Compressibility Considerations for k-w Turbulence Models in Hypersonic Boundary-Layer Applications

The ability of k-w models to predict compressible turbulent skin friction in hypersonic boundary layers is investigated. Although uncorrected two-equation models can agree well with correlations for hot-wall cases, they tend to perform progressively worse (particularly for cold walls) as the Mach nu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of spacecraft and rockets 2010-01, Vol.47 (1), p.11-20
1. Verfasser: Rumsey, Christopher L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20
container_issue 1
container_start_page 11
container_title Journal of spacecraft and rockets
container_volume 47
creator Rumsey, Christopher L
description The ability of k-w models to predict compressible turbulent skin friction in hypersonic boundary layers is investigated. Although uncorrected two-equation models can agree well with correlations for hot-wall cases, they tend to perform progressively worse (particularly for cold walls) as the Mach number is increased in the hypersonic regime. Simple algebraic models such as Baldwin-Lomax perform better compared to experiments and correlations in these circumstances. Many of the compressibility corrections described in the literature are summarized here. These include corrections that have only a small influence f or k-w models or that apply only in specific circumstances. The most widely used general corrections were designed for use with jet or mixing-layer free-shear flows. A less-well-known dilatation-dissipation correction intended for boundary-layer flows is also tested and is shown to agree reasonably well with the Baldwin-Lomax model at cold-wall conditions. It exhibits a less dramatic influence than the free-shear type of correction. There is clearly a need for improved understanding and better overall physical modeling for turbulence models applied to hypersonic boundary-layer flows.
doi_str_mv 10.2514/1.45350
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_aiaa_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2161749348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2161749348</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a1938-25da25321857e8bbc9661f6d4fadb67df93d700d33aab72339cb5ba56ec36e223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf4FwIK4kVnPpq0vZxFnTDxZl6HpEkgM2tq0qL791Y3EIZX54Xz8HDOC8AlRjPCcH6HZzmjDB2BCWaUZryo8mMwQYiQLOcMnYKzlNYIYV7yagJUHTZdNCk55bzrt7AObXLaRNm7MUEbInzPPuFqiGrwpm0MfAna-ARdCxfbzsQUWtfA-zC0WsZttpRbE-G867xrdo5zcGKlT-ZiP6fg7fFhVS-y5evTcz1fZhJXtMwI05IwSnDJClMq1VScY8t1bqVWvNC2orpASFMqpSoIpVWjmJKMm4ZyQwidgpudt4vhYzCpFxuXGuO9bE0YkihyiiktcTmSVwfkOgyxHY8TBHNc5BXNyz9fE0NK0VjRRbcZfxQYiZ-qBRa_VY_k7Y6UTso_134tOm2FHbzvzVc_stf_sgfKb657irY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2161749348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Compressibility Considerations for k-w Turbulence Models in Hypersonic Boundary-Layer Applications</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Rumsey, Christopher L</creator><creatorcontrib>Rumsey, Christopher L</creatorcontrib><description>The ability of k-w models to predict compressible turbulent skin friction in hypersonic boundary layers is investigated. Although uncorrected two-equation models can agree well with correlations for hot-wall cases, they tend to perform progressively worse (particularly for cold walls) as the Mach number is increased in the hypersonic regime. Simple algebraic models such as Baldwin-Lomax perform better compared to experiments and correlations in these circumstances. Many of the compressibility corrections described in the literature are summarized here. These include corrections that have only a small influence f or k-w models or that apply only in specific circumstances. The most widely used general corrections were designed for use with jet or mixing-layer free-shear flows. A less-well-known dilatation-dissipation correction intended for boundary-layer flows is also tested and is shown to agree reasonably well with the Baldwin-Lomax model at cold-wall conditions. It exhibits a less dramatic influence than the free-shear type of correction. There is clearly a need for improved understanding and better overall physical modeling for turbulence models applied to hypersonic boundary-layer flows.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4650</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-6794</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/1.45350</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Compressibility ; Turbulence models</subject><ispartof>Journal of spacecraft and rockets, 2010-01, Vol.47 (1), p.11-20</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Jan/Feb 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a1938-25da25321857e8bbc9661f6d4fadb67df93d700d33aab72339cb5ba56ec36e223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a1938-25da25321857e8bbc9661f6d4fadb67df93d700d33aab72339cb5ba56ec36e223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rumsey, Christopher L</creatorcontrib><title>Compressibility Considerations for k-w Turbulence Models in Hypersonic Boundary-Layer Applications</title><title>Journal of spacecraft and rockets</title><description>The ability of k-w models to predict compressible turbulent skin friction in hypersonic boundary layers is investigated. Although uncorrected two-equation models can agree well with correlations for hot-wall cases, they tend to perform progressively worse (particularly for cold walls) as the Mach number is increased in the hypersonic regime. Simple algebraic models such as Baldwin-Lomax perform better compared to experiments and correlations in these circumstances. Many of the compressibility corrections described in the literature are summarized here. These include corrections that have only a small influence f or k-w models or that apply only in specific circumstances. The most widely used general corrections were designed for use with jet or mixing-layer free-shear flows. A less-well-known dilatation-dissipation correction intended for boundary-layer flows is also tested and is shown to agree reasonably well with the Baldwin-Lomax model at cold-wall conditions. It exhibits a less dramatic influence than the free-shear type of correction. There is clearly a need for improved understanding and better overall physical modeling for turbulence models applied to hypersonic boundary-layer flows.</description><subject>Compressibility</subject><subject>Turbulence models</subject><issn>0022-4650</issn><issn>1533-6794</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf4FwIK4kVnPpq0vZxFnTDxZl6HpEkgM2tq0qL791Y3EIZX54Xz8HDOC8AlRjPCcH6HZzmjDB2BCWaUZryo8mMwQYiQLOcMnYKzlNYIYV7yagJUHTZdNCk55bzrt7AObXLaRNm7MUEbInzPPuFqiGrwpm0MfAna-ARdCxfbzsQUWtfA-zC0WsZttpRbE-G867xrdo5zcGKlT-ZiP6fg7fFhVS-y5evTcz1fZhJXtMwI05IwSnDJClMq1VScY8t1bqVWvNC2orpASFMqpSoIpVWjmJKMm4ZyQwidgpudt4vhYzCpFxuXGuO9bE0YkihyiiktcTmSVwfkOgyxHY8TBHNc5BXNyz9fE0NK0VjRRbcZfxQYiZ-qBRa_VY_k7Y6UTso_134tOm2FHbzvzVc_stf_sgfKb657irY</recordid><startdate>201001</startdate><enddate>201001</enddate><creator>Rumsey, Christopher L</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201001</creationdate><title>Compressibility Considerations for k-w Turbulence Models in Hypersonic Boundary-Layer Applications</title><author>Rumsey, Christopher L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a1938-25da25321857e8bbc9661f6d4fadb67df93d700d33aab72339cb5ba56ec36e223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Compressibility</topic><topic>Turbulence models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rumsey, Christopher L</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of spacecraft and rockets</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rumsey, Christopher L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Compressibility Considerations for k-w Turbulence Models in Hypersonic Boundary-Layer Applications</atitle><jtitle>Journal of spacecraft and rockets</jtitle><date>2010-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>20</epage><pages>11-20</pages><issn>0022-4650</issn><eissn>1533-6794</eissn><abstract>The ability of k-w models to predict compressible turbulent skin friction in hypersonic boundary layers is investigated. Although uncorrected two-equation models can agree well with correlations for hot-wall cases, they tend to perform progressively worse (particularly for cold walls) as the Mach number is increased in the hypersonic regime. Simple algebraic models such as Baldwin-Lomax perform better compared to experiments and correlations in these circumstances. Many of the compressibility corrections described in the literature are summarized here. These include corrections that have only a small influence f or k-w models or that apply only in specific circumstances. The most widely used general corrections were designed for use with jet or mixing-layer free-shear flows. A less-well-known dilatation-dissipation correction intended for boundary-layer flows is also tested and is shown to agree reasonably well with the Baldwin-Lomax model at cold-wall conditions. It exhibits a less dramatic influence than the free-shear type of correction. There is clearly a need for improved understanding and better overall physical modeling for turbulence models applied to hypersonic boundary-layer flows.</abstract><cop>Reston</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/1.45350</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4650
ispartof Journal of spacecraft and rockets, 2010-01, Vol.47 (1), p.11-20
issn 0022-4650
1533-6794
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2161749348
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Compressibility
Turbulence models
title Compressibility Considerations for k-w Turbulence Models in Hypersonic Boundary-Layer Applications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T02%3A01%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_aiaa_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Compressibility%20Considerations%20for%20k-w%20Turbulence%20Models%20in%20Hypersonic%20Boundary-Layer%20Applications&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20spacecraft%20and%20rockets&rft.au=Rumsey,%20Christopher%20L&rft.date=2010-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=20&rft.pages=11-20&rft.issn=0022-4650&rft.eissn=1533-6794&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/1.45350&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_aiaa_%3E2161749348%3C/proquest_aiaa_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2161749348&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true