A prospective audit of external cephalic version at term: are ultrasound parameters predictive of outcome?

This prospective study was designed to audit our provision of external cephalic version (ECV) but also to assess the relative importance of various ultrasound markers as indicators of a successful outcome. Data were collected between November 1998 and November 1999. There were 102 breech presentatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2001, Vol.21 (6), p.580-582
Hauptverfasser: Guyer, C H, Heard, M J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 582
container_issue 6
container_start_page 580
container_title Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
container_volume 21
creator Guyer, C H
Heard, M J
description This prospective study was designed to audit our provision of external cephalic version (ECV) but also to assess the relative importance of various ultrasound markers as indicators of a successful outcome. Data were collected between November 1998 and November 1999. There were 102 breech presentations at term and 47 women had an external cephalic version. We had an overall success rate of 55% with no adverse outcomes. Parity, a non-extended breech presentation and posterior placenta were all independently associated with a higher success rate. As only 49% of women with an uncomplicated breech presentation at term agreed to have an ECV the audit has prompted us to assess how we might improve the uptake of our service. Given that fetal position and placental site seem to influence outcome, we would suggest that a basic ultrasound scan should form part of the procedure. The audit has confirmed the value of ECV in reducing the incidence of breech presentation at term. With the increasing caesarean section rate for this obstetric problem it is important that all units in the United Kingdom are able to provide this service.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/01443610120085519
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_215722043</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71425577</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-9ea74e968ad67f5e26bcfaffbc6e935783f0130c2a227ef913e0f65ec50d95db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuLFDEUhYMoTs_oD3AjwYW70jwqlSoVZBjGBwy40XW4nbqh06QqZZIanX9vmm4YVHR1F-c7B849hDzj7BVnPXvNeNvKjjMuGOuV4sMDsuGya5uuH-RDsjnoTQXUGTnPec8Y40y1j8kZF0pwrcWG7C_pkmJe0BZ_ixTW0RcaHcWfBdMMgVpcdhC8pbeYso8zhUKrNL2hkJCuoSTIcZ1HukCCCauUayKO_hhYo-JabJzw_RPyyEHI-PR0L8i3D9dfrz41N18-fr66vGmsbNvSDAi6xaHrYey0Uyi6rXXg3NZ2OEile-kYl8wKEEKjG7hE5jqFVrFxUONWXpCXx9xa7PuKuZjJZ4shwIxxzUbzViildQVf_AHu43oonY3gSgvBWlkhfoRsfVNO6MyS_ATpznBmDiuYv1aonuen4HU74XjvOL29Au-OgJ9dTBP8iCmMpsBdiMklmK3PRv4v_-1v9h1CKDtbB7lv8G_3L6CcqIc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215722043</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A prospective audit of external cephalic version at term: are ultrasound parameters predictive of outcome?</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis:Master (3349 titles)</source><creator>Guyer, C H ; Heard, M J</creator><creatorcontrib>Guyer, C H ; Heard, M J</creatorcontrib><description>This prospective study was designed to audit our provision of external cephalic version (ECV) but also to assess the relative importance of various ultrasound markers as indicators of a successful outcome. Data were collected between November 1998 and November 1999. There were 102 breech presentations at term and 47 women had an external cephalic version. We had an overall success rate of 55% with no adverse outcomes. Parity, a non-extended breech presentation and posterior placenta were all independently associated with a higher success rate. As only 49% of women with an uncomplicated breech presentation at term agreed to have an ECV the audit has prompted us to assess how we might improve the uptake of our service. Given that fetal position and placental site seem to influence outcome, we would suggest that a basic ultrasound scan should form part of the procedure. The audit has confirmed the value of ECV in reducing the incidence of breech presentation at term. With the increasing caesarean section rate for this obstetric problem it is important that all units in the United Kingdom are able to provide this service.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-3615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1364-6893</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01443610120085519</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12521772</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOGYDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Births ; Clinical outcomes ; Obstetrics ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2001, Vol.21 (6), p.580-582</ispartof><rights>2001 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2001</rights><rights>Copyright Carfax Publishing Company Nov 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-9ea74e968ad67f5e26bcfaffbc6e935783f0130c2a227ef913e0f65ec50d95db3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01443610120085519$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01443610120085519$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,59647,60436,61221,61402</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12521772$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guyer, C H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heard, M J</creatorcontrib><title>A prospective audit of external cephalic version at term: are ultrasound parameters predictive of outcome?</title><title>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><addtitle>J Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><description>This prospective study was designed to audit our provision of external cephalic version (ECV) but also to assess the relative importance of various ultrasound markers as indicators of a successful outcome. Data were collected between November 1998 and November 1999. There were 102 breech presentations at term and 47 women had an external cephalic version. We had an overall success rate of 55% with no adverse outcomes. Parity, a non-extended breech presentation and posterior placenta were all independently associated with a higher success rate. As only 49% of women with an uncomplicated breech presentation at term agreed to have an ECV the audit has prompted us to assess how we might improve the uptake of our service. Given that fetal position and placental site seem to influence outcome, we would suggest that a basic ultrasound scan should form part of the procedure. The audit has confirmed the value of ECV in reducing the incidence of breech presentation at term. With the increasing caesarean section rate for this obstetric problem it is important that all units in the United Kingdom are able to provide this service.</description><subject>Births</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>0144-3615</issn><issn>1364-6893</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUuLFDEUhYMoTs_oD3AjwYW70jwqlSoVZBjGBwy40XW4nbqh06QqZZIanX9vmm4YVHR1F-c7B849hDzj7BVnPXvNeNvKjjMuGOuV4sMDsuGya5uuH-RDsjnoTQXUGTnPec8Y40y1j8kZF0pwrcWG7C_pkmJe0BZ_ixTW0RcaHcWfBdMMgVpcdhC8pbeYso8zhUKrNL2hkJCuoSTIcZ1HukCCCauUayKO_hhYo-JabJzw_RPyyEHI-PR0L8i3D9dfrz41N18-fr66vGmsbNvSDAi6xaHrYey0Uyi6rXXg3NZ2OEile-kYl8wKEEKjG7hE5jqFVrFxUONWXpCXx9xa7PuKuZjJZ4shwIxxzUbzViildQVf_AHu43oonY3gSgvBWlkhfoRsfVNO6MyS_ATpznBmDiuYv1aonuen4HU74XjvOL29Au-OgJ9dTBP8iCmMpsBdiMklmK3PRv4v_-1v9h1CKDtbB7lv8G_3L6CcqIc</recordid><startdate>2001</startdate><enddate>2001</enddate><creator>Guyer, C H</creator><creator>Heard, M J</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2001</creationdate><title>A prospective audit of external cephalic version at term: are ultrasound parameters predictive of outcome?</title><author>Guyer, C H ; Heard, M J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-9ea74e968ad67f5e26bcfaffbc6e935783f0130c2a227ef913e0f65ec50d95db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Births</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guyer, C H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heard, M J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guyer, C H</au><au>Heard, M J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A prospective audit of external cephalic version at term: are ultrasound parameters predictive of outcome?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>J Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><date>2001</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>580</spage><epage>582</epage><pages>580-582</pages><issn>0144-3615</issn><eissn>1364-6893</eissn><coden>JOGYDW</coden><abstract>This prospective study was designed to audit our provision of external cephalic version (ECV) but also to assess the relative importance of various ultrasound markers as indicators of a successful outcome. Data were collected between November 1998 and November 1999. There were 102 breech presentations at term and 47 women had an external cephalic version. We had an overall success rate of 55% with no adverse outcomes. Parity, a non-extended breech presentation and posterior placenta were all independently associated with a higher success rate. As only 49% of women with an uncomplicated breech presentation at term agreed to have an ECV the audit has prompted us to assess how we might improve the uptake of our service. Given that fetal position and placental site seem to influence outcome, we would suggest that a basic ultrasound scan should form part of the procedure. The audit has confirmed the value of ECV in reducing the incidence of breech presentation at term. With the increasing caesarean section rate for this obstetric problem it is important that all units in the United Kingdom are able to provide this service.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>12521772</pmid><doi>10.1080/01443610120085519</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0144-3615
ispartof Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2001, Vol.21 (6), p.580-582
issn 0144-3615
1364-6893
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_215722043
source Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles)
subjects Births
Clinical outcomes
Obstetrics
Ultrasonic imaging
title A prospective audit of external cephalic version at term: are ultrasound parameters predictive of outcome?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A52%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20prospective%20audit%20of%20external%20cephalic%20version%20at%20term:%20are%20ultrasound%20parameters%20predictive%20of%20outcome?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Guyer,%20C%20H&rft.date=2001&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=580&rft.epage=582&rft.pages=580-582&rft.issn=0144-3615&rft.eissn=1364-6893&rft.coden=JOGYDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01443610120085519&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E71425577%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215722043&rft_id=info:pmid/12521772&rfr_iscdi=true