Herbicide Programs Utilizing Halauxifen-Methyl for Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) Control in Soybean

Evolution of glyphosate-resistant (GR) weeds, such as horseweed, presents major challenges in no-till soybean production systems. Effective GR horseweed control with preplant burndown applications is necessary to prevent potential soybean yield losses due to competition and to manage the soil weed s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Weed technology 2018-12, Vol.32 (6), p.659-664
Hauptverfasser: Zimmer, Marcelo, Young, Bryan G, Johnson, William G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 664
container_issue 6
container_start_page 659
container_title Weed technology
container_volume 32
creator Zimmer, Marcelo
Young, Bryan G
Johnson, William G
description Evolution of glyphosate-resistant (GR) weeds, such as horseweed, presents major challenges in no-till soybean production systems. Effective GR horseweed control with preplant burndown applications is necessary to prevent potential soybean yield losses due to competition and to manage the soil weed seedbank. Halauxifen-methyl is a new synthetic auxin herbicide for broadleaf weed control in preplant burndown applications for soybean and other crops at low use rates (5 g ae ha–1). Experiments were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of herbicide treatments containing halauxifen-methyl for control of GR horseweed in comparison to existing herbicide treatments utilized in no-till GR soybean systems. Glyphosate alone controlled horseweed 33%. Herbicide treatments that included halauxifenmethyl, dicamba, or saflufenacil in combination with glyphosate controlled horseweed 87% to 96%, 89%, and 93%, respectively, 35 d after burndown application (DAB). Horseweed control, horseweed density reduction, and ground cover reduction by halauxifen-methyl plus glyphosate was similar to dicamba plus glyphosate. Horseweed control was greater for halauxifen-methyl plus glyphosate than for 2,4-D plus glyphosate. Cloransulam, cloransulam plus flumioxazin, and cloransulam plus sulfentrazone added to halauxifenmethyl plus glyphosate increased horseweed control and reduced horseweed density. No herbicide injury or soybean yield reduction was observed for treatments containing halauxifen-methyl. Nomenclature: 2,4-D; dicamba; glufosinate; glyphosate; halauxifen-methyl; saflufenacil; horseweed, Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq. ERICA; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/wet.2018.60
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2159371436</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26567659</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26567659</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-7883107fadab60e7b70c824d4d5b89d1c7b408b86e33a073aca9716a3d4579d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMoqKsnz0LAi4t0TZo26R5lUVdQFD_OZdJMNUtN1iSL1l9vZUU8eZph3od34CHkgLMJZ1ydvmOa5IxXE8k2yA4vS5blqmCbf_ZtshvjgjEu85ztkI85Bm0ba5DeBf8c4DXSp2Q7-2ndM51DB6sP26LLbjC99B1tfaCXXb988RESZvcYbUzgEp37EPEd0dDjmXf9J9AGHBh0AzCmwykF31Hr6IPvNYLbI1stdBH3f-aIPF2cP87m2fXt5dXs7DrTgquUqaoSnKkWDGjJUGnFmiovTGFKXU0Nb5QuWKUriUIAUwIamCouQZiiVFOjxIgcrXuXwb-tMKZ64VfBDS_rnJdToXgh5ECdrKkm-BgDtvUy2FcIfc1Z_a22HtTW32pryQb6cE0vYvLhF81lKZUcOkdkvM619d7hv11fo2GEvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2159371436</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Herbicide Programs Utilizing Halauxifen-Methyl for Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) Control in Soybean</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Zimmer, Marcelo ; Young, Bryan G ; Johnson, William G</creator><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, Marcelo ; Young, Bryan G ; Johnson, William G</creatorcontrib><description>Evolution of glyphosate-resistant (GR) weeds, such as horseweed, presents major challenges in no-till soybean production systems. Effective GR horseweed control with preplant burndown applications is necessary to prevent potential soybean yield losses due to competition and to manage the soil weed seedbank. Halauxifen-methyl is a new synthetic auxin herbicide for broadleaf weed control in preplant burndown applications for soybean and other crops at low use rates (5 g ae ha–1). Experiments were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of herbicide treatments containing halauxifen-methyl for control of GR horseweed in comparison to existing herbicide treatments utilized in no-till GR soybean systems. Glyphosate alone controlled horseweed 33%. Herbicide treatments that included halauxifenmethyl, dicamba, or saflufenacil in combination with glyphosate controlled horseweed 87% to 96%, 89%, and 93%, respectively, 35 d after burndown application (DAB). Horseweed control, horseweed density reduction, and ground cover reduction by halauxifen-methyl plus glyphosate was similar to dicamba plus glyphosate. Horseweed control was greater for halauxifen-methyl plus glyphosate than for 2,4-D plus glyphosate. Cloransulam, cloransulam plus flumioxazin, and cloransulam plus sulfentrazone added to halauxifenmethyl plus glyphosate increased horseweed control and reduced horseweed density. No herbicide injury or soybean yield reduction was observed for treatments containing halauxifen-methyl. Nomenclature: 2,4-D; dicamba; glufosinate; glyphosate; halauxifen-methyl; saflufenacil; horseweed, Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq. ERICA; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/wet.2018.60</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>2,4-D ; Agricultural production ; Crop production ; Density ; Glyphosate ; Ground cover ; Herbicide resistance ; herbicide resistance management ; Herbicides ; Injury prevention ; Seed banks ; Seeds ; Soybeans ; Spring preplant burndown ; synthetic auxins ; System effectiveness ; Weed control ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2018-12, Vol.32 (6), p.659-664</ispartof><rights>Weed Science Society of America, 2018.</rights><rights>Weed Science Society of America, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-7883107fadab60e7b70c824d4d5b89d1c7b408b86e33a073aca9716a3d4579d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-7883107fadab60e7b70c824d4d5b89d1c7b408b86e33a073aca9716a3d4579d73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4451-0849</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26567659$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26567659$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Bryan G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, William G</creatorcontrib><title>Herbicide Programs Utilizing Halauxifen-Methyl for Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) Control in Soybean</title><title>Weed technology</title><addtitle>Weed Technol</addtitle><description>Evolution of glyphosate-resistant (GR) weeds, such as horseweed, presents major challenges in no-till soybean production systems. Effective GR horseweed control with preplant burndown applications is necessary to prevent potential soybean yield losses due to competition and to manage the soil weed seedbank. Halauxifen-methyl is a new synthetic auxin herbicide for broadleaf weed control in preplant burndown applications for soybean and other crops at low use rates (5 g ae ha–1). Experiments were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of herbicide treatments containing halauxifen-methyl for control of GR horseweed in comparison to existing herbicide treatments utilized in no-till GR soybean systems. Glyphosate alone controlled horseweed 33%. Herbicide treatments that included halauxifenmethyl, dicamba, or saflufenacil in combination with glyphosate controlled horseweed 87% to 96%, 89%, and 93%, respectively, 35 d after burndown application (DAB). Horseweed control, horseweed density reduction, and ground cover reduction by halauxifen-methyl plus glyphosate was similar to dicamba plus glyphosate. Horseweed control was greater for halauxifen-methyl plus glyphosate than for 2,4-D plus glyphosate. Cloransulam, cloransulam plus flumioxazin, and cloransulam plus sulfentrazone added to halauxifenmethyl plus glyphosate increased horseweed control and reduced horseweed density. No herbicide injury or soybean yield reduction was observed for treatments containing halauxifen-methyl. Nomenclature: 2,4-D; dicamba; glufosinate; glyphosate; halauxifen-methyl; saflufenacil; horseweed, Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq. ERICA; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.</description><subject>2,4-D</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Glyphosate</subject><subject>Ground cover</subject><subject>Herbicide resistance</subject><subject>herbicide resistance management</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Injury prevention</subject><subject>Seed banks</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Spring preplant burndown</subject><subject>synthetic auxins</subject><subject>System effectiveness</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>1550-2740</issn><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMoqKsnz0LAi4t0TZo26R5lUVdQFD_OZdJMNUtN1iSL1l9vZUU8eZph3od34CHkgLMJZ1ydvmOa5IxXE8k2yA4vS5blqmCbf_ZtshvjgjEu85ztkI85Bm0ba5DeBf8c4DXSp2Q7-2ndM51DB6sP26LLbjC99B1tfaCXXb988RESZvcYbUzgEp37EPEd0dDjmXf9J9AGHBh0AzCmwykF31Hr6IPvNYLbI1stdBH3f-aIPF2cP87m2fXt5dXs7DrTgquUqaoSnKkWDGjJUGnFmiovTGFKXU0Nb5QuWKUriUIAUwIamCouQZiiVFOjxIgcrXuXwb-tMKZ64VfBDS_rnJdToXgh5ECdrKkm-BgDtvUy2FcIfc1Z_a22HtTW32pryQb6cE0vYvLhF81lKZUcOkdkvM619d7hv11fo2GEvw</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Zimmer, Marcelo</creator><creator>Young, Bryan G</creator><creator>Johnson, William G</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4451-0849</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>Herbicide Programs Utilizing Halauxifen-Methyl for Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) Control in Soybean</title><author>Zimmer, Marcelo ; Young, Bryan G ; Johnson, William G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-7883107fadab60e7b70c824d4d5b89d1c7b408b86e33a073aca9716a3d4579d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>2,4-D</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Glyphosate</topic><topic>Ground cover</topic><topic>Herbicide resistance</topic><topic>herbicide resistance management</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Injury prevention</topic><topic>Seed banks</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Spring preplant burndown</topic><topic>synthetic auxins</topic><topic>System effectiveness</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Bryan G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, William G</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture &amp; Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zimmer, Marcelo</au><au>Young, Bryan G</au><au>Johnson, William G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Herbicide Programs Utilizing Halauxifen-Methyl for Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) Control in Soybean</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><stitle>Weed Technol</stitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>659</spage><epage>664</epage><pages>659-664</pages><issn>1550-2740</issn><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>Evolution of glyphosate-resistant (GR) weeds, such as horseweed, presents major challenges in no-till soybean production systems. Effective GR horseweed control with preplant burndown applications is necessary to prevent potential soybean yield losses due to competition and to manage the soil weed seedbank. Halauxifen-methyl is a new synthetic auxin herbicide for broadleaf weed control in preplant burndown applications for soybean and other crops at low use rates (5 g ae ha–1). Experiments were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of herbicide treatments containing halauxifen-methyl for control of GR horseweed in comparison to existing herbicide treatments utilized in no-till GR soybean systems. Glyphosate alone controlled horseweed 33%. Herbicide treatments that included halauxifenmethyl, dicamba, or saflufenacil in combination with glyphosate controlled horseweed 87% to 96%, 89%, and 93%, respectively, 35 d after burndown application (DAB). Horseweed control, horseweed density reduction, and ground cover reduction by halauxifen-methyl plus glyphosate was similar to dicamba plus glyphosate. Horseweed control was greater for halauxifen-methyl plus glyphosate than for 2,4-D plus glyphosate. Cloransulam, cloransulam plus flumioxazin, and cloransulam plus sulfentrazone added to halauxifenmethyl plus glyphosate increased horseweed control and reduced horseweed density. No herbicide injury or soybean yield reduction was observed for treatments containing halauxifen-methyl. Nomenclature: 2,4-D; dicamba; glufosinate; glyphosate; halauxifen-methyl; saflufenacil; horseweed, Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq. ERICA; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/wet.2018.60</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4451-0849</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1550-2740
ispartof Weed technology, 2018-12, Vol.32 (6), p.659-664
issn 1550-2740
0890-037X
1550-2740
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2159371436
source Cambridge Journals Online; JSTOR
subjects 2,4-D
Agricultural production
Crop production
Density
Glyphosate
Ground cover
Herbicide resistance
herbicide resistance management
Herbicides
Injury prevention
Seed banks
Seeds
Soybeans
Spring preplant burndown
synthetic auxins
System effectiveness
Weed control
Weeds
title Herbicide Programs Utilizing Halauxifen-Methyl for Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) Control in Soybean
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A55%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Herbicide%20Programs%20Utilizing%20Halauxifen-Methyl%20for%20Glyphosate-Resistant%20Horseweed%20(Conyza%20canadensis)%20Control%20in%20Soybean&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Zimmer,%20Marcelo&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=659&rft.epage=664&rft.pages=659-664&rft.issn=1550-2740&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/wet.2018.60&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26567659%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2159371436&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26567659&rfr_iscdi=true