Training Aspiring Entrepreneurs to Pitch Experienced Investors: Evidence from a Field Experiment in the United States

Accredited investors finance more than 75,000 U.S. startups annually. We explain how training aspiring entrepreneurs to pitch their new business ideas to these investors affects their odds of continued funding discussions. We model accredited investors’ decision to continue investigation as a real o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Management science 2018-11, Vol.64 (11), p.5164-5179
Hauptverfasser: Clingingsmith, David, Shane, Scott
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5179
container_issue 11
container_start_page 5164
container_title Management science
container_volume 64
creator Clingingsmith, David
Shane, Scott
description Accredited investors finance more than 75,000 U.S. startups annually. We explain how training aspiring entrepreneurs to pitch their new business ideas to these investors affects their odds of continued funding discussions. We model accredited investors’ decision to continue investigation as a real option whose value is a function of their experience and the information contained in the entrepreneurs’ pitches. We derive four hypotheses from the model, which we test through a field experiment that randomly assigns pitch training at four elevator pitch competitions. The data support all four hypotheses and are inconsistent with alternative explanations. The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2882 . This paper was accepted by Ashish Arora, entrepreneurship and innovation.
doi_str_mv 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2882
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2154693643</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48748347</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48748347</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-d7c1c48494a9259b51395f6d86268260ae5249984f82500b39fba6b10581f40c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4MoOKdXb0LAc2uSJmnibYxOBwMFt3Poj9RlrGlN0qH_vS0dXj29x_t-v-89PgDcYxRjItKnxvoyJginMRGCXIAZZoRHjCF8CWYIERZhieQ1uPH-gBBKRcpnoN-63FhjP-HCd8aNTWaD053TVvfOw9DCdxPKPcy-O-2MtqWu4NqetA-t888wO5lqHMLatQ3M4croY3U2N9oGaCwMew131oQh-RHyoP0tuKrzo9d35zoHu1W2Xb5Gm7eX9XKxiUqakBBVaYlLKqikuSRMFgwnktW8EpxwQTjKNSNUSkFrQRhCRSLrIucFRkzgmqIymYPHaW_n2q9-eFkd2t7Z4aQimFEuE06TwRVPrtK13jtdq274PXc_CiM1olUjWjWiVSPaIfAwBQ4jhD83FSkVCU0HPZp0Y-vWNf6_fb-cfIUs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2154693643</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Training Aspiring Entrepreneurs to Pitch Experienced Investors: Evidence from a Field Experiment in the United States</title><source>INFORMS PubsOnLine</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Clingingsmith, David ; Shane, Scott</creator><creatorcontrib>Clingingsmith, David ; Shane, Scott</creatorcontrib><description>Accredited investors finance more than 75,000 U.S. startups annually. We explain how training aspiring entrepreneurs to pitch their new business ideas to these investors affects their odds of continued funding discussions. We model accredited investors’ decision to continue investigation as a real option whose value is a function of their experience and the information contained in the entrepreneurs’ pitches. We derive four hypotheses from the model, which we test through a field experiment that randomly assigns pitch training at four elevator pitch competitions. The data support all four hypotheses and are inconsistent with alternative explanations. The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2882 . This paper was accepted by Ashish Arora, entrepreneurship and innovation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-1909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2882</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum: INFORMS</publisher><subject>Elevator pitch ; Entrepreneurial finance ; Entrepreneurs ; experiment ; Field study ; Finance ; Hypotheses ; investment ; Investors ; Pitch ; pitching ; Startups ; Training</subject><ispartof>Management science, 2018-11, Vol.64 (11), p.5164-5179</ispartof><rights>2017 INFORMS</rights><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Nov 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-d7c1c48494a9259b51395f6d86268260ae5249984f82500b39fba6b10581f40c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-d7c1c48494a9259b51395f6d86268260ae5249984f82500b39fba6b10581f40c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4908-2321 ; 0000-0002-9928-284X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48748347$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2882$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,3679,27905,27906,57998,58231,62595</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clingingsmith, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shane, Scott</creatorcontrib><title>Training Aspiring Entrepreneurs to Pitch Experienced Investors: Evidence from a Field Experiment in the United States</title><title>Management science</title><description>Accredited investors finance more than 75,000 U.S. startups annually. We explain how training aspiring entrepreneurs to pitch their new business ideas to these investors affects their odds of continued funding discussions. We model accredited investors’ decision to continue investigation as a real option whose value is a function of their experience and the information contained in the entrepreneurs’ pitches. We derive four hypotheses from the model, which we test through a field experiment that randomly assigns pitch training at four elevator pitch competitions. The data support all four hypotheses and are inconsistent with alternative explanations. The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2882 . This paper was accepted by Ashish Arora, entrepreneurship and innovation.</description><subject>Elevator pitch</subject><subject>Entrepreneurial finance</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>experiment</subject><subject>Field study</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>investment</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Pitch</subject><subject>pitching</subject><subject>Startups</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0025-1909</issn><issn>1526-5501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4MoOKdXb0LAc2uSJmnibYxOBwMFt3Poj9RlrGlN0qH_vS0dXj29x_t-v-89PgDcYxRjItKnxvoyJginMRGCXIAZZoRHjCF8CWYIERZhieQ1uPH-gBBKRcpnoN-63FhjP-HCd8aNTWaD053TVvfOw9DCdxPKPcy-O-2MtqWu4NqetA-t888wO5lqHMLatQ3M4croY3U2N9oGaCwMew131oQh-RHyoP0tuKrzo9d35zoHu1W2Xb5Gm7eX9XKxiUqakBBVaYlLKqikuSRMFgwnktW8EpxwQTjKNSNUSkFrQRhCRSLrIucFRkzgmqIymYPHaW_n2q9-eFkd2t7Z4aQimFEuE06TwRVPrtK13jtdq274PXc_CiM1olUjWjWiVSPaIfAwBQ4jhD83FSkVCU0HPZp0Y-vWNf6_fb-cfIUs</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Clingingsmith, David</creator><creator>Shane, Scott</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4908-2321</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9928-284X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Training Aspiring Entrepreneurs to Pitch Experienced Investors: Evidence from a Field Experiment in the United States</title><author>Clingingsmith, David ; Shane, Scott</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-d7c1c48494a9259b51395f6d86268260ae5249984f82500b39fba6b10581f40c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Elevator pitch</topic><topic>Entrepreneurial finance</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>experiment</topic><topic>Field study</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>investment</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Pitch</topic><topic>pitching</topic><topic>Startups</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clingingsmith, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shane, Scott</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clingingsmith, David</au><au>Shane, Scott</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Training Aspiring Entrepreneurs to Pitch Experienced Investors: Evidence from a Field Experiment in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Management science</jtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>5164</spage><epage>5179</epage><pages>5164-5179</pages><issn>0025-1909</issn><eissn>1526-5501</eissn><abstract>Accredited investors finance more than 75,000 U.S. startups annually. We explain how training aspiring entrepreneurs to pitch their new business ideas to these investors affects their odds of continued funding discussions. We model accredited investors’ decision to continue investigation as a real option whose value is a function of their experience and the information contained in the entrepreneurs’ pitches. We derive four hypotheses from the model, which we test through a field experiment that randomly assigns pitch training at four elevator pitch competitions. The data support all four hypotheses and are inconsistent with alternative explanations. The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2882 . This paper was accepted by Ashish Arora, entrepreneurship and innovation.</abstract><cop>Linthicum</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/mnsc.2017.2882</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4908-2321</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9928-284X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-1909
ispartof Management science, 2018-11, Vol.64 (11), p.5164-5179
issn 0025-1909
1526-5501
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2154693643
source INFORMS PubsOnLine; Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Elevator pitch
Entrepreneurial finance
Entrepreneurs
experiment
Field study
Finance
Hypotheses
investment
Investors
Pitch
pitching
Startups
Training
title Training Aspiring Entrepreneurs to Pitch Experienced Investors: Evidence from a Field Experiment in the United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A16%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Training%20Aspiring%20Entrepreneurs%20to%20Pitch%20Experienced%20Investors:%20Evidence%20from%20a%20Field%20Experiment%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Management%20science&rft.au=Clingingsmith,%20David&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=5164&rft.epage=5179&rft.pages=5164-5179&rft.issn=0025-1909&rft.eissn=1526-5501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2882&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48748347%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2154693643&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48748347&rfr_iscdi=true