Mass harvesting of marine microalgae using different techniques

•Salinity affects the harvesting process for marine microalgae.•The use of electrical-based harvesting may reduce the energy requirement for marine microalgae.•Harvesting on marine species vary according to strains and the techniques used.•Each harvesting methods for marine microalgae have their own...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Food and bioproducts processing 2018-11, Vol.112, p.169-184
Hauptverfasser: Fuad, Nurafifah, Omar, Rozita, Kamarudin, Suryani, Harun, Razif, Idris, A., W.A.K.G., Wan Azlina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 184
container_issue
container_start_page 169
container_title Food and bioproducts processing
container_volume 112
creator Fuad, Nurafifah
Omar, Rozita
Kamarudin, Suryani
Harun, Razif
Idris, A.
W.A.K.G., Wan Azlina
description •Salinity affects the harvesting process for marine microalgae.•The use of electrical-based harvesting may reduce the energy requirement for marine microalgae.•Harvesting on marine species vary according to strains and the techniques used.•Each harvesting methods for marine microalgae have their own advantages and disadvantages. The marine species microalgae are an attractive source of feedstock for biofuel production and other bio-products such as omega-3 fatty acids and aquaculture feeds. The prevailing main nutrients in seawater environment for their growth are believed to be more economical than freshwater in terms of their cultivation system which may lead to low cost for upstream processing. Hence, marine microalgae provide attractive potential to be further explored. However, harvesting process of microalgae is known to be too costly because of their dilute nature that accounts for 20–30% of the overall production costs rendering using microalgae as the raw material not economically feasible. Currently the various harvesting methods including centrifugation, flocculation, flotation, filtration and magnetic separation had been applied to harvest marine species. For instance, harvesting by electrolytic means that require less energy to harvest marine species compared to the freshwater species. This can potentially help to reduce the challenges related to the exploitation of microalgae biomass. However, different techniques have their own advantages and drawbacks, whereas their cost and energy requirement vary accordingly depending on the selection of marine microalgal strains, equipment used and/or the choice of harvesting aid (flocculants, surfactant). Thus far, no single technique may still be proposed. Therefore, this paper aims to provide further details of each method used focusing only for marine species of microalgae with their respective advantages and disadvantages.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fbp.2018.10.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2157468518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960308518307223</els_id><sourcerecordid>2157468518</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-62fbb0e43c40ccdb4913de40bd0623171a5e9f285fd4ca9329070377bb8c73c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMcHcIvEOWE3tuNEHBCqeElFXOBsOc66ddUmxU4r8fc4KmdOq92d2Zkdxm4QCgSs7taFa3dFCVinvgCoTtgMlRA5lwpP2QyaCnIOtTxnFzGuARIS5Yw9vJsYs5UJB4qj75fZ4LKtCb6nbOttGMxmaSjbx2nVeecoUD9mI9lV77_3FK_YmTObSNd_9ZJ9PT99zl_zxcfL2_xxkVsBcsyr0rUtkOCptbZrRYO8IwFtB1XJUaGR1Liylq4T1jS8bEABV6pta6u4RX7Jbo93d2GYdEe9HvahT5K6RKlEVUusEwqPqOQ8xkBO74JP7_xoBD3lpNc65aSnnKZRyilx7o8cSvYPnoKO1lNvqfOB7Ki7wf_D_gWTh2_I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2157468518</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mass harvesting of marine microalgae using different techniques</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Fuad, Nurafifah ; Omar, Rozita ; Kamarudin, Suryani ; Harun, Razif ; Idris, A. ; W.A.K.G., Wan Azlina</creator><creatorcontrib>Fuad, Nurafifah ; Omar, Rozita ; Kamarudin, Suryani ; Harun, Razif ; Idris, A. ; W.A.K.G., Wan Azlina</creatorcontrib><description>•Salinity affects the harvesting process for marine microalgae.•The use of electrical-based harvesting may reduce the energy requirement for marine microalgae.•Harvesting on marine species vary according to strains and the techniques used.•Each harvesting methods for marine microalgae have their own advantages and disadvantages. The marine species microalgae are an attractive source of feedstock for biofuel production and other bio-products such as omega-3 fatty acids and aquaculture feeds. The prevailing main nutrients in seawater environment for their growth are believed to be more economical than freshwater in terms of their cultivation system which may lead to low cost for upstream processing. Hence, marine microalgae provide attractive potential to be further explored. However, harvesting process of microalgae is known to be too costly because of their dilute nature that accounts for 20–30% of the overall production costs rendering using microalgae as the raw material not economically feasible. Currently the various harvesting methods including centrifugation, flocculation, flotation, filtration and magnetic separation had been applied to harvest marine species. For instance, harvesting by electrolytic means that require less energy to harvest marine species compared to the freshwater species. This can potentially help to reduce the challenges related to the exploitation of microalgae biomass. However, different techniques have their own advantages and drawbacks, whereas their cost and energy requirement vary accordingly depending on the selection of marine microalgal strains, equipment used and/or the choice of harvesting aid (flocculants, surfactant). Thus far, no single technique may still be proposed. Therefore, this paper aims to provide further details of each method used focusing only for marine species of microalgae with their respective advantages and disadvantages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-3085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-3571</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2018.10.006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rugby: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Algae ; Aquaculture ; Aquaculture feeds ; Bio-products ; Biofuel ; Biofuels ; Biomass ; Centrifugation ; Centrifuging ; Cultivation ; Energy harvesting ; Exploitation ; Fatty acids ; Flocculants ; Flocculation ; Flotation ; Freshwater ; Harvest ; Harvesting ; Inland water environment ; Magnetic separation ; Marine ecology ; Marine environment ; Marine species ; Microalgae ; Nutrients ; Operating costs ; Phytoplankton ; Production costs ; Raw materials ; Seawater ; Species</subject><ispartof>Food and bioproducts processing, 2018-11, Vol.112, p.169-184</ispartof><rights>2018 Institution of Chemical Engineers</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Nov 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-62fbb0e43c40ccdb4913de40bd0623171a5e9f285fd4ca9329070377bb8c73c13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-62fbb0e43c40ccdb4913de40bd0623171a5e9f285fd4ca9329070377bb8c73c13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3875-8218</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2018.10.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fuad, Nurafifah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omar, Rozita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamarudin, Suryani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harun, Razif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idris, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>W.A.K.G., Wan Azlina</creatorcontrib><title>Mass harvesting of marine microalgae using different techniques</title><title>Food and bioproducts processing</title><description>•Salinity affects the harvesting process for marine microalgae.•The use of electrical-based harvesting may reduce the energy requirement for marine microalgae.•Harvesting on marine species vary according to strains and the techniques used.•Each harvesting methods for marine microalgae have their own advantages and disadvantages. The marine species microalgae are an attractive source of feedstock for biofuel production and other bio-products such as omega-3 fatty acids and aquaculture feeds. The prevailing main nutrients in seawater environment for their growth are believed to be more economical than freshwater in terms of their cultivation system which may lead to low cost for upstream processing. Hence, marine microalgae provide attractive potential to be further explored. However, harvesting process of microalgae is known to be too costly because of their dilute nature that accounts for 20–30% of the overall production costs rendering using microalgae as the raw material not economically feasible. Currently the various harvesting methods including centrifugation, flocculation, flotation, filtration and magnetic separation had been applied to harvest marine species. For instance, harvesting by electrolytic means that require less energy to harvest marine species compared to the freshwater species. This can potentially help to reduce the challenges related to the exploitation of microalgae biomass. However, different techniques have their own advantages and drawbacks, whereas their cost and energy requirement vary accordingly depending on the selection of marine microalgal strains, equipment used and/or the choice of harvesting aid (flocculants, surfactant). Thus far, no single technique may still be proposed. Therefore, this paper aims to provide further details of each method used focusing only for marine species of microalgae with their respective advantages and disadvantages.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Aquaculture feeds</subject><subject>Bio-products</subject><subject>Biofuel</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Centrifugation</subject><subject>Centrifuging</subject><subject>Cultivation</subject><subject>Energy harvesting</subject><subject>Exploitation</subject><subject>Fatty acids</subject><subject>Flocculants</subject><subject>Flocculation</subject><subject>Flotation</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Harvest</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Inland water environment</subject><subject>Magnetic separation</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>Marine environment</subject><subject>Marine species</subject><subject>Microalgae</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Operating costs</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>Production costs</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Seawater</subject><subject>Species</subject><issn>0960-3085</issn><issn>1744-3571</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMcHcIvEOWE3tuNEHBCqeElFXOBsOc66ddUmxU4r8fc4KmdOq92d2Zkdxm4QCgSs7taFa3dFCVinvgCoTtgMlRA5lwpP2QyaCnIOtTxnFzGuARIS5Yw9vJsYs5UJB4qj75fZ4LKtCb6nbOttGMxmaSjbx2nVeecoUD9mI9lV77_3FK_YmTObSNd_9ZJ9PT99zl_zxcfL2_xxkVsBcsyr0rUtkOCptbZrRYO8IwFtB1XJUaGR1Liylq4T1jS8bEABV6pta6u4RX7Jbo93d2GYdEe9HvahT5K6RKlEVUusEwqPqOQ8xkBO74JP7_xoBD3lpNc65aSnnKZRyilx7o8cSvYPnoKO1lNvqfOB7Ki7wf_D_gWTh2_I</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Fuad, Nurafifah</creator><creator>Omar, Rozita</creator><creator>Kamarudin, Suryani</creator><creator>Harun, Razif</creator><creator>Idris, A.</creator><creator>W.A.K.G., Wan Azlina</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3875-8218</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Mass harvesting of marine microalgae using different techniques</title><author>Fuad, Nurafifah ; Omar, Rozita ; Kamarudin, Suryani ; Harun, Razif ; Idris, A. ; W.A.K.G., Wan Azlina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-62fbb0e43c40ccdb4913de40bd0623171a5e9f285fd4ca9329070377bb8c73c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Aquaculture feeds</topic><topic>Bio-products</topic><topic>Biofuel</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Centrifugation</topic><topic>Centrifuging</topic><topic>Cultivation</topic><topic>Energy harvesting</topic><topic>Exploitation</topic><topic>Fatty acids</topic><topic>Flocculants</topic><topic>Flocculation</topic><topic>Flotation</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Harvest</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Inland water environment</topic><topic>Magnetic separation</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>Marine environment</topic><topic>Marine species</topic><topic>Microalgae</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Operating costs</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>Production costs</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Seawater</topic><topic>Species</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fuad, Nurafifah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omar, Rozita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamarudin, Suryani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harun, Razif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idris, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>W.A.K.G., Wan Azlina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Food and bioproducts processing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fuad, Nurafifah</au><au>Omar, Rozita</au><au>Kamarudin, Suryani</au><au>Harun, Razif</au><au>Idris, A.</au><au>W.A.K.G., Wan Azlina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mass harvesting of marine microalgae using different techniques</atitle><jtitle>Food and bioproducts processing</jtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>112</volume><spage>169</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>169-184</pages><issn>0960-3085</issn><eissn>1744-3571</eissn><abstract>•Salinity affects the harvesting process for marine microalgae.•The use of electrical-based harvesting may reduce the energy requirement for marine microalgae.•Harvesting on marine species vary according to strains and the techniques used.•Each harvesting methods for marine microalgae have their own advantages and disadvantages. The marine species microalgae are an attractive source of feedstock for biofuel production and other bio-products such as omega-3 fatty acids and aquaculture feeds. The prevailing main nutrients in seawater environment for their growth are believed to be more economical than freshwater in terms of their cultivation system which may lead to low cost for upstream processing. Hence, marine microalgae provide attractive potential to be further explored. However, harvesting process of microalgae is known to be too costly because of their dilute nature that accounts for 20–30% of the overall production costs rendering using microalgae as the raw material not economically feasible. Currently the various harvesting methods including centrifugation, flocculation, flotation, filtration and magnetic separation had been applied to harvest marine species. For instance, harvesting by electrolytic means that require less energy to harvest marine species compared to the freshwater species. This can potentially help to reduce the challenges related to the exploitation of microalgae biomass. However, different techniques have their own advantages and drawbacks, whereas their cost and energy requirement vary accordingly depending on the selection of marine microalgal strains, equipment used and/or the choice of harvesting aid (flocculants, surfactant). Thus far, no single technique may still be proposed. Therefore, this paper aims to provide further details of each method used focusing only for marine species of microalgae with their respective advantages and disadvantages.</abstract><cop>Rugby</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.fbp.2018.10.006</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3875-8218</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-3085
ispartof Food and bioproducts processing, 2018-11, Vol.112, p.169-184
issn 0960-3085
1744-3571
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2157468518
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Algae
Aquaculture
Aquaculture feeds
Bio-products
Biofuel
Biofuels
Biomass
Centrifugation
Centrifuging
Cultivation
Energy harvesting
Exploitation
Fatty acids
Flocculants
Flocculation
Flotation
Freshwater
Harvest
Harvesting
Inland water environment
Magnetic separation
Marine ecology
Marine environment
Marine species
Microalgae
Nutrients
Operating costs
Phytoplankton
Production costs
Raw materials
Seawater
Species
title Mass harvesting of marine microalgae using different techniques
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T06%3A20%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mass%20harvesting%20of%20marine%20microalgae%20using%20different%20techniques&rft.jtitle=Food%20and%20bioproducts%20processing&rft.au=Fuad,%20Nurafifah&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=112&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=169-184&rft.issn=0960-3085&rft.eissn=1744-3571&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fbp.2018.10.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2157468518%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2157468518&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0960308518307223&rfr_iscdi=true