The Work of Writing: Raiding the Inarticulate
This article proposes that two processes are involved in the generation of content during writing: (a) an active, knowledge-constituting process in which content is synthesized by constraints within semantic memory representing the implicit structure of the writer's understanding, and (b) a ref...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Educational psychologist 2018-10, Vol.53 (4), p.238-257 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 257 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 238 |
container_title | Educational psychologist |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Galbraith, David Baaijen, Veerle M. |
description | This article proposes that two processes are involved in the generation of content during writing: (a) an active, knowledge-constituting process in which content is synthesized by constraints within semantic memory representing the implicit structure of the writer's understanding, and (b) a reflective, knowledge-transforming process in which content retrieved from episodic memory is manipulated in working memory to satisfy rhetorical goals. It suggests that, although both processes are required for effective writing, the contrasting nature of the implicit organization guiding the constitution of the writer's understanding and the explicit organization required to satisfy rhetorical goals is the source of a fundamental conflict in writing. The article starts by relating the processes to current models of writing. It outlines how they are combined in a dual-process model and discusses evidence for the model. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications for writing research and the teaching and development of writing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00461520.2018.1505515 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2157718634</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1200292</ericid><sourcerecordid>2157718634</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-d6dbe6cd1f15dcd21794c11341f8223fe25c14a0077562084d6b3a7daca48d663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_QiHgOXVms7tJPSmlaqUgSKXHZbsfujXN1k2K9N-bkOrR0wy8zzsDDyEjhDFCATcATCCnMKaAxRg5cI78hAyQZzQVk4KfkkHHpB10Ti7qegMAiJwPSLr8sMkqxM8kuGQVfeOr99vkVXnTLknThvNKxcbrfakae0nOnCpre3WcQ_L2MFtOn9LFy-N8er9INYO8SY0wayu0QYfcaEMxnzCNmDF0BaWZs5RrZAogz7mgUDAj1pnKjdKKFUaIbEiu-7u7GL72tm7kJuxj1b6UFHmeYyEy1lK8p3QMdR2tk7votyoeJILszMhfM7IzI49m2t6o79no9V9n9owUgE5om9_1ua9ciFv1HWJpZKMOZYguqkr7Wmb_v_gB6ENw8g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2157718634</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Work of Writing: Raiding the Inarticulate</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Galbraith, David ; Baaijen, Veerle M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Galbraith, David ; Baaijen, Veerle M.</creatorcontrib><description>This article proposes that two processes are involved in the generation of content during writing: (a) an active, knowledge-constituting process in which content is synthesized by constraints within semantic memory representing the implicit structure of the writer's understanding, and (b) a reflective, knowledge-transforming process in which content retrieved from episodic memory is manipulated in working memory to satisfy rhetorical goals. It suggests that, although both processes are required for effective writing, the contrasting nature of the implicit organization guiding the constitution of the writer's understanding and the explicit organization required to satisfy rhetorical goals is the source of a fundamental conflict in writing. The article starts by relating the processes to current models of writing. It outlines how they are combined in a dual-process model and discusses evidence for the model. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications for writing research and the teaching and development of writing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-1520</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6985</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2018.1505515</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Routledge</publisher><subject>Cognitive Processes ; Concept Formation ; Memory ; Metacognition ; Reflection ; Writing ; Writing (Composition) ; Writing Processes ; Writing Research ; Writing Strategies</subject><ispartof>Educational psychologist, 2018-10, Vol.53 (4), p.238-257</ispartof><rights>2018 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC 2018</rights><rights>2018 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-d6dbe6cd1f15dcd21794c11341f8223fe25c14a0077562084d6b3a7daca48d663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-d6dbe6cd1f15dcd21794c11341f8223fe25c14a0077562084d6b3a7daca48d663</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4743-6472 ; 0000-0003-4195-6386</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00461520.2018.1505515$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00461520.2018.1505515$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,59646,60435</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1200292$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Galbraith, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baaijen, Veerle M.</creatorcontrib><title>The Work of Writing: Raiding the Inarticulate</title><title>Educational psychologist</title><description>This article proposes that two processes are involved in the generation of content during writing: (a) an active, knowledge-constituting process in which content is synthesized by constraints within semantic memory representing the implicit structure of the writer's understanding, and (b) a reflective, knowledge-transforming process in which content retrieved from episodic memory is manipulated in working memory to satisfy rhetorical goals. It suggests that, although both processes are required for effective writing, the contrasting nature of the implicit organization guiding the constitution of the writer's understanding and the explicit organization required to satisfy rhetorical goals is the source of a fundamental conflict in writing. The article starts by relating the processes to current models of writing. It outlines how they are combined in a dual-process model and discusses evidence for the model. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications for writing research and the teaching and development of writing.</description><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Concept Formation</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Reflection</subject><subject>Writing</subject><subject>Writing (Composition)</subject><subject>Writing Processes</subject><subject>Writing Research</subject><subject>Writing Strategies</subject><issn>0046-1520</issn><issn>1532-6985</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_QiHgOXVms7tJPSmlaqUgSKXHZbsfujXN1k2K9N-bkOrR0wy8zzsDDyEjhDFCATcATCCnMKaAxRg5cI78hAyQZzQVk4KfkkHHpB10Ti7qegMAiJwPSLr8sMkqxM8kuGQVfeOr99vkVXnTLknThvNKxcbrfakae0nOnCpre3WcQ_L2MFtOn9LFy-N8er9INYO8SY0wayu0QYfcaEMxnzCNmDF0BaWZs5RrZAogz7mgUDAj1pnKjdKKFUaIbEiu-7u7GL72tm7kJuxj1b6UFHmeYyEy1lK8p3QMdR2tk7votyoeJILszMhfM7IzI49m2t6o79no9V9n9owUgE5om9_1ua9ciFv1HWJpZKMOZYguqkr7Wmb_v_gB6ENw8g</recordid><startdate>20181002</startdate><enddate>20181002</enddate><creator>Galbraith, David</creator><creator>Baaijen, Veerle M.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4743-6472</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4195-6386</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181002</creationdate><title>The Work of Writing: Raiding the Inarticulate</title><author>Galbraith, David ; Baaijen, Veerle M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-d6dbe6cd1f15dcd21794c11341f8223fe25c14a0077562084d6b3a7daca48d663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Concept Formation</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Reflection</topic><topic>Writing</topic><topic>Writing (Composition)</topic><topic>Writing Processes</topic><topic>Writing Research</topic><topic>Writing Strategies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Galbraith, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baaijen, Veerle M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Educational psychologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Galbraith, David</au><au>Baaijen, Veerle M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1200292</ericid><atitle>The Work of Writing: Raiding the Inarticulate</atitle><jtitle>Educational psychologist</jtitle><date>2018-10-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>238</spage><epage>257</epage><pages>238-257</pages><issn>0046-1520</issn><eissn>1532-6985</eissn><abstract>This article proposes that two processes are involved in the generation of content during writing: (a) an active, knowledge-constituting process in which content is synthesized by constraints within semantic memory representing the implicit structure of the writer's understanding, and (b) a reflective, knowledge-transforming process in which content retrieved from episodic memory is manipulated in working memory to satisfy rhetorical goals. It suggests that, although both processes are required for effective writing, the contrasting nature of the implicit organization guiding the constitution of the writer's understanding and the explicit organization required to satisfy rhetorical goals is the source of a fundamental conflict in writing. The article starts by relating the processes to current models of writing. It outlines how they are combined in a dual-process model and discusses evidence for the model. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications for writing research and the teaching and development of writing.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/00461520.2018.1505515</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4743-6472</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4195-6386</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0046-1520 |
ispartof | Educational psychologist, 2018-10, Vol.53 (4), p.238-257 |
issn | 0046-1520 1532-6985 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2157718634 |
source | EBSCOhost Education Source; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | Cognitive Processes Concept Formation Memory Metacognition Reflection Writing Writing (Composition) Writing Processes Writing Research Writing Strategies |
title | The Work of Writing: Raiding the Inarticulate |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T10%3A02%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Work%20of%20Writing:%20Raiding%20the%20Inarticulate&rft.jtitle=Educational%20psychologist&rft.au=Galbraith,%20David&rft.date=2018-10-02&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=238&rft.epage=257&rft.pages=238-257&rft.issn=0046-1520&rft.eissn=1532-6985&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00461520.2018.1505515&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2157718634%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2157718634&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1200292&rfr_iscdi=true |