Mass harvesting of marine microalgae using different techniques
•Salinity affects the harvesting process for marine microalgae.•The use of electrical-based harvesting may reduce the energy requirement for marine microalgae.•Harvesting on marine species vary according to strains and the techniques used.•Each harvesting methods for marine microalgae have their own...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Food and bioproducts processing 2018-11, Vol.112, p.169-184 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 184 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 169 |
container_title | Food and bioproducts processing |
container_volume | 112 |
creator | Fuad, Nurafifah Omar, Rozita Kamarudin, Suryani Harun, Razif Idris, A. W.A.K.G., Wan Azlina |
description | •Salinity affects the harvesting process for marine microalgae.•The use of electrical-based harvesting may reduce the energy requirement for marine microalgae.•Harvesting on marine species vary according to strains and the techniques used.•Each harvesting methods for marine microalgae have their own advantages and disadvantages.
The marine species microalgae are an attractive source of feedstock for biofuel production and other bio-products such as omega-3 fatty acids and aquaculture feeds. The prevailing main nutrients in seawater environment for their growth are believed to be more economical than freshwater in terms of their cultivation system which may lead to low cost for upstream processing. Hence, marine microalgae provide attractive potential to be further explored. However, harvesting process of microalgae is known to be too costly because of their dilute nature that accounts for 20–30% of the overall production costs rendering using microalgae as the raw material not economically feasible. Currently the various harvesting methods including centrifugation, flocculation, flotation, filtration and magnetic separation had been applied to harvest marine species. For instance, harvesting by electrolytic means that require less energy to harvest marine species compared to the freshwater species. This can potentially help to reduce the challenges related to the exploitation of microalgae biomass. However, different techniques have their own advantages and drawbacks, whereas their cost and energy requirement vary accordingly depending on the selection of marine microalgal strains, equipment used and/or the choice of harvesting aid (flocculants, surfactant). Thus far, no single technique may still be proposed. Therefore, this paper aims to provide further details of each method used focusing only for marine species of microalgae with their respective advantages and disadvantages. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.fbp.2018.10.006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2157468518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960308518307223</els_id><sourcerecordid>2157468518</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-62fbb0e43c40ccdb4913de40bd0623171a5e9f285fd4ca9329070377bb8c73c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMcHcIvEOWE3tuNEHBCqeElFXOBsOc66ddUmxU4r8fc4KmdOq92d2Zkdxm4QCgSs7taFa3dFCVinvgCoTtgMlRA5lwpP2QyaCnIOtTxnFzGuARIS5Yw9vJsYs5UJB4qj75fZ4LKtCb6nbOttGMxmaSjbx2nVeecoUD9mI9lV77_3FK_YmTObSNd_9ZJ9PT99zl_zxcfL2_xxkVsBcsyr0rUtkOCptbZrRYO8IwFtB1XJUaGR1Liylq4T1jS8bEABV6pta6u4RX7Jbo93d2GYdEe9HvahT5K6RKlEVUusEwqPqOQ8xkBO74JP7_xoBD3lpNc65aSnnKZRyilx7o8cSvYPnoKO1lNvqfOB7Ki7wf_D_gWTh2_I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2157468518</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mass harvesting of marine microalgae using different techniques</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Fuad, Nurafifah ; Omar, Rozita ; Kamarudin, Suryani ; Harun, Razif ; Idris, A. ; W.A.K.G., Wan Azlina</creator><creatorcontrib>Fuad, Nurafifah ; Omar, Rozita ; Kamarudin, Suryani ; Harun, Razif ; Idris, A. ; W.A.K.G., Wan Azlina</creatorcontrib><description>•Salinity affects the harvesting process for marine microalgae.•The use of electrical-based harvesting may reduce the energy requirement for marine microalgae.•Harvesting on marine species vary according to strains and the techniques used.•Each harvesting methods for marine microalgae have their own advantages and disadvantages.
The marine species microalgae are an attractive source of feedstock for biofuel production and other bio-products such as omega-3 fatty acids and aquaculture feeds. The prevailing main nutrients in seawater environment for their growth are believed to be more economical than freshwater in terms of their cultivation system which may lead to low cost for upstream processing. Hence, marine microalgae provide attractive potential to be further explored. However, harvesting process of microalgae is known to be too costly because of their dilute nature that accounts for 20–30% of the overall production costs rendering using microalgae as the raw material not economically feasible. Currently the various harvesting methods including centrifugation, flocculation, flotation, filtration and magnetic separation had been applied to harvest marine species. For instance, harvesting by electrolytic means that require less energy to harvest marine species compared to the freshwater species. This can potentially help to reduce the challenges related to the exploitation of microalgae biomass. However, different techniques have their own advantages and drawbacks, whereas their cost and energy requirement vary accordingly depending on the selection of marine microalgal strains, equipment used and/or the choice of harvesting aid (flocculants, surfactant). Thus far, no single technique may still be proposed. Therefore, this paper aims to provide further details of each method used focusing only for marine species of microalgae with their respective advantages and disadvantages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-3085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-3571</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2018.10.006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rugby: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Algae ; Aquaculture ; Aquaculture feeds ; Bio-products ; Biofuel ; Biofuels ; Biomass ; Centrifugation ; Centrifuging ; Cultivation ; Energy harvesting ; Exploitation ; Fatty acids ; Flocculants ; Flocculation ; Flotation ; Freshwater ; Harvest ; Harvesting ; Inland water environment ; Magnetic separation ; Marine ecology ; Marine environment ; Marine species ; Microalgae ; Nutrients ; Operating costs ; Phytoplankton ; Production costs ; Raw materials ; Seawater ; Species</subject><ispartof>Food and bioproducts processing, 2018-11, Vol.112, p.169-184</ispartof><rights>2018 Institution of Chemical Engineers</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Nov 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-62fbb0e43c40ccdb4913de40bd0623171a5e9f285fd4ca9329070377bb8c73c13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-62fbb0e43c40ccdb4913de40bd0623171a5e9f285fd4ca9329070377bb8c73c13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3875-8218</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2018.10.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fuad, Nurafifah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omar, Rozita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamarudin, Suryani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harun, Razif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idris, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>W.A.K.G., Wan Azlina</creatorcontrib><title>Mass harvesting of marine microalgae using different techniques</title><title>Food and bioproducts processing</title><description>•Salinity affects the harvesting process for marine microalgae.•The use of electrical-based harvesting may reduce the energy requirement for marine microalgae.•Harvesting on marine species vary according to strains and the techniques used.•Each harvesting methods for marine microalgae have their own advantages and disadvantages.
The marine species microalgae are an attractive source of feedstock for biofuel production and other bio-products such as omega-3 fatty acids and aquaculture feeds. The prevailing main nutrients in seawater environment for their growth are believed to be more economical than freshwater in terms of their cultivation system which may lead to low cost for upstream processing. Hence, marine microalgae provide attractive potential to be further explored. However, harvesting process of microalgae is known to be too costly because of their dilute nature that accounts for 20–30% of the overall production costs rendering using microalgae as the raw material not economically feasible. Currently the various harvesting methods including centrifugation, flocculation, flotation, filtration and magnetic separation had been applied to harvest marine species. For instance, harvesting by electrolytic means that require less energy to harvest marine species compared to the freshwater species. This can potentially help to reduce the challenges related to the exploitation of microalgae biomass. However, different techniques have their own advantages and drawbacks, whereas their cost and energy requirement vary accordingly depending on the selection of marine microalgal strains, equipment used and/or the choice of harvesting aid (flocculants, surfactant). Thus far, no single technique may still be proposed. Therefore, this paper aims to provide further details of each method used focusing only for marine species of microalgae with their respective advantages and disadvantages.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Aquaculture feeds</subject><subject>Bio-products</subject><subject>Biofuel</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Centrifugation</subject><subject>Centrifuging</subject><subject>Cultivation</subject><subject>Energy harvesting</subject><subject>Exploitation</subject><subject>Fatty acids</subject><subject>Flocculants</subject><subject>Flocculation</subject><subject>Flotation</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Harvest</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Inland water environment</subject><subject>Magnetic separation</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>Marine environment</subject><subject>Marine species</subject><subject>Microalgae</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Operating costs</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>Production costs</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Seawater</subject><subject>Species</subject><issn>0960-3085</issn><issn>1744-3571</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMcHcIvEOWE3tuNEHBCqeElFXOBsOc66ddUmxU4r8fc4KmdOq92d2Zkdxm4QCgSs7taFa3dFCVinvgCoTtgMlRA5lwpP2QyaCnIOtTxnFzGuARIS5Yw9vJsYs5UJB4qj75fZ4LKtCb6nbOttGMxmaSjbx2nVeecoUD9mI9lV77_3FK_YmTObSNd_9ZJ9PT99zl_zxcfL2_xxkVsBcsyr0rUtkOCptbZrRYO8IwFtB1XJUaGR1Liylq4T1jS8bEABV6pta6u4RX7Jbo93d2GYdEe9HvahT5K6RKlEVUusEwqPqOQ8xkBO74JP7_xoBD3lpNc65aSnnKZRyilx7o8cSvYPnoKO1lNvqfOB7Ki7wf_D_gWTh2_I</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Fuad, Nurafifah</creator><creator>Omar, Rozita</creator><creator>Kamarudin, Suryani</creator><creator>Harun, Razif</creator><creator>Idris, A.</creator><creator>W.A.K.G., Wan Azlina</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3875-8218</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Mass harvesting of marine microalgae using different techniques</title><author>Fuad, Nurafifah ; Omar, Rozita ; Kamarudin, Suryani ; Harun, Razif ; Idris, A. ; W.A.K.G., Wan Azlina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-62fbb0e43c40ccdb4913de40bd0623171a5e9f285fd4ca9329070377bb8c73c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Aquaculture feeds</topic><topic>Bio-products</topic><topic>Biofuel</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Centrifugation</topic><topic>Centrifuging</topic><topic>Cultivation</topic><topic>Energy harvesting</topic><topic>Exploitation</topic><topic>Fatty acids</topic><topic>Flocculants</topic><topic>Flocculation</topic><topic>Flotation</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Harvest</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Inland water environment</topic><topic>Magnetic separation</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>Marine environment</topic><topic>Marine species</topic><topic>Microalgae</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Operating costs</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>Production costs</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Seawater</topic><topic>Species</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fuad, Nurafifah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omar, Rozita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamarudin, Suryani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harun, Razif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idris, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>W.A.K.G., Wan Azlina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Food and bioproducts processing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fuad, Nurafifah</au><au>Omar, Rozita</au><au>Kamarudin, Suryani</au><au>Harun, Razif</au><au>Idris, A.</au><au>W.A.K.G., Wan Azlina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mass harvesting of marine microalgae using different techniques</atitle><jtitle>Food and bioproducts processing</jtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>112</volume><spage>169</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>169-184</pages><issn>0960-3085</issn><eissn>1744-3571</eissn><abstract>•Salinity affects the harvesting process for marine microalgae.•The use of electrical-based harvesting may reduce the energy requirement for marine microalgae.•Harvesting on marine species vary according to strains and the techniques used.•Each harvesting methods for marine microalgae have their own advantages and disadvantages.
The marine species microalgae are an attractive source of feedstock for biofuel production and other bio-products such as omega-3 fatty acids and aquaculture feeds. The prevailing main nutrients in seawater environment for their growth are believed to be more economical than freshwater in terms of their cultivation system which may lead to low cost for upstream processing. Hence, marine microalgae provide attractive potential to be further explored. However, harvesting process of microalgae is known to be too costly because of their dilute nature that accounts for 20–30% of the overall production costs rendering using microalgae as the raw material not economically feasible. Currently the various harvesting methods including centrifugation, flocculation, flotation, filtration and magnetic separation had been applied to harvest marine species. For instance, harvesting by electrolytic means that require less energy to harvest marine species compared to the freshwater species. This can potentially help to reduce the challenges related to the exploitation of microalgae biomass. However, different techniques have their own advantages and drawbacks, whereas their cost and energy requirement vary accordingly depending on the selection of marine microalgal strains, equipment used and/or the choice of harvesting aid (flocculants, surfactant). Thus far, no single technique may still be proposed. Therefore, this paper aims to provide further details of each method used focusing only for marine species of microalgae with their respective advantages and disadvantages.</abstract><cop>Rugby</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.fbp.2018.10.006</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3875-8218</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-3085 |
ispartof | Food and bioproducts processing, 2018-11, Vol.112, p.169-184 |
issn | 0960-3085 1744-3571 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2157468518 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Algae Aquaculture Aquaculture feeds Bio-products Biofuel Biofuels Biomass Centrifugation Centrifuging Cultivation Energy harvesting Exploitation Fatty acids Flocculants Flocculation Flotation Freshwater Harvest Harvesting Inland water environment Magnetic separation Marine ecology Marine environment Marine species Microalgae Nutrients Operating costs Phytoplankton Production costs Raw materials Seawater Species |
title | Mass harvesting of marine microalgae using different techniques |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T06%3A20%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mass%20harvesting%20of%20marine%20microalgae%20using%20different%20techniques&rft.jtitle=Food%20and%20bioproducts%20processing&rft.au=Fuad,%20Nurafifah&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=112&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=169-184&rft.issn=0960-3085&rft.eissn=1744-3571&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fbp.2018.10.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2157468518%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2157468518&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0960308518307223&rfr_iscdi=true |