How Face-to-Face Interviews and Cognitive Skill Affect Item Non-Response: A Randomized Experiment Assigning Mode of Interview
Technology and the decreased cost of survey research have made it possible for researchers to collect data using new and varied modes of interview. These data are often analyzed as if they were generated using similar processes, but the modes of interview may produce differences in response simply d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Political science research and methods 2019-01, Vol.7 (1), p.143-162 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 162 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 143 |
container_title | Political science research and methods |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Gooch, Andrew Vavreck, Lynn |
description | Technology and the decreased cost of survey research have made it possible for researchers to collect data using new and varied modes of interview. These data are often analyzed as if they were generated using similar processes, but the modes of interview may produce differences in response simply due to the presence or absence of an interviewer. In this paper, we explore the differences in item non-response that result from different modes of interview and find that mode makes a difference. The data are from an experiment in which we randomly assigned an adult population to an in-person or self-completed survey after subjects agreed to participate in a short poll. For nearly every topic and format of question, we find less item non-response in the self-complete mode. Furthermore, we find the difference across modes in non-response is exacerbated for respondents with low levels of cognitive abilities. Moving from high to low levels of cognitive ability, an otherwise average respondent can be up to six times more likely to say “don’t know” in a face-to-face interview than in a self-completed survey, depending on the type of question. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/psrm.2016.20 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2159336389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_psrm_2016_20</cupid><sourcerecordid>2159336389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-8c03066291e187af56abcbb580d04ae41a14d9d15bc066d97dd21a01c7322033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE9PAjEQxTdGEwly8wM08epiu91_9UYICAlqgtw33XaWFNnt2hZQE7-73UDk4hxm5vCb9zIvCG4JHhJMsofWmnoYYZL6dhH0IhyzMI9zdvm3Z_g6GFi7wb4YTlIW94KfmT6gKRcQOh12E80bB2av4GARbyQa63WjnNoDentX2y0aVRUIh-YOavSim3AJttWNhUc0Qkt_oGv1DRJNPlswqobGoZG1yms0a_SsJSBdnS1ugquKby0MTrMfrKaT1XgWLl6f5uPRIhQURy7MBaY4TSNGgOQZr5KUl6IskxxLHHOICSexZJIkpfCYZJmUEeGYiIxGEaa0H9wdZVujP3ZgXbHRO9N4xyIiCaM0pTnz1P2REkZba6AqWv8BN18FwUUXcdFFXHQR--bx4QnndWmUXMNZ9d-DX5iPfmg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2159336389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Face-to-Face Interviews and Cognitive Skill Affect Item Non-Response: A Randomized Experiment Assigning Mode of Interview</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Gooch, Andrew ; Vavreck, Lynn</creator><creatorcontrib>Gooch, Andrew ; Vavreck, Lynn</creatorcontrib><description>Technology and the decreased cost of survey research have made it possible for researchers to collect data using new and varied modes of interview. These data are often analyzed as if they were generated using similar processes, but the modes of interview may produce differences in response simply due to the presence or absence of an interviewer. In this paper, we explore the differences in item non-response that result from different modes of interview and find that mode makes a difference. The data are from an experiment in which we randomly assigned an adult population to an in-person or self-completed survey after subjects agreed to participate in a short poll. For nearly every topic and format of question, we find less item non-response in the self-complete mode. Furthermore, we find the difference across modes in non-response is exacerbated for respondents with low levels of cognitive abilities. Moving from high to low levels of cognitive ability, an otherwise average respondent can be up to six times more likely to say “don’t know” in a face-to-face interview than in a self-completed survey, depending on the type of question.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-8470</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-8489</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/psrm.2016.20</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Ability ; Cognition ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive ability ; Education ; Experiments ; Interviews ; Original Articles ; Partisanship ; Polls & surveys ; Respondents</subject><ispartof>Political science research and methods, 2019-01, Vol.7 (1), p.143-162</ispartof><rights>The European Political Science Association 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-8c03066291e187af56abcbb580d04ae41a14d9d15bc066d97dd21a01c7322033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-8c03066291e187af56abcbb580d04ae41a14d9d15bc066d97dd21a01c7322033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847016000200/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,12845,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gooch, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vavreck, Lynn</creatorcontrib><title>How Face-to-Face Interviews and Cognitive Skill Affect Item Non-Response: A Randomized Experiment Assigning Mode of Interview</title><title>Political science research and methods</title><addtitle>PSRM</addtitle><description>Technology and the decreased cost of survey research have made it possible for researchers to collect data using new and varied modes of interview. These data are often analyzed as if they were generated using similar processes, but the modes of interview may produce differences in response simply due to the presence or absence of an interviewer. In this paper, we explore the differences in item non-response that result from different modes of interview and find that mode makes a difference. The data are from an experiment in which we randomly assigned an adult population to an in-person or self-completed survey after subjects agreed to participate in a short poll. For nearly every topic and format of question, we find less item non-response in the self-complete mode. Furthermore, we find the difference across modes in non-response is exacerbated for respondents with low levels of cognitive abilities. Moving from high to low levels of cognitive ability, an otherwise average respondent can be up to six times more likely to say “don’t know” in a face-to-face interview than in a self-completed survey, depending on the type of question.</description><subject>Ability</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><subject>Partisanship</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><issn>2049-8470</issn><issn>2049-8489</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE9PAjEQxTdGEwly8wM08epiu91_9UYICAlqgtw33XaWFNnt2hZQE7-73UDk4hxm5vCb9zIvCG4JHhJMsofWmnoYYZL6dhH0IhyzMI9zdvm3Z_g6GFi7wb4YTlIW94KfmT6gKRcQOh12E80bB2av4GARbyQa63WjnNoDentX2y0aVRUIh-YOavSim3AJttWNhUc0Qkt_oGv1DRJNPlswqobGoZG1yms0a_SsJSBdnS1ugquKby0MTrMfrKaT1XgWLl6f5uPRIhQURy7MBaY4TSNGgOQZr5KUl6IskxxLHHOICSexZJIkpfCYZJmUEeGYiIxGEaa0H9wdZVujP3ZgXbHRO9N4xyIiCaM0pTnz1P2REkZba6AqWv8BN18FwUUXcdFFXHQR--bx4QnndWmUXMNZ9d-DX5iPfmg</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Gooch, Andrew</creator><creator>Vavreck, Lynn</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>How Face-to-Face Interviews and Cognitive Skill Affect Item Non-Response: A Randomized Experiment Assigning Mode of Interview</title><author>Gooch, Andrew ; Vavreck, Lynn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-8c03066291e187af56abcbb580d04ae41a14d9d15bc066d97dd21a01c7322033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Ability</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><topic>Partisanship</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gooch, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vavreck, Lynn</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Political science research and methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gooch, Andrew</au><au>Vavreck, Lynn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Face-to-Face Interviews and Cognitive Skill Affect Item Non-Response: A Randomized Experiment Assigning Mode of Interview</atitle><jtitle>Political science research and methods</jtitle><addtitle>PSRM</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>143</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>143-162</pages><issn>2049-8470</issn><eissn>2049-8489</eissn><abstract>Technology and the decreased cost of survey research have made it possible for researchers to collect data using new and varied modes of interview. These data are often analyzed as if they were generated using similar processes, but the modes of interview may produce differences in response simply due to the presence or absence of an interviewer. In this paper, we explore the differences in item non-response that result from different modes of interview and find that mode makes a difference. The data are from an experiment in which we randomly assigned an adult population to an in-person or self-completed survey after subjects agreed to participate in a short poll. For nearly every topic and format of question, we find less item non-response in the self-complete mode. Furthermore, we find the difference across modes in non-response is exacerbated for respondents with low levels of cognitive abilities. Moving from high to low levels of cognitive ability, an otherwise average respondent can be up to six times more likely to say “don’t know” in a face-to-face interview than in a self-completed survey, depending on the type of question.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/psrm.2016.20</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2049-8470 |
ispartof | Political science research and methods, 2019-01, Vol.7 (1), p.143-162 |
issn | 2049-8470 2049-8489 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2159336389 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Ability Cognition Cognition & reasoning Cognitive ability Education Experiments Interviews Original Articles Partisanship Polls & surveys Respondents |
title | How Face-to-Face Interviews and Cognitive Skill Affect Item Non-Response: A Randomized Experiment Assigning Mode of Interview |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T00%3A03%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Face-to-Face%20Interviews%20and%20Cognitive%20Skill%20Affect%20Item%20Non-Response:%20A%20Randomized%20Experiment%20Assigning%20Mode%20of%20Interview&rft.jtitle=Political%20science%20research%20and%20methods&rft.au=Gooch,%20Andrew&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=143&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=143-162&rft.issn=2049-8470&rft.eissn=2049-8489&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/psrm.2016.20&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2159336389%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2159336389&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_psrm_2016_20&rfr_iscdi=true |