A feasibility study of an internal control methodology using hydrocortisone cream for the management of skin reactions in patients receiving radical radiation therapy for cancers of the head and neck

Background: The literature on the evaluation of the management of radiation-induced dermatitis demonstrates the methodological difficulties of studying this subject. Therefore, the feasibility of a methodology whereby the patient acted as their own control was used to study acute cutaneous side effe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of radiotherapy in practice 2006-12, Vol.5 (4), p.211-218
Hauptverfasser: Sperduti, A., Cashell, A., Rocca, C., Hirji, A., Billingsley, S., Waldron, J., Pond, G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 218
container_issue 4
container_start_page 211
container_title Journal of radiotherapy in practice
container_volume 5
creator Sperduti, A.
Cashell, A.
Rocca, C.
Hirji, A.
Billingsley, S.
Waldron, J.
Pond, G.
description Background: The literature on the evaluation of the management of radiation-induced dermatitis demonstrates the methodological difficulties of studying this subject. Therefore, the feasibility of a methodology whereby the patient acted as their own control was used to study acute cutaneous side effects for head and neck radiotherapy patients using 1% hydrocortisone cream (HC). Methods: Twenty patients were asked to apply Hyderm (1% hydrocortisone) cream twice daily to one side of the treatment area (either right or left) beginning on day one of radiation therapy and ending 2 weeks post-radiation therapy. The centres standard skin care protocol using mild soap and water and no creams was used on the other side of the neck. Once weekly the patients were assessed and scored using the Radiation-Induced Skin Reaction Scale and Radiotherapy and Oncology Group assessment scales and the patient completed a symptom scoring scale each week was a baseline assessment undertaken before they started treatment. To document compliance with study instructions, patients were asked to keep a calendar indicating when they applied the cream and to which side, and this was collected by clinical staff. Results: At the conclusion of the study, 12 patients were enrolled. During the course of the study it became increasingly obvious that the side to which patients were applying the Hyderm scored higher on the assessment scale, indicating an increased skin reaction than the control side. This was confirmed with the photographs and patient symptom scale. As a result of these increased reactions, the study ceased accrual earlier than anticipated and all patients were advised to discontinue Hyderm use. Conclusion: The increase in skin toxicity was unexpected, particularly as the institutional standard of care recommended the use of HC as treatment for radiation dermatitis. The number of patients in the study was too small to make conclusive statements about the efficacy of HC. We were able to confirm the feasibility of using an internal control methodology in these patients. Compliance results indicate the skin care instructions were clearly written and patients were able to follow them.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1460396906000306
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_215460611</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1460396906000306</cupid><sourcerecordid>1401047861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3b48698bf7ab576a8918672a210feb42923d8d8a83c699c3fa231fc8b9fa1e7d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu3CAQhlGVStls-gC5od6dgnGwfVyt2qTSSj20PVtjGHZJbNgCW8lPmNcKZCP1UOU0aP75v0H_EHLD2S1nvP3ykzeSiV72TDLGBJMfyCq32opzwS9e36wq-iW5ivGRsaZpWLsizxtqEKId7WTTQmM66YV6Q8FR6xIGBxNV3qXgJzpjOnjtJ79f6Clat6eHRQevfEg2eodUBYSZGh9oOiCdwcEeZ3SpAOOTdTTrKlnvYobTIySbxZi7Cu3fwgugrcobS4UyWEABjssrVIFTGGKhFf4BQed_aupQPV2TjwamiJ_e6pr8_vb11_ah2v24_77d7ColuEyVGJtO9t1oWhjvWgldzzvZ1lBzZnBs6r4WutMddELJvlfCQC24Ud3YG-DYarEmn8_cY_B_ThjT8OhPJaU41Pwuhyxz4GvCz0Mq-BgDmuEY7AxhGTgbyrmG_86VPeLNA_MYrN7jP_L7rhfAvpwr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215460611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A feasibility study of an internal control methodology using hydrocortisone cream for the management of skin reactions in patients receiving radical radiation therapy for cancers of the head and neck</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Sperduti, A. ; Cashell, A. ; Rocca, C. ; Hirji, A. ; Billingsley, S. ; Waldron, J. ; Pond, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sperduti, A. ; Cashell, A. ; Rocca, C. ; Hirji, A. ; Billingsley, S. ; Waldron, J. ; Pond, G.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The literature on the evaluation of the management of radiation-induced dermatitis demonstrates the methodological difficulties of studying this subject. Therefore, the feasibility of a methodology whereby the patient acted as their own control was used to study acute cutaneous side effects for head and neck radiotherapy patients using 1% hydrocortisone cream (HC). Methods: Twenty patients were asked to apply Hyderm (1% hydrocortisone) cream twice daily to one side of the treatment area (either right or left) beginning on day one of radiation therapy and ending 2 weeks post-radiation therapy. The centres standard skin care protocol using mild soap and water and no creams was used on the other side of the neck. Once weekly the patients were assessed and scored using the Radiation-Induced Skin Reaction Scale and Radiotherapy and Oncology Group assessment scales and the patient completed a symptom scoring scale each week was a baseline assessment undertaken before they started treatment. To document compliance with study instructions, patients were asked to keep a calendar indicating when they applied the cream and to which side, and this was collected by clinical staff. Results: At the conclusion of the study, 12 patients were enrolled. During the course of the study it became increasingly obvious that the side to which patients were applying the Hyderm scored higher on the assessment scale, indicating an increased skin reaction than the control side. This was confirmed with the photographs and patient symptom scale. As a result of these increased reactions, the study ceased accrual earlier than anticipated and all patients were advised to discontinue Hyderm use. Conclusion: The increase in skin toxicity was unexpected, particularly as the institutional standard of care recommended the use of HC as treatment for radiation dermatitis. The number of patients in the study was too small to make conclusive statements about the efficacy of HC. We were able to confirm the feasibility of using an internal control methodology in these patients. Compliance results indicate the skin care instructions were clearly written and patients were able to follow them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1460-3969</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-1131</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1460396906000306</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Original Article</subject><ispartof>Journal of radiotherapy in practice, 2006-12, Vol.5 (4), p.211-218</ispartof><rights>2006 Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3b48698bf7ab576a8918672a210feb42923d8d8a83c699c3fa231fc8b9fa1e7d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1460396906000306/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sperduti, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cashell, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocca, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirji, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billingsley, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waldron, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pond, G.</creatorcontrib><title>A feasibility study of an internal control methodology using hydrocortisone cream for the management of skin reactions in patients receiving radical radiation therapy for cancers of the head and neck</title><title>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</title><addtitle>J Radiother Pract</addtitle><description>Background: The literature on the evaluation of the management of radiation-induced dermatitis demonstrates the methodological difficulties of studying this subject. Therefore, the feasibility of a methodology whereby the patient acted as their own control was used to study acute cutaneous side effects for head and neck radiotherapy patients using 1% hydrocortisone cream (HC). Methods: Twenty patients were asked to apply Hyderm (1% hydrocortisone) cream twice daily to one side of the treatment area (either right or left) beginning on day one of radiation therapy and ending 2 weeks post-radiation therapy. The centres standard skin care protocol using mild soap and water and no creams was used on the other side of the neck. Once weekly the patients were assessed and scored using the Radiation-Induced Skin Reaction Scale and Radiotherapy and Oncology Group assessment scales and the patient completed a symptom scoring scale each week was a baseline assessment undertaken before they started treatment. To document compliance with study instructions, patients were asked to keep a calendar indicating when they applied the cream and to which side, and this was collected by clinical staff. Results: At the conclusion of the study, 12 patients were enrolled. During the course of the study it became increasingly obvious that the side to which patients were applying the Hyderm scored higher on the assessment scale, indicating an increased skin reaction than the control side. This was confirmed with the photographs and patient symptom scale. As a result of these increased reactions, the study ceased accrual earlier than anticipated and all patients were advised to discontinue Hyderm use. Conclusion: The increase in skin toxicity was unexpected, particularly as the institutional standard of care recommended the use of HC as treatment for radiation dermatitis. The number of patients in the study was too small to make conclusive statements about the efficacy of HC. We were able to confirm the feasibility of using an internal control methodology in these patients. Compliance results indicate the skin care instructions were clearly written and patients were able to follow them.</description><subject>Original Article</subject><issn>1460-3969</issn><issn>1467-1131</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFu3CAQhlGVStls-gC5od6dgnGwfVyt2qTSSj20PVtjGHZJbNgCW8lPmNcKZCP1UOU0aP75v0H_EHLD2S1nvP3ykzeSiV72TDLGBJMfyCq32opzwS9e36wq-iW5ivGRsaZpWLsizxtqEKId7WTTQmM66YV6Q8FR6xIGBxNV3qXgJzpjOnjtJ79f6Clat6eHRQevfEg2eodUBYSZGh9oOiCdwcEeZ3SpAOOTdTTrKlnvYobTIySbxZi7Cu3fwgugrcobS4UyWEABjssrVIFTGGKhFf4BQed_aupQPV2TjwamiJ_e6pr8_vb11_ah2v24_77d7ColuEyVGJtO9t1oWhjvWgldzzvZ1lBzZnBs6r4WutMddELJvlfCQC24Ud3YG-DYarEmn8_cY_B_ThjT8OhPJaU41Pwuhyxz4GvCz0Mq-BgDmuEY7AxhGTgbyrmG_86VPeLNA_MYrN7jP_L7rhfAvpwr</recordid><startdate>200612</startdate><enddate>200612</enddate><creator>Sperduti, A.</creator><creator>Cashell, A.</creator><creator>Rocca, C.</creator><creator>Hirji, A.</creator><creator>Billingsley, S.</creator><creator>Waldron, J.</creator><creator>Pond, G.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200612</creationdate><title>A feasibility study of an internal control methodology using hydrocortisone cream for the management of skin reactions in patients receiving radical radiation therapy for cancers of the head and neck</title><author>Sperduti, A. ; Cashell, A. ; Rocca, C. ; Hirji, A. ; Billingsley, S. ; Waldron, J. ; Pond, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3b48698bf7ab576a8918672a210feb42923d8d8a83c699c3fa231fc8b9fa1e7d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Original Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sperduti, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cashell, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocca, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirji, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billingsley, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waldron, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pond, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sperduti, A.</au><au>Cashell, A.</au><au>Rocca, C.</au><au>Hirji, A.</au><au>Billingsley, S.</au><au>Waldron, J.</au><au>Pond, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A feasibility study of an internal control methodology using hydrocortisone cream for the management of skin reactions in patients receiving radical radiation therapy for cancers of the head and neck</atitle><jtitle>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Radiother Pract</addtitle><date>2006-12</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>211</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>211-218</pages><issn>1460-3969</issn><eissn>1467-1131</eissn><abstract>Background: The literature on the evaluation of the management of radiation-induced dermatitis demonstrates the methodological difficulties of studying this subject. Therefore, the feasibility of a methodology whereby the patient acted as their own control was used to study acute cutaneous side effects for head and neck radiotherapy patients using 1% hydrocortisone cream (HC). Methods: Twenty patients were asked to apply Hyderm (1% hydrocortisone) cream twice daily to one side of the treatment area (either right or left) beginning on day one of radiation therapy and ending 2 weeks post-radiation therapy. The centres standard skin care protocol using mild soap and water and no creams was used on the other side of the neck. Once weekly the patients were assessed and scored using the Radiation-Induced Skin Reaction Scale and Radiotherapy and Oncology Group assessment scales and the patient completed a symptom scoring scale each week was a baseline assessment undertaken before they started treatment. To document compliance with study instructions, patients were asked to keep a calendar indicating when they applied the cream and to which side, and this was collected by clinical staff. Results: At the conclusion of the study, 12 patients were enrolled. During the course of the study it became increasingly obvious that the side to which patients were applying the Hyderm scored higher on the assessment scale, indicating an increased skin reaction than the control side. This was confirmed with the photographs and patient symptom scale. As a result of these increased reactions, the study ceased accrual earlier than anticipated and all patients were advised to discontinue Hyderm use. Conclusion: The increase in skin toxicity was unexpected, particularly as the institutional standard of care recommended the use of HC as treatment for radiation dermatitis. The number of patients in the study was too small to make conclusive statements about the efficacy of HC. We were able to confirm the feasibility of using an internal control methodology in these patients. Compliance results indicate the skin care instructions were clearly written and patients were able to follow them.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1460396906000306</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1460-3969
ispartof Journal of radiotherapy in practice, 2006-12, Vol.5 (4), p.211-218
issn 1460-3969
1467-1131
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_215460611
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Original Article
title A feasibility study of an internal control methodology using hydrocortisone cream for the management of skin reactions in patients receiving radical radiation therapy for cancers of the head and neck
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T20%3A15%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20feasibility%20study%20of%20an%20internal%20control%20methodology%20using%20hydrocortisone%20cream%20for%20the%20management%20of%20skin%20reactions%20in%20patients%20receiving%20radical%20radiation%20therapy%20for%20cancers%20of%20the%20head%20and%20neck&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20radiotherapy%20in%20practice&rft.au=Sperduti,%20A.&rft.date=2006-12&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=211&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=211-218&rft.issn=1460-3969&rft.eissn=1467-1131&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1460396906000306&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1401047861%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215460611&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1460396906000306&rfr_iscdi=true