The Effect of Diversification Relatedness on Firm Performance
This paper investigates the relationship between diversification relatedness and firm performance in the U.S. property-liability insurance industry. While prior research has evaluated the effect of diversification on insurer performance, little evidence exists regarding the relation between diversif...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of insurance issues 2017-10, Vol.40 (2), p.125-158 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 158 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 125 |
container_title | Journal of insurance issues |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Morris, Brandon C. L. Fier, Stephen G. Liebenberg, Andre P. |
description | This paper investigates the relationship between diversification relatedness and firm performance in the U.S. property-liability insurance industry. While prior research has evaluated the effect of diversification on insurer performance, little evidence exists regarding the relation between diversification strategy and performance for diversified firms. Theory suggests that potential costs and benefits are associated with related and unrelated forms of diversification and that these can vary along the relatedness continuum. We test for the net effect of diversification strategy and find that relatedness negatively impacts accounting performance. This relatedness penalty is robust to corrections for potential endogeneity bias, it exists for newly diversifying firms, and it has a differential effect on stock and mutual insurers. Finally, we find that related diversification is largely responsible for the diversification penalty found in prior research while unrelated diversification has no relation to accounting performance. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2162432977</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44464643</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44464643</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g167t-9216326a273c93d1d330c89af47b38666857be070d578fd8fe77794fc79923523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjVFLwzAUhYMoWKc_QQj4XEhy09zmwQeZmwoDReZzydJEU9ZmJpngv7cwOQ-HAx_fOSOVABC1FFKek4o3wGvFUF2Sq5wHxrgArSpyv_1ydOW9s4VGTx_Dj0s5-GBNCXGi725viusnlzOd5zqkkb655GMazWTdNbnwZp_dzX8vyMd6tV0-15vXp5flw6b-5ApLrQVXIJQRCFZDz3sAZlttvMQdtEqptsGdY8j6Blvft94hopbeotYCGgELcnfyHlL8PrpcuiEe0zRfdrNaSBAacaZuT9SQS0zdIYXRpN9OSqnmAPwBW89NIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2162432977</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of Diversification Relatedness on Firm Performance</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Morris, Brandon C. L. ; Fier, Stephen G. ; Liebenberg, Andre P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Morris, Brandon C. L. ; Fier, Stephen G. ; Liebenberg, Andre P.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper investigates the relationship between diversification relatedness and firm performance in the U.S. property-liability insurance industry. While prior research has evaluated the effect of diversification on insurer performance, little evidence exists regarding the relation between diversification strategy and performance for diversified firms. Theory suggests that potential costs and benefits are associated with related and unrelated forms of diversification and that these can vary along the relatedness continuum. We test for the net effect of diversification strategy and find that relatedness negatively impacts accounting performance. This relatedness penalty is robust to corrections for potential endogeneity bias, it exists for newly diversifying firms, and it has a differential effect on stock and mutual insurers. Finally, we find that related diversification is largely responsible for the diversification penalty found in prior research while unrelated diversification has no relation to accounting performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1531-6076</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2332-4244</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Northridge: Western Risk and Insurance Association</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Business cycles ; Business insurance ; Business structures ; Data envelopment analysis ; Diversification ; Employee insurance ; Homeowners insurance ; Industrial sectors ; Insurance industry ; Insurance premiums ; Insurance providers ; Liability insurance ; Mutual insurers ; Product diversification ; Writing</subject><ispartof>Journal of insurance issues, 2017-10, Vol.40 (2), p.125-158</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Western Risk and Insurance Association, 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Western Risk & Insurance Association Fall 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44464643$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44464643$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morris, Brandon C. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fier, Stephen G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebenberg, Andre P.</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Diversification Relatedness on Firm Performance</title><title>Journal of insurance issues</title><description>This paper investigates the relationship between diversification relatedness and firm performance in the U.S. property-liability insurance industry. While prior research has evaluated the effect of diversification on insurer performance, little evidence exists regarding the relation between diversification strategy and performance for diversified firms. Theory suggests that potential costs and benefits are associated with related and unrelated forms of diversification and that these can vary along the relatedness continuum. We test for the net effect of diversification strategy and find that relatedness negatively impacts accounting performance. This relatedness penalty is robust to corrections for potential endogeneity bias, it exists for newly diversifying firms, and it has a differential effect on stock and mutual insurers. Finally, we find that related diversification is largely responsible for the diversification penalty found in prior research while unrelated diversification has no relation to accounting performance.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Business cycles</subject><subject>Business insurance</subject><subject>Business structures</subject><subject>Data envelopment analysis</subject><subject>Diversification</subject><subject>Employee insurance</subject><subject>Homeowners insurance</subject><subject>Industrial sectors</subject><subject>Insurance industry</subject><subject>Insurance premiums</subject><subject>Insurance providers</subject><subject>Liability insurance</subject><subject>Mutual insurers</subject><subject>Product diversification</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>1531-6076</issn><issn>2332-4244</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotjVFLwzAUhYMoWKc_QQj4XEhy09zmwQeZmwoDReZzydJEU9ZmJpngv7cwOQ-HAx_fOSOVABC1FFKek4o3wGvFUF2Sq5wHxrgArSpyv_1ydOW9s4VGTx_Dj0s5-GBNCXGi725viusnlzOd5zqkkb655GMazWTdNbnwZp_dzX8vyMd6tV0-15vXp5flw6b-5ApLrQVXIJQRCFZDz3sAZlttvMQdtEqptsGdY8j6Blvft94hopbeotYCGgELcnfyHlL8PrpcuiEe0zRfdrNaSBAacaZuT9SQS0zdIYXRpN9OSqnmAPwBW89NIg</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Morris, Brandon C. L.</creator><creator>Fier, Stephen G.</creator><creator>Liebenberg, Andre P.</creator><general>Western Risk and Insurance Association</general><general>Western Risk & Insurance Association</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>The Effect of Diversification Relatedness on Firm Performance</title><author>Morris, Brandon C. L. ; Fier, Stephen G. ; Liebenberg, Andre P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g167t-9216326a273c93d1d330c89af47b38666857be070d578fd8fe77794fc79923523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Business cycles</topic><topic>Business insurance</topic><topic>Business structures</topic><topic>Data envelopment analysis</topic><topic>Diversification</topic><topic>Employee insurance</topic><topic>Homeowners insurance</topic><topic>Industrial sectors</topic><topic>Insurance industry</topic><topic>Insurance premiums</topic><topic>Insurance providers</topic><topic>Liability insurance</topic><topic>Mutual insurers</topic><topic>Product diversification</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morris, Brandon C. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fier, Stephen G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebenberg, Andre P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of insurance issues</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morris, Brandon C. L.</au><au>Fier, Stephen G.</au><au>Liebenberg, Andre P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effect of Diversification Relatedness on Firm Performance</atitle><jtitle>Journal of insurance issues</jtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>158</epage><pages>125-158</pages><issn>1531-6076</issn><eissn>2332-4244</eissn><abstract>This paper investigates the relationship between diversification relatedness and firm performance in the U.S. property-liability insurance industry. While prior research has evaluated the effect of diversification on insurer performance, little evidence exists regarding the relation between diversification strategy and performance for diversified firms. Theory suggests that potential costs and benefits are associated with related and unrelated forms of diversification and that these can vary along the relatedness continuum. We test for the net effect of diversification strategy and find that relatedness negatively impacts accounting performance. This relatedness penalty is robust to corrections for potential endogeneity bias, it exists for newly diversifying firms, and it has a differential effect on stock and mutual insurers. Finally, we find that related diversification is largely responsible for the diversification penalty found in prior research while unrelated diversification has no relation to accounting performance.</abstract><cop>Northridge</cop><pub>Western Risk and Insurance Association</pub><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1531-6076 |
ispartof | Journal of insurance issues, 2017-10, Vol.40 (2), p.125-158 |
issn | 1531-6076 2332-4244 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2162432977 |
source | Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Accounting Business cycles Business insurance Business structures Data envelopment analysis Diversification Employee insurance Homeowners insurance Industrial sectors Insurance industry Insurance premiums Insurance providers Liability insurance Mutual insurers Product diversification Writing |
title | The Effect of Diversification Relatedness on Firm Performance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A28%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Diversification%20Relatedness%20on%20Firm%20Performance&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20insurance%20issues&rft.au=Morris,%20Brandon%20C.%20L.&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=158&rft.pages=125-158&rft.issn=1531-6076&rft.eissn=2332-4244&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44464643%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2162432977&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44464643&rfr_iscdi=true |