Influence of Glyphosate/Dicamba Application Rate and Timing on the Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed in Glyphosate/Dicamba-Resistant Soybean

Dicamba may be an efficacious option for the control of glyphosate-resistant (GR) horseweed in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean; research is needed to optimize the application rate based on horseweed height at the time of application. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of glyp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Weed technology 2018-12, Vol.32 (6), p.678-682
Hauptverfasser: Hedges, Brittany K, Soltani, Nader, Hooker, David C, Robinson, Darren E, Sikkema, Peter H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 682
container_issue 6
container_start_page 678
container_title Weed technology
container_volume 32
creator Hedges, Brittany K
Soltani, Nader
Hooker, David C
Robinson, Darren E
Sikkema, Peter H
description Dicamba may be an efficacious option for the control of glyphosate-resistant (GR) horseweed in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean; research is needed to optimize the application rate based on horseweed height at the time of application. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of glyphosate/dicamba rate and application timing for the control of GR horseweed. Glyphosate/dicamba was applied at three rates (900, 1,350, and 1,800 g ae ha-1) at three horseweed application timings (5, 15, and 25 cm) in a factorial design. There was no interaction between glyphosate/dicamba rate and timing for GR horseweed control or soybean yield; however, there was an interaction for GR horseweed density and biomass. At 2 and 4 wk after application (WAA), there was a decrease in GR horseweed control as the height at the time application increased. At 4 WAA, the application of glyphosate/dicamba to GR horseweed that was 5-, 15-, and 25-cm tall provided 87%, 76%, and 62% control, respectively. There was no impact of glyphosate/dicamba application timing on soybean yield. At 2, 4, and 8 WAA, there was an increase in GR horseweed control as the rate of glyphosate/ dicamba was increased. At 8 WAA, glyphosate/dicamba applied at 900, 1,350, and 1,800 g ae ha-1 controlled GR horseweed 76%, 87%, and 92%, respectively. Earlier application timings and higher rates of glyphosate/dicamba caused the greatest reduction in GR horseweed density and biomass. Reduced GR horseweed competition resulted in a 100% to 144% increase in soybean yield, but there was no difference in soybean yield among glyphosate/dicamba rates tested. Nomenclature: Dicamba; glyphosate; horseweed, Erigeron canadensis L. Cronq.; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/wet.2018.72
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2159370759</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26567662</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26567662</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-9896d85fef0ed60f09066710d631b46382955a482d341e95552607dbaeb73f593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFFLwzAUhYMoOKdPPgsBn0S6JematI9j6jYYCHM-h3S9dR1dUpOMsf_hDzazIhPEp3u45-McOAhdU9KjhIr-DnyPEZr2BDtBHZokJGJiQE6P9Dm6cG5NCOWMkQ76mOqy3oJeAjYlHtf7ZmWc8tB_qJZqkys8bJo6SF8ZjefBwEoXeFFtKv2Gw8uvAI-M9tbUvwOiObjKeaU9nhjrYAdQ4Er_UXFEvph9DkpforNS1Q6uvm8XvT49LkaTaPY8no6GsyiPqfBRlma8SJMSSgIFJyXJCOeCkoLHNB_wOGVZkqhByop4QCHohHEiilxBLuIyyeIuum1zG2vet-C8XJut1aFSMhp8QcQXdd9SS2ucs1DKxlYbZfeSEnmYXYbZ5WF2KVigb1p67byxPyjjCRecH_y71s8rYzT8m_UJ3ZSN_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2159370759</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of Glyphosate/Dicamba Application Rate and Timing on the Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed in Glyphosate/Dicamba-Resistant Soybean</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Hedges, Brittany K ; Soltani, Nader ; Hooker, David C ; Robinson, Darren E ; Sikkema, Peter H</creator><creatorcontrib>Hedges, Brittany K ; Soltani, Nader ; Hooker, David C ; Robinson, Darren E ; Sikkema, Peter H</creatorcontrib><description>Dicamba may be an efficacious option for the control of glyphosate-resistant (GR) horseweed in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean; research is needed to optimize the application rate based on horseweed height at the time of application. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of glyphosate/dicamba rate and application timing for the control of GR horseweed. Glyphosate/dicamba was applied at three rates (900, 1,350, and 1,800 g ae ha-1) at three horseweed application timings (5, 15, and 25 cm) in a factorial design. There was no interaction between glyphosate/dicamba rate and timing for GR horseweed control or soybean yield; however, there was an interaction for GR horseweed density and biomass. At 2 and 4 wk after application (WAA), there was a decrease in GR horseweed control as the height at the time application increased. At 4 WAA, the application of glyphosate/dicamba to GR horseweed that was 5-, 15-, and 25-cm tall provided 87%, 76%, and 62% control, respectively. There was no impact of glyphosate/dicamba application timing on soybean yield. At 2, 4, and 8 WAA, there was an increase in GR horseweed control as the rate of glyphosate/ dicamba was increased. At 8 WAA, glyphosate/dicamba applied at 900, 1,350, and 1,800 g ae ha-1 controlled GR horseweed 76%, 87%, and 92%, respectively. Earlier application timings and higher rates of glyphosate/dicamba caused the greatest reduction in GR horseweed density and biomass. Reduced GR horseweed competition resulted in a 100% to 144% increase in soybean yield, but there was no difference in soybean yield among glyphosate/dicamba rates tested. Nomenclature: Dicamba; glyphosate; horseweed, Erigeron canadensis L. Cronq.; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/wet.2018.72</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Biomass ; Canada fleabane ; Crop yield ; Crops ; Density ; Factorial design ; Glyphosate ; glyphosate resistance ; Height ; Herbicides ; rate ; Seeds ; Soybeans ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2018-12, Vol.32 (6), p.678-682</ispartof><rights>Weed Science Society of America, 2018.</rights><rights>Weed Science Society of America, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-9896d85fef0ed60f09066710d631b46382955a482d341e95552607dbaeb73f593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-9896d85fef0ed60f09066710d631b46382955a482d341e95552607dbaeb73f593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26567662$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26567662$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27902,27903,57994,58227</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hedges, Brittany K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soltani, Nader</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooker, David C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Darren E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sikkema, Peter H</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of Glyphosate/Dicamba Application Rate and Timing on the Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed in Glyphosate/Dicamba-Resistant Soybean</title><title>Weed technology</title><addtitle>Weed Technol</addtitle><description>Dicamba may be an efficacious option for the control of glyphosate-resistant (GR) horseweed in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean; research is needed to optimize the application rate based on horseweed height at the time of application. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of glyphosate/dicamba rate and application timing for the control of GR horseweed. Glyphosate/dicamba was applied at three rates (900, 1,350, and 1,800 g ae ha-1) at three horseweed application timings (5, 15, and 25 cm) in a factorial design. There was no interaction between glyphosate/dicamba rate and timing for GR horseweed control or soybean yield; however, there was an interaction for GR horseweed density and biomass. At 2 and 4 wk after application (WAA), there was a decrease in GR horseweed control as the height at the time application increased. At 4 WAA, the application of glyphosate/dicamba to GR horseweed that was 5-, 15-, and 25-cm tall provided 87%, 76%, and 62% control, respectively. There was no impact of glyphosate/dicamba application timing on soybean yield. At 2, 4, and 8 WAA, there was an increase in GR horseweed control as the rate of glyphosate/ dicamba was increased. At 8 WAA, glyphosate/dicamba applied at 900, 1,350, and 1,800 g ae ha-1 controlled GR horseweed 76%, 87%, and 92%, respectively. Earlier application timings and higher rates of glyphosate/dicamba caused the greatest reduction in GR horseweed density and biomass. Reduced GR horseweed competition resulted in a 100% to 144% increase in soybean yield, but there was no difference in soybean yield among glyphosate/dicamba rates tested. Nomenclature: Dicamba; glyphosate; horseweed, Erigeron canadensis L. Cronq.; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Canada fleabane</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Factorial design</subject><subject>Glyphosate</subject><subject>glyphosate resistance</subject><subject>Height</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>rate</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>1550-2740</issn><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFFLwzAUhYMoOKdPPgsBn0S6JematI9j6jYYCHM-h3S9dR1dUpOMsf_hDzazIhPEp3u45-McOAhdU9KjhIr-DnyPEZr2BDtBHZokJGJiQE6P9Dm6cG5NCOWMkQ76mOqy3oJeAjYlHtf7ZmWc8tB_qJZqkys8bJo6SF8ZjefBwEoXeFFtKv2Gw8uvAI-M9tbUvwOiObjKeaU9nhjrYAdQ4Er_UXFEvph9DkpforNS1Q6uvm8XvT49LkaTaPY8no6GsyiPqfBRlma8SJMSSgIFJyXJCOeCkoLHNB_wOGVZkqhByop4QCHohHEiilxBLuIyyeIuum1zG2vet-C8XJut1aFSMhp8QcQXdd9SS2ucs1DKxlYbZfeSEnmYXYbZ5WF2KVigb1p67byxPyjjCRecH_y71s8rYzT8m_UJ3ZSN_g</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Hedges, Brittany K</creator><creator>Soltani, Nader</creator><creator>Hooker, David C</creator><creator>Robinson, Darren E</creator><creator>Sikkema, Peter H</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>Influence of Glyphosate/Dicamba Application Rate and Timing on the Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed in Glyphosate/Dicamba-Resistant Soybean</title><author>Hedges, Brittany K ; Soltani, Nader ; Hooker, David C ; Robinson, Darren E ; Sikkema, Peter H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-9896d85fef0ed60f09066710d631b46382955a482d341e95552607dbaeb73f593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Canada fleabane</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Factorial design</topic><topic>Glyphosate</topic><topic>glyphosate resistance</topic><topic>Height</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>rate</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hedges, Brittany K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soltani, Nader</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooker, David C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Darren E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sikkema, Peter H</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hedges, Brittany K</au><au>Soltani, Nader</au><au>Hooker, David C</au><au>Robinson, Darren E</au><au>Sikkema, Peter H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of Glyphosate/Dicamba Application Rate and Timing on the Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed in Glyphosate/Dicamba-Resistant Soybean</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><stitle>Weed Technol</stitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>678</spage><epage>682</epage><pages>678-682</pages><issn>1550-2740</issn><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>Dicamba may be an efficacious option for the control of glyphosate-resistant (GR) horseweed in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean; research is needed to optimize the application rate based on horseweed height at the time of application. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of glyphosate/dicamba rate and application timing for the control of GR horseweed. Glyphosate/dicamba was applied at three rates (900, 1,350, and 1,800 g ae ha-1) at three horseweed application timings (5, 15, and 25 cm) in a factorial design. There was no interaction between glyphosate/dicamba rate and timing for GR horseweed control or soybean yield; however, there was an interaction for GR horseweed density and biomass. At 2 and 4 wk after application (WAA), there was a decrease in GR horseweed control as the height at the time application increased. At 4 WAA, the application of glyphosate/dicamba to GR horseweed that was 5-, 15-, and 25-cm tall provided 87%, 76%, and 62% control, respectively. There was no impact of glyphosate/dicamba application timing on soybean yield. At 2, 4, and 8 WAA, there was an increase in GR horseweed control as the rate of glyphosate/ dicamba was increased. At 8 WAA, glyphosate/dicamba applied at 900, 1,350, and 1,800 g ae ha-1 controlled GR horseweed 76%, 87%, and 92%, respectively. Earlier application timings and higher rates of glyphosate/dicamba caused the greatest reduction in GR horseweed density and biomass. Reduced GR horseweed competition resulted in a 100% to 144% increase in soybean yield, but there was no difference in soybean yield among glyphosate/dicamba rates tested. Nomenclature: Dicamba; glyphosate; horseweed, Erigeron canadensis L. Cronq.; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/wet.2018.72</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1550-2740
ispartof Weed technology, 2018-12, Vol.32 (6), p.678-682
issn 1550-2740
0890-037X
1550-2740
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2159370759
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Agricultural production
Biomass
Canada fleabane
Crop yield
Crops
Density
Factorial design
Glyphosate
glyphosate resistance
Height
Herbicides
rate
Seeds
Soybeans
Weeds
title Influence of Glyphosate/Dicamba Application Rate and Timing on the Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed in Glyphosate/Dicamba-Resistant Soybean
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T10%3A15%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20Glyphosate/Dicamba%20Application%20Rate%20and%20Timing%20on%20the%20Control%20of%20Glyphosate-Resistant%20Horseweed%20in%20Glyphosate/Dicamba-Resistant%20Soybean&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Hedges,%20Brittany%20K&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=678&rft.epage=682&rft.pages=678-682&rft.issn=1550-2740&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/wet.2018.72&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26567662%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2159370759&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26567662&rfr_iscdi=true