The Challenges of Writing in School: Conceptualizing Writing Development Within a Sociocognitive Framework

This article argues for a conceptualization of school writing that emphasizes how cognitive and sociocultural factors interact. In academic, professional, and affinity-based communities, an emphasis on standards of quality drives the adoption of such practices as revision and peer and expert review....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educational psychologist 2018-10, Vol.53 (4), p.280-300
1. Verfasser: Deane, Paul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 300
container_issue 4
container_start_page 280
container_title Educational psychologist
container_volume 53
creator Deane, Paul
description This article argues for a conceptualization of school writing that emphasizes how cognitive and sociocultural factors interact. In academic, professional, and affinity-based communities, an emphasis on standards of quality drives the adoption of such practices as revision and peer and expert review. In school, everyday writing practices center around demonstrations of knowledge (taking notes, writing summaries, providing personal responses to readings, completing worksheets, etc.) where the teacher is often the sole or primary audience. This context tends to privilege knowledge-telling strategies and prioritize fluency and efficiency of expression. When these sociocultural factors interact with cognition, group differences tend to emerge, as knowledge telling provides few opportunities for disadvantaged groups to overcome barriers linked to differences in prior knowledge, fluency, attention management, or motivation. It also affects the efficacy of instructional practices, because cognitive ability and social identity affect how students internalize the metacognitive concepts and strategies characteristic of expert writers.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00461520.2018.1513844
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2157717901</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1200293</ericid><sourcerecordid>2157717901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d7fbb4e4931374eae2d589ff1c96e7e00251374e72d1d6c5a1d0da27ae0042c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUiWWKd4nDgPVqDyFhKLFrG0jDNpXBK7OCkIvh6HFpasZnHO9YwvIcfAJsBydspYkoLgbMIZ5BMQEOdJskNGIGIepUUudslocKJB2icHXbdkjAEIMSLLeY10WqumQbvAjrqKPnvTG7ugxtKZrp1rzujUWY2rfq0a8zWgX-US37FxqxZtT59NX4eIojOnjdNuYYPzjvTaqxY_nH89JHuVajo82s4xebq-mk9vo4fHm7vpxUOk45T1UZlVLy8JJkUMcZagQl6KvKgq0EWKGTLGxQ_IeAllqoWCkpWKZyqghOs0HpOTzbsr797W2PVy6dbehpWSg8gyyAoGwRIbS3vXdR4rufKmVf5TApNDrfK3VjnUKre1htzxJofe6L_M1T3wcFkRB36-4cZWzrcq_LwpZa8-G-crr6w2nYz_X_ENLb6IuA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2157717901</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Challenges of Writing in School: Conceptualizing Writing Development Within a Sociocognitive Framework</title><source>Education Source</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Deane, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Deane, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>This article argues for a conceptualization of school writing that emphasizes how cognitive and sociocultural factors interact. In academic, professional, and affinity-based communities, an emphasis on standards of quality drives the adoption of such practices as revision and peer and expert review. In school, everyday writing practices center around demonstrations of knowledge (taking notes, writing summaries, providing personal responses to readings, completing worksheets, etc.) where the teacher is often the sole or primary audience. This context tends to privilege knowledge-telling strategies and prioritize fluency and efficiency of expression. When these sociocultural factors interact with cognition, group differences tend to emerge, as knowledge telling provides few opportunities for disadvantaged groups to overcome barriers linked to differences in prior knowledge, fluency, attention management, or motivation. It also affects the efficacy of instructional practices, because cognitive ability and social identity affect how students internalize the metacognitive concepts and strategies characteristic of expert writers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-1520</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6985</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2018.1513844</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Routledge</publisher><subject>Academic Discourse ; Attention ; Best Practices ; Cognitive Ability ; Content Area Writing ; Cultural Influences ; Differences ; Knowledge Level ; Language Skills ; Prior Learning ; Social Influences ; Student Motivation ; Writing ; Writing (Composition) ; Writing Achievement ; Writing Instruction ; Writing Strategies</subject><ispartof>Educational psychologist, 2018-10, Vol.53 (4), p.280-300</ispartof><rights>2018 Educational Testing Service. Published with license by Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2018</rights><rights>2018 Educational Testing Service. Published with license by Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d7fbb4e4931374eae2d589ff1c96e7e00251374e72d1d6c5a1d0da27ae0042c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d7fbb4e4931374eae2d589ff1c96e7e00251374e72d1d6c5a1d0da27ae0042c63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6838-2856</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00461520.2018.1513844$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00461520.2018.1513844$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1200293$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Deane, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>The Challenges of Writing in School: Conceptualizing Writing Development Within a Sociocognitive Framework</title><title>Educational psychologist</title><description>This article argues for a conceptualization of school writing that emphasizes how cognitive and sociocultural factors interact. In academic, professional, and affinity-based communities, an emphasis on standards of quality drives the adoption of such practices as revision and peer and expert review. In school, everyday writing practices center around demonstrations of knowledge (taking notes, writing summaries, providing personal responses to readings, completing worksheets, etc.) where the teacher is often the sole or primary audience. This context tends to privilege knowledge-telling strategies and prioritize fluency and efficiency of expression. When these sociocultural factors interact with cognition, group differences tend to emerge, as knowledge telling provides few opportunities for disadvantaged groups to overcome barriers linked to differences in prior knowledge, fluency, attention management, or motivation. It also affects the efficacy of instructional practices, because cognitive ability and social identity affect how students internalize the metacognitive concepts and strategies characteristic of expert writers.</description><subject>Academic Discourse</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>Cognitive Ability</subject><subject>Content Area Writing</subject><subject>Cultural Influences</subject><subject>Differences</subject><subject>Knowledge Level</subject><subject>Language Skills</subject><subject>Prior Learning</subject><subject>Social Influences</subject><subject>Student Motivation</subject><subject>Writing</subject><subject>Writing (Composition)</subject><subject>Writing Achievement</subject><subject>Writing Instruction</subject><subject>Writing Strategies</subject><issn>0046-1520</issn><issn>1532-6985</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUiWWKd4nDgPVqDyFhKLFrG0jDNpXBK7OCkIvh6HFpasZnHO9YwvIcfAJsBydspYkoLgbMIZ5BMQEOdJskNGIGIepUUudslocKJB2icHXbdkjAEIMSLLeY10WqumQbvAjrqKPnvTG7ugxtKZrp1rzujUWY2rfq0a8zWgX-US37FxqxZtT59NX4eIojOnjdNuYYPzjvTaqxY_nH89JHuVajo82s4xebq-mk9vo4fHm7vpxUOk45T1UZlVLy8JJkUMcZagQl6KvKgq0EWKGTLGxQ_IeAllqoWCkpWKZyqghOs0HpOTzbsr797W2PVy6dbehpWSg8gyyAoGwRIbS3vXdR4rufKmVf5TApNDrfK3VjnUKre1htzxJofe6L_M1T3wcFkRB36-4cZWzrcq_LwpZa8-G-crr6w2nYz_X_ENLb6IuA</recordid><startdate>20181002</startdate><enddate>20181002</enddate><creator>Deane, Paul</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6838-2856</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181002</creationdate><title>The Challenges of Writing in School: Conceptualizing Writing Development Within a Sociocognitive Framework</title><author>Deane, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d7fbb4e4931374eae2d589ff1c96e7e00251374e72d1d6c5a1d0da27ae0042c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Academic Discourse</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>Cognitive Ability</topic><topic>Content Area Writing</topic><topic>Cultural Influences</topic><topic>Differences</topic><topic>Knowledge Level</topic><topic>Language Skills</topic><topic>Prior Learning</topic><topic>Social Influences</topic><topic>Student Motivation</topic><topic>Writing</topic><topic>Writing (Composition)</topic><topic>Writing Achievement</topic><topic>Writing Instruction</topic><topic>Writing Strategies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deane, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Educational psychologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deane, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1200293</ericid><atitle>The Challenges of Writing in School: Conceptualizing Writing Development Within a Sociocognitive Framework</atitle><jtitle>Educational psychologist</jtitle><date>2018-10-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>280</spage><epage>300</epage><pages>280-300</pages><issn>0046-1520</issn><eissn>1532-6985</eissn><abstract>This article argues for a conceptualization of school writing that emphasizes how cognitive and sociocultural factors interact. In academic, professional, and affinity-based communities, an emphasis on standards of quality drives the adoption of such practices as revision and peer and expert review. In school, everyday writing practices center around demonstrations of knowledge (taking notes, writing summaries, providing personal responses to readings, completing worksheets, etc.) where the teacher is often the sole or primary audience. This context tends to privilege knowledge-telling strategies and prioritize fluency and efficiency of expression. When these sociocultural factors interact with cognition, group differences tend to emerge, as knowledge telling provides few opportunities for disadvantaged groups to overcome barriers linked to differences in prior knowledge, fluency, attention management, or motivation. It also affects the efficacy of instructional practices, because cognitive ability and social identity affect how students internalize the metacognitive concepts and strategies characteristic of expert writers.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/00461520.2018.1513844</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6838-2856</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0046-1520
ispartof Educational psychologist, 2018-10, Vol.53 (4), p.280-300
issn 0046-1520
1532-6985
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2157717901
source Education Source; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
subjects Academic Discourse
Attention
Best Practices
Cognitive Ability
Content Area Writing
Cultural Influences
Differences
Knowledge Level
Language Skills
Prior Learning
Social Influences
Student Motivation
Writing
Writing (Composition)
Writing Achievement
Writing Instruction
Writing Strategies
title The Challenges of Writing in School: Conceptualizing Writing Development Within a Sociocognitive Framework
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T05%3A50%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Challenges%20of%20Writing%20in%20School:%20Conceptualizing%20Writing%20Development%20Within%20a%20Sociocognitive%20Framework&rft.jtitle=Educational%20psychologist&rft.au=Deane,%20Paul&rft.date=2018-10-02&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=280&rft.epage=300&rft.pages=280-300&rft.issn=0046-1520&rft.eissn=1532-6985&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00461520.2018.1513844&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2157717901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2157717901&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1200293&rfr_iscdi=true