 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2163993823 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection) |
subjects | Aerosol effects Aerosols Air temperature Atmospheric models Climate change Climate models Computer simulation Cooling Cooling effects detection Earth surface Geoengineering Global temperatures Global warming Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Hemispheres Mathematical models optimal fingerprint Stratosphere Stratospheric sulfate Stratospheric warming Sulfates Sulfur Sulfur dioxide Surface cooling Surface temperature Surface temperature measurements Surface-air temperature relationships Technology Temperature Temperature effects Temperature measurement Tropical environments Upper atmosphere Volcanic eruption effects Volcanic eruptions |
title | Best Scale for Detecting the Effects of Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering on Surface Temperature |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T15%3A24%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Best%20Scale%20for%20Detecting%20the%20Effects%20of%20Stratospheric%20Sulfate%20Aerosol%20Geoengineering%20on%20Surface%20Temperature&rft.jtitle=Earth's%20future&rft.au=Lo,%20Y.%20T.%20E.&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1660&rft.epage=1671&rft.pages=1660-1671&rft.issn=2328-4277&rft.eissn=2328-4277&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2018EF000933&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2163993823%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2163993823&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |