HIERARCHIES OF CATEGORICAL DISADVANTAGE: Economic Insecurity at the Intersection of Disability, Gender, and Race
Intersectional feminist scholars emphasize how overlapping systems of oppression structure gender inequality, but in focusing on the gendered, classed, and racialized bases of stratification, many often overlook disability as an important social category in determining economic outcomes. This is a s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gender & society 2019-02, Vol.33 (1), p.64-93 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 93 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 64 |
container_title | Gender & society |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | MAROTO, MICHELLE PETTINICCHIO, DAVID PATTERSON, ANDREW C. |
description | Intersectional feminist scholars emphasize how overlapping systems of oppression structure gender inequality, but in focusing on the gendered, classed, and racialized bases of stratification, many often overlook disability as an important social category in determining economic outcomes. This is a significant omission given that disability severely limits opportunities and contributes to cumulative disadvantage. We draw from feminist disability and intersectional theories to account for how disability intersects with gender, race, and education to produce economic insecurity. The findings from our analyses of 2015 American Community Survey data provide strong empirical support for hierarchies of disadvantage, where women and racial minority groups with disabilities and less education experience the highest poverty levels, report the lowest total income, and have a greater reliance on sources outside the labor market for economic security. By taking disability into account, our study demonstrates how these multiple characteristics lead to overlapping oppressions that become embedded and reproduced within the larger social structure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0891243218794648 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2161333709</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26597133</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0891243218794648</sage_id><sourcerecordid>26597133</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-2f863e2705b72a089cfb8a49299e894a228cb4e16888e33653a4e1cc0de39d273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LxDAQxYMoWFfvXoSCB0_VJJPm41i63W5hsdCtXkvaTcWidk26h_3vbakoePD0GOb33gwPoWuC7wkR4gFLRSgDSqRQjDN5gjwShjQAJcQp8qZ1MO3P0YVzHcaYs1B56G6dJUVUxKNs_Xzlx1GZpHmRxdHGX2bbaPkcPZZRmlyis1a_OXP1rQv0tErKeB1s8nSCgwYEDAFtJQdDBQ5rQfV4tGlrqZmiShmpmKZUNjUzhEspDQAPQY9T0-CdAbWjAhbods7d2_7zYNxQdf3BfownK0o4AQCB1UjhmWps75w1bbW3r-_aHiuCq6mO6m8doyWYLU6_mN_Qf_ibme_c0NuffMpDJaY3vgDYNmIo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2161333709</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>HIERARCHIES OF CATEGORICAL DISADVANTAGE: Economic Insecurity at the Intersection of Disability, Gender, and Race</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>MAROTO, MICHELLE ; PETTINICCHIO, DAVID ; PATTERSON, ANDREW C.</creator><creatorcontrib>MAROTO, MICHELLE ; PETTINICCHIO, DAVID ; PATTERSON, ANDREW C.</creatorcontrib><description>Intersectional feminist scholars emphasize how overlapping systems of oppression structure gender inequality, but in focusing on the gendered, classed, and racialized bases of stratification, many often overlook disability as an important social category in determining economic outcomes. This is a significant omission given that disability severely limits opportunities and contributes to cumulative disadvantage. We draw from feminist disability and intersectional theories to account for how disability intersects with gender, race, and education to produce economic insecurity. The findings from our analyses of 2015 American Community Survey data provide strong empirical support for hierarchies of disadvantage, where women and racial minority groups with disabilities and less education experience the highest poverty levels, report the lowest total income, and have a greater reliance on sources outside the labor market for economic security. By taking disability into account, our study demonstrates how these multiple characteristics lead to overlapping oppressions that become embedded and reproduced within the larger social structure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0891-2432</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3977</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0891243218794648</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Inc</publisher><subject>Disability ; Females ; Feminism ; Feminist theory ; Gender ; Gender inequality ; Insecurity ; Intersectionality ; Labor market ; Low income groups ; Minority groups ; Oppression ; Poverty ; Race ; Reliance ; Security ; Social stratification ; Social structure ; Special education ; Women</subject><ispartof>Gender & society, 2019-02, Vol.33 (1), p.64-93</ispartof><rights>2018 by The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-2f863e2705b72a089cfb8a49299e894a228cb4e16888e33653a4e1cc0de39d273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-2f863e2705b72a089cfb8a49299e894a228cb4e16888e33653a4e1cc0de39d273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26597133$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26597133$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,803,21819,27922,27924,27925,33774,43621,43622,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>MAROTO, MICHELLE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PETTINICCHIO, DAVID</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PATTERSON, ANDREW C.</creatorcontrib><title>HIERARCHIES OF CATEGORICAL DISADVANTAGE: Economic Insecurity at the Intersection of Disability, Gender, and Race</title><title>Gender & society</title><description>Intersectional feminist scholars emphasize how overlapping systems of oppression structure gender inequality, but in focusing on the gendered, classed, and racialized bases of stratification, many often overlook disability as an important social category in determining economic outcomes. This is a significant omission given that disability severely limits opportunities and contributes to cumulative disadvantage. We draw from feminist disability and intersectional theories to account for how disability intersects with gender, race, and education to produce economic insecurity. The findings from our analyses of 2015 American Community Survey data provide strong empirical support for hierarchies of disadvantage, where women and racial minority groups with disabilities and less education experience the highest poverty levels, report the lowest total income, and have a greater reliance on sources outside the labor market for economic security. By taking disability into account, our study demonstrates how these multiple characteristics lead to overlapping oppressions that become embedded and reproduced within the larger social structure.</description><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Feminist theory</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender inequality</subject><subject>Insecurity</subject><subject>Intersectionality</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Minority groups</subject><subject>Oppression</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Reliance</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Social stratification</subject><subject>Social structure</subject><subject>Special education</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0891-2432</issn><issn>1552-3977</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1LxDAQxYMoWFfvXoSCB0_VJJPm41i63W5hsdCtXkvaTcWidk26h_3vbakoePD0GOb33gwPoWuC7wkR4gFLRSgDSqRQjDN5gjwShjQAJcQp8qZ1MO3P0YVzHcaYs1B56G6dJUVUxKNs_Xzlx1GZpHmRxdHGX2bbaPkcPZZRmlyis1a_OXP1rQv0tErKeB1s8nSCgwYEDAFtJQdDBQ5rQfV4tGlrqZmiShmpmKZUNjUzhEspDQAPQY9T0-CdAbWjAhbods7d2_7zYNxQdf3BfownK0o4AQCB1UjhmWps75w1bbW3r-_aHiuCq6mO6m8doyWYLU6_mN_Qf_ibme_c0NuffMpDJaY3vgDYNmIo</recordid><startdate>20190201</startdate><enddate>20190201</enddate><creator>MAROTO, MICHELLE</creator><creator>PETTINICCHIO, DAVID</creator><creator>PATTERSON, ANDREW C.</creator><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190201</creationdate><title>HIERARCHIES OF CATEGORICAL DISADVANTAGE</title><author>MAROTO, MICHELLE ; PETTINICCHIO, DAVID ; PATTERSON, ANDREW C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-2f863e2705b72a089cfb8a49299e894a228cb4e16888e33653a4e1cc0de39d273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Feminist theory</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender inequality</topic><topic>Insecurity</topic><topic>Intersectionality</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Minority groups</topic><topic>Oppression</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Reliance</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Social stratification</topic><topic>Social structure</topic><topic>Special education</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MAROTO, MICHELLE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PETTINICCHIO, DAVID</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PATTERSON, ANDREW C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Gender & society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MAROTO, MICHELLE</au><au>PETTINICCHIO, DAVID</au><au>PATTERSON, ANDREW C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HIERARCHIES OF CATEGORICAL DISADVANTAGE: Economic Insecurity at the Intersection of Disability, Gender, and Race</atitle><jtitle>Gender & society</jtitle><date>2019-02-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>64</spage><epage>93</epage><pages>64-93</pages><issn>0891-2432</issn><eissn>1552-3977</eissn><abstract>Intersectional feminist scholars emphasize how overlapping systems of oppression structure gender inequality, but in focusing on the gendered, classed, and racialized bases of stratification, many often overlook disability as an important social category in determining economic outcomes. This is a significant omission given that disability severely limits opportunities and contributes to cumulative disadvantage. We draw from feminist disability and intersectional theories to account for how disability intersects with gender, race, and education to produce economic insecurity. The findings from our analyses of 2015 American Community Survey data provide strong empirical support for hierarchies of disadvantage, where women and racial minority groups with disabilities and less education experience the highest poverty levels, report the lowest total income, and have a greater reliance on sources outside the labor market for economic security. By taking disability into account, our study demonstrates how these multiple characteristics lead to overlapping oppressions that become embedded and reproduced within the larger social structure.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications, Inc</pub><doi>10.1177/0891243218794648</doi><tpages>30</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0891-2432 |
ispartof | Gender & society, 2019-02, Vol.33 (1), p.64-93 |
issn | 0891-2432 1552-3977 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2161333709 |
source | Access via SAGE; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Disability Females Feminism Feminist theory Gender Gender inequality Insecurity Intersectionality Labor market Low income groups Minority groups Oppression Poverty Race Reliance Security Social stratification Social structure Special education Women |
title | HIERARCHIES OF CATEGORICAL DISADVANTAGE: Economic Insecurity at the Intersection of Disability, Gender, and Race |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T16%3A33%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HIERARCHIES%20OF%20CATEGORICAL%20DISADVANTAGE:%20Economic%20Insecurity%20at%20the%20Intersection%20of%20Disability,%20Gender,%20and%20Race&rft.jtitle=Gender%20&%20society&rft.au=MAROTO,%20MICHELLE&rft.date=2019-02-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=64&rft.epage=93&rft.pages=64-93&rft.issn=0891-2432&rft.eissn=1552-3977&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0891243218794648&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26597133%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2161333709&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26597133&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0891243218794648&rfr_iscdi=true |