Back to basics: A methodological perspective on marble-burying behavior as a screening test for psychiatric illness

•Quantification of MB is influenced by observer bias and burying substrate.•MB possibly results from normal exploration and is subject to habituation.•High density substrates clearly differentiate MB from normal rodent activity.•MB can be distinguished from normal behavior based on preoccupation. An...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioural processes 2018-12, Vol.157, p.590-600
Hauptverfasser: de Brouwer, Geoffrey, Wolmarans, De Wet
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 600
container_issue
container_start_page 590
container_title Behavioural processes
container_volume 157
creator de Brouwer, Geoffrey
Wolmarans, De Wet
description •Quantification of MB is influenced by observer bias and burying substrate.•MB possibly results from normal exploration and is subject to habituation.•High density substrates clearly differentiate MB from normal rodent activity.•MB can be distinguished from normal behavior based on preoccupation. Animal models of human psychiatric illness are valuable frameworks to investigate the etiology and neurobiology underlying the human conditions. Accurate behavioral measures that can be used to characterize animal behavior, thereby contributing to a model’s validity, are crucial. One such measure, i.e. the rodent marble-burying test (MBT), is often applied as a measure of anxiety- and compulsive-like behaviors. However, the test is characterized by noteworthy between-laboratory methodological differences and demonstrates positive treatment responses to an array of pharmacotherapies that are often of little translational value. Therefore, using a naturalistic animal model of obsessive-compulsive disorder, i.e. the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii), the current investigation attempted to illuminate the discrepancies reported in literature by means of a methodological approach to the MBT. Five key aspects of the test that vary between laboratories, viz. observer/scoring, burying substrate, optional avoidance, the use of repeated testing, and determinations of locomotor activity, have been investigated. Following repeated MB tests in four different burying substrates and in two zone configurations, we have demonstrated that 1) observer bias may contribute to the significant differences in findings reported, 2) MB seems to be a natural exploratory response to a novel environment, rather than being triggered by aberrant cognition, 3) burying substrates with a small particle size and higher density deliver the most accurate results with respect to the burying phenotype, and 4) to exclude the influence of normal exploratory behavior on the number of marbles being covered, assessments of marble-burying should be based on pre-occupation with the objects itself.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.04.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2157464094</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0376635717304795</els_id><sourcerecordid>2157464094</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-2481857edb654faa25e91346dbe015265f8bf3795139abd97ea56c279d6dd6e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtr4zAURkWZ0qSPf1AGwaztSrIk210MZEpfEOimXQs9rhtlHMuVnED-_SgkM8tZXbic7z4OQreUlJRQebcuDYwx2JIR2pSEl4TSMzSnTc2KpiLNNzQnVS0LWYl6hi5TWhOSSSIv0Iy1suWNYHOUfmn7G08BG528Tfd4gTcwrYILffj0Vvd4hJhGsJPfAQ4D3uhoeijMNu798IkNrPTOh4h1whonGwGGQ3-CNOEu98e0tyuvp-gt9n0_QErX6LzTfYKbU71CH0-P7w8vxfLt-fVhsSwsZ9VUMN7QRtTgjBS805oJaGnFpTNAqGBSdI3pqroVtGq1cW0NWkjL6tZJ5yTI6gr9OM7Nmr62-SC1Dts45JWKUVFzyUnLM8WPlI0hpQidGqPPX-4VJepgWq3V0bQ6mFaEq2w6x76fhm_NBty_0F-1Gfh5BCC_uPMQVbIeBgvOx6xTueD_v-EPZSGSQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2157464094</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Back to basics: A methodological perspective on marble-burying behavior as a screening test for psychiatric illness</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>de Brouwer, Geoffrey ; Wolmarans, De Wet</creator><creatorcontrib>de Brouwer, Geoffrey ; Wolmarans, De Wet</creatorcontrib><description>•Quantification of MB is influenced by observer bias and burying substrate.•MB possibly results from normal exploration and is subject to habituation.•High density substrates clearly differentiate MB from normal rodent activity.•MB can be distinguished from normal behavior based on preoccupation. Animal models of human psychiatric illness are valuable frameworks to investigate the etiology and neurobiology underlying the human conditions. Accurate behavioral measures that can be used to characterize animal behavior, thereby contributing to a model’s validity, are crucial. One such measure, i.e. the rodent marble-burying test (MBT), is often applied as a measure of anxiety- and compulsive-like behaviors. However, the test is characterized by noteworthy between-laboratory methodological differences and demonstrates positive treatment responses to an array of pharmacotherapies that are often of little translational value. Therefore, using a naturalistic animal model of obsessive-compulsive disorder, i.e. the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii), the current investigation attempted to illuminate the discrepancies reported in literature by means of a methodological approach to the MBT. Five key aspects of the test that vary between laboratories, viz. observer/scoring, burying substrate, optional avoidance, the use of repeated testing, and determinations of locomotor activity, have been investigated. Following repeated MB tests in four different burying substrates and in two zone configurations, we have demonstrated that 1) observer bias may contribute to the significant differences in findings reported, 2) MB seems to be a natural exploratory response to a novel environment, rather than being triggered by aberrant cognition, 3) burying substrates with a small particle size and higher density deliver the most accurate results with respect to the burying phenotype, and 4) to exclude the influence of normal exploratory behavior on the number of marbles being covered, assessments of marble-burying should be based on pre-occupation with the objects itself.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-6357</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8308</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.04.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29694852</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal model ; Animal models ; Animals ; Anxiety ; Anxiety - psychology ; Behavior, Animal ; Burying ; Burying behavior ; Cognition ; Compulsive Behavior - psychology ; Disease Models, Animal ; Etiology ; Exploratory behavior ; Female ; Locomotor activity ; Male ; Mental Disorders - psychology ; Motor Activity ; Nervous system ; Observer Variation ; Obsessive compulsive disorder ; Obsessive-Compulsive ; Peromyscus - psychology ; Peromyscus maniculatus ; Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii ; Phenotypes ; Reproducibility of Results ; Rodents</subject><ispartof>Behavioural processes, 2018-12, Vol.157, p.590-600</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Dec 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-2481857edb654faa25e91346dbe015265f8bf3795139abd97ea56c279d6dd6e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-2481857edb654faa25e91346dbe015265f8bf3795139abd97ea56c279d6dd6e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.04.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29694852$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Brouwer, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolmarans, De Wet</creatorcontrib><title>Back to basics: A methodological perspective on marble-burying behavior as a screening test for psychiatric illness</title><title>Behavioural processes</title><addtitle>Behav Processes</addtitle><description>•Quantification of MB is influenced by observer bias and burying substrate.•MB possibly results from normal exploration and is subject to habituation.•High density substrates clearly differentiate MB from normal rodent activity.•MB can be distinguished from normal behavior based on preoccupation. Animal models of human psychiatric illness are valuable frameworks to investigate the etiology and neurobiology underlying the human conditions. Accurate behavioral measures that can be used to characterize animal behavior, thereby contributing to a model’s validity, are crucial. One such measure, i.e. the rodent marble-burying test (MBT), is often applied as a measure of anxiety- and compulsive-like behaviors. However, the test is characterized by noteworthy between-laboratory methodological differences and demonstrates positive treatment responses to an array of pharmacotherapies that are often of little translational value. Therefore, using a naturalistic animal model of obsessive-compulsive disorder, i.e. the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii), the current investigation attempted to illuminate the discrepancies reported in literature by means of a methodological approach to the MBT. Five key aspects of the test that vary between laboratories, viz. observer/scoring, burying substrate, optional avoidance, the use of repeated testing, and determinations of locomotor activity, have been investigated. Following repeated MB tests in four different burying substrates and in two zone configurations, we have demonstrated that 1) observer bias may contribute to the significant differences in findings reported, 2) MB seems to be a natural exploratory response to a novel environment, rather than being triggered by aberrant cognition, 3) burying substrates with a small particle size and higher density deliver the most accurate results with respect to the burying phenotype, and 4) to exclude the influence of normal exploratory behavior on the number of marbles being covered, assessments of marble-burying should be based on pre-occupation with the objects itself.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal model</subject><subject>Animal models</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Anxiety - psychology</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal</subject><subject>Burying</subject><subject>Burying behavior</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Compulsive Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Etiology</subject><subject>Exploratory behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Locomotor activity</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Motor Activity</subject><subject>Nervous system</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Obsessive compulsive disorder</subject><subject>Obsessive-Compulsive</subject><subject>Peromyscus - psychology</subject><subject>Peromyscus maniculatus</subject><subject>Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><issn>0376-6357</issn><issn>1872-8308</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtr4zAURkWZ0qSPf1AGwaztSrIk210MZEpfEOimXQs9rhtlHMuVnED-_SgkM8tZXbic7z4OQreUlJRQebcuDYwx2JIR2pSEl4TSMzSnTc2KpiLNNzQnVS0LWYl6hi5TWhOSSSIv0Iy1suWNYHOUfmn7G08BG528Tfd4gTcwrYILffj0Vvd4hJhGsJPfAQ4D3uhoeijMNu798IkNrPTOh4h1whonGwGGQ3-CNOEu98e0tyuvp-gt9n0_QErX6LzTfYKbU71CH0-P7w8vxfLt-fVhsSwsZ9VUMN7QRtTgjBS805oJaGnFpTNAqGBSdI3pqroVtGq1cW0NWkjL6tZJ5yTI6gr9OM7Nmr62-SC1Dts45JWKUVFzyUnLM8WPlI0hpQidGqPPX-4VJepgWq3V0bQ6mFaEq2w6x76fhm_NBty_0F-1Gfh5BCC_uPMQVbIeBgvOx6xTueD_v-EPZSGSQA</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>de Brouwer, Geoffrey</creator><creator>Wolmarans, De Wet</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Back to basics: A methodological perspective on marble-burying behavior as a screening test for psychiatric illness</title><author>de Brouwer, Geoffrey ; Wolmarans, De Wet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-2481857edb654faa25e91346dbe015265f8bf3795139abd97ea56c279d6dd6e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal model</topic><topic>Animal models</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Anxiety - psychology</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal</topic><topic>Burying</topic><topic>Burying behavior</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Compulsive Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Etiology</topic><topic>Exploratory behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Locomotor activity</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Motor Activity</topic><topic>Nervous system</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Obsessive compulsive disorder</topic><topic>Obsessive-Compulsive</topic><topic>Peromyscus - psychology</topic><topic>Peromyscus maniculatus</topic><topic>Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Brouwer, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolmarans, De Wet</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Behavioural processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Brouwer, Geoffrey</au><au>Wolmarans, De Wet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Back to basics: A methodological perspective on marble-burying behavior as a screening test for psychiatric illness</atitle><jtitle>Behavioural processes</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Processes</addtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>157</volume><spage>590</spage><epage>600</epage><pages>590-600</pages><issn>0376-6357</issn><eissn>1872-8308</eissn><abstract>•Quantification of MB is influenced by observer bias and burying substrate.•MB possibly results from normal exploration and is subject to habituation.•High density substrates clearly differentiate MB from normal rodent activity.•MB can be distinguished from normal behavior based on preoccupation. Animal models of human psychiatric illness are valuable frameworks to investigate the etiology and neurobiology underlying the human conditions. Accurate behavioral measures that can be used to characterize animal behavior, thereby contributing to a model’s validity, are crucial. One such measure, i.e. the rodent marble-burying test (MBT), is often applied as a measure of anxiety- and compulsive-like behaviors. However, the test is characterized by noteworthy between-laboratory methodological differences and demonstrates positive treatment responses to an array of pharmacotherapies that are often of little translational value. Therefore, using a naturalistic animal model of obsessive-compulsive disorder, i.e. the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii), the current investigation attempted to illuminate the discrepancies reported in literature by means of a methodological approach to the MBT. Five key aspects of the test that vary between laboratories, viz. observer/scoring, burying substrate, optional avoidance, the use of repeated testing, and determinations of locomotor activity, have been investigated. Following repeated MB tests in four different burying substrates and in two zone configurations, we have demonstrated that 1) observer bias may contribute to the significant differences in findings reported, 2) MB seems to be a natural exploratory response to a novel environment, rather than being triggered by aberrant cognition, 3) burying substrates with a small particle size and higher density deliver the most accurate results with respect to the burying phenotype, and 4) to exclude the influence of normal exploratory behavior on the number of marbles being covered, assessments of marble-burying should be based on pre-occupation with the objects itself.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>29694852</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.beproc.2018.04.011</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0376-6357
ispartof Behavioural processes, 2018-12, Vol.157, p.590-600
issn 0376-6357
1872-8308
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2157464094
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE
subjects Animal behavior
Animal model
Animal models
Animals
Anxiety
Anxiety - psychology
Behavior, Animal
Burying
Burying behavior
Cognition
Compulsive Behavior - psychology
Disease Models, Animal
Etiology
Exploratory behavior
Female
Locomotor activity
Male
Mental Disorders - psychology
Motor Activity
Nervous system
Observer Variation
Obsessive compulsive disorder
Obsessive-Compulsive
Peromyscus - psychology
Peromyscus maniculatus
Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii
Phenotypes
Reproducibility of Results
Rodents
title Back to basics: A methodological perspective on marble-burying behavior as a screening test for psychiatric illness
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A39%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Back%20to%20basics:%20A%20methodological%20perspective%20on%20marble-burying%20behavior%20as%20a%20screening%20test%20for%20psychiatric%20illness&rft.jtitle=Behavioural%20processes&rft.au=de%20Brouwer,%20Geoffrey&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=157&rft.spage=590&rft.epage=600&rft.pages=590-600&rft.issn=0376-6357&rft.eissn=1872-8308&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.04.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2157464094%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2157464094&rft_id=info:pmid/29694852&rft_els_id=S0376635717304795&rfr_iscdi=true