The Validity of Assessment Center Ratings and 16PF Personality Trait Scores in Police Sergeant Promotions: A Case of Incremental Validity
Assessment centers (AC) have become a mainstay of promotion systems for both the private and public sectors -- police agencies included. While costly to develop and implement, their track record of validity and legal defensibility has justified their increased use. Personality trait scores have show...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Public personnel management 2007-03, Vol.36 (1), p.21-32 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 32 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 21 |
| container_title | Public personnel management |
| container_volume | 36 |
| creator | Love, Kevin G. DeArmond, Sarah |
| description | Assessment centers (AC) have become a mainstay of promotion systems for both the private and public sectors -- police agencies included. While costly to develop and implement, their track record of validity and legal defensibility has justified their increased use. Personality trait scores have shown incremental validity, however, when combined with cognitive ability tests in predicting a range of employee and managerial behaviors, but not for state police recruits. Personality assessment may have a role in predicting job performance and making promotion decisions when used in combination with other predictors (e.g., cognitive ability testing, biodata, and AC ratings). Moreover, the AC has been shown to be equally valid in predicting on-the-job performance for both males and females in law enforcement and related settings. Therefore, it would be unlikely that the use of a more heterogeneous sample in the present study would significantly alter the findings. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/009102600703600102 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_215947417</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A161597750</galeid><sage_id>10.1177_009102600703600102</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A161597750</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-e6fae526aff2ba75de66b51d602435ed4509db7edb21326f52460942f43fbbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl9r2zAQwM3YYFm3L7Ansbc9uJVk_Zn3FszaBcIalrBXI9snT8WROp0C60fYt55MSiE0jCE4CfH73XHHFcV7Ri8Z0_qK0ppRrijVtMoxv18UC1YLWWrB2ctiMQPlTLwu3iDe0cxUnC-KP7ufQH6YyQ0uPZBgyRIREPfgE2lygEi-m-T8iMT4gTC1uSYbiBh8drKxi8Ylsu1DBCTOk02YXA9kC3EEk3NsYtiH5ILHz2RJGoMwF1n5PsJcw0xPxd8Wr6yZEN493hfF7vrLrvlarm9vVs1yXfai1qkEZQ1Iroy1vDNaDqBUJ9mgKBeVhEFIWg-dhqHjuUNlJReK1oJbUdmu66uL4sMx7X0Mvw6Aqb0Lh5i7wZYzWQstmM5QeYRGM0HrvA0pmn4ED9FMwYN1-XvJVBa0ljTzl2f4fAbYu_6s8PFEyEyC32k0B8R2tf323-ynm_UpW55j-zBNMEKbB9ncnvL8yPcxIEaw7X10exMfWkbbebPa55uVpaujhCbnfBrfP4y_d6jKWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215947417</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Validity of Assessment Center Ratings and 16PF Personality Trait Scores in Police Sergeant Promotions: A Case of Incremental Validity</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Love, Kevin G. ; DeArmond, Sarah</creator><creatorcontrib>Love, Kevin G. ; DeArmond, Sarah</creatorcontrib><description>Assessment centers (AC) have become a mainstay of promotion systems for both the private and public sectors -- police agencies included. While costly to develop and implement, their track record of validity and legal defensibility has justified their increased use. Personality trait scores have shown incremental validity, however, when combined with cognitive ability tests in predicting a range of employee and managerial behaviors, but not for state police recruits. Personality assessment may have a role in predicting job performance and making promotion decisions when used in combination with other predictors (e.g., cognitive ability testing, biodata, and AC ratings). Moreover, the AC has been shown to be equally valid in predicting on-the-job performance for both males and females in law enforcement and related settings. Therefore, it would be unlikely that the use of a more heterogeneous sample in the present study would significantly alter the findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-0260</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-7421</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/009102600703600102</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PPMNCX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Ability tests ; Assessment centers ; Assessment Centers (Personnel) ; Candidates ; Cognitive ability ; Company personnel management ; Consortia ; Effectiveness ; Employee promotions ; Evaluation ; Forecasts and trends ; Human resource management ; Job performance ; Job Skills ; Law enforcement ; Management development programs ; Market trend/market analysis ; Methods ; Personality ; Personality Assessment ; Personality Measures ; Personality Studies ; Personality tests ; Personality traits ; Police ; Police administration ; Police departments ; Psychological tests ; Ratings & rankings ; Studies ; Supervisors ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Public personnel management, 2007-03, Vol.36 (1), p.21-32</ispartof><rights>2007 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2007 Sage Publications, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright International Public Management Association for Human Resources Spring 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-e6fae526aff2ba75de66b51d602435ed4509db7edb21326f52460942f43fbbc3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/009102600703600102$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/009102600703600102$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Love, Kevin G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeArmond, Sarah</creatorcontrib><title>The Validity of Assessment Center Ratings and 16PF Personality Trait Scores in Police Sergeant Promotions: A Case of Incremental Validity</title><title>Public personnel management</title><addtitle>Public Personnel Management</addtitle><description>Assessment centers (AC) have become a mainstay of promotion systems for both the private and public sectors -- police agencies included. While costly to develop and implement, their track record of validity and legal defensibility has justified their increased use. Personality trait scores have shown incremental validity, however, when combined with cognitive ability tests in predicting a range of employee and managerial behaviors, but not for state police recruits. Personality assessment may have a role in predicting job performance and making promotion decisions when used in combination with other predictors (e.g., cognitive ability testing, biodata, and AC ratings). Moreover, the AC has been shown to be equally valid in predicting on-the-job performance for both males and females in law enforcement and related settings. Therefore, it would be unlikely that the use of a more heterogeneous sample in the present study would significantly alter the findings.</description><subject>Ability tests</subject><subject>Assessment centers</subject><subject>Assessment Centers (Personnel)</subject><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Company personnel management</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Employee promotions</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Human resource management</subject><subject>Job performance</subject><subject>Job Skills</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Management development programs</subject><subject>Market trend/market analysis</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality Assessment</subject><subject>Personality Measures</subject><subject>Personality Studies</subject><subject>Personality tests</subject><subject>Personality traits</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Police administration</subject><subject>Police departments</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Ratings & rankings</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supervisors</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0091-0260</issn><issn>1945-7421</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl9r2zAQwM3YYFm3L7Ansbc9uJVk_Zn3FszaBcIalrBXI9snT8WROp0C60fYt55MSiE0jCE4CfH73XHHFcV7Ri8Z0_qK0ppRrijVtMoxv18UC1YLWWrB2ctiMQPlTLwu3iDe0cxUnC-KP7ufQH6YyQ0uPZBgyRIREPfgE2lygEi-m-T8iMT4gTC1uSYbiBh8drKxi8Ylsu1DBCTOk02YXA9kC3EEk3NsYtiH5ILHz2RJGoMwF1n5PsJcw0xPxd8Wr6yZEN493hfF7vrLrvlarm9vVs1yXfai1qkEZQ1Iroy1vDNaDqBUJ9mgKBeVhEFIWg-dhqHjuUNlJReK1oJbUdmu66uL4sMx7X0Mvw6Aqb0Lh5i7wZYzWQstmM5QeYRGM0HrvA0pmn4ED9FMwYN1-XvJVBa0ljTzl2f4fAbYu_6s8PFEyEyC32k0B8R2tf323-ynm_UpW55j-zBNMEKbB9ncnvL8yPcxIEaw7X10exMfWkbbebPa55uVpaujhCbnfBrfP4y_d6jKWg</recordid><startdate>20070322</startdate><enddate>20070322</enddate><creator>Love, Kevin G.</creator><creator>DeArmond, Sarah</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070322</creationdate><title>The Validity of Assessment Center Ratings and 16PF Personality Trait Scores in Police Sergeant Promotions: A Case of Incremental Validity</title><author>Love, Kevin G. ; DeArmond, Sarah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-e6fae526aff2ba75de66b51d602435ed4509db7edb21326f52460942f43fbbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Ability tests</topic><topic>Assessment centers</topic><topic>Assessment Centers (Personnel)</topic><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Company personnel management</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Employee promotions</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Human resource management</topic><topic>Job performance</topic><topic>Job Skills</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Management development programs</topic><topic>Market trend/market analysis</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality Assessment</topic><topic>Personality Measures</topic><topic>Personality Studies</topic><topic>Personality tests</topic><topic>Personality traits</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Police administration</topic><topic>Police departments</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Ratings & rankings</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supervisors</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Love, Kevin G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeArmond, Sarah</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Public personnel management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Love, Kevin G.</au><au>DeArmond, Sarah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Validity of Assessment Center Ratings and 16PF Personality Trait Scores in Police Sergeant Promotions: A Case of Incremental Validity</atitle><jtitle>Public personnel management</jtitle><addtitle>Public Personnel Management</addtitle><date>2007-03-22</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>32</epage><pages>21-32</pages><issn>0091-0260</issn><eissn>1945-7421</eissn><coden>PPMNCX</coden><abstract>Assessment centers (AC) have become a mainstay of promotion systems for both the private and public sectors -- police agencies included. While costly to develop and implement, their track record of validity and legal defensibility has justified their increased use. Personality trait scores have shown incremental validity, however, when combined with cognitive ability tests in predicting a range of employee and managerial behaviors, but not for state police recruits. Personality assessment may have a role in predicting job performance and making promotion decisions when used in combination with other predictors (e.g., cognitive ability testing, biodata, and AC ratings). Moreover, the AC has been shown to be equally valid in predicting on-the-job performance for both males and females in law enforcement and related settings. Therefore, it would be unlikely that the use of a more heterogeneous sample in the present study would significantly alter the findings.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/009102600703600102</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0091-0260 |
| ispartof | Public personnel management, 2007-03, Vol.36 (1), p.21-32 |
| issn | 0091-0260 1945-7421 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_215947417 |
| source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Education Source |
| subjects | Ability tests Assessment centers Assessment Centers (Personnel) Candidates Cognitive ability Company personnel management Consortia Effectiveness Employee promotions Evaluation Forecasts and trends Human resource management Job performance Job Skills Law enforcement Management development programs Market trend/market analysis Methods Personality Personality Assessment Personality Measures Personality Studies Personality tests Personality traits Police Police administration Police departments Psychological tests Ratings & rankings Studies Supervisors Validity |
| title | The Validity of Assessment Center Ratings and 16PF Personality Trait Scores in Police Sergeant Promotions: A Case of Incremental Validity |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T04%3A47%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Validity%20of%20Assessment%20Center%20Ratings%20and%2016PF%20Personality%20Trait%20Scores%20in%20Police%20Sergeant%20Promotions:%20A%20Case%20of%20Incremental%20Validity&rft.jtitle=Public%20personnel%20management&rft.au=Love,%20Kevin%20G.&rft.date=2007-03-22&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=32&rft.pages=21-32&rft.issn=0091-0260&rft.eissn=1945-7421&rft.coden=PPMNCX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/009102600703600102&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA161597750%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215947417&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A161597750&rft_sage_id=10.1177_009102600703600102&rfr_iscdi=true |