In Case You Didn't Hear Me the First Time: An Examination of Repetitious Upward Dissent
This study explores how employees express dissent to management about the same issue on multiple occasions across time (i.e., how they practice repetition). Employees completed a survey instrument reporting how often they used varying upward dissent tactics, how often and for how long they raised th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Management communication quarterly 2009-02, Vol.22 (3), p.416-436 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 436 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 416 |
container_title | Management communication quarterly |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Kassing, Jeffrey W. |
description | This study explores how employees express dissent to management about the same issue on multiple occasions across time (i.e., how they practice repetition). Employees completed a survey instrument reporting how often they used varying upward dissent tactics, how often and for how long they raised the same issue, and how they perceived their supervisors responded to their concerns. Results indicate that employees relied predominantly on competent upward dissent tactics but that they adopted less competent and more face-threatening tactics as repetition progressed. In addition, employees' perceptions of their supervisors' responses to repetition related to the overall duration of repetition but not to the frequency with which employees raised issues or the amount of time that elapsed between dissent episodes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0893318908327008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_216344973</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0893318908327008</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1625240451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-cdfab048c856d814d4c3683a38ad4d12a05e99e7303c36f7d30c951a107105023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EEqGwM1owIIbAne3E9ogCpZWKWMrAFBnbgVQ0KXYy8O9JFAaE1OmG73vvpEfIOcINopS3oDTnqDQoziSAOiAJZhlLc6nVIUlGnI78mJzEuAFAJhATcr1saGGip69tT-9r11x1dOFNoE-edh-ezusQO7qut_6UHFXmM_qz3zsjL_OHdbFIV8-Py-JulVqmdJdaV5k3EMqqLHcKhROW54obrowTDpmBzGvtJQc-gEo6DlZnaBAkQgaMz8jF1LsL7VfvY1du2j40w8uSYc6F0JIP0uU-CTVTKIVGGCyYLBvaGIOvyl2otyZ8lwjluFr5f7Uhkk6RaN79n9J9_g_bwGbX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928174910</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In Case You Didn't Hear Me the First Time: An Examination of Repetitious Upward Dissent</title><source>SAGE Publications</source><creator>Kassing, Jeffrey W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kassing, Jeffrey W.</creatorcontrib><description>This study explores how employees express dissent to management about the same issue on multiple occasions across time (i.e., how they practice repetition). Employees completed a survey instrument reporting how often they used varying upward dissent tactics, how often and for how long they raised the same issue, and how they perceived their supervisors responded to their concerns. Results indicate that employees relied predominantly on competent upward dissent tactics but that they adopted less competent and more face-threatening tactics as repetition progressed. In addition, employees' perceptions of their supervisors' responses to repetition related to the overall duration of repetition but not to the frequency with which employees raised issues or the amount of time that elapsed between dissent episodes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-3189</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6798</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0893318908327008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Communication ; Employee attitude ; Employees ; Job satisfaction ; Perceptions ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Management communication quarterly, 2009-02, Vol.22 (3), p.416-436</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Feb 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-cdfab048c856d814d4c3683a38ad4d12a05e99e7303c36f7d30c951a107105023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0893318908327008$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0893318908327008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kassing, Jeffrey W.</creatorcontrib><title>In Case You Didn't Hear Me the First Time: An Examination of Repetitious Upward Dissent</title><title>Management communication quarterly</title><description>This study explores how employees express dissent to management about the same issue on multiple occasions across time (i.e., how they practice repetition). Employees completed a survey instrument reporting how often they used varying upward dissent tactics, how often and for how long they raised the same issue, and how they perceived their supervisors responded to their concerns. Results indicate that employees relied predominantly on competent upward dissent tactics but that they adopted less competent and more face-threatening tactics as repetition progressed. In addition, employees' perceptions of their supervisors' responses to repetition related to the overall duration of repetition but not to the frequency with which employees raised issues or the amount of time that elapsed between dissent episodes.</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Employee attitude</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0893-3189</issn><issn>1552-6798</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EEqGwM1owIIbAne3E9ogCpZWKWMrAFBnbgVQ0KXYy8O9JFAaE1OmG73vvpEfIOcINopS3oDTnqDQoziSAOiAJZhlLc6nVIUlGnI78mJzEuAFAJhATcr1saGGip69tT-9r11x1dOFNoE-edh-ezusQO7qut_6UHFXmM_qz3zsjL_OHdbFIV8-Py-JulVqmdJdaV5k3EMqqLHcKhROW54obrowTDpmBzGvtJQc-gEo6DlZnaBAkQgaMz8jF1LsL7VfvY1du2j40w8uSYc6F0JIP0uU-CTVTKIVGGCyYLBvaGIOvyl2otyZ8lwjluFr5f7Uhkk6RaN79n9J9_g_bwGbX</recordid><startdate>20090201</startdate><enddate>20090201</enddate><creator>Kassing, Jeffrey W.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090201</creationdate><title>In Case You Didn't Hear Me the First Time</title><author>Kassing, Jeffrey W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-cdfab048c856d814d4c3683a38ad4d12a05e99e7303c36f7d30c951a107105023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Employee attitude</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kassing, Jeffrey W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Management communication quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kassing, Jeffrey W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In Case You Didn't Hear Me the First Time: An Examination of Repetitious Upward Dissent</atitle><jtitle>Management communication quarterly</jtitle><date>2009-02-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>416</spage><epage>436</epage><pages>416-436</pages><issn>0893-3189</issn><eissn>1552-6798</eissn><abstract>This study explores how employees express dissent to management about the same issue on multiple occasions across time (i.e., how they practice repetition). Employees completed a survey instrument reporting how often they used varying upward dissent tactics, how often and for how long they raised the same issue, and how they perceived their supervisors responded to their concerns. Results indicate that employees relied predominantly on competent upward dissent tactics but that they adopted less competent and more face-threatening tactics as repetition progressed. In addition, employees' perceptions of their supervisors' responses to repetition related to the overall duration of repetition but not to the frequency with which employees raised issues or the amount of time that elapsed between dissent episodes.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0893318908327008</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0893-3189 |
ispartof | Management communication quarterly, 2009-02, Vol.22 (3), p.416-436 |
issn | 0893-3189 1552-6798 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_216344973 |
source | SAGE Publications |
subjects | Communication Employee attitude Employees Job satisfaction Perceptions Studies |
title | In Case You Didn't Hear Me the First Time: An Examination of Repetitious Upward Dissent |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T14%3A37%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20Case%20You%20Didn't%20Hear%20Me%20the%20First%20Time:%20An%20Examination%20of%20Repetitious%20Upward%20Dissent&rft.jtitle=Management%20communication%20quarterly&rft.au=Kassing,%20Jeffrey%20W.&rft.date=2009-02-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=416&rft.epage=436&rft.pages=416-436&rft.issn=0893-3189&rft.eissn=1552-6798&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0893318908327008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1625240451%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928174910&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0893318908327008&rfr_iscdi=true |