The stratified multi-criteria decision-making method
•This paper applies a recent concept, namely the concept of stratification.•The dynamicity of the decision environment when a decision is made is considered.•The method mimics the brain’s decision making process and has the potential for future applications in artificial intelligence.•The method wil...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Knowledge-based systems 2018-12, Vol.162, p.115-123 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 123 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 115 |
container_title | Knowledge-based systems |
container_volume | 162 |
creator | Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi |
description | •This paper applies a recent concept, namely the concept of stratification.•The dynamicity of the decision environment when a decision is made is considered.•The method mimics the brain’s decision making process and has the potential for future applications in artificial intelligence.•The method will be useful to researchers who are applying different MCDM methods.
Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods generally require the decision maker to evaluate alternatives with respect to decision criteria and also to assign importance weightings to the criteria. Then, based on the assigned weightings, the best alternative can be selected. However, after a decision is made it often happens that the decision maker becomes doubtful whether the right weightings have been assigned to the criteria given that a variety of eventualities may occur in the near future. The main aim of this paper is to address this concern and improve the application of MCDM methods by addressing possible fluctuations in the criteria weightings. The recently proposed concept of stratification (CST) is used in conjunction with MCDM methods to stratify the decision environment. The method is then applied to a supplier selection problem. The stratified MCDM (SMCDM) approach is in its early stages only and requires further research to reach its maturity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.07.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2162995977</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0950705118303502</els_id><sourcerecordid>2162995977</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-f4014dc878a57c095e66b2f46a8cd1ceb9cb6f94b75c99001707287b3b8a25823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDFPwzAUhC0EEqXwDxgiMSc8u05sL0iogoJUiaXMlmO_UKdNUmwXqf-eVGFmest3d--OkHsKBQVaPbbFrh_iKRYMqCxAFADsgsyoFCwXHNQlmYEqIRdQ0mtyE2MLI8GonBG-2WIWUzDJNx5d1h33yec2-ITBm8yh9dEPfd6Zne-_sg7TdnC35Kox-4h3f3dOPl9fNsu3fP2xel8-r3O7kJDyhgPlzkohTSns-AFWVc0aXhlpHbVYK1tXjeK1KK1SAFSAYFLUi1oaVkq2mJOHyfcQhu8jxqTb4Rj6MVIzWjGlSiXESPGJsmGIMWCjD8F3Jpw0BX3eR7d62kef99Eg9Nh-lD1NMhwb_HgMOlqPvUXnA9qk3eD_N_gFk8pvrw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2162995977</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The stratified multi-criteria decision-making method</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi</creator><creatorcontrib>Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi</creatorcontrib><description>•This paper applies a recent concept, namely the concept of stratification.•The dynamicity of the decision environment when a decision is made is considered.•The method mimics the brain’s decision making process and has the potential for future applications in artificial intelligence.•The method will be useful to researchers who are applying different MCDM methods.
Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods generally require the decision maker to evaluate alternatives with respect to decision criteria and also to assign importance weightings to the criteria. Then, based on the assigned weightings, the best alternative can be selected. However, after a decision is made it often happens that the decision maker becomes doubtful whether the right weightings have been assigned to the criteria given that a variety of eventualities may occur in the near future. The main aim of this paper is to address this concern and improve the application of MCDM methods by addressing possible fluctuations in the criteria weightings. The recently proposed concept of stratification (CST) is used in conjunction with MCDM methods to stratify the decision environment. The method is then applied to a supplier selection problem. The stratified MCDM (SMCDM) approach is in its early stages only and requires further research to reach its maturity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-7051</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.07.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Component and supplier management ; Concept of stratification (CST) ; Decision making ; Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) ; Multiple criteria decision making ; Multiple criterion ; SMCDM ; Uncertainty ; Variations</subject><ispartof>Knowledge-based systems, 2018-12, Vol.162, p.115-123</ispartof><rights>2018</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Dec 15, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-f4014dc878a57c095e66b2f46a8cd1ceb9cb6f94b75c99001707287b3b8a25823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-f4014dc878a57c095e66b2f46a8cd1ceb9cb6f94b75c99001707287b3b8a25823</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1280-8870</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950705118303502$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi</creatorcontrib><title>The stratified multi-criteria decision-making method</title><title>Knowledge-based systems</title><description>•This paper applies a recent concept, namely the concept of stratification.•The dynamicity of the decision environment when a decision is made is considered.•The method mimics the brain’s decision making process and has the potential for future applications in artificial intelligence.•The method will be useful to researchers who are applying different MCDM methods.
Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods generally require the decision maker to evaluate alternatives with respect to decision criteria and also to assign importance weightings to the criteria. Then, based on the assigned weightings, the best alternative can be selected. However, after a decision is made it often happens that the decision maker becomes doubtful whether the right weightings have been assigned to the criteria given that a variety of eventualities may occur in the near future. The main aim of this paper is to address this concern and improve the application of MCDM methods by addressing possible fluctuations in the criteria weightings. The recently proposed concept of stratification (CST) is used in conjunction with MCDM methods to stratify the decision environment. The method is then applied to a supplier selection problem. The stratified MCDM (SMCDM) approach is in its early stages only and requires further research to reach its maturity.</description><subject>Component and supplier management</subject><subject>Concept of stratification (CST)</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)</subject><subject>Multiple criteria decision making</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>SMCDM</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Variations</subject><issn>0950-7051</issn><issn>1872-7409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDFPwzAUhC0EEqXwDxgiMSc8u05sL0iogoJUiaXMlmO_UKdNUmwXqf-eVGFmest3d--OkHsKBQVaPbbFrh_iKRYMqCxAFADsgsyoFCwXHNQlmYEqIRdQ0mtyE2MLI8GonBG-2WIWUzDJNx5d1h33yec2-ITBm8yh9dEPfd6Zne-_sg7TdnC35Kox-4h3f3dOPl9fNsu3fP2xel8-r3O7kJDyhgPlzkohTSns-AFWVc0aXhlpHbVYK1tXjeK1KK1SAFSAYFLUi1oaVkq2mJOHyfcQhu8jxqTb4Rj6MVIzWjGlSiXESPGJsmGIMWCjD8F3Jpw0BX3eR7d62kef99Eg9Nh-lD1NMhwb_HgMOlqPvUXnA9qk3eD_N_gFk8pvrw</recordid><startdate>20181215</startdate><enddate>20181215</enddate><creator>Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1280-8870</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181215</creationdate><title>The stratified multi-criteria decision-making method</title><author>Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-f4014dc878a57c095e66b2f46a8cd1ceb9cb6f94b75c99001707287b3b8a25823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Component and supplier management</topic><topic>Concept of stratification (CST)</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)</topic><topic>Multiple criteria decision making</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>SMCDM</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Variations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Knowledge-based systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The stratified multi-criteria decision-making method</atitle><jtitle>Knowledge-based systems</jtitle><date>2018-12-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>162</volume><spage>115</spage><epage>123</epage><pages>115-123</pages><issn>0950-7051</issn><eissn>1872-7409</eissn><abstract>•This paper applies a recent concept, namely the concept of stratification.•The dynamicity of the decision environment when a decision is made is considered.•The method mimics the brain’s decision making process and has the potential for future applications in artificial intelligence.•The method will be useful to researchers who are applying different MCDM methods.
Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods generally require the decision maker to evaluate alternatives with respect to decision criteria and also to assign importance weightings to the criteria. Then, based on the assigned weightings, the best alternative can be selected. However, after a decision is made it often happens that the decision maker becomes doubtful whether the right weightings have been assigned to the criteria given that a variety of eventualities may occur in the near future. The main aim of this paper is to address this concern and improve the application of MCDM methods by addressing possible fluctuations in the criteria weightings. The recently proposed concept of stratification (CST) is used in conjunction with MCDM methods to stratify the decision environment. The method is then applied to a supplier selection problem. The stratified MCDM (SMCDM) approach is in its early stages only and requires further research to reach its maturity.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.knosys.2018.07.002</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1280-8870</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0950-7051 |
ispartof | Knowledge-based systems, 2018-12, Vol.162, p.115-123 |
issn | 0950-7051 1872-7409 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2162995977 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Component and supplier management Concept of stratification (CST) Decision making Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Multiple criteria decision making Multiple criterion SMCDM Uncertainty Variations |
title | The stratified multi-criteria decision-making method |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A26%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20stratified%20multi-criteria%20decision-making%20method&rft.jtitle=Knowledge-based%20systems&rft.au=Asadabadi,%20Mehdi%20Rajabi&rft.date=2018-12-15&rft.volume=162&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=123&rft.pages=115-123&rft.issn=0950-7051&rft.eissn=1872-7409&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.07.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2162995977%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2162995977&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0950705118303502&rfr_iscdi=true |