Does Macaronesia exist? Conflicting signal in the bryophyte and pteridophyte floras1

Macaronesia, which includes five mid-Atlantic archipelagos (Azores, Madeira, Selvagems, Canaries, and Cape Verdes), has been traditionally recognized as a distinct biogeographic unit whose circumscription has been intimately associated with the hypothesis that the flora is a relict of a formerly bro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of botany 2007-04, Vol.94 (4), p.625
Hauptverfasser: Vanderpoorten, A, Rumsey, F J, Carine, M A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 625
container_title American journal of botany
container_volume 94
creator Vanderpoorten, A
Rumsey, F J
Carine, M A
description Macaronesia, which includes five mid-Atlantic archipelagos (Azores, Madeira, Selvagems, Canaries, and Cape Verdes), has been traditionally recognized as a distinct biogeographic unit whose circumscription has been intimately associated with the hypothesis that the flora is a relict of a formerly broadly distributed subtropical Tertiary flora. The concept of Macaronesia is revisited here using parsimony and Bayesian analyses of floristic data sets for the moss, liverwort, and pteridophyte fioras. All analyses reject the monophyly of Macaronesia s.l., resolving the Cape Verdes with tropical Africa. Of the other Macaronesian archipelagos, the liverwort and pteridophyte analyses support, or could not reject, an Azorean-Madeiran-Canarian dade (hereafter Macaronesia s.s.), but the moss analysis resolves the Canary Islands as sister to North Africa, thus rejecting the concept of Macaronesia s.s. for this group. Dynamic interchange of taxa with neighboring continental areas rather than relictualism best explains the relationships of the Cape Verde cryptogamic flora and the Canary Island moss flora. In contrast, relictualism is consistent with a monophyletic Macaronesia s.s. for liverworts and pteridophytes. However, from the limited information available on relationships of endemic cryptogams, this explanation alone may be unsatisfactory. Spatially congruent patterns may, in fact, conceal a complex mixture of relictual distributions and more recent speciation and dispersal events. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_215888350</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1257621741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2158883503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjL0OgjAURhujifjzDjfuJG2RQCcH1Li4sZsKBUqaFntLIm8vAw_g9OWcnHwrErE0yWLORLYmEaWUx4JxviU7xH5GcRY8IuXVKYSnrKR3VqGWoL4awwUKZxujq6BtC6hbKw1oC6FT8PaTG7opKJC2hiEor-tFNMZ5iexANo00qI7L7snpfiuLRzx49xkVhlfvRj9f4ouzNM_zJKXJX9EPHflBlA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215888350</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Macaronesia exist? Conflicting signal in the bryophyte and pteridophyte floras1</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Vanderpoorten, A ; Rumsey, F J ; Carine, M A</creator><creatorcontrib>Vanderpoorten, A ; Rumsey, F J ; Carine, M A</creatorcontrib><description>Macaronesia, which includes five mid-Atlantic archipelagos (Azores, Madeira, Selvagems, Canaries, and Cape Verdes), has been traditionally recognized as a distinct biogeographic unit whose circumscription has been intimately associated with the hypothesis that the flora is a relict of a formerly broadly distributed subtropical Tertiary flora. The concept of Macaronesia is revisited here using parsimony and Bayesian analyses of floristic data sets for the moss, liverwort, and pteridophyte fioras. All analyses reject the monophyly of Macaronesia s.l., resolving the Cape Verdes with tropical Africa. Of the other Macaronesian archipelagos, the liverwort and pteridophyte analyses support, or could not reject, an Azorean-Madeiran-Canarian dade (hereafter Macaronesia s.s.), but the moss analysis resolves the Canary Islands as sister to North Africa, thus rejecting the concept of Macaronesia s.s. for this group. Dynamic interchange of taxa with neighboring continental areas rather than relictualism best explains the relationships of the Cape Verde cryptogamic flora and the Canary Island moss flora. In contrast, relictualism is consistent with a monophyletic Macaronesia s.s. for liverworts and pteridophytes. However, from the limited information available on relationships of endemic cryptogams, this explanation alone may be unsatisfactory. Spatially congruent patterns may, in fact, conceal a complex mixture of relictual distributions and more recent speciation and dispersal events. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9122</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2197</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJBOAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Columbus: Botanical Society of America, Inc</publisher><subject>Bayesian analysis ; Biogeography ; Botany ; Dispersal ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Islands</subject><ispartof>American journal of botany, 2007-04, Vol.94 (4), p.625</ispartof><rights>Copyright Botanical Society of America, Inc. Apr 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vanderpoorten, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rumsey, F J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carine, M A</creatorcontrib><title>Does Macaronesia exist? Conflicting signal in the bryophyte and pteridophyte floras1</title><title>American journal of botany</title><description>Macaronesia, which includes five mid-Atlantic archipelagos (Azores, Madeira, Selvagems, Canaries, and Cape Verdes), has been traditionally recognized as a distinct biogeographic unit whose circumscription has been intimately associated with the hypothesis that the flora is a relict of a formerly broadly distributed subtropical Tertiary flora. The concept of Macaronesia is revisited here using parsimony and Bayesian analyses of floristic data sets for the moss, liverwort, and pteridophyte fioras. All analyses reject the monophyly of Macaronesia s.l., resolving the Cape Verdes with tropical Africa. Of the other Macaronesian archipelagos, the liverwort and pteridophyte analyses support, or could not reject, an Azorean-Madeiran-Canarian dade (hereafter Macaronesia s.s.), but the moss analysis resolves the Canary Islands as sister to North Africa, thus rejecting the concept of Macaronesia s.s. for this group. Dynamic interchange of taxa with neighboring continental areas rather than relictualism best explains the relationships of the Cape Verde cryptogamic flora and the Canary Island moss flora. In contrast, relictualism is consistent with a monophyletic Macaronesia s.s. for liverworts and pteridophytes. However, from the limited information available on relationships of endemic cryptogams, this explanation alone may be unsatisfactory. Spatially congruent patterns may, in fact, conceal a complex mixture of relictual distributions and more recent speciation and dispersal events. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>Botany</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Islands</subject><issn>0002-9122</issn><issn>1537-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjL0OgjAURhujifjzDjfuJG2RQCcH1Li4sZsKBUqaFntLIm8vAw_g9OWcnHwrErE0yWLORLYmEaWUx4JxviU7xH5GcRY8IuXVKYSnrKR3VqGWoL4awwUKZxujq6BtC6hbKw1oC6FT8PaTG7opKJC2hiEor-tFNMZ5iexANo00qI7L7snpfiuLRzx49xkVhlfvRj9f4ouzNM_zJKXJX9EPHflBlA</recordid><startdate>20070401</startdate><enddate>20070401</enddate><creator>Vanderpoorten, A</creator><creator>Rumsey, F J</creator><creator>Carine, M A</creator><general>Botanical Society of America, Inc</general><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070401</creationdate><title>Does Macaronesia exist? Conflicting signal in the bryophyte and pteridophyte floras1</title><author>Vanderpoorten, A ; Rumsey, F J ; Carine, M A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2158883503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>Botany</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Islands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vanderpoorten, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rumsey, F J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carine, M A</creatorcontrib><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vanderpoorten, A</au><au>Rumsey, F J</au><au>Carine, M A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Macaronesia exist? Conflicting signal in the bryophyte and pteridophyte floras1</atitle><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle><date>2007-04-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>625</spage><pages>625-</pages><issn>0002-9122</issn><eissn>1537-2197</eissn><coden>AJBOAA</coden><abstract>Macaronesia, which includes five mid-Atlantic archipelagos (Azores, Madeira, Selvagems, Canaries, and Cape Verdes), has been traditionally recognized as a distinct biogeographic unit whose circumscription has been intimately associated with the hypothesis that the flora is a relict of a formerly broadly distributed subtropical Tertiary flora. The concept of Macaronesia is revisited here using parsimony and Bayesian analyses of floristic data sets for the moss, liverwort, and pteridophyte fioras. All analyses reject the monophyly of Macaronesia s.l., resolving the Cape Verdes with tropical Africa. Of the other Macaronesian archipelagos, the liverwort and pteridophyte analyses support, or could not reject, an Azorean-Madeiran-Canarian dade (hereafter Macaronesia s.s.), but the moss analysis resolves the Canary Islands as sister to North Africa, thus rejecting the concept of Macaronesia s.s. for this group. Dynamic interchange of taxa with neighboring continental areas rather than relictualism best explains the relationships of the Cape Verde cryptogamic flora and the Canary Island moss flora. In contrast, relictualism is consistent with a monophyletic Macaronesia s.s. for liverworts and pteridophytes. However, from the limited information available on relationships of endemic cryptogams, this explanation alone may be unsatisfactory. Spatially congruent patterns may, in fact, conceal a complex mixture of relictual distributions and more recent speciation and dispersal events. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Columbus</cop><pub>Botanical Society of America, Inc</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9122
ispartof American journal of botany, 2007-04, Vol.94 (4), p.625
issn 0002-9122
1537-2197
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_215888350
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Bayesian analysis
Biogeography
Botany
Dispersal
Flowers & plants
Islands
title Does Macaronesia exist? Conflicting signal in the bryophyte and pteridophyte floras1
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T14%3A29%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Macaronesia%20exist?%20Conflicting%20signal%20in%20the%20bryophyte%20and%20pteridophyte%20floras1&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20botany&rft.au=Vanderpoorten,%20A&rft.date=2007-04-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=625&rft.pages=625-&rft.issn=0002-9122&rft.eissn=1537-2197&rft.coden=AJBOAA&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1257621741%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215888350&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true