Effects of Close-to-Nature Conversion on Pinus massoniana Plantations at Different Stand Developmental Stages
Close-to-nature (CTN) forestry integrates multiple forest functions and emphasizes forest ecosystem conservation. Within this framework, forests are typically maintained as uneven-aged mixed stands with multiple vertical layers and are managed following the defined stand developmental stages, that i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tropical conservation science 2018-01, Vol.11 (1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Tropical conservation science |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Wang, Xiaoming Lu, Yuanchang Xing, Haitao Zeng, Ji Xie, Yangsheng Cai, Daoxiong Liu, Xianzhao Zhang, Xianqiang |
description | Close-to-nature (CTN) forestry integrates multiple forest functions and emphasizes forest ecosystem conservation. Within this framework, forests are typically maintained as uneven-aged mixed stands with multiple vertical layers and are managed following the defined stand developmental stages, that is, the various phases of forest succession. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of CTN management on the stand structure and growth of Pinus massoniana using data from 28 plots managed with the CTN approach and 58 plots of traditional monocultures in southern China. A comparison was performed between three vertical layers across five developmental stages of the CTN stands and the monoculture stands. The results showed that the tree species diversity improved in the CTN stands, with a decrease in the importance value of P. massoniana. The conversion did not change the diameter growth averaged over all species, but it did promote the radial growth of P. massoniana in the canopy layer. The stand growth, in terms of the basal area and the volume of the canopy trees, declined in the CTN stands during the final two stages, as harvesting took place, and the volume growth of P. massoniana also decreased in the CTN stands. However, the conversion seemed to improve the stand productivity of the subcanopy and regeneration layers, where higher relative dominance values of all species were observed, especially during the later stages. Overall, the CTN conversion tended to benefit the stand structure and improve the single tree growth of P. massoniana rather than the total stand growth. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1940082918767953 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2160994950</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1940082918767953</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2160994950</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b397t-d2411cb1eb7caed98333607f19e06be40ef2b2c71585cfdf78231837823ec45f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LxDAQDaLgunr3GPDcNWnapjlKd_2ARRfUc0nbiXRpk5qkC_57UyooHhQG3vDmzXvMIHRJyYpSzq-pSAjJY0FznnGRsiO0mKho4o5_9KfozLk9IVksMr5A_UYpqL3DRuGiMw4ib6JH6UcLuDD6ANa1RuNQu1aPDvfSOaNbqSXedVJ76cPYYenxug1OFrTHz17qBq_hAJ0Z-sDIbuLewJ2jEyU7BxdfuESvt5uX4j7aPt09FDfbqGKC-6iJE0rrikLFawmNyBljGeGKCiBZBQkBFVdxzWmap7VqFM9jRnM2AdRJqtgSXc2-gzXvIzhf7s1odYgsY5oRIRKRkqAis6q2xjkLqhxs20v7UVJSTk8tfz81rETzigvnfJv-oV_N-qo1RsP_AZ913YTv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2160994950</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Close-to-Nature Conversion on Pinus massoniana Plantations at Different Stand Developmental Stages</title><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>BioOne Open Access Titles</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Wang, Xiaoming ; Lu, Yuanchang ; Xing, Haitao ; Zeng, Ji ; Xie, Yangsheng ; Cai, Daoxiong ; Liu, Xianzhao ; Zhang, Xianqiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaoming ; Lu, Yuanchang ; Xing, Haitao ; Zeng, Ji ; Xie, Yangsheng ; Cai, Daoxiong ; Liu, Xianzhao ; Zhang, Xianqiang</creatorcontrib><description>Close-to-nature (CTN) forestry integrates multiple forest functions and emphasizes forest ecosystem conservation. Within this framework, forests are typically maintained as uneven-aged mixed stands with multiple vertical layers and are managed following the defined stand developmental stages, that is, the various phases of forest succession. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of CTN management on the stand structure and growth of Pinus massoniana using data from 28 plots managed with the CTN approach and 58 plots of traditional monocultures in southern China. A comparison was performed between three vertical layers across five developmental stages of the CTN stands and the monoculture stands. The results showed that the tree species diversity improved in the CTN stands, with a decrease in the importance value of P. massoniana. The conversion did not change the diameter growth averaged over all species, but it did promote the radial growth of P. massoniana in the canopy layer. The stand growth, in terms of the basal area and the volume of the canopy trees, declined in the CTN stands during the final two stages, as harvesting took place, and the volume growth of P. massoniana also decreased in the CTN stands. However, the conversion seemed to improve the stand productivity of the subcanopy and regeneration layers, where higher relative dominance values of all species were observed, especially during the later stages. Overall, the CTN conversion tended to benefit the stand structure and improve the single tree growth of P. massoniana rather than the total stand growth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1940-0829</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-0829</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1940082918767953</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Canopies ; close-to-nature forestry ; Conversion ; Developmental stages ; Ecological succession ; Environmental changes ; Forest conservation ; Forest ecosystems ; Forest management ; Forestry ; Forests ; Harvesting ; Long-term effects ; mixed forest ; Monoculture ; Pine trees ; Pinus massoniana ; Plant diversity ; plantation ; Plantations ; Regeneration ; silviculture ; Species diversity ; Stand structure ; stand succession ; Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><ispartof>Tropical conservation science, 2018-01, Vol.11 (1)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018 Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b397t-d2411cb1eb7caed98333607f19e06be40ef2b2c71585cfdf78231837823ec45f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b397t-d2411cb1eb7caed98333607f19e06be40ef2b2c71585cfdf78231837823ec45f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1177/1940082918767953$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1940082918767953$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>109,314,780,784,21966,27853,27924,27925,44945,45333,52719</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaoming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Yuanchang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xing, Haitao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Ji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Yangsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Daoxiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xianzhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xianqiang</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Close-to-Nature Conversion on Pinus massoniana Plantations at Different Stand Developmental Stages</title><title>Tropical conservation science</title><description>Close-to-nature (CTN) forestry integrates multiple forest functions and emphasizes forest ecosystem conservation. Within this framework, forests are typically maintained as uneven-aged mixed stands with multiple vertical layers and are managed following the defined stand developmental stages, that is, the various phases of forest succession. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of CTN management on the stand structure and growth of Pinus massoniana using data from 28 plots managed with the CTN approach and 58 plots of traditional monocultures in southern China. A comparison was performed between three vertical layers across five developmental stages of the CTN stands and the monoculture stands. The results showed that the tree species diversity improved in the CTN stands, with a decrease in the importance value of P. massoniana. The conversion did not change the diameter growth averaged over all species, but it did promote the radial growth of P. massoniana in the canopy layer. The stand growth, in terms of the basal area and the volume of the canopy trees, declined in the CTN stands during the final two stages, as harvesting took place, and the volume growth of P. massoniana also decreased in the CTN stands. However, the conversion seemed to improve the stand productivity of the subcanopy and regeneration layers, where higher relative dominance values of all species were observed, especially during the later stages. Overall, the CTN conversion tended to benefit the stand structure and improve the single tree growth of P. massoniana rather than the total stand growth.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>close-to-nature forestry</subject><subject>Conversion</subject><subject>Developmental stages</subject><subject>Ecological succession</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Long-term effects</subject><subject>mixed forest</subject><subject>Monoculture</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Pinus massoniana</subject><subject>Plant diversity</subject><subject>plantation</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Regeneration</subject><subject>silviculture</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Stand structure</subject><subject>stand succession</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><issn>1940-0829</issn><issn>1940-0829</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUE1LxDAQDaLgunr3GPDcNWnapjlKd_2ARRfUc0nbiXRpk5qkC_57UyooHhQG3vDmzXvMIHRJyYpSzq-pSAjJY0FznnGRsiO0mKho4o5_9KfozLk9IVksMr5A_UYpqL3DRuGiMw4ib6JH6UcLuDD6ANa1RuNQu1aPDvfSOaNbqSXedVJ76cPYYenxug1OFrTHz17qBq_hAJ0Z-sDIbuLewJ2jEyU7BxdfuESvt5uX4j7aPt09FDfbqGKC-6iJE0rrikLFawmNyBljGeGKCiBZBQkBFVdxzWmap7VqFM9jRnM2AdRJqtgSXc2-gzXvIzhf7s1odYgsY5oRIRKRkqAis6q2xjkLqhxs20v7UVJSTk8tfz81rETzigvnfJv-oV_N-qo1RsP_AZ913YTv</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Wang, Xiaoming</creator><creator>Lu, Yuanchang</creator><creator>Xing, Haitao</creator><creator>Zeng, Ji</creator><creator>Xie, Yangsheng</creator><creator>Cai, Daoxiong</creator><creator>Liu, Xianzhao</creator><creator>Zhang, Xianqiang</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Effects of Close-to-Nature Conversion on Pinus massoniana Plantations at Different Stand Developmental Stages</title><author>Wang, Xiaoming ; Lu, Yuanchang ; Xing, Haitao ; Zeng, Ji ; Xie, Yangsheng ; Cai, Daoxiong ; Liu, Xianzhao ; Zhang, Xianqiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b397t-d2411cb1eb7caed98333607f19e06be40ef2b2c71585cfdf78231837823ec45f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>close-to-nature forestry</topic><topic>Conversion</topic><topic>Developmental stages</topic><topic>Ecological succession</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Long-term effects</topic><topic>mixed forest</topic><topic>Monoculture</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Pinus massoniana</topic><topic>Plant diversity</topic><topic>plantation</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Regeneration</topic><topic>silviculture</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Stand structure</topic><topic>stand succession</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaoming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Yuanchang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xing, Haitao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Ji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Yangsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Daoxiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xianzhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xianqiang</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Tropical conservation science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Xiaoming</au><au>Lu, Yuanchang</au><au>Xing, Haitao</au><au>Zeng, Ji</au><au>Xie, Yangsheng</au><au>Cai, Daoxiong</au><au>Liu, Xianzhao</au><au>Zhang, Xianqiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Close-to-Nature Conversion on Pinus massoniana Plantations at Different Stand Developmental Stages</atitle><jtitle>Tropical conservation science</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1940-0829</issn><eissn>1940-0829</eissn><abstract>Close-to-nature (CTN) forestry integrates multiple forest functions and emphasizes forest ecosystem conservation. Within this framework, forests are typically maintained as uneven-aged mixed stands with multiple vertical layers and are managed following the defined stand developmental stages, that is, the various phases of forest succession. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of CTN management on the stand structure and growth of Pinus massoniana using data from 28 plots managed with the CTN approach and 58 plots of traditional monocultures in southern China. A comparison was performed between three vertical layers across five developmental stages of the CTN stands and the monoculture stands. The results showed that the tree species diversity improved in the CTN stands, with a decrease in the importance value of P. massoniana. The conversion did not change the diameter growth averaged over all species, but it did promote the radial growth of P. massoniana in the canopy layer. The stand growth, in terms of the basal area and the volume of the canopy trees, declined in the CTN stands during the final two stages, as harvesting took place, and the volume growth of P. massoniana also decreased in the CTN stands. However, the conversion seemed to improve the stand productivity of the subcanopy and regeneration layers, where higher relative dominance values of all species were observed, especially during the later stages. Overall, the CTN conversion tended to benefit the stand structure and improve the single tree growth of P. massoniana rather than the total stand growth.</abstract><cop>Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1940082918767953</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1940-0829 |
ispartof | Tropical conservation science, 2018-01, Vol.11 (1) |
issn | 1940-0829 1940-0829 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2160994950 |
source | Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; BioOne Open Access Titles; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Biodiversity Canopies close-to-nature forestry Conversion Developmental stages Ecological succession Environmental changes Forest conservation Forest ecosystems Forest management Forestry Forests Harvesting Long-term effects mixed forest Monoculture Pine trees Pinus massoniana Plant diversity plantation Plantations Regeneration silviculture Species diversity Stand structure stand succession Terrestrial ecosystems |
title | Effects of Close-to-Nature Conversion on Pinus massoniana Plantations at Different Stand Developmental Stages |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T10%3A03%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Close-to-Nature%20Conversion%20on%20Pinus%20massoniana%20Plantations%20at%20Different%20Stand%20Developmental%20Stages&rft.jtitle=Tropical%20conservation%20science&rft.au=Wang,%20Xiaoming&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1940-0829&rft.eissn=1940-0829&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1940082918767953&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2160994950%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2160994950&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1940082918767953&rfr_iscdi=true |