Training Aspiring Entrepreneurs to Pitch Experienced Investors: Evidence from a Field Experiment in the United States
Accredited investors finance more than 75,000 U.S. startups annually. We explain how training aspiring entrepreneurs to pitch their new business ideas to these investors affects their odds of continued funding discussions. We model accredited investors’ decision to continue investigation as a real o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Management science 2018-11, Vol.64 (11), p.5164-5179 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5179 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 5164 |
container_title | Management science |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Clingingsmith, David Shane, Scott |
description | Accredited investors finance more than 75,000 U.S. startups annually. We explain how training aspiring entrepreneurs to pitch their new business ideas to these investors affects their odds of continued funding discussions. We model accredited investors’ decision to continue investigation as a real option whose value is a function of their experience and the information contained in the entrepreneurs’ pitches. We derive four hypotheses from the model, which we test through a field experiment that randomly assigns pitch training at four elevator pitch competitions. The data support all four hypotheses and are inconsistent with alternative explanations.
The online appendix is available at
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2882
.
This paper was accepted by Ashish Arora, entrepreneurship and innovation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2882 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2154693643</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48748347</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48748347</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-d7c1c48494a9259b51395f6d86268260ae5249984f82500b39fba6b10581f40c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4MoOKdXb0LAc2uSJmnibYxOBwMFt3Poj9RlrGlN0qH_vS0dXj29x_t-v-89PgDcYxRjItKnxvoyJginMRGCXIAZZoRHjCF8CWYIERZhieQ1uPH-gBBKRcpnoN-63FhjP-HCd8aNTWaD053TVvfOw9DCdxPKPcy-O-2MtqWu4NqetA-t888wO5lqHMLatQ3M4croY3U2N9oGaCwMew131oQh-RHyoP0tuKrzo9d35zoHu1W2Xb5Gm7eX9XKxiUqakBBVaYlLKqikuSRMFgwnktW8EpxwQTjKNSNUSkFrQRhCRSLrIucFRkzgmqIymYPHaW_n2q9-eFkd2t7Z4aQimFEuE06TwRVPrtK13jtdq274PXc_CiM1olUjWjWiVSPaIfAwBQ4jhD83FSkVCU0HPZp0Y-vWNf6_fb-cfIUs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2154693643</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Training Aspiring Entrepreneurs to Pitch Experienced Investors: Evidence from a Field Experiment in the United States</title><source>INFORMS PubsOnLine</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Clingingsmith, David ; Shane, Scott</creator><creatorcontrib>Clingingsmith, David ; Shane, Scott</creatorcontrib><description>Accredited investors finance more than 75,000 U.S. startups annually. We explain how training aspiring entrepreneurs to pitch their new business ideas to these investors affects their odds of continued funding discussions. We model accredited investors’ decision to continue investigation as a real option whose value is a function of their experience and the information contained in the entrepreneurs’ pitches. We derive four hypotheses from the model, which we test through a field experiment that randomly assigns pitch training at four elevator pitch competitions. The data support all four hypotheses and are inconsistent with alternative explanations.
The online appendix is available at
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2882
.
This paper was accepted by Ashish Arora, entrepreneurship and innovation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-1909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2882</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum: INFORMS</publisher><subject>Elevator pitch ; Entrepreneurial finance ; Entrepreneurs ; experiment ; Field study ; Finance ; Hypotheses ; investment ; Investors ; Pitch ; pitching ; Startups ; Training</subject><ispartof>Management science, 2018-11, Vol.64 (11), p.5164-5179</ispartof><rights>2017 INFORMS</rights><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Nov 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-d7c1c48494a9259b51395f6d86268260ae5249984f82500b39fba6b10581f40c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-d7c1c48494a9259b51395f6d86268260ae5249984f82500b39fba6b10581f40c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4908-2321 ; 0000-0002-9928-284X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48748347$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2882$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,3679,27905,27906,57998,58231,62595</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clingingsmith, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shane, Scott</creatorcontrib><title>Training Aspiring Entrepreneurs to Pitch Experienced Investors: Evidence from a Field Experiment in the United States</title><title>Management science</title><description>Accredited investors finance more than 75,000 U.S. startups annually. We explain how training aspiring entrepreneurs to pitch their new business ideas to these investors affects their odds of continued funding discussions. We model accredited investors’ decision to continue investigation as a real option whose value is a function of their experience and the information contained in the entrepreneurs’ pitches. We derive four hypotheses from the model, which we test through a field experiment that randomly assigns pitch training at four elevator pitch competitions. The data support all four hypotheses and are inconsistent with alternative explanations.
The online appendix is available at
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2882
.
This paper was accepted by Ashish Arora, entrepreneurship and innovation.</description><subject>Elevator pitch</subject><subject>Entrepreneurial finance</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>experiment</subject><subject>Field study</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>investment</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Pitch</subject><subject>pitching</subject><subject>Startups</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0025-1909</issn><issn>1526-5501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4MoOKdXb0LAc2uSJmnibYxOBwMFt3Poj9RlrGlN0qH_vS0dXj29x_t-v-89PgDcYxRjItKnxvoyJginMRGCXIAZZoRHjCF8CWYIERZhieQ1uPH-gBBKRcpnoN-63FhjP-HCd8aNTWaD053TVvfOw9DCdxPKPcy-O-2MtqWu4NqetA-t888wO5lqHMLatQ3M4croY3U2N9oGaCwMew131oQh-RHyoP0tuKrzo9d35zoHu1W2Xb5Gm7eX9XKxiUqakBBVaYlLKqikuSRMFgwnktW8EpxwQTjKNSNUSkFrQRhCRSLrIucFRkzgmqIymYPHaW_n2q9-eFkd2t7Z4aQimFEuE06TwRVPrtK13jtdq274PXc_CiM1olUjWjWiVSPaIfAwBQ4jhD83FSkVCU0HPZp0Y-vWNf6_fb-cfIUs</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Clingingsmith, David</creator><creator>Shane, Scott</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4908-2321</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9928-284X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Training Aspiring Entrepreneurs to Pitch Experienced Investors: Evidence from a Field Experiment in the United States</title><author>Clingingsmith, David ; Shane, Scott</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-d7c1c48494a9259b51395f6d86268260ae5249984f82500b39fba6b10581f40c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Elevator pitch</topic><topic>Entrepreneurial finance</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>experiment</topic><topic>Field study</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>investment</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Pitch</topic><topic>pitching</topic><topic>Startups</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clingingsmith, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shane, Scott</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clingingsmith, David</au><au>Shane, Scott</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Training Aspiring Entrepreneurs to Pitch Experienced Investors: Evidence from a Field Experiment in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Management science</jtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>5164</spage><epage>5179</epage><pages>5164-5179</pages><issn>0025-1909</issn><eissn>1526-5501</eissn><abstract>Accredited investors finance more than 75,000 U.S. startups annually. We explain how training aspiring entrepreneurs to pitch their new business ideas to these investors affects their odds of continued funding discussions. We model accredited investors’ decision to continue investigation as a real option whose value is a function of their experience and the information contained in the entrepreneurs’ pitches. We derive four hypotheses from the model, which we test through a field experiment that randomly assigns pitch training at four elevator pitch competitions. The data support all four hypotheses and are inconsistent with alternative explanations.
The online appendix is available at
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2882
.
This paper was accepted by Ashish Arora, entrepreneurship and innovation.</abstract><cop>Linthicum</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/mnsc.2017.2882</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4908-2321</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9928-284X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-1909 |
ispartof | Management science, 2018-11, Vol.64 (11), p.5164-5179 |
issn | 0025-1909 1526-5501 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2154693643 |
source | INFORMS PubsOnLine; Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Elevator pitch Entrepreneurial finance Entrepreneurs experiment Field study Finance Hypotheses investment Investors Pitch pitching Startups Training |
title | Training Aspiring Entrepreneurs to Pitch Experienced Investors: Evidence from a Field Experiment in the United States |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A16%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Training%20Aspiring%20Entrepreneurs%20to%20Pitch%20Experienced%20Investors:%20Evidence%20from%20a%20Field%20Experiment%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Management%20science&rft.au=Clingingsmith,%20David&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=5164&rft.epage=5179&rft.pages=5164-5179&rft.issn=0025-1909&rft.eissn=1526-5501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2882&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48748347%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2154693643&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48748347&rfr_iscdi=true |