Global urban sustainability assessment: A multidimensional approach
A new strategic direction for greening our cities and making them smart to reduce the environmental impact of their performance, increase employment and economic viability, and to enhance the quality of life requires a thorough assessment of sustainability and smart urban performance. This paper con...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England) West Yorkshire, England), 2018-11, Vol.26 (6), p.904-920 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 920 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 904 |
container_title | Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England) |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Shmelev, Stanislav E. Shmeleva, Irina A. |
description | A new strategic direction for greening our cities and making them smart to reduce the environmental impact of their performance, increase employment and economic viability, and to enhance the quality of life requires a thorough assessment of sustainability and smart urban performance. This paper considers a database of over 90 global cities including London, New York, Hong Kong, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Sao Paolo, Rio de Janeiro, Buenos Aires, Paris, Berlin, Stockholm, Moscow, Beijing, Seoul, Singapore, Shanghai, Sydney and Tokyo exploring linkages between different sustainability and smart city dimensions. To assess urban sustainability performance, this study applied a multi‐criteria approach using a panel of 20 indicators to a set of 57 global cities. The assessment comprised important aspects of energy transitions, focusing on the drivers of CO2 emissions in cities, including the share of coal in the energy mix, public transport and cycling patterns, waste recycling, the water‐energy nexus, as well as the role of smart and creative economy. The results show that San Francisco leads in economic and environmental priorities, and Stockholm leads in social and smart city priorities. Seoul consistently performs very successfully across the whole spectrum of indicators. We devote considerable attention to the strategies, policies and performance of the leading cities, namely, San Francisco, Stockholm and Seoul. This assessment could be a valuable tool for policy‐makers and investors, and could help identify linkages between different sustainability dimensions, as well as investment opportunities in cities with sustainability potential. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/sd.1887 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2160335724</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2160335724</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3467-79d7b90e2adf8d4415554a02754fcba3c213741fd54a0939e65d0b27219301783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbxLwQ8eJDU2a9s1lupWoWCB_W8bLIb3JImNZMg_fdujAcvnoYZnnlneAi5pLCgAOwW3YLmuToiMwpap1RRfUxmoLM8hRzYKTlD3AJAzqiYkdW6bgtbJ0NX2CbBAXsbGluEOvSHxCJ6xJ1v-rtkmeyGug8uxBZD28Qdu993rS0_zslJZWv0F791Tt4fH95WT-nmZf28Wm7SkotMpUo7VWjwzLoqd0JQKaWwwJQUVVlYXjLKlaCVG6eaa59JBwVTjGoOVOV8Tq6m3Hj2c_DYm207dPETNIxmwLlUTETqeqLKrkXsfGX2XdjZ7mAomNGQQWdGQ5FMJtKXbRPwDye0hOiNR-RmQr5C7Q__JZnX-5_Ab1TPb0E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2160335724</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global urban sustainability assessment: A multidimensional approach</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Shmelev, Stanislav E. ; Shmeleva, Irina A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shmelev, Stanislav E. ; Shmeleva, Irina A.</creatorcontrib><description>A new strategic direction for greening our cities and making them smart to reduce the environmental impact of their performance, increase employment and economic viability, and to enhance the quality of life requires a thorough assessment of sustainability and smart urban performance. This paper considers a database of over 90 global cities including London, New York, Hong Kong, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Sao Paolo, Rio de Janeiro, Buenos Aires, Paris, Berlin, Stockholm, Moscow, Beijing, Seoul, Singapore, Shanghai, Sydney and Tokyo exploring linkages between different sustainability and smart city dimensions. To assess urban sustainability performance, this study applied a multi‐criteria approach using a panel of 20 indicators to a set of 57 global cities. The assessment comprised important aspects of energy transitions, focusing on the drivers of CO2 emissions in cities, including the share of coal in the energy mix, public transport and cycling patterns, waste recycling, the water‐energy nexus, as well as the role of smart and creative economy. The results show that San Francisco leads in economic and environmental priorities, and Stockholm leads in social and smart city priorities. Seoul consistently performs very successfully across the whole spectrum of indicators. We devote considerable attention to the strategies, policies and performance of the leading cities, namely, San Francisco, Stockholm and Seoul. This assessment could be a valuable tool for policy‐makers and investors, and could help identify linkages between different sustainability dimensions, as well as investment opportunities in cities with sustainability potential.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0968-0802</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1719</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sd.1887</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Bicycles ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Cities ; Coal ; Creative industries ; Criteria ; Cycling ; Economic conditions ; Economics ; Employment ; Energy ; Environmental impact ; environmental policy ; Evaluation ; Global cities ; Greening ; Impact analysis ; Indicators ; Investment ; Investments ; Investors ; Linkages ; Multidimensional approach ; multi‐criteria decision aid ; Policy making ; Priorities ; Public transportation ; Quality of life ; Recycling ; Smart cities ; smart city ; Strategy ; Sustainability ; sustainable cities ; Sustainable development ; Viability ; Waste recycling</subject><ispartof>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England), 2018-11, Vol.26 (6), p.904-920</ispartof><rights>2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3467-79d7b90e2adf8d4415554a02754fcba3c213741fd54a0939e65d0b27219301783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3467-79d7b90e2adf8d4415554a02754fcba3c213741fd54a0939e65d0b27219301783</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4123-9873 ; 0000-0003-2103-0201</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsd.1887$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsd.1887$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27853,27911,27912,45561,45562</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shmelev, Stanislav E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shmeleva, Irina A.</creatorcontrib><title>Global urban sustainability assessment: A multidimensional approach</title><title>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)</title><description>A new strategic direction for greening our cities and making them smart to reduce the environmental impact of their performance, increase employment and economic viability, and to enhance the quality of life requires a thorough assessment of sustainability and smart urban performance. This paper considers a database of over 90 global cities including London, New York, Hong Kong, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Sao Paolo, Rio de Janeiro, Buenos Aires, Paris, Berlin, Stockholm, Moscow, Beijing, Seoul, Singapore, Shanghai, Sydney and Tokyo exploring linkages between different sustainability and smart city dimensions. To assess urban sustainability performance, this study applied a multi‐criteria approach using a panel of 20 indicators to a set of 57 global cities. The assessment comprised important aspects of energy transitions, focusing on the drivers of CO2 emissions in cities, including the share of coal in the energy mix, public transport and cycling patterns, waste recycling, the water‐energy nexus, as well as the role of smart and creative economy. The results show that San Francisco leads in economic and environmental priorities, and Stockholm leads in social and smart city priorities. Seoul consistently performs very successfully across the whole spectrum of indicators. We devote considerable attention to the strategies, policies and performance of the leading cities, namely, San Francisco, Stockholm and Seoul. This assessment could be a valuable tool for policy‐makers and investors, and could help identify linkages between different sustainability dimensions, as well as investment opportunities in cities with sustainability potential.</description><subject>Bicycles</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Creative industries</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Cycling</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>environmental policy</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Global cities</subject><subject>Greening</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Linkages</subject><subject>Multidimensional approach</subject><subject>multi‐criteria decision aid</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Priorities</subject><subject>Public transportation</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Recycling</subject><subject>Smart cities</subject><subject>smart city</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>sustainable cities</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Viability</subject><subject>Waste recycling</subject><issn>0968-0802</issn><issn>1099-1719</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbxLwQ8eJDU2a9s1lupWoWCB_W8bLIb3JImNZMg_fdujAcvnoYZnnlneAi5pLCgAOwW3YLmuToiMwpap1RRfUxmoLM8hRzYKTlD3AJAzqiYkdW6bgtbJ0NX2CbBAXsbGluEOvSHxCJ6xJ1v-rtkmeyGug8uxBZD28Qdu993rS0_zslJZWv0F791Tt4fH95WT-nmZf28Wm7SkotMpUo7VWjwzLoqd0JQKaWwwJQUVVlYXjLKlaCVG6eaa59JBwVTjGoOVOV8Tq6m3Hj2c_DYm207dPETNIxmwLlUTETqeqLKrkXsfGX2XdjZ7mAomNGQQWdGQ5FMJtKXbRPwDye0hOiNR-RmQr5C7Q__JZnX-5_Ab1TPb0E</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Shmelev, Stanislav E.</creator><creator>Shmeleva, Irina A.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4123-9873</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2103-0201</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Global urban sustainability assessment: A multidimensional approach</title><author>Shmelev, Stanislav E. ; Shmeleva, Irina A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3467-79d7b90e2adf8d4415554a02754fcba3c213741fd54a0939e65d0b27219301783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bicycles</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Creative industries</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Cycling</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>environmental policy</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Global cities</topic><topic>Greening</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Linkages</topic><topic>Multidimensional approach</topic><topic>multi‐criteria decision aid</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Priorities</topic><topic>Public transportation</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Recycling</topic><topic>Smart cities</topic><topic>smart city</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>sustainable cities</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Viability</topic><topic>Waste recycling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shmelev, Stanislav E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shmeleva, Irina A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shmelev, Stanislav E.</au><au>Shmeleva, Irina A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global urban sustainability assessment: A multidimensional approach</atitle><jtitle>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)</jtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>904</spage><epage>920</epage><pages>904-920</pages><issn>0968-0802</issn><eissn>1099-1719</eissn><abstract>A new strategic direction for greening our cities and making them smart to reduce the environmental impact of their performance, increase employment and economic viability, and to enhance the quality of life requires a thorough assessment of sustainability and smart urban performance. This paper considers a database of over 90 global cities including London, New York, Hong Kong, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Sao Paolo, Rio de Janeiro, Buenos Aires, Paris, Berlin, Stockholm, Moscow, Beijing, Seoul, Singapore, Shanghai, Sydney and Tokyo exploring linkages between different sustainability and smart city dimensions. To assess urban sustainability performance, this study applied a multi‐criteria approach using a panel of 20 indicators to a set of 57 global cities. The assessment comprised important aspects of energy transitions, focusing on the drivers of CO2 emissions in cities, including the share of coal in the energy mix, public transport and cycling patterns, waste recycling, the water‐energy nexus, as well as the role of smart and creative economy. The results show that San Francisco leads in economic and environmental priorities, and Stockholm leads in social and smart city priorities. Seoul consistently performs very successfully across the whole spectrum of indicators. We devote considerable attention to the strategies, policies and performance of the leading cities, namely, San Francisco, Stockholm and Seoul. This assessment could be a valuable tool for policy‐makers and investors, and could help identify linkages between different sustainability dimensions, as well as investment opportunities in cities with sustainability potential.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/sd.1887</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4123-9873</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2103-0201</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0968-0802 |
ispartof | Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England), 2018-11, Vol.26 (6), p.904-920 |
issn | 0968-0802 1099-1719 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2160335724 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Bicycles Carbon dioxide Carbon dioxide emissions Cities Coal Creative industries Criteria Cycling Economic conditions Economics Employment Energy Environmental impact environmental policy Evaluation Global cities Greening Impact analysis Indicators Investment Investments Investors Linkages Multidimensional approach multi‐criteria decision aid Policy making Priorities Public transportation Quality of life Recycling Smart cities smart city Strategy Sustainability sustainable cities Sustainable development Viability Waste recycling |
title | Global urban sustainability assessment: A multidimensional approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T15%3A33%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20urban%20sustainability%20assessment:%20A%20multidimensional%20approach&rft.jtitle=Sustainable%20development%20(Bradford,%20West%20Yorkshire,%20England)&rft.au=Shmelev,%20Stanislav%20E.&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=904&rft.epage=920&rft.pages=904-920&rft.issn=0968-0802&rft.eissn=1099-1719&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sd.1887&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2160335724%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2160335724&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |