The Challenges of Writing in School: Conceptualizing Writing Development Within a Sociocognitive Framework
This article argues for a conceptualization of school writing that emphasizes how cognitive and sociocultural factors interact. In academic, professional, and affinity-based communities, an emphasis on standards of quality drives the adoption of such practices as revision and peer and expert review....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Educational psychologist 2018-10, Vol.53 (4), p.280-300 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 300 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 280 |
container_title | Educational psychologist |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Deane, Paul |
description | This article argues for a conceptualization of school writing that emphasizes how cognitive and sociocultural factors interact. In academic, professional, and affinity-based communities, an emphasis on standards of quality drives the adoption of such practices as revision and peer and expert review. In school, everyday writing practices center around demonstrations of knowledge (taking notes, writing summaries, providing personal responses to readings, completing worksheets, etc.) where the teacher is often the sole or primary audience. This context tends to privilege knowledge-telling strategies and prioritize fluency and efficiency of expression. When these sociocultural factors interact with cognition, group differences tend to emerge, as knowledge telling provides few opportunities for disadvantaged groups to overcome barriers linked to differences in prior knowledge, fluency, attention management, or motivation. It also affects the efficacy of instructional practices, because cognitive ability and social identity affect how students internalize the metacognitive concepts and strategies characteristic of expert writers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00461520.2018.1513844 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2157717901</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1200293</ericid><sourcerecordid>2157717901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d7fbb4e4931374eae2d589ff1c96e7e00251374e72d1d6c5a1d0da27ae0042c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUiWWKd4nDgPVqDyFhKLFrG0jDNpXBK7OCkIvh6HFpasZnHO9YwvIcfAJsBydspYkoLgbMIZ5BMQEOdJskNGIGIepUUudslocKJB2icHXbdkjAEIMSLLeY10WqumQbvAjrqKPnvTG7ugxtKZrp1rzujUWY2rfq0a8zWgX-US37FxqxZtT59NX4eIojOnjdNuYYPzjvTaqxY_nH89JHuVajo82s4xebq-mk9vo4fHm7vpxUOk45T1UZlVLy8JJkUMcZagQl6KvKgq0EWKGTLGxQ_IeAllqoWCkpWKZyqghOs0HpOTzbsr797W2PVy6dbehpWSg8gyyAoGwRIbS3vXdR4rufKmVf5TApNDrfK3VjnUKre1htzxJofe6L_M1T3wcFkRB36-4cZWzrcq_LwpZa8-G-crr6w2nYz_X_ENLb6IuA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2157717901</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Challenges of Writing in School: Conceptualizing Writing Development Within a Sociocognitive Framework</title><source>Education Source</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Deane, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Deane, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>This article argues for a conceptualization of school writing that emphasizes how cognitive and sociocultural factors interact. In academic, professional, and affinity-based communities, an emphasis on standards of quality drives the adoption of such practices as revision and peer and expert review. In school, everyday writing practices center around demonstrations of knowledge (taking notes, writing summaries, providing personal responses to readings, completing worksheets, etc.) where the teacher is often the sole or primary audience. This context tends to privilege knowledge-telling strategies and prioritize fluency and efficiency of expression. When these sociocultural factors interact with cognition, group differences tend to emerge, as knowledge telling provides few opportunities for disadvantaged groups to overcome barriers linked to differences in prior knowledge, fluency, attention management, or motivation. It also affects the efficacy of instructional practices, because cognitive ability and social identity affect how students internalize the metacognitive concepts and strategies characteristic of expert writers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-1520</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6985</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2018.1513844</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Routledge</publisher><subject>Academic Discourse ; Attention ; Best Practices ; Cognitive Ability ; Content Area Writing ; Cultural Influences ; Differences ; Knowledge Level ; Language Skills ; Prior Learning ; Social Influences ; Student Motivation ; Writing ; Writing (Composition) ; Writing Achievement ; Writing Instruction ; Writing Strategies</subject><ispartof>Educational psychologist, 2018-10, Vol.53 (4), p.280-300</ispartof><rights>2018 Educational Testing Service. Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2018</rights><rights>2018 Educational Testing Service. Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d7fbb4e4931374eae2d589ff1c96e7e00251374e72d1d6c5a1d0da27ae0042c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d7fbb4e4931374eae2d589ff1c96e7e00251374e72d1d6c5a1d0da27ae0042c63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6838-2856</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00461520.2018.1513844$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00461520.2018.1513844$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1200293$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Deane, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>The Challenges of Writing in School: Conceptualizing Writing Development Within a Sociocognitive Framework</title><title>Educational psychologist</title><description>This article argues for a conceptualization of school writing that emphasizes how cognitive and sociocultural factors interact. In academic, professional, and affinity-based communities, an emphasis on standards of quality drives the adoption of such practices as revision and peer and expert review. In school, everyday writing practices center around demonstrations of knowledge (taking notes, writing summaries, providing personal responses to readings, completing worksheets, etc.) where the teacher is often the sole or primary audience. This context tends to privilege knowledge-telling strategies and prioritize fluency and efficiency of expression. When these sociocultural factors interact with cognition, group differences tend to emerge, as knowledge telling provides few opportunities for disadvantaged groups to overcome barriers linked to differences in prior knowledge, fluency, attention management, or motivation. It also affects the efficacy of instructional practices, because cognitive ability and social identity affect how students internalize the metacognitive concepts and strategies characteristic of expert writers.</description><subject>Academic Discourse</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>Cognitive Ability</subject><subject>Content Area Writing</subject><subject>Cultural Influences</subject><subject>Differences</subject><subject>Knowledge Level</subject><subject>Language Skills</subject><subject>Prior Learning</subject><subject>Social Influences</subject><subject>Student Motivation</subject><subject>Writing</subject><subject>Writing (Composition)</subject><subject>Writing Achievement</subject><subject>Writing Instruction</subject><subject>Writing Strategies</subject><issn>0046-1520</issn><issn>1532-6985</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUiWWKd4nDgPVqDyFhKLFrG0jDNpXBK7OCkIvh6HFpasZnHO9YwvIcfAJsBydspYkoLgbMIZ5BMQEOdJskNGIGIepUUudslocKJB2icHXbdkjAEIMSLLeY10WqumQbvAjrqKPnvTG7ugxtKZrp1rzujUWY2rfq0a8zWgX-US37FxqxZtT59NX4eIojOnjdNuYYPzjvTaqxY_nH89JHuVajo82s4xebq-mk9vo4fHm7vpxUOk45T1UZlVLy8JJkUMcZagQl6KvKgq0EWKGTLGxQ_IeAllqoWCkpWKZyqghOs0HpOTzbsr797W2PVy6dbehpWSg8gyyAoGwRIbS3vXdR4rufKmVf5TApNDrfK3VjnUKre1htzxJofe6L_M1T3wcFkRB36-4cZWzrcq_LwpZa8-G-crr6w2nYz_X_ENLb6IuA</recordid><startdate>20181002</startdate><enddate>20181002</enddate><creator>Deane, Paul</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6838-2856</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181002</creationdate><title>The Challenges of Writing in School: Conceptualizing Writing Development Within a Sociocognitive Framework</title><author>Deane, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d7fbb4e4931374eae2d589ff1c96e7e00251374e72d1d6c5a1d0da27ae0042c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Academic Discourse</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>Cognitive Ability</topic><topic>Content Area Writing</topic><topic>Cultural Influences</topic><topic>Differences</topic><topic>Knowledge Level</topic><topic>Language Skills</topic><topic>Prior Learning</topic><topic>Social Influences</topic><topic>Student Motivation</topic><topic>Writing</topic><topic>Writing (Composition)</topic><topic>Writing Achievement</topic><topic>Writing Instruction</topic><topic>Writing Strategies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deane, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Educational psychologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deane, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1200293</ericid><atitle>The Challenges of Writing in School: Conceptualizing Writing Development Within a Sociocognitive Framework</atitle><jtitle>Educational psychologist</jtitle><date>2018-10-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>280</spage><epage>300</epage><pages>280-300</pages><issn>0046-1520</issn><eissn>1532-6985</eissn><abstract>This article argues for a conceptualization of school writing that emphasizes how cognitive and sociocultural factors interact. In academic, professional, and affinity-based communities, an emphasis on standards of quality drives the adoption of such practices as revision and peer and expert review. In school, everyday writing practices center around demonstrations of knowledge (taking notes, writing summaries, providing personal responses to readings, completing worksheets, etc.) where the teacher is often the sole or primary audience. This context tends to privilege knowledge-telling strategies and prioritize fluency and efficiency of expression. When these sociocultural factors interact with cognition, group differences tend to emerge, as knowledge telling provides few opportunities for disadvantaged groups to overcome barriers linked to differences in prior knowledge, fluency, attention management, or motivation. It also affects the efficacy of instructional practices, because cognitive ability and social identity affect how students internalize the metacognitive concepts and strategies characteristic of expert writers.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/00461520.2018.1513844</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6838-2856</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0046-1520 |
ispartof | Educational psychologist, 2018-10, Vol.53 (4), p.280-300 |
issn | 0046-1520 1532-6985 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2157717901 |
source | Education Source; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | Academic Discourse Attention Best Practices Cognitive Ability Content Area Writing Cultural Influences Differences Knowledge Level Language Skills Prior Learning Social Influences Student Motivation Writing Writing (Composition) Writing Achievement Writing Instruction Writing Strategies |
title | The Challenges of Writing in School: Conceptualizing Writing Development Within a Sociocognitive Framework |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T05%3A50%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Challenges%20of%20Writing%20in%20School:%20Conceptualizing%20Writing%20Development%20Within%20a%20Sociocognitive%20Framework&rft.jtitle=Educational%20psychologist&rft.au=Deane,%20Paul&rft.date=2018-10-02&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=280&rft.epage=300&rft.pages=280-300&rft.issn=0046-1520&rft.eissn=1532-6985&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00461520.2018.1513844&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2157717901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2157717901&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1200293&rfr_iscdi=true |