In Case You Didn't Hear Me the First Time: An Examination of Repetitious Upward Dissent

This study explores how employees express dissent to management about the same issue on multiple occasions across time (i.e., how they practice repetition). Employees completed a survey instrument reporting how often they used varying upward dissent tactics, how often and for how long they raised th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Management communication quarterly 2009-02, Vol.22 (3), p.416-436
1. Verfasser: Kassing, Jeffrey W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 436
container_issue 3
container_start_page 416
container_title Management communication quarterly
container_volume 22
creator Kassing, Jeffrey W.
description This study explores how employees express dissent to management about the same issue on multiple occasions across time (i.e., how they practice repetition). Employees completed a survey instrument reporting how often they used varying upward dissent tactics, how often and for how long they raised the same issue, and how they perceived their supervisors responded to their concerns. Results indicate that employees relied predominantly on competent upward dissent tactics but that they adopted less competent and more face-threatening tactics as repetition progressed. In addition, employees' perceptions of their supervisors' responses to repetition related to the overall duration of repetition but not to the frequency with which employees raised issues or the amount of time that elapsed between dissent episodes.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0893318908327008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_216344973</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0893318908327008</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1625240451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-cdfab048c856d814d4c3683a38ad4d12a05e99e7303c36f7d30c951a107105023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EEqGwM1owIIbAne3E9ogCpZWKWMrAFBnbgVQ0KXYy8O9JFAaE1OmG73vvpEfIOcINopS3oDTnqDQoziSAOiAJZhlLc6nVIUlGnI78mJzEuAFAJhATcr1saGGip69tT-9r11x1dOFNoE-edh-ezusQO7qut_6UHFXmM_qz3zsjL_OHdbFIV8-Py-JulVqmdJdaV5k3EMqqLHcKhROW54obrowTDpmBzGvtJQc-gEo6DlZnaBAkQgaMz8jF1LsL7VfvY1du2j40w8uSYc6F0JIP0uU-CTVTKIVGGCyYLBvaGIOvyl2otyZ8lwjluFr5f7Uhkk6RaN79n9J9_g_bwGbX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928174910</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In Case You Didn't Hear Me the First Time: An Examination of Repetitious Upward Dissent</title><source>SAGE Publications</source><creator>Kassing, Jeffrey W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kassing, Jeffrey W.</creatorcontrib><description>This study explores how employees express dissent to management about the same issue on multiple occasions across time (i.e., how they practice repetition). Employees completed a survey instrument reporting how often they used varying upward dissent tactics, how often and for how long they raised the same issue, and how they perceived their supervisors responded to their concerns. Results indicate that employees relied predominantly on competent upward dissent tactics but that they adopted less competent and more face-threatening tactics as repetition progressed. In addition, employees' perceptions of their supervisors' responses to repetition related to the overall duration of repetition but not to the frequency with which employees raised issues or the amount of time that elapsed between dissent episodes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-3189</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6798</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0893318908327008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Communication ; Employee attitude ; Employees ; Job satisfaction ; Perceptions ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Management communication quarterly, 2009-02, Vol.22 (3), p.416-436</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Feb 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-cdfab048c856d814d4c3683a38ad4d12a05e99e7303c36f7d30c951a107105023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0893318908327008$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0893318908327008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kassing, Jeffrey W.</creatorcontrib><title>In Case You Didn't Hear Me the First Time: An Examination of Repetitious Upward Dissent</title><title>Management communication quarterly</title><description>This study explores how employees express dissent to management about the same issue on multiple occasions across time (i.e., how they practice repetition). Employees completed a survey instrument reporting how often they used varying upward dissent tactics, how often and for how long they raised the same issue, and how they perceived their supervisors responded to their concerns. Results indicate that employees relied predominantly on competent upward dissent tactics but that they adopted less competent and more face-threatening tactics as repetition progressed. In addition, employees' perceptions of their supervisors' responses to repetition related to the overall duration of repetition but not to the frequency with which employees raised issues or the amount of time that elapsed between dissent episodes.</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Employee attitude</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0893-3189</issn><issn>1552-6798</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EEqGwM1owIIbAne3E9ogCpZWKWMrAFBnbgVQ0KXYy8O9JFAaE1OmG73vvpEfIOcINopS3oDTnqDQoziSAOiAJZhlLc6nVIUlGnI78mJzEuAFAJhATcr1saGGip69tT-9r11x1dOFNoE-edh-ezusQO7qut_6UHFXmM_qz3zsjL_OHdbFIV8-Py-JulVqmdJdaV5k3EMqqLHcKhROW54obrowTDpmBzGvtJQc-gEo6DlZnaBAkQgaMz8jF1LsL7VfvY1du2j40w8uSYc6F0JIP0uU-CTVTKIVGGCyYLBvaGIOvyl2otyZ8lwjluFr5f7Uhkk6RaN79n9J9_g_bwGbX</recordid><startdate>20090201</startdate><enddate>20090201</enddate><creator>Kassing, Jeffrey W.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090201</creationdate><title>In Case You Didn't Hear Me the First Time</title><author>Kassing, Jeffrey W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-cdfab048c856d814d4c3683a38ad4d12a05e99e7303c36f7d30c951a107105023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Employee attitude</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kassing, Jeffrey W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Management communication quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kassing, Jeffrey W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In Case You Didn't Hear Me the First Time: An Examination of Repetitious Upward Dissent</atitle><jtitle>Management communication quarterly</jtitle><date>2009-02-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>416</spage><epage>436</epage><pages>416-436</pages><issn>0893-3189</issn><eissn>1552-6798</eissn><abstract>This study explores how employees express dissent to management about the same issue on multiple occasions across time (i.e., how they practice repetition). Employees completed a survey instrument reporting how often they used varying upward dissent tactics, how often and for how long they raised the same issue, and how they perceived their supervisors responded to their concerns. Results indicate that employees relied predominantly on competent upward dissent tactics but that they adopted less competent and more face-threatening tactics as repetition progressed. In addition, employees' perceptions of their supervisors' responses to repetition related to the overall duration of repetition but not to the frequency with which employees raised issues or the amount of time that elapsed between dissent episodes.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0893318908327008</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0893-3189
ispartof Management communication quarterly, 2009-02, Vol.22 (3), p.416-436
issn 0893-3189
1552-6798
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_216344973
source SAGE Publications
subjects Communication
Employee attitude
Employees
Job satisfaction
Perceptions
Studies
title In Case You Didn't Hear Me the First Time: An Examination of Repetitious Upward Dissent
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T14%3A37%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20Case%20You%20Didn't%20Hear%20Me%20the%20First%20Time:%20An%20Examination%20of%20Repetitious%20Upward%20Dissent&rft.jtitle=Management%20communication%20quarterly&rft.au=Kassing,%20Jeffrey%20W.&rft.date=2009-02-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=416&rft.epage=436&rft.pages=416-436&rft.issn=0893-3189&rft.eissn=1552-6798&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0893318908327008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1625240451%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928174910&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0893318908327008&rfr_iscdi=true