Methodology for selection of the most damaging ground motions for nuclear power plant structures

A methodology for selecting the most unfavorable ground motions (MUGMs) for practical dynamic analyses of nuclear power plant (NPP) systems is proposed. A series of correlation analyses are carried out to select relevant intensity measures (IMs) that best characterize structural demand parameters an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984) 2019-01, Vol.116, p.345-357
Hauptverfasser: Li, Cuihua, Zhai, Changhai, Kunnath, Sashi, Ji, Duofa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 357
container_issue
container_start_page 345
container_title Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)
container_volume 116
creator Li, Cuihua
Zhai, Changhai
Kunnath, Sashi
Ji, Duofa
description A methodology for selecting the most unfavorable ground motions (MUGMs) for practical dynamic analyses of nuclear power plant (NPP) systems is proposed. A series of correlation analyses are carried out to select relevant intensity measures (IMs) that best characterize structural demand parameters and consequently the damage potential of ground motions on NPP structures. Predictive demand models are developed as a function of the selected IMs using a large suite of as-recorded ground motions. A damage index is defined and the MUGMs were identified according to the estimated damage values. The reliability of the methodology is verified by comparing the identified MUGMs with the “actual MUGMs” that resulted in the peak damage values among all dynamic simulations. As an alternative to traditional spectrum-based record selection methods, the proposed methodology will ensure a very low risk of failure of NPP structures under the design level earthquake and can be utilized in seismic margin assessment. •A method to assess the seismic risk of NPPs is proposed using predictive models.•Ground motion IMs that best characterize seismic demand in the NPPs are identified.•A damage index is developed to define the damage of ground motions on NPPs.•The method identifies ground motions that can minimize the seismic risk of NPPs.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.039
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2161284939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0267726117302701</els_id><sourcerecordid>2161284939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-64238ccaab71c822cd88f08d9fd70f70e0c8325f15054c2df07911a55cfdacf63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QQi4nvEm80iyEim-oOJGwV2MeUxnmE5qklH675227t3cC5dzzuV8CF0SyAmQ-rrLo297sx1yCoTnIHIoxBGaEc5EVpTk_RjNgNYsY7Qmp-gsxg6AMMLrGfp4tmnlje99s8XOBxxtb3Vq_YC9w2ll8drHhI1aq6YdGtwEPw5mOu4kce8YRt1bFfDG_9hp9mpIOKYw6jQGG8_RiVN9tBd_e47e7u9eF4_Z8uXhaXG7zFRRQ8rqkhZca6U-GdGcUm04d8CNcIaBY2BB84JWjlRQlZoaB0wQoqpKO6O0q4s5ujrkboL_Gm1MsvNjGKaXkpKaUF6KQkyq6qDSwccYrJOb0K5V2EoCcgdTdvIPptzBlCAk7H03B5-dKny3NsioWztoa9ow4ZLGt_8k_AKpMIKy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2161284939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methodology for selection of the most damaging ground motions for nuclear power plant structures</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Li, Cuihua ; Zhai, Changhai ; Kunnath, Sashi ; Ji, Duofa</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Cuihua ; Zhai, Changhai ; Kunnath, Sashi ; Ji, Duofa</creatorcontrib><description>A methodology for selecting the most unfavorable ground motions (MUGMs) for practical dynamic analyses of nuclear power plant (NPP) systems is proposed. A series of correlation analyses are carried out to select relevant intensity measures (IMs) that best characterize structural demand parameters and consequently the damage potential of ground motions on NPP structures. Predictive demand models are developed as a function of the selected IMs using a large suite of as-recorded ground motions. A damage index is defined and the MUGMs were identified according to the estimated damage values. The reliability of the methodology is verified by comparing the identified MUGMs with the “actual MUGMs” that resulted in the peak damage values among all dynamic simulations. As an alternative to traditional spectrum-based record selection methods, the proposed methodology will ensure a very low risk of failure of NPP structures under the design level earthquake and can be utilized in seismic margin assessment. •A method to assess the seismic risk of NPPs is proposed using predictive models.•Ground motion IMs that best characterize seismic demand in the NPPs are identified.•A damage index is developed to define the damage of ground motions on NPPs.•The method identifies ground motions that can minimize the seismic risk of NPPs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0267-7261</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-341X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.039</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Barking: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Computer simulation ; Correlation analysis ; Earthquake damage ; Earthquakes ; Ground motion damage potential ; Intensity measures (IMs) ; Methodology ; Nuclear energy ; Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) ; Nuclear power plants ; Overall damage ; Plant structures ; Seismic activity ; Seismic design ; Seismic engineering ; Structural damage ; The most unfavorable ground motions (MUGMs)</subject><ispartof>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984), 2019-01, Vol.116, p.345-357</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jan 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-64238ccaab71c822cd88f08d9fd70f70e0c8325f15054c2df07911a55cfdacf63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-64238ccaab71c822cd88f08d9fd70f70e0c8325f15054c2df07911a55cfdacf63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.039$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27925,27926,45996</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Cuihua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhai, Changhai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunnath, Sashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Duofa</creatorcontrib><title>Methodology for selection of the most damaging ground motions for nuclear power plant structures</title><title>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</title><description>A methodology for selecting the most unfavorable ground motions (MUGMs) for practical dynamic analyses of nuclear power plant (NPP) systems is proposed. A series of correlation analyses are carried out to select relevant intensity measures (IMs) that best characterize structural demand parameters and consequently the damage potential of ground motions on NPP structures. Predictive demand models are developed as a function of the selected IMs using a large suite of as-recorded ground motions. A damage index is defined and the MUGMs were identified according to the estimated damage values. The reliability of the methodology is verified by comparing the identified MUGMs with the “actual MUGMs” that resulted in the peak damage values among all dynamic simulations. As an alternative to traditional spectrum-based record selection methods, the proposed methodology will ensure a very low risk of failure of NPP structures under the design level earthquake and can be utilized in seismic margin assessment. •A method to assess the seismic risk of NPPs is proposed using predictive models.•Ground motion IMs that best characterize seismic demand in the NPPs are identified.•A damage index is developed to define the damage of ground motions on NPPs.•The method identifies ground motions that can minimize the seismic risk of NPPs.</description><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Ground motion damage potential</subject><subject>Intensity measures (IMs)</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Nuclear energy</subject><subject>Nuclear Power Plant (NPP)</subject><subject>Nuclear power plants</subject><subject>Overall damage</subject><subject>Plant structures</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic design</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Structural damage</subject><subject>The most unfavorable ground motions (MUGMs)</subject><issn>0267-7261</issn><issn>1879-341X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QQi4nvEm80iyEim-oOJGwV2MeUxnmE5qklH675227t3cC5dzzuV8CF0SyAmQ-rrLo297sx1yCoTnIHIoxBGaEc5EVpTk_RjNgNYsY7Qmp-gsxg6AMMLrGfp4tmnlje99s8XOBxxtb3Vq_YC9w2ll8drHhI1aq6YdGtwEPw5mOu4kce8YRt1bFfDG_9hp9mpIOKYw6jQGG8_RiVN9tBd_e47e7u9eF4_Z8uXhaXG7zFRRQ8rqkhZca6U-GdGcUm04d8CNcIaBY2BB84JWjlRQlZoaB0wQoqpKO6O0q4s5ujrkboL_Gm1MsvNjGKaXkpKaUF6KQkyq6qDSwccYrJOb0K5V2EoCcgdTdvIPptzBlCAk7H03B5-dKny3NsioWztoa9ow4ZLGt_8k_AKpMIKy</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Li, Cuihua</creator><creator>Zhai, Changhai</creator><creator>Kunnath, Sashi</creator><creator>Ji, Duofa</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Methodology for selection of the most damaging ground motions for nuclear power plant structures</title><author>Li, Cuihua ; Zhai, Changhai ; Kunnath, Sashi ; Ji, Duofa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-64238ccaab71c822cd88f08d9fd70f70e0c8325f15054c2df07911a55cfdacf63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Ground motion damage potential</topic><topic>Intensity measures (IMs)</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Nuclear energy</topic><topic>Nuclear Power Plant (NPP)</topic><topic>Nuclear power plants</topic><topic>Overall damage</topic><topic>Plant structures</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic design</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Structural damage</topic><topic>The most unfavorable ground motions (MUGMs)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Cuihua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhai, Changhai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunnath, Sashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Duofa</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Cuihua</au><au>Zhai, Changhai</au><au>Kunnath, Sashi</au><au>Ji, Duofa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methodology for selection of the most damaging ground motions for nuclear power plant structures</atitle><jtitle>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</jtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>116</volume><spage>345</spage><epage>357</epage><pages>345-357</pages><issn>0267-7261</issn><eissn>1879-341X</eissn><abstract>A methodology for selecting the most unfavorable ground motions (MUGMs) for practical dynamic analyses of nuclear power plant (NPP) systems is proposed. A series of correlation analyses are carried out to select relevant intensity measures (IMs) that best characterize structural demand parameters and consequently the damage potential of ground motions on NPP structures. Predictive demand models are developed as a function of the selected IMs using a large suite of as-recorded ground motions. A damage index is defined and the MUGMs were identified according to the estimated damage values. The reliability of the methodology is verified by comparing the identified MUGMs with the “actual MUGMs” that resulted in the peak damage values among all dynamic simulations. As an alternative to traditional spectrum-based record selection methods, the proposed methodology will ensure a very low risk of failure of NPP structures under the design level earthquake and can be utilized in seismic margin assessment. •A method to assess the seismic risk of NPPs is proposed using predictive models.•Ground motion IMs that best characterize seismic demand in the NPPs are identified.•A damage index is developed to define the damage of ground motions on NPPs.•The method identifies ground motions that can minimize the seismic risk of NPPs.</abstract><cop>Barking</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.039</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0267-7261
ispartof Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984), 2019-01, Vol.116, p.345-357
issn 0267-7261
1879-341X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2161284939
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Computer simulation
Correlation analysis
Earthquake damage
Earthquakes
Ground motion damage potential
Intensity measures (IMs)
Methodology
Nuclear energy
Nuclear Power Plant (NPP)
Nuclear power plants
Overall damage
Plant structures
Seismic activity
Seismic design
Seismic engineering
Structural damage
The most unfavorable ground motions (MUGMs)
title Methodology for selection of the most damaging ground motions for nuclear power plant structures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T14%3A06%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methodology%20for%20selection%20of%20the%20most%20damaging%20ground%20motions%20for%20nuclear%20power%20plant%20structures&rft.jtitle=Soil%20dynamics%20and%20earthquake%20engineering%20(1984)&rft.au=Li,%20Cuihua&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=116&rft.spage=345&rft.epage=357&rft.pages=345-357&rft.issn=0267-7261&rft.eissn=1879-341X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.039&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2161284939%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2161284939&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0267726117302701&rfr_iscdi=true