Evaluating Soil Management Using Particulate and Chemically Labile Soil Organic Matter Fractions

Particulate organic matter (POM), an established soil quality indicator, is too costly for routine testing by analytical labs. Chemical oxidation of labile soil organic matter is less costly and may prove to be an equally effective indicator. The objectives of this study were to test the relationshi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Soil Science Society of America journal 2008-01, Vol.72 (1), p.180-185
Hauptverfasser: Mirsky, S.B, Lanyon, L.E, Needelman, B.A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 185
container_issue 1
container_start_page 180
container_title Soil Science Society of America journal
container_volume 72
creator Mirsky, S.B
Lanyon, L.E
Needelman, B.A
description Particulate organic matter (POM), an established soil quality indicator, is too costly for routine testing by analytical labs. Chemical oxidation of labile soil organic matter is less costly and may prove to be an equally effective indicator. The objectives of this study were to test the relationship between POM and chemically labile organic matter (CLOM) and to evaluate the effects of soil management on POM and CLOM. The study was conducted within a long-term crop rotation x fertility treatment study in central Pennsylvania. Crop rotation sequences were continuous corn (Zea mays L.), corn-soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], 4 yr of corn followed by 4 yr of alfalfa hay (Medicago sativa L.), and corn-oat (Avena sativa L.)-winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-2 yr of red clover hay (Trifolium pratense L.). Fertilizer treatments were mineral fertilizer, N-based liquid dairy manure, and P-based liquid dairy manure. A significant linear relationship between POM-C and CLOM-C treatment means was observed (r2 = 0.74). Both POM-C and CLOM-C concentrations were greatest for manure-based fertility treatments and for crop rotations receiving the most frequent applications of manure. Only CLOM-C, however, distinguished between the N-based and P-based manure treatments. Further development of CLOM-C as a soil quality indicator may yield a reliable, cost-effective soil quality management tool.
doi_str_mv 10.2136/sssaj2005.0279
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_216052029</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1857393581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4079-75e4c31625a5ba8e970df8aea9393304f4a21d62dd45fda84a74d4a4b14f35213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRsH5cvRoEj6mzX0n24EFK6wcVhdjzOk02dUua6G6i9L93S4pXLzMw_N57zCPkgsKYUZ7ceO9xzQDkGFiqDsiICi5jSBJ6SEbAExpLpeQxOfF-DUClAhiR9-k31j12tllFeWvr6BkbXJmNabpo4XfXV3SdLfoaOxNhU0aTD7OxBdb1Nprj0tZm0L24FTa2CPquMy6aOSw62zb-jBxVWHtzvt-nZDGbvk0e4vnL_ePkbh4XAlIVp9KIgtOESZRLzIxKoawyNKi44hxEJZDRMmFlKWRVYiYwFaVAsaSi4jL8f0quBt9P1371xnd63fauCZGa0QQkA6YCNB6gwrXeO1PpT2c36Laagt6VqP9K1LsSg-B674o-_Fw5bArr_1QBZJApCNztwP2EQrb_uOr87onl-W6G0z7nctBX2GpcuZCxyBlQDpBJyRLBfwEnk44q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216052029</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating Soil Management Using Particulate and Chemically Labile Soil Organic Matter Fractions</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Mirsky, S.B ; Lanyon, L.E ; Needelman, B.A</creator><creatorcontrib>Mirsky, S.B ; Lanyon, L.E ; Needelman, B.A</creatorcontrib><description>Particulate organic matter (POM), an established soil quality indicator, is too costly for routine testing by analytical labs. Chemical oxidation of labile soil organic matter is less costly and may prove to be an equally effective indicator. The objectives of this study were to test the relationship between POM and chemically labile organic matter (CLOM) and to evaluate the effects of soil management on POM and CLOM. The study was conducted within a long-term crop rotation x fertility treatment study in central Pennsylvania. Crop rotation sequences were continuous corn (Zea mays L.), corn-soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], 4 yr of corn followed by 4 yr of alfalfa hay (Medicago sativa L.), and corn-oat (Avena sativa L.)-winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-2 yr of red clover hay (Trifolium pratense L.). Fertilizer treatments were mineral fertilizer, N-based liquid dairy manure, and P-based liquid dairy manure. A significant linear relationship between POM-C and CLOM-C treatment means was observed (r2 = 0.74). Both POM-C and CLOM-C concentrations were greatest for manure-based fertility treatments and for crop rotations receiving the most frequent applications of manure. Only CLOM-C, however, distinguished between the N-based and P-based manure treatments. Further development of CLOM-C as a soil quality indicator may yield a reliable, cost-effective soil quality management tool.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-5995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0279</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSSJD4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: Soil Science Society</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; agricultural soils ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Alfalfa ; animal manures ; Biological and medical sciences ; chemically labile organic matter ; Corn ; Crop residues ; Crop rotation ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Farm management ; Fertility ; fertilizer application ; fertilizers ; Fractionation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Loam soils ; Methods ; Mineral fertilizers ; nitrogen ; oxidation ; Particulate organic matter ; phosphorus ; potassium permanganate ; Red clover ; Reproductive technologies ; Research methodology ; soil fertility ; Soil management ; Soil organic matter ; Soil quality ; soil quality indicators ; Soil science ; Soils ; Soybeans ; Surficial geology ; Testing laboratories ; Tillage ; Vegetables ; Winter wheat</subject><ispartof>Soil Science Society of America journal, 2008-01, Vol.72 (1), p.180-185</ispartof><rights>Soil Science Society of America</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jan/Feb 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4079-75e4c31625a5ba8e970df8aea9393304f4a21d62dd45fda84a74d4a4b14f35213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4079-75e4c31625a5ba8e970df8aea9393304f4a21d62dd45fda84a74d4a4b14f35213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2136%2Fsssaj2005.0279$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2136%2Fsssaj2005.0279$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20020890$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mirsky, S.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanyon, L.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Needelman, B.A</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating Soil Management Using Particulate and Chemically Labile Soil Organic Matter Fractions</title><title>Soil Science Society of America journal</title><description>Particulate organic matter (POM), an established soil quality indicator, is too costly for routine testing by analytical labs. Chemical oxidation of labile soil organic matter is less costly and may prove to be an equally effective indicator. The objectives of this study were to test the relationship between POM and chemically labile organic matter (CLOM) and to evaluate the effects of soil management on POM and CLOM. The study was conducted within a long-term crop rotation x fertility treatment study in central Pennsylvania. Crop rotation sequences were continuous corn (Zea mays L.), corn-soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], 4 yr of corn followed by 4 yr of alfalfa hay (Medicago sativa L.), and corn-oat (Avena sativa L.)-winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-2 yr of red clover hay (Trifolium pratense L.). Fertilizer treatments were mineral fertilizer, N-based liquid dairy manure, and P-based liquid dairy manure. A significant linear relationship between POM-C and CLOM-C treatment means was observed (r2 = 0.74). Both POM-C and CLOM-C concentrations were greatest for manure-based fertility treatments and for crop rotations receiving the most frequent applications of manure. Only CLOM-C, however, distinguished between the N-based and P-based manure treatments. Further development of CLOM-C as a soil quality indicator may yield a reliable, cost-effective soil quality management tool.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>agricultural soils</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Alfalfa</subject><subject>animal manures</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>chemically labile organic matter</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Crop residues</subject><subject>Crop rotation</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Farm management</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>fertilizer application</subject><subject>fertilizers</subject><subject>Fractionation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Loam soils</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Mineral fertilizers</subject><subject>nitrogen</subject><subject>oxidation</subject><subject>Particulate organic matter</subject><subject>phosphorus</subject><subject>potassium permanganate</subject><subject>Red clover</subject><subject>Reproductive technologies</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>soil fertility</subject><subject>Soil management</subject><subject>Soil organic matter</subject><subject>Soil quality</subject><subject>soil quality indicators</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Surficial geology</subject><subject>Testing laboratories</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><subject>Winter wheat</subject><issn>0361-5995</issn><issn>1435-0661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRsH5cvRoEj6mzX0n24EFK6wcVhdjzOk02dUua6G6i9L93S4pXLzMw_N57zCPkgsKYUZ7ceO9xzQDkGFiqDsiICi5jSBJ6SEbAExpLpeQxOfF-DUClAhiR9-k31j12tllFeWvr6BkbXJmNabpo4XfXV3SdLfoaOxNhU0aTD7OxBdb1Nprj0tZm0L24FTa2CPquMy6aOSw62zb-jBxVWHtzvt-nZDGbvk0e4vnL_ePkbh4XAlIVp9KIgtOESZRLzIxKoawyNKi44hxEJZDRMmFlKWRVYiYwFaVAsaSi4jL8f0quBt9P1371xnd63fauCZGa0QQkA6YCNB6gwrXeO1PpT2c36Laagt6VqP9K1LsSg-B674o-_Fw5bArr_1QBZJApCNztwP2EQrb_uOr87onl-W6G0z7nctBX2GpcuZCxyBlQDpBJyRLBfwEnk44q</recordid><startdate>200801</startdate><enddate>200801</enddate><creator>Mirsky, S.B</creator><creator>Lanyon, L.E</creator><creator>Needelman, B.A</creator><general>Soil Science Society</general><general>Soil Science Society of America</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200801</creationdate><title>Evaluating Soil Management Using Particulate and Chemically Labile Soil Organic Matter Fractions</title><author>Mirsky, S.B ; Lanyon, L.E ; Needelman, B.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4079-75e4c31625a5ba8e970df8aea9393304f4a21d62dd45fda84a74d4a4b14f35213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>agricultural soils</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Alfalfa</topic><topic>animal manures</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>chemically labile organic matter</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Crop residues</topic><topic>Crop rotation</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Farm management</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>fertilizer application</topic><topic>fertilizers</topic><topic>Fractionation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Loam soils</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Mineral fertilizers</topic><topic>nitrogen</topic><topic>oxidation</topic><topic>Particulate organic matter</topic><topic>phosphorus</topic><topic>potassium permanganate</topic><topic>Red clover</topic><topic>Reproductive technologies</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>soil fertility</topic><topic>Soil management</topic><topic>Soil organic matter</topic><topic>Soil quality</topic><topic>soil quality indicators</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Surficial geology</topic><topic>Testing laboratories</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><topic>Winter wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mirsky, S.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanyon, L.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Needelman, B.A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Soil Science Society of America journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mirsky, S.B</au><au>Lanyon, L.E</au><au>Needelman, B.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating Soil Management Using Particulate and Chemically Labile Soil Organic Matter Fractions</atitle><jtitle>Soil Science Society of America journal</jtitle><date>2008-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>180</spage><epage>185</epage><pages>180-185</pages><issn>0361-5995</issn><eissn>1435-0661</eissn><coden>SSSJD4</coden><abstract>Particulate organic matter (POM), an established soil quality indicator, is too costly for routine testing by analytical labs. Chemical oxidation of labile soil organic matter is less costly and may prove to be an equally effective indicator. The objectives of this study were to test the relationship between POM and chemically labile organic matter (CLOM) and to evaluate the effects of soil management on POM and CLOM. The study was conducted within a long-term crop rotation x fertility treatment study in central Pennsylvania. Crop rotation sequences were continuous corn (Zea mays L.), corn-soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], 4 yr of corn followed by 4 yr of alfalfa hay (Medicago sativa L.), and corn-oat (Avena sativa L.)-winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-2 yr of red clover hay (Trifolium pratense L.). Fertilizer treatments were mineral fertilizer, N-based liquid dairy manure, and P-based liquid dairy manure. A significant linear relationship between POM-C and CLOM-C treatment means was observed (r2 = 0.74). Both POM-C and CLOM-C concentrations were greatest for manure-based fertility treatments and for crop rotations receiving the most frequent applications of manure. Only CLOM-C, however, distinguished between the N-based and P-based manure treatments. Further development of CLOM-C as a soil quality indicator may yield a reliable, cost-effective soil quality management tool.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>Soil Science Society</pub><doi>10.2136/sssaj2005.0279</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-5995
ispartof Soil Science Society of America journal, 2008-01, Vol.72 (1), p.180-185
issn 0361-5995
1435-0661
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_216052029
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects Agricultural practices
agricultural soils
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Alfalfa
animal manures
Biological and medical sciences
chemically labile organic matter
Corn
Crop residues
Crop rotation
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
Farm management
Fertility
fertilizer application
fertilizers
Fractionation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Loam soils
Methods
Mineral fertilizers
nitrogen
oxidation
Particulate organic matter
phosphorus
potassium permanganate
Red clover
Reproductive technologies
Research methodology
soil fertility
Soil management
Soil organic matter
Soil quality
soil quality indicators
Soil science
Soils
Soybeans
Surficial geology
Testing laboratories
Tillage
Vegetables
Winter wheat
title Evaluating Soil Management Using Particulate and Chemically Labile Soil Organic Matter Fractions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T16%3A25%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20Soil%20Management%20Using%20Particulate%20and%20Chemically%20Labile%20Soil%20Organic%20Matter%20Fractions&rft.jtitle=Soil%20Science%20Society%20of%20America%20journal&rft.au=Mirsky,%20S.B&rft.date=2008-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=180&rft.epage=185&rft.pages=180-185&rft.issn=0361-5995&rft.eissn=1435-0661&rft.coden=SSSJD4&rft_id=info:doi/10.2136/sssaj2005.0279&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1857393581%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216052029&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true