Methodology for selection of the most damaging ground motions for nuclear power plant structures
A methodology for selecting the most unfavorable ground motions (MUGMs) for practical dynamic analyses of nuclear power plant (NPP) systems is proposed. A series of correlation analyses are carried out to select relevant intensity measures (IMs) that best characterize structural demand parameters an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984) 2019-01, Vol.116, p.345-357 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 357 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 345 |
container_title | Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984) |
container_volume | 116 |
creator | Li, Cuihua Zhai, Changhai Kunnath, Sashi Ji, Duofa |
description | A methodology for selecting the most unfavorable ground motions (MUGMs) for practical dynamic analyses of nuclear power plant (NPP) systems is proposed. A series of correlation analyses are carried out to select relevant intensity measures (IMs) that best characterize structural demand parameters and consequently the damage potential of ground motions on NPP structures. Predictive demand models are developed as a function of the selected IMs using a large suite of as-recorded ground motions. A damage index is defined and the MUGMs were identified according to the estimated damage values. The reliability of the methodology is verified by comparing the identified MUGMs with the “actual MUGMs” that resulted in the peak damage values among all dynamic simulations. As an alternative to traditional spectrum-based record selection methods, the proposed methodology will ensure a very low risk of failure of NPP structures under the design level earthquake and can be utilized in seismic margin assessment.
•A method to assess the seismic risk of NPPs is proposed using predictive models.•Ground motion IMs that best characterize seismic demand in the NPPs are identified.•A damage index is developed to define the damage of ground motions on NPPs.•The method identifies ground motions that can minimize the seismic risk of NPPs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.039 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2161284939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0267726117302701</els_id><sourcerecordid>2161284939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-64238ccaab71c822cd88f08d9fd70f70e0c8325f15054c2df07911a55cfdacf63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QQi4nvEm80iyEim-oOJGwV2MeUxnmE5qklH675227t3cC5dzzuV8CF0SyAmQ-rrLo297sx1yCoTnIHIoxBGaEc5EVpTk_RjNgNYsY7Qmp-gsxg6AMMLrGfp4tmnlje99s8XOBxxtb3Vq_YC9w2ll8drHhI1aq6YdGtwEPw5mOu4kce8YRt1bFfDG_9hp9mpIOKYw6jQGG8_RiVN9tBd_e47e7u9eF4_Z8uXhaXG7zFRRQ8rqkhZca6U-GdGcUm04d8CNcIaBY2BB84JWjlRQlZoaB0wQoqpKO6O0q4s5ujrkboL_Gm1MsvNjGKaXkpKaUF6KQkyq6qDSwccYrJOb0K5V2EoCcgdTdvIPptzBlCAk7H03B5-dKny3NsioWztoa9ow4ZLGt_8k_AKpMIKy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2161284939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methodology for selection of the most damaging ground motions for nuclear power plant structures</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Li, Cuihua ; Zhai, Changhai ; Kunnath, Sashi ; Ji, Duofa</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Cuihua ; Zhai, Changhai ; Kunnath, Sashi ; Ji, Duofa</creatorcontrib><description>A methodology for selecting the most unfavorable ground motions (MUGMs) for practical dynamic analyses of nuclear power plant (NPP) systems is proposed. A series of correlation analyses are carried out to select relevant intensity measures (IMs) that best characterize structural demand parameters and consequently the damage potential of ground motions on NPP structures. Predictive demand models are developed as a function of the selected IMs using a large suite of as-recorded ground motions. A damage index is defined and the MUGMs were identified according to the estimated damage values. The reliability of the methodology is verified by comparing the identified MUGMs with the “actual MUGMs” that resulted in the peak damage values among all dynamic simulations. As an alternative to traditional spectrum-based record selection methods, the proposed methodology will ensure a very low risk of failure of NPP structures under the design level earthquake and can be utilized in seismic margin assessment.
•A method to assess the seismic risk of NPPs is proposed using predictive models.•Ground motion IMs that best characterize seismic demand in the NPPs are identified.•A damage index is developed to define the damage of ground motions on NPPs.•The method identifies ground motions that can minimize the seismic risk of NPPs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0267-7261</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-341X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.039</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Barking: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Computer simulation ; Correlation analysis ; Earthquake damage ; Earthquakes ; Ground motion damage potential ; Intensity measures (IMs) ; Methodology ; Nuclear energy ; Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) ; Nuclear power plants ; Overall damage ; Plant structures ; Seismic activity ; Seismic design ; Seismic engineering ; Structural damage ; The most unfavorable ground motions (MUGMs)</subject><ispartof>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984), 2019-01, Vol.116, p.345-357</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jan 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-64238ccaab71c822cd88f08d9fd70f70e0c8325f15054c2df07911a55cfdacf63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-64238ccaab71c822cd88f08d9fd70f70e0c8325f15054c2df07911a55cfdacf63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.039$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27925,27926,45996</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Cuihua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhai, Changhai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunnath, Sashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Duofa</creatorcontrib><title>Methodology for selection of the most damaging ground motions for nuclear power plant structures</title><title>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</title><description>A methodology for selecting the most unfavorable ground motions (MUGMs) for practical dynamic analyses of nuclear power plant (NPP) systems is proposed. A series of correlation analyses are carried out to select relevant intensity measures (IMs) that best characterize structural demand parameters and consequently the damage potential of ground motions on NPP structures. Predictive demand models are developed as a function of the selected IMs using a large suite of as-recorded ground motions. A damage index is defined and the MUGMs were identified according to the estimated damage values. The reliability of the methodology is verified by comparing the identified MUGMs with the “actual MUGMs” that resulted in the peak damage values among all dynamic simulations. As an alternative to traditional spectrum-based record selection methods, the proposed methodology will ensure a very low risk of failure of NPP structures under the design level earthquake and can be utilized in seismic margin assessment.
•A method to assess the seismic risk of NPPs is proposed using predictive models.•Ground motion IMs that best characterize seismic demand in the NPPs are identified.•A damage index is developed to define the damage of ground motions on NPPs.•The method identifies ground motions that can minimize the seismic risk of NPPs.</description><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Ground motion damage potential</subject><subject>Intensity measures (IMs)</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Nuclear energy</subject><subject>Nuclear Power Plant (NPP)</subject><subject>Nuclear power plants</subject><subject>Overall damage</subject><subject>Plant structures</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic design</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Structural damage</subject><subject>The most unfavorable ground motions (MUGMs)</subject><issn>0267-7261</issn><issn>1879-341X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QQi4nvEm80iyEim-oOJGwV2MeUxnmE5qklH675227t3cC5dzzuV8CF0SyAmQ-rrLo297sx1yCoTnIHIoxBGaEc5EVpTk_RjNgNYsY7Qmp-gsxg6AMMLrGfp4tmnlje99s8XOBxxtb3Vq_YC9w2ll8drHhI1aq6YdGtwEPw5mOu4kce8YRt1bFfDG_9hp9mpIOKYw6jQGG8_RiVN9tBd_e47e7u9eF4_Z8uXhaXG7zFRRQ8rqkhZca6U-GdGcUm04d8CNcIaBY2BB84JWjlRQlZoaB0wQoqpKO6O0q4s5ujrkboL_Gm1MsvNjGKaXkpKaUF6KQkyq6qDSwccYrJOb0K5V2EoCcgdTdvIPptzBlCAk7H03B5-dKny3NsioWztoa9ow4ZLGt_8k_AKpMIKy</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Li, Cuihua</creator><creator>Zhai, Changhai</creator><creator>Kunnath, Sashi</creator><creator>Ji, Duofa</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Methodology for selection of the most damaging ground motions for nuclear power plant structures</title><author>Li, Cuihua ; Zhai, Changhai ; Kunnath, Sashi ; Ji, Duofa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-64238ccaab71c822cd88f08d9fd70f70e0c8325f15054c2df07911a55cfdacf63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Ground motion damage potential</topic><topic>Intensity measures (IMs)</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Nuclear energy</topic><topic>Nuclear Power Plant (NPP)</topic><topic>Nuclear power plants</topic><topic>Overall damage</topic><topic>Plant structures</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic design</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Structural damage</topic><topic>The most unfavorable ground motions (MUGMs)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Cuihua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhai, Changhai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunnath, Sashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Duofa</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Cuihua</au><au>Zhai, Changhai</au><au>Kunnath, Sashi</au><au>Ji, Duofa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methodology for selection of the most damaging ground motions for nuclear power plant structures</atitle><jtitle>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</jtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>116</volume><spage>345</spage><epage>357</epage><pages>345-357</pages><issn>0267-7261</issn><eissn>1879-341X</eissn><abstract>A methodology for selecting the most unfavorable ground motions (MUGMs) for practical dynamic analyses of nuclear power plant (NPP) systems is proposed. A series of correlation analyses are carried out to select relevant intensity measures (IMs) that best characterize structural demand parameters and consequently the damage potential of ground motions on NPP structures. Predictive demand models are developed as a function of the selected IMs using a large suite of as-recorded ground motions. A damage index is defined and the MUGMs were identified according to the estimated damage values. The reliability of the methodology is verified by comparing the identified MUGMs with the “actual MUGMs” that resulted in the peak damage values among all dynamic simulations. As an alternative to traditional spectrum-based record selection methods, the proposed methodology will ensure a very low risk of failure of NPP structures under the design level earthquake and can be utilized in seismic margin assessment.
•A method to assess the seismic risk of NPPs is proposed using predictive models.•Ground motion IMs that best characterize seismic demand in the NPPs are identified.•A damage index is developed to define the damage of ground motions on NPPs.•The method identifies ground motions that can minimize the seismic risk of NPPs.</abstract><cop>Barking</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.039</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0267-7261 |
ispartof | Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984), 2019-01, Vol.116, p.345-357 |
issn | 0267-7261 1879-341X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2161284939 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Computer simulation Correlation analysis Earthquake damage Earthquakes Ground motion damage potential Intensity measures (IMs) Methodology Nuclear energy Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) Nuclear power plants Overall damage Plant structures Seismic activity Seismic design Seismic engineering Structural damage The most unfavorable ground motions (MUGMs) |
title | Methodology for selection of the most damaging ground motions for nuclear power plant structures |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T14%3A06%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methodology%20for%20selection%20of%20the%20most%20damaging%20ground%20motions%20for%20nuclear%20power%20plant%20structures&rft.jtitle=Soil%20dynamics%20and%20earthquake%20engineering%20(1984)&rft.au=Li,%20Cuihua&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=116&rft.spage=345&rft.epage=357&rft.pages=345-357&rft.issn=0267-7261&rft.eissn=1879-341X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.039&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2161284939%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2161284939&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0267726117302701&rfr_iscdi=true |