How Face-to-Face Interviews and Cognitive Skill Affect Item Non-Response: A Randomized Experiment Assigning Mode of Interview

Technology and the decreased cost of survey research have made it possible for researchers to collect data using new and varied modes of interview. These data are often analyzed as if they were generated using similar processes, but the modes of interview may produce differences in response simply d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Political science research and methods 2019-01, Vol.7 (1), p.143-162
Hauptverfasser: Gooch, Andrew, Vavreck, Lynn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 162
container_issue 1
container_start_page 143
container_title Political science research and methods
container_volume 7
creator Gooch, Andrew
Vavreck, Lynn
description Technology and the decreased cost of survey research have made it possible for researchers to collect data using new and varied modes of interview. These data are often analyzed as if they were generated using similar processes, but the modes of interview may produce differences in response simply due to the presence or absence of an interviewer. In this paper, we explore the differences in item non-response that result from different modes of interview and find that mode makes a difference. The data are from an experiment in which we randomly assigned an adult population to an in-person or self-completed survey after subjects agreed to participate in a short poll. For nearly every topic and format of question, we find less item non-response in the self-complete mode. Furthermore, we find the difference across modes in non-response is exacerbated for respondents with low levels of cognitive abilities. Moving from high to low levels of cognitive ability, an otherwise average respondent can be up to six times more likely to say “don’t know” in a face-to-face interview than in a self-completed survey, depending on the type of question.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/psrm.2016.20
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2159336389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_psrm_2016_20</cupid><sourcerecordid>2159336389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-8c03066291e187af56abcbb580d04ae41a14d9d15bc066d97dd21a01c7322033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE9PAjEQxTdGEwly8wM08epiu91_9UYICAlqgtw33XaWFNnt2hZQE7-73UDk4hxm5vCb9zIvCG4JHhJMsofWmnoYYZL6dhH0IhyzMI9zdvm3Z_g6GFi7wb4YTlIW94KfmT6gKRcQOh12E80bB2av4GARbyQa63WjnNoDentX2y0aVRUIh-YOavSim3AJttWNhUc0Qkt_oGv1DRJNPlswqobGoZG1yms0a_SsJSBdnS1ugquKby0MTrMfrKaT1XgWLl6f5uPRIhQURy7MBaY4TSNGgOQZr5KUl6IskxxLHHOICSexZJIkpfCYZJmUEeGYiIxGEaa0H9wdZVujP3ZgXbHRO9N4xyIiCaM0pTnz1P2REkZba6AqWv8BN18FwUUXcdFFXHQR--bx4QnndWmUXMNZ9d-DX5iPfmg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2159336389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Face-to-Face Interviews and Cognitive Skill Affect Item Non-Response: A Randomized Experiment Assigning Mode of Interview</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Gooch, Andrew ; Vavreck, Lynn</creator><creatorcontrib>Gooch, Andrew ; Vavreck, Lynn</creatorcontrib><description>Technology and the decreased cost of survey research have made it possible for researchers to collect data using new and varied modes of interview. These data are often analyzed as if they were generated using similar processes, but the modes of interview may produce differences in response simply due to the presence or absence of an interviewer. In this paper, we explore the differences in item non-response that result from different modes of interview and find that mode makes a difference. The data are from an experiment in which we randomly assigned an adult population to an in-person or self-completed survey after subjects agreed to participate in a short poll. For nearly every topic and format of question, we find less item non-response in the self-complete mode. Furthermore, we find the difference across modes in non-response is exacerbated for respondents with low levels of cognitive abilities. Moving from high to low levels of cognitive ability, an otherwise average respondent can be up to six times more likely to say “don’t know” in a face-to-face interview than in a self-completed survey, depending on the type of question.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-8470</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-8489</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/psrm.2016.20</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Ability ; Cognition ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive ability ; Education ; Experiments ; Interviews ; Original Articles ; Partisanship ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Respondents</subject><ispartof>Political science research and methods, 2019-01, Vol.7 (1), p.143-162</ispartof><rights>The European Political Science Association 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-8c03066291e187af56abcbb580d04ae41a14d9d15bc066d97dd21a01c7322033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-8c03066291e187af56abcbb580d04ae41a14d9d15bc066d97dd21a01c7322033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847016000200/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,12845,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gooch, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vavreck, Lynn</creatorcontrib><title>How Face-to-Face Interviews and Cognitive Skill Affect Item Non-Response: A Randomized Experiment Assigning Mode of Interview</title><title>Political science research and methods</title><addtitle>PSRM</addtitle><description>Technology and the decreased cost of survey research have made it possible for researchers to collect data using new and varied modes of interview. These data are often analyzed as if they were generated using similar processes, but the modes of interview may produce differences in response simply due to the presence or absence of an interviewer. In this paper, we explore the differences in item non-response that result from different modes of interview and find that mode makes a difference. The data are from an experiment in which we randomly assigned an adult population to an in-person or self-completed survey after subjects agreed to participate in a short poll. For nearly every topic and format of question, we find less item non-response in the self-complete mode. Furthermore, we find the difference across modes in non-response is exacerbated for respondents with low levels of cognitive abilities. Moving from high to low levels of cognitive ability, an otherwise average respondent can be up to six times more likely to say “don’t know” in a face-to-face interview than in a self-completed survey, depending on the type of question.</description><subject>Ability</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><subject>Partisanship</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><issn>2049-8470</issn><issn>2049-8489</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE9PAjEQxTdGEwly8wM08epiu91_9UYICAlqgtw33XaWFNnt2hZQE7-73UDk4hxm5vCb9zIvCG4JHhJMsofWmnoYYZL6dhH0IhyzMI9zdvm3Z_g6GFi7wb4YTlIW94KfmT6gKRcQOh12E80bB2av4GARbyQa63WjnNoDentX2y0aVRUIh-YOavSim3AJttWNhUc0Qkt_oGv1DRJNPlswqobGoZG1yms0a_SsJSBdnS1ugquKby0MTrMfrKaT1XgWLl6f5uPRIhQURy7MBaY4TSNGgOQZr5KUl6IskxxLHHOICSexZJIkpfCYZJmUEeGYiIxGEaa0H9wdZVujP3ZgXbHRO9N4xyIiCaM0pTnz1P2REkZba6AqWv8BN18FwUUXcdFFXHQR--bx4QnndWmUXMNZ9d-DX5iPfmg</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Gooch, Andrew</creator><creator>Vavreck, Lynn</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>How Face-to-Face Interviews and Cognitive Skill Affect Item Non-Response: A Randomized Experiment Assigning Mode of Interview</title><author>Gooch, Andrew ; Vavreck, Lynn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-8c03066291e187af56abcbb580d04ae41a14d9d15bc066d97dd21a01c7322033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Ability</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><topic>Partisanship</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gooch, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vavreck, Lynn</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Political science research and methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gooch, Andrew</au><au>Vavreck, Lynn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Face-to-Face Interviews and Cognitive Skill Affect Item Non-Response: A Randomized Experiment Assigning Mode of Interview</atitle><jtitle>Political science research and methods</jtitle><addtitle>PSRM</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>143</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>143-162</pages><issn>2049-8470</issn><eissn>2049-8489</eissn><abstract>Technology and the decreased cost of survey research have made it possible for researchers to collect data using new and varied modes of interview. These data are often analyzed as if they were generated using similar processes, but the modes of interview may produce differences in response simply due to the presence or absence of an interviewer. In this paper, we explore the differences in item non-response that result from different modes of interview and find that mode makes a difference. The data are from an experiment in which we randomly assigned an adult population to an in-person or self-completed survey after subjects agreed to participate in a short poll. For nearly every topic and format of question, we find less item non-response in the self-complete mode. Furthermore, we find the difference across modes in non-response is exacerbated for respondents with low levels of cognitive abilities. Moving from high to low levels of cognitive ability, an otherwise average respondent can be up to six times more likely to say “don’t know” in a face-to-face interview than in a self-completed survey, depending on the type of question.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/psrm.2016.20</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2049-8470
ispartof Political science research and methods, 2019-01, Vol.7 (1), p.143-162
issn 2049-8470
2049-8489
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2159336389
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Ability
Cognition
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive ability
Education
Experiments
Interviews
Original Articles
Partisanship
Polls & surveys
Respondents
title How Face-to-Face Interviews and Cognitive Skill Affect Item Non-Response: A Randomized Experiment Assigning Mode of Interview
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T00%3A03%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Face-to-Face%20Interviews%20and%20Cognitive%20Skill%20Affect%20Item%20Non-Response:%20A%20Randomized%20Experiment%20Assigning%20Mode%20of%20Interview&rft.jtitle=Political%20science%20research%20and%20methods&rft.au=Gooch,%20Andrew&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=143&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=143-162&rft.issn=2049-8470&rft.eissn=2049-8489&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/psrm.2016.20&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2159336389%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2159336389&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_psrm_2016_20&rfr_iscdi=true