Does Macaronesia exist? Conflicting signal in the bryophyte and pteridophyte floras1
Macaronesia, which includes five mid-Atlantic archipelagos (Azores, Madeira, Selvagems, Canaries, and Cape Verdes), has been traditionally recognized as a distinct biogeographic unit whose circumscription has been intimately associated with the hypothesis that the flora is a relict of a formerly bro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of botany 2007-04, Vol.94 (4), p.625 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 625 |
container_title | American journal of botany |
container_volume | 94 |
creator | Vanderpoorten, A Rumsey, F J Carine, M A |
description | Macaronesia, which includes five mid-Atlantic archipelagos (Azores, Madeira, Selvagems, Canaries, and Cape Verdes), has been traditionally recognized as a distinct biogeographic unit whose circumscription has been intimately associated with the hypothesis that the flora is a relict of a formerly broadly distributed subtropical Tertiary flora. The concept of Macaronesia is revisited here using parsimony and Bayesian analyses of floristic data sets for the moss, liverwort, and pteridophyte fioras. All analyses reject the monophyly of Macaronesia s.l., resolving the Cape Verdes with tropical Africa. Of the other Macaronesian archipelagos, the liverwort and pteridophyte analyses support, or could not reject, an Azorean-Madeiran-Canarian dade (hereafter Macaronesia s.s.), but the moss analysis resolves the Canary Islands as sister to North Africa, thus rejecting the concept of Macaronesia s.s. for this group. Dynamic interchange of taxa with neighboring continental areas rather than relictualism best explains the relationships of the Cape Verde cryptogamic flora and the Canary Island moss flora. In contrast, relictualism is consistent with a monophyletic Macaronesia s.s. for liverworts and pteridophytes. However, from the limited information available on relationships of endemic cryptogams, this explanation alone may be unsatisfactory. Spatially congruent patterns may, in fact, conceal a complex mixture of relictual distributions and more recent speciation and dispersal events. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_215888350</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1257621741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2158883503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjL0OgjAURhujifjzDjfuJG2RQCcH1Li4sZsKBUqaFntLIm8vAw_g9OWcnHwrErE0yWLORLYmEaWUx4JxviU7xH5GcRY8IuXVKYSnrKR3VqGWoL4awwUKZxujq6BtC6hbKw1oC6FT8PaTG7opKJC2hiEor-tFNMZ5iexANo00qI7L7snpfiuLRzx49xkVhlfvRj9f4ouzNM_zJKXJX9EPHflBlA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215888350</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Macaronesia exist? Conflicting signal in the bryophyte and pteridophyte floras1</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Vanderpoorten, A ; Rumsey, F J ; Carine, M A</creator><creatorcontrib>Vanderpoorten, A ; Rumsey, F J ; Carine, M A</creatorcontrib><description>Macaronesia, which includes five mid-Atlantic archipelagos (Azores, Madeira, Selvagems, Canaries, and Cape Verdes), has been traditionally recognized as a distinct biogeographic unit whose circumscription has been intimately associated with the hypothesis that the flora is a relict of a formerly broadly distributed subtropical Tertiary flora. The concept of Macaronesia is revisited here using parsimony and Bayesian analyses of floristic data sets for the moss, liverwort, and pteridophyte fioras. All analyses reject the monophyly of Macaronesia s.l., resolving the Cape Verdes with tropical Africa. Of the other Macaronesian archipelagos, the liverwort and pteridophyte analyses support, or could not reject, an Azorean-Madeiran-Canarian dade (hereafter Macaronesia s.s.), but the moss analysis resolves the Canary Islands as sister to North Africa, thus rejecting the concept of Macaronesia s.s. for this group. Dynamic interchange of taxa with neighboring continental areas rather than relictualism best explains the relationships of the Cape Verde cryptogamic flora and the Canary Island moss flora. In contrast, relictualism is consistent with a monophyletic Macaronesia s.s. for liverworts and pteridophytes. However, from the limited information available on relationships of endemic cryptogams, this explanation alone may be unsatisfactory. Spatially congruent patterns may, in fact, conceal a complex mixture of relictual distributions and more recent speciation and dispersal events. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9122</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2197</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJBOAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Columbus: Botanical Society of America, Inc</publisher><subject>Bayesian analysis ; Biogeography ; Botany ; Dispersal ; Flowers & plants ; Islands</subject><ispartof>American journal of botany, 2007-04, Vol.94 (4), p.625</ispartof><rights>Copyright Botanical Society of America, Inc. Apr 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vanderpoorten, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rumsey, F J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carine, M A</creatorcontrib><title>Does Macaronesia exist? Conflicting signal in the bryophyte and pteridophyte floras1</title><title>American journal of botany</title><description>Macaronesia, which includes five mid-Atlantic archipelagos (Azores, Madeira, Selvagems, Canaries, and Cape Verdes), has been traditionally recognized as a distinct biogeographic unit whose circumscription has been intimately associated with the hypothesis that the flora is a relict of a formerly broadly distributed subtropical Tertiary flora. The concept of Macaronesia is revisited here using parsimony and Bayesian analyses of floristic data sets for the moss, liverwort, and pteridophyte fioras. All analyses reject the monophyly of Macaronesia s.l., resolving the Cape Verdes with tropical Africa. Of the other Macaronesian archipelagos, the liverwort and pteridophyte analyses support, or could not reject, an Azorean-Madeiran-Canarian dade (hereafter Macaronesia s.s.), but the moss analysis resolves the Canary Islands as sister to North Africa, thus rejecting the concept of Macaronesia s.s. for this group. Dynamic interchange of taxa with neighboring continental areas rather than relictualism best explains the relationships of the Cape Verde cryptogamic flora and the Canary Island moss flora. In contrast, relictualism is consistent with a monophyletic Macaronesia s.s. for liverworts and pteridophytes. However, from the limited information available on relationships of endemic cryptogams, this explanation alone may be unsatisfactory. Spatially congruent patterns may, in fact, conceal a complex mixture of relictual distributions and more recent speciation and dispersal events. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>Botany</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Islands</subject><issn>0002-9122</issn><issn>1537-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjL0OgjAURhujifjzDjfuJG2RQCcH1Li4sZsKBUqaFntLIm8vAw_g9OWcnHwrErE0yWLORLYmEaWUx4JxviU7xH5GcRY8IuXVKYSnrKR3VqGWoL4awwUKZxujq6BtC6hbKw1oC6FT8PaTG7opKJC2hiEor-tFNMZ5iexANo00qI7L7snpfiuLRzx49xkVhlfvRj9f4ouzNM_zJKXJX9EPHflBlA</recordid><startdate>20070401</startdate><enddate>20070401</enddate><creator>Vanderpoorten, A</creator><creator>Rumsey, F J</creator><creator>Carine, M A</creator><general>Botanical Society of America, Inc</general><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070401</creationdate><title>Does Macaronesia exist? Conflicting signal in the bryophyte and pteridophyte floras1</title><author>Vanderpoorten, A ; Rumsey, F J ; Carine, M A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2158883503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>Botany</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Islands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vanderpoorten, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rumsey, F J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carine, M A</creatorcontrib><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vanderpoorten, A</au><au>Rumsey, F J</au><au>Carine, M A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Macaronesia exist? Conflicting signal in the bryophyte and pteridophyte floras1</atitle><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle><date>2007-04-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>625</spage><pages>625-</pages><issn>0002-9122</issn><eissn>1537-2197</eissn><coden>AJBOAA</coden><abstract>Macaronesia, which includes five mid-Atlantic archipelagos (Azores, Madeira, Selvagems, Canaries, and Cape Verdes), has been traditionally recognized as a distinct biogeographic unit whose circumscription has been intimately associated with the hypothesis that the flora is a relict of a formerly broadly distributed subtropical Tertiary flora. The concept of Macaronesia is revisited here using parsimony and Bayesian analyses of floristic data sets for the moss, liverwort, and pteridophyte fioras. All analyses reject the monophyly of Macaronesia s.l., resolving the Cape Verdes with tropical Africa. Of the other Macaronesian archipelagos, the liverwort and pteridophyte analyses support, or could not reject, an Azorean-Madeiran-Canarian dade (hereafter Macaronesia s.s.), but the moss analysis resolves the Canary Islands as sister to North Africa, thus rejecting the concept of Macaronesia s.s. for this group. Dynamic interchange of taxa with neighboring continental areas rather than relictualism best explains the relationships of the Cape Verde cryptogamic flora and the Canary Island moss flora. In contrast, relictualism is consistent with a monophyletic Macaronesia s.s. for liverworts and pteridophytes. However, from the limited information available on relationships of endemic cryptogams, this explanation alone may be unsatisfactory. Spatially congruent patterns may, in fact, conceal a complex mixture of relictual distributions and more recent speciation and dispersal events. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Columbus</cop><pub>Botanical Society of America, Inc</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9122 |
ispartof | American journal of botany, 2007-04, Vol.94 (4), p.625 |
issn | 0002-9122 1537-2197 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_215888350 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Bayesian analysis Biogeography Botany Dispersal Flowers & plants Islands |
title | Does Macaronesia exist? Conflicting signal in the bryophyte and pteridophyte floras1 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T14%3A29%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Macaronesia%20exist?%20Conflicting%20signal%20in%20the%20bryophyte%20and%20pteridophyte%20floras1&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20botany&rft.au=Vanderpoorten,%20A&rft.date=2007-04-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=625&rft.pages=625-&rft.issn=0002-9122&rft.eissn=1537-2197&rft.coden=AJBOAA&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1257621741%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215888350&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |