Effects of Close-to-Nature Conversion on Pinus massoniana Plantations at Different Stand Developmental Stages

Close-to-nature (CTN) forestry integrates multiple forest functions and emphasizes forest ecosystem conservation. Within this framework, forests are typically maintained as uneven-aged mixed stands with multiple vertical layers and are managed following the defined stand developmental stages, that i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tropical conservation science 2018-01, Vol.11 (1)
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Xiaoming, Lu, Yuanchang, Xing, Haitao, Zeng, Ji, Xie, Yangsheng, Cai, Daoxiong, Liu, Xianzhao, Zhang, Xianqiang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Tropical conservation science
container_volume 11
creator Wang, Xiaoming
Lu, Yuanchang
Xing, Haitao
Zeng, Ji
Xie, Yangsheng
Cai, Daoxiong
Liu, Xianzhao
Zhang, Xianqiang
description Close-to-nature (CTN) forestry integrates multiple forest functions and emphasizes forest ecosystem conservation. Within this framework, forests are typically maintained as uneven-aged mixed stands with multiple vertical layers and are managed following the defined stand developmental stages, that is, the various phases of forest succession. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of CTN management on the stand structure and growth of Pinus massoniana using data from 28 plots managed with the CTN approach and 58 plots of traditional monocultures in southern China. A comparison was performed between three vertical layers across five developmental stages of the CTN stands and the monoculture stands. The results showed that the tree species diversity improved in the CTN stands, with a decrease in the importance value of P. massoniana. The conversion did not change the diameter growth averaged over all species, but it did promote the radial growth of P. massoniana in the canopy layer. The stand growth, in terms of the basal area and the volume of the canopy trees, declined in the CTN stands during the final two stages, as harvesting took place, and the volume growth of P. massoniana also decreased in the CTN stands. However, the conversion seemed to improve the stand productivity of the subcanopy and regeneration layers, where higher relative dominance values of all species were observed, especially during the later stages. Overall, the CTN conversion tended to benefit the stand structure and improve the single tree growth of P. massoniana rather than the total stand growth.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1940082918767953
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2160994950</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1940082918767953</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2160994950</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b397t-d2411cb1eb7caed98333607f19e06be40ef2b2c71585cfdf78231837823ec45f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LxDAQDaLgunr3GPDcNWnapjlKd_2ARRfUc0nbiXRpk5qkC_57UyooHhQG3vDmzXvMIHRJyYpSzq-pSAjJY0FznnGRsiO0mKho4o5_9KfozLk9IVksMr5A_UYpqL3DRuGiMw4ib6JH6UcLuDD6ANa1RuNQu1aPDvfSOaNbqSXedVJ76cPYYenxug1OFrTHz17qBq_hAJ0Z-sDIbuLewJ2jEyU7BxdfuESvt5uX4j7aPt09FDfbqGKC-6iJE0rrikLFawmNyBljGeGKCiBZBQkBFVdxzWmap7VqFM9jRnM2AdRJqtgSXc2-gzXvIzhf7s1odYgsY5oRIRKRkqAis6q2xjkLqhxs20v7UVJSTk8tfz81rETzigvnfJv-oV_N-qo1RsP_AZ913YTv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2160994950</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Close-to-Nature Conversion on Pinus massoniana Plantations at Different Stand Developmental Stages</title><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>BioOne Open Access Titles</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Wang, Xiaoming ; Lu, Yuanchang ; Xing, Haitao ; Zeng, Ji ; Xie, Yangsheng ; Cai, Daoxiong ; Liu, Xianzhao ; Zhang, Xianqiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaoming ; Lu, Yuanchang ; Xing, Haitao ; Zeng, Ji ; Xie, Yangsheng ; Cai, Daoxiong ; Liu, Xianzhao ; Zhang, Xianqiang</creatorcontrib><description>Close-to-nature (CTN) forestry integrates multiple forest functions and emphasizes forest ecosystem conservation. Within this framework, forests are typically maintained as uneven-aged mixed stands with multiple vertical layers and are managed following the defined stand developmental stages, that is, the various phases of forest succession. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of CTN management on the stand structure and growth of Pinus massoniana using data from 28 plots managed with the CTN approach and 58 plots of traditional monocultures in southern China. A comparison was performed between three vertical layers across five developmental stages of the CTN stands and the monoculture stands. The results showed that the tree species diversity improved in the CTN stands, with a decrease in the importance value of P. massoniana. The conversion did not change the diameter growth averaged over all species, but it did promote the radial growth of P. massoniana in the canopy layer. The stand growth, in terms of the basal area and the volume of the canopy trees, declined in the CTN stands during the final two stages, as harvesting took place, and the volume growth of P. massoniana also decreased in the CTN stands. However, the conversion seemed to improve the stand productivity of the subcanopy and regeneration layers, where higher relative dominance values of all species were observed, especially during the later stages. Overall, the CTN conversion tended to benefit the stand structure and improve the single tree growth of P. massoniana rather than the total stand growth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1940-0829</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-0829</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1940082918767953</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Canopies ; close-to-nature forestry ; Conversion ; Developmental stages ; Ecological succession ; Environmental changes ; Forest conservation ; Forest ecosystems ; Forest management ; Forestry ; Forests ; Harvesting ; Long-term effects ; mixed forest ; Monoculture ; Pine trees ; Pinus massoniana ; Plant diversity ; plantation ; Plantations ; Regeneration ; silviculture ; Species diversity ; Stand structure ; stand succession ; Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><ispartof>Tropical conservation science, 2018-01, Vol.11 (1)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018 Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b397t-d2411cb1eb7caed98333607f19e06be40ef2b2c71585cfdf78231837823ec45f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b397t-d2411cb1eb7caed98333607f19e06be40ef2b2c71585cfdf78231837823ec45f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1177/1940082918767953$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1940082918767953$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>109,314,780,784,21966,27853,27924,27925,44945,45333,52719</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaoming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Yuanchang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xing, Haitao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Ji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Yangsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Daoxiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xianzhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xianqiang</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Close-to-Nature Conversion on Pinus massoniana Plantations at Different Stand Developmental Stages</title><title>Tropical conservation science</title><description>Close-to-nature (CTN) forestry integrates multiple forest functions and emphasizes forest ecosystem conservation. Within this framework, forests are typically maintained as uneven-aged mixed stands with multiple vertical layers and are managed following the defined stand developmental stages, that is, the various phases of forest succession. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of CTN management on the stand structure and growth of Pinus massoniana using data from 28 plots managed with the CTN approach and 58 plots of traditional monocultures in southern China. A comparison was performed between three vertical layers across five developmental stages of the CTN stands and the monoculture stands. The results showed that the tree species diversity improved in the CTN stands, with a decrease in the importance value of P. massoniana. The conversion did not change the diameter growth averaged over all species, but it did promote the radial growth of P. massoniana in the canopy layer. The stand growth, in terms of the basal area and the volume of the canopy trees, declined in the CTN stands during the final two stages, as harvesting took place, and the volume growth of P. massoniana also decreased in the CTN stands. However, the conversion seemed to improve the stand productivity of the subcanopy and regeneration layers, where higher relative dominance values of all species were observed, especially during the later stages. Overall, the CTN conversion tended to benefit the stand structure and improve the single tree growth of P. massoniana rather than the total stand growth.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>close-to-nature forestry</subject><subject>Conversion</subject><subject>Developmental stages</subject><subject>Ecological succession</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Long-term effects</subject><subject>mixed forest</subject><subject>Monoculture</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Pinus massoniana</subject><subject>Plant diversity</subject><subject>plantation</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Regeneration</subject><subject>silviculture</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Stand structure</subject><subject>stand succession</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><issn>1940-0829</issn><issn>1940-0829</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUE1LxDAQDaLgunr3GPDcNWnapjlKd_2ARRfUc0nbiXRpk5qkC_57UyooHhQG3vDmzXvMIHRJyYpSzq-pSAjJY0FznnGRsiO0mKho4o5_9KfozLk9IVksMr5A_UYpqL3DRuGiMw4ib6JH6UcLuDD6ANa1RuNQu1aPDvfSOaNbqSXedVJ76cPYYenxug1OFrTHz17qBq_hAJ0Z-sDIbuLewJ2jEyU7BxdfuESvt5uX4j7aPt09FDfbqGKC-6iJE0rrikLFawmNyBljGeGKCiBZBQkBFVdxzWmap7VqFM9jRnM2AdRJqtgSXc2-gzXvIzhf7s1odYgsY5oRIRKRkqAis6q2xjkLqhxs20v7UVJSTk8tfz81rETzigvnfJv-oV_N-qo1RsP_AZ913YTv</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Wang, Xiaoming</creator><creator>Lu, Yuanchang</creator><creator>Xing, Haitao</creator><creator>Zeng, Ji</creator><creator>Xie, Yangsheng</creator><creator>Cai, Daoxiong</creator><creator>Liu, Xianzhao</creator><creator>Zhang, Xianqiang</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Effects of Close-to-Nature Conversion on Pinus massoniana Plantations at Different Stand Developmental Stages</title><author>Wang, Xiaoming ; Lu, Yuanchang ; Xing, Haitao ; Zeng, Ji ; Xie, Yangsheng ; Cai, Daoxiong ; Liu, Xianzhao ; Zhang, Xianqiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b397t-d2411cb1eb7caed98333607f19e06be40ef2b2c71585cfdf78231837823ec45f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>close-to-nature forestry</topic><topic>Conversion</topic><topic>Developmental stages</topic><topic>Ecological succession</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Long-term effects</topic><topic>mixed forest</topic><topic>Monoculture</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Pinus massoniana</topic><topic>Plant diversity</topic><topic>plantation</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Regeneration</topic><topic>silviculture</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Stand structure</topic><topic>stand succession</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaoming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Yuanchang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xing, Haitao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Ji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Yangsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Daoxiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xianzhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xianqiang</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Tropical conservation science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Xiaoming</au><au>Lu, Yuanchang</au><au>Xing, Haitao</au><au>Zeng, Ji</au><au>Xie, Yangsheng</au><au>Cai, Daoxiong</au><au>Liu, Xianzhao</au><au>Zhang, Xianqiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Close-to-Nature Conversion on Pinus massoniana Plantations at Different Stand Developmental Stages</atitle><jtitle>Tropical conservation science</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1940-0829</issn><eissn>1940-0829</eissn><abstract>Close-to-nature (CTN) forestry integrates multiple forest functions and emphasizes forest ecosystem conservation. Within this framework, forests are typically maintained as uneven-aged mixed stands with multiple vertical layers and are managed following the defined stand developmental stages, that is, the various phases of forest succession. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of CTN management on the stand structure and growth of Pinus massoniana using data from 28 plots managed with the CTN approach and 58 plots of traditional monocultures in southern China. A comparison was performed between three vertical layers across five developmental stages of the CTN stands and the monoculture stands. The results showed that the tree species diversity improved in the CTN stands, with a decrease in the importance value of P. massoniana. The conversion did not change the diameter growth averaged over all species, but it did promote the radial growth of P. massoniana in the canopy layer. The stand growth, in terms of the basal area and the volume of the canopy trees, declined in the CTN stands during the final two stages, as harvesting took place, and the volume growth of P. massoniana also decreased in the CTN stands. However, the conversion seemed to improve the stand productivity of the subcanopy and regeneration layers, where higher relative dominance values of all species were observed, especially during the later stages. Overall, the CTN conversion tended to benefit the stand structure and improve the single tree growth of P. massoniana rather than the total stand growth.</abstract><cop>Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1940082918767953</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1940-0829
ispartof Tropical conservation science, 2018-01, Vol.11 (1)
issn 1940-0829
1940-0829
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2160994950
source Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; BioOne Open Access Titles; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Biodiversity
Canopies
close-to-nature forestry
Conversion
Developmental stages
Ecological succession
Environmental changes
Forest conservation
Forest ecosystems
Forest management
Forestry
Forests
Harvesting
Long-term effects
mixed forest
Monoculture
Pine trees
Pinus massoniana
Plant diversity
plantation
Plantations
Regeneration
silviculture
Species diversity
Stand structure
stand succession
Terrestrial ecosystems
title Effects of Close-to-Nature Conversion on Pinus massoniana Plantations at Different Stand Developmental Stages
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T10%3A03%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Close-to-Nature%20Conversion%20on%20Pinus%20massoniana%20Plantations%20at%20Different%20Stand%20Developmental%20Stages&rft.jtitle=Tropical%20conservation%20science&rft.au=Wang,%20Xiaoming&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1940-0829&rft.eissn=1940-0829&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1940082918767953&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2160994950%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2160994950&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1940082918767953&rfr_iscdi=true