Birthing a better future: a mixed-methods evaluation of multimedia exposition conveying the importance of the first 1001 days of life
The early years of life are marked by a crucial period for child development, occurring between conception and 2 years old. The charity, Zero2 Expo, created a multimedia exposition, Birthing a Better Future, to convey a public health message on the importance of the first 1001 days of life and the p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet (British edition) 2018-11, Vol.392, p.S27-S27 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S27 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | S27 |
container_title | The Lancet (British edition) |
container_volume | 392 |
creator | Cupp, Meghan A Owugha, Jessica Florschutz, Alex Beckingham, Andy Kisan, Virad Manikam, Logan Lakhanpaul, Monica |
description | The early years of life are marked by a crucial period for child development, occurring between conception and 2 years old. The charity, Zero2 Expo, created a multimedia exposition, Birthing a Better Future, to convey a public health message on the importance of the first 1001 days of life and the potential this period holds for intervention measures to have lifelong benefits. This evaluation aimed to determine whether this exposition is effective at raising awareness of the importance of the first 1001 days of life and inform the implementation of future expositions.
We conducted a realistic evaluation of the exposition pilot in The Corridor Gallery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK, from Nov 12, 2017, to Jan 6, 2018. Participants were selected through convenience sampling from individuals passing through the gallery. Semi-structured interviews led by a topic guide were conducted by a researcher on 6 random days (10% of the pilot's total duration) and feedback questionnaires were freely available. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim for qualitative assessment through content analysis in NVivo (version 11), and questionnaire responses were assessed through Likert scales in R statistical software.
We conducted 12 interviews and collected 19 feedback questionnaires from participants from a range of backgrounds, including parents, the general public, and health-care professionals. Analysis indicated an overall positive response to the exposition. According to a Likert scale, 11 (78·6%) of 14 respondents agreed that the exhibition raised their awareness of the topic. Nine (69·2%) of 13 participants felt that the exhibition affected their knowledge of the topic. 16 (84·2%) of 19 participants agreed that the exposition was thought-provoking. The number of survey respondents varied across questions, since some were implemented after a survey piloting round and therefore have fewer respondents. Interview themes included increased awareness of the importance of the early years of childhood development as well as recommendations for future expositions. Although participants were supportive of the multimedia approach, they believed that art pieces were more impactful than written pieces, a finding that should be considered in future expositions.
This pilot demonstrates the potential of a multimedia exposition to effectively convey public health messages. Future expositions might be valuable for public health communication strategies and hold potentia |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32191-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2155043847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140673618321913</els_id><sourcerecordid>2155043847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2293-9da908ee6f8b2596f34b83b18ba39b6a5e7c3c8c203b21089bc765362a51259f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1KxDAUhYMoOP48ghBwo4tq0jRp6kZ08A8EFyq4C2l640SmzZikg_MAvrftjLh1deHcc87lfggdUXJGCRXnz4QWJBMlEydUnrKcVjRjW2hCi7LIeFG-baPJn2UX7cX4QQgpBOET9H3tQpq57h1rXENKELDtUx_gYhBa9wVN1kKa-SZiWOp5r5PzHfYWt_08uRYapzF8LXx064Xx3RJWY12aAXbtwoekOwNjYlSsCzFhSgjFjV7FUZ47Cwdox-p5hMPfuY9eb29epvfZ49Pdw_TqMTN5XrGsanRFJICwss55JSwraslqKmvNqlpoDqVhRpqcsDqnRFa1KQVnItecDn7L9tHxpncR_GcPMakP34duOKlyyjkpmCzKwcU3LhN8jAGsWgTX6rBSlKiRuFoTVyNORaVaE1dsyF1ucjC8sHQQVDQOhu8bF8Ak1Xj3T8MPIfqI1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2155043847</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Birthing a better future: a mixed-methods evaluation of multimedia exposition conveying the importance of the first 1001 days of life</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Cupp, Meghan A ; Owugha, Jessica ; Florschutz, Alex ; Beckingham, Andy ; Kisan, Virad ; Manikam, Logan ; Lakhanpaul, Monica</creator><creatorcontrib>Cupp, Meghan A ; Owugha, Jessica ; Florschutz, Alex ; Beckingham, Andy ; Kisan, Virad ; Manikam, Logan ; Lakhanpaul, Monica</creatorcontrib><description>The early years of life are marked by a crucial period for child development, occurring between conception and 2 years old. The charity, Zero2 Expo, created a multimedia exposition, Birthing a Better Future, to convey a public health message on the importance of the first 1001 days of life and the potential this period holds for intervention measures to have lifelong benefits. This evaluation aimed to determine whether this exposition is effective at raising awareness of the importance of the first 1001 days of life and inform the implementation of future expositions.
We conducted a realistic evaluation of the exposition pilot in The Corridor Gallery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK, from Nov 12, 2017, to Jan 6, 2018. Participants were selected through convenience sampling from individuals passing through the gallery. Semi-structured interviews led by a topic guide were conducted by a researcher on 6 random days (10% of the pilot's total duration) and feedback questionnaires were freely available. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim for qualitative assessment through content analysis in NVivo (version 11), and questionnaire responses were assessed through Likert scales in R statistical software.
We conducted 12 interviews and collected 19 feedback questionnaires from participants from a range of backgrounds, including parents, the general public, and health-care professionals. Analysis indicated an overall positive response to the exposition. According to a Likert scale, 11 (78·6%) of 14 respondents agreed that the exhibition raised their awareness of the topic. Nine (69·2%) of 13 participants felt that the exhibition affected their knowledge of the topic. 16 (84·2%) of 19 participants agreed that the exposition was thought-provoking. The number of survey respondents varied across questions, since some were implemented after a survey piloting round and therefore have fewer respondents. Interview themes included increased awareness of the importance of the early years of childhood development as well as recommendations for future expositions. Although participants were supportive of the multimedia approach, they believed that art pieces were more impactful than written pieces, a finding that should be considered in future expositions.
This pilot demonstrates the potential of a multimedia exposition to effectively convey public health messages. Future expositions might be valuable for public health communication strategies and hold potential to influence public perceptions of health-related topics.
Zero2 Expo.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32191-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Children ; Content analysis ; Conveying ; Data analysis ; Exposure ; Feedback ; Mixed methods research ; Multimedia ; Parents ; Polls & surveys ; Public health ; Qualitative analysis</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 2018-11, Vol.392, p.S27-S27</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2018. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2293-9da908ee6f8b2596f34b83b18ba39b6a5e7c3c8c203b21089bc765362a51259f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2155043847?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64389,72469</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cupp, Meghan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owugha, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Florschutz, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckingham, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kisan, Virad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manikam, Logan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakhanpaul, Monica</creatorcontrib><title>Birthing a better future: a mixed-methods evaluation of multimedia exposition conveying the importance of the first 1001 days of life</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><description>The early years of life are marked by a crucial period for child development, occurring between conception and 2 years old. The charity, Zero2 Expo, created a multimedia exposition, Birthing a Better Future, to convey a public health message on the importance of the first 1001 days of life and the potential this period holds for intervention measures to have lifelong benefits. This evaluation aimed to determine whether this exposition is effective at raising awareness of the importance of the first 1001 days of life and inform the implementation of future expositions.
We conducted a realistic evaluation of the exposition pilot in The Corridor Gallery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK, from Nov 12, 2017, to Jan 6, 2018. Participants were selected through convenience sampling from individuals passing through the gallery. Semi-structured interviews led by a topic guide were conducted by a researcher on 6 random days (10% of the pilot's total duration) and feedback questionnaires were freely available. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim for qualitative assessment through content analysis in NVivo (version 11), and questionnaire responses were assessed through Likert scales in R statistical software.
We conducted 12 interviews and collected 19 feedback questionnaires from participants from a range of backgrounds, including parents, the general public, and health-care professionals. Analysis indicated an overall positive response to the exposition. According to a Likert scale, 11 (78·6%) of 14 respondents agreed that the exhibition raised their awareness of the topic. Nine (69·2%) of 13 participants felt that the exhibition affected their knowledge of the topic. 16 (84·2%) of 19 participants agreed that the exposition was thought-provoking. The number of survey respondents varied across questions, since some were implemented after a survey piloting round and therefore have fewer respondents. Interview themes included increased awareness of the importance of the early years of childhood development as well as recommendations for future expositions. Although participants were supportive of the multimedia approach, they believed that art pieces were more impactful than written pieces, a finding that should be considered in future expositions.
This pilot demonstrates the potential of a multimedia exposition to effectively convey public health messages. Future expositions might be valuable for public health communication strategies and hold potential to influence public perceptions of health-related topics.
Zero2 Expo.</description><subject>Children</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Conveying</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Mixed methods research</subject><subject>Multimedia</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1KxDAUhYMoOP48ghBwo4tq0jRp6kZ08A8EFyq4C2l640SmzZikg_MAvrftjLh1deHcc87lfggdUXJGCRXnz4QWJBMlEydUnrKcVjRjW2hCi7LIeFG-baPJn2UX7cX4QQgpBOET9H3tQpq57h1rXENKELDtUx_gYhBa9wVN1kKa-SZiWOp5r5PzHfYWt_08uRYapzF8LXx064Xx3RJWY12aAXbtwoekOwNjYlSsCzFhSgjFjV7FUZ47Cwdox-p5hMPfuY9eb29epvfZ49Pdw_TqMTN5XrGsanRFJICwss55JSwraslqKmvNqlpoDqVhRpqcsDqnRFa1KQVnItecDn7L9tHxpncR_GcPMakP34duOKlyyjkpmCzKwcU3LhN8jAGsWgTX6rBSlKiRuFoTVyNORaVaE1dsyF1ucjC8sHQQVDQOhu8bF8Ak1Xj3T8MPIfqI1g</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Cupp, Meghan A</creator><creator>Owugha, Jessica</creator><creator>Florschutz, Alex</creator><creator>Beckingham, Andy</creator><creator>Kisan, Virad</creator><creator>Manikam, Logan</creator><creator>Lakhanpaul, Monica</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Birthing a better future: a mixed-methods evaluation of multimedia exposition conveying the importance of the first 1001 days of life</title><author>Cupp, Meghan A ; Owugha, Jessica ; Florschutz, Alex ; Beckingham, Andy ; Kisan, Virad ; Manikam, Logan ; Lakhanpaul, Monica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2293-9da908ee6f8b2596f34b83b18ba39b6a5e7c3c8c203b21089bc765362a51259f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Children</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Conveying</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Mixed methods research</topic><topic>Multimedia</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cupp, Meghan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owugha, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Florschutz, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckingham, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kisan, Virad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manikam, Logan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakhanpaul, Monica</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cupp, Meghan A</au><au>Owugha, Jessica</au><au>Florschutz, Alex</au><au>Beckingham, Andy</au><au>Kisan, Virad</au><au>Manikam, Logan</au><au>Lakhanpaul, Monica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Birthing a better future: a mixed-methods evaluation of multimedia exposition conveying the importance of the first 1001 days of life</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>392</volume><spage>S27</spage><epage>S27</epage><pages>S27-S27</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><abstract>The early years of life are marked by a crucial period for child development, occurring between conception and 2 years old. The charity, Zero2 Expo, created a multimedia exposition, Birthing a Better Future, to convey a public health message on the importance of the first 1001 days of life and the potential this period holds for intervention measures to have lifelong benefits. This evaluation aimed to determine whether this exposition is effective at raising awareness of the importance of the first 1001 days of life and inform the implementation of future expositions.
We conducted a realistic evaluation of the exposition pilot in The Corridor Gallery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK, from Nov 12, 2017, to Jan 6, 2018. Participants were selected through convenience sampling from individuals passing through the gallery. Semi-structured interviews led by a topic guide were conducted by a researcher on 6 random days (10% of the pilot's total duration) and feedback questionnaires were freely available. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim for qualitative assessment through content analysis in NVivo (version 11), and questionnaire responses were assessed through Likert scales in R statistical software.
We conducted 12 interviews and collected 19 feedback questionnaires from participants from a range of backgrounds, including parents, the general public, and health-care professionals. Analysis indicated an overall positive response to the exposition. According to a Likert scale, 11 (78·6%) of 14 respondents agreed that the exhibition raised their awareness of the topic. Nine (69·2%) of 13 participants felt that the exhibition affected their knowledge of the topic. 16 (84·2%) of 19 participants agreed that the exposition was thought-provoking. The number of survey respondents varied across questions, since some were implemented after a survey piloting round and therefore have fewer respondents. Interview themes included increased awareness of the importance of the early years of childhood development as well as recommendations for future expositions. Although participants were supportive of the multimedia approach, they believed that art pieces were more impactful than written pieces, a finding that should be considered in future expositions.
This pilot demonstrates the potential of a multimedia exposition to effectively convey public health messages. Future expositions might be valuable for public health communication strategies and hold potential to influence public perceptions of health-related topics.
Zero2 Expo.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32191-3</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-6736 |
ispartof | The Lancet (British edition), 2018-11, Vol.392, p.S27-S27 |
issn | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2155043847 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Children Content analysis Conveying Data analysis Exposure Feedback Mixed methods research Multimedia Parents Polls & surveys Public health Qualitative analysis |
title | Birthing a better future: a mixed-methods evaluation of multimedia exposition conveying the importance of the first 1001 days of life |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T15%3A25%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Birthing%20a%20better%20future:%20a%20mixed-methods%20evaluation%20of%20multimedia%20exposition%20conveying%20the%20importance%20of%20the%20first%201001%20days%20of%20life&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Cupp,%20Meghan%20A&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=392&rft.spage=S27&rft.epage=S27&rft.pages=S27-S27&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32191-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2155043847%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2155043847&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0140673618321913&rfr_iscdi=true |