Perceptual learning in flavor aversion conditioning: Roles of stimulus comparison and latent inhibition of common stimulus elements
In three experiments, rats received training in which an aversion was established to one flavor and the extent to which this aversion generalized to a second flavor was tested. Experiment 1 showed that nonreinforced preexposure to both flavors resulted in reduced generalization between them. Experim...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Learning and motivation 1995-05, Vol.26 (2), p.203-219 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 219 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 203 |
container_title | Learning and motivation |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Symonds, Michelle Hall, Geoffrey |
description | In three experiments, rats received training in which an aversion was established to one flavor and the extent to which this aversion generalized to a second flavor was tested. Experiment 1 showed that nonreinforced preexposure to both flavors resulted in reduced generalization between them. Experiments 2 and 3 demonstrated that this reduction in generalization required the two flavors to be presented on alternate trials during preexposure. Subjects given preexposure consisting of a block of trials with one flavor followed by a block of trials with the other showed the same degree of generalization as subjects given no preexposure. The two schedules of stimulus presentation were equated in the total amount of exposure given to each stimulus, making it unlikely that differences in latent inhibition could be responsible for the difference seen on the test. It is suggested that the opportunity for stimulus comparison offered by the alternating schedule might be important in a process of perceptual learning that is responsible for the reduced generalization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0023-9690(95)90005-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_215413427</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0023969095900055</els_id><sourcerecordid>4503823</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-6a2c1453f23dd0a627ba44794c55e657ac81423942596fcd0ad43ab5cada8b4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKv_wEVwpYvRPKeNC0GKLygoouuQydzRlJmkJjMF1_5x01a6dHUP3O-cyz0InVJySQktrwhhvFClIudKXihCiCzkHhpRomShKGP7aLRDDtFRSgtCKJVTNUI_LxAtLPvBtLgFE73zH9h53LRmFSI2K4jJBY9t8LXrs8r7a_waWkg4NDj1rhvaIeV9tzTRpYwaX-PW9OD7HPTpqo1tDWemy2rngRa6TKVjdNCYNsHJ3xyj9_u7t9ljMX9-eJrdzgvLOe2L0jBLheQN43VNTMkmlRFiooSVEko5MXZKBeNKMKnKxmakFtxU0praTCtR8TE62-YuY_gaIPV6EYbo80nNqBSUCzbJkNhCNoaUIjR6GV1n4remRK_b1usq9bpKraTetK1ltt1sbZAfWDmIOlkH3kLtIthe18H9H_ALRnaJjQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215413427</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceptual learning in flavor aversion conditioning: Roles of stimulus comparison and latent inhibition of common stimulus elements</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Symonds, Michelle ; Hall, Geoffrey</creator><creatorcontrib>Symonds, Michelle ; Hall, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><description>In three experiments, rats received training in which an aversion was established to one flavor and the extent to which this aversion generalized to a second flavor was tested. Experiment 1 showed that nonreinforced preexposure to both flavors resulted in reduced generalization between them. Experiments 2 and 3 demonstrated that this reduction in generalization required the two flavors to be presented on alternate trials during preexposure. Subjects given preexposure consisting of a block of trials with one flavor followed by a block of trials with the other showed the same degree of generalization as subjects given no preexposure. The two schedules of stimulus presentation were equated in the total amount of exposure given to each stimulus, making it unlikely that differences in latent inhibition could be responsible for the difference seen on the test. It is suggested that the opportunity for stimulus comparison offered by the alternating schedule might be important in a process of perceptual learning that is responsible for the reduced generalization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-9690</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9122</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0023-9690(95)90005-5</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LNMVAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animal cognition ; Learning ; Psychology ; Rodents ; Sensory perception</subject><ispartof>Learning and motivation, 1995-05, Vol.26 (2), p.203-219</ispartof><rights>1995</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press May 1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-6a2c1453f23dd0a627ba44794c55e657ac81423942596fcd0ad43ab5cada8b4b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-6a2c1453f23dd0a627ba44794c55e657ac81423942596fcd0ad43ab5cada8b4b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0023969095900055$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Symonds, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><title>Perceptual learning in flavor aversion conditioning: Roles of stimulus comparison and latent inhibition of common stimulus elements</title><title>Learning and motivation</title><description>In three experiments, rats received training in which an aversion was established to one flavor and the extent to which this aversion generalized to a second flavor was tested. Experiment 1 showed that nonreinforced preexposure to both flavors resulted in reduced generalization between them. Experiments 2 and 3 demonstrated that this reduction in generalization required the two flavors to be presented on alternate trials during preexposure. Subjects given preexposure consisting of a block of trials with one flavor followed by a block of trials with the other showed the same degree of generalization as subjects given no preexposure. The two schedules of stimulus presentation were equated in the total amount of exposure given to each stimulus, making it unlikely that differences in latent inhibition could be responsible for the difference seen on the test. It is suggested that the opportunity for stimulus comparison offered by the alternating schedule might be important in a process of perceptual learning that is responsible for the reduced generalization.</description><subject>Animal cognition</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><issn>0023-9690</issn><issn>1095-9122</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKv_wEVwpYvRPKeNC0GKLygoouuQydzRlJmkJjMF1_5x01a6dHUP3O-cyz0InVJySQktrwhhvFClIudKXihCiCzkHhpRomShKGP7aLRDDtFRSgtCKJVTNUI_LxAtLPvBtLgFE73zH9h53LRmFSI2K4jJBY9t8LXrs8r7a_waWkg4NDj1rhvaIeV9tzTRpYwaX-PW9OD7HPTpqo1tDWemy2rngRa6TKVjdNCYNsHJ3xyj9_u7t9ljMX9-eJrdzgvLOe2L0jBLheQN43VNTMkmlRFiooSVEko5MXZKBeNKMKnKxmakFtxU0praTCtR8TE62-YuY_gaIPV6EYbo80nNqBSUCzbJkNhCNoaUIjR6GV1n4remRK_b1usq9bpKraTetK1ltt1sbZAfWDmIOlkH3kLtIthe18H9H_ALRnaJjQ</recordid><startdate>19950501</startdate><enddate>19950501</enddate><creator>Symonds, Michelle</creator><creator>Hall, Geoffrey</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950501</creationdate><title>Perceptual learning in flavor aversion conditioning: Roles of stimulus comparison and latent inhibition of common stimulus elements</title><author>Symonds, Michelle ; Hall, Geoffrey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-6a2c1453f23dd0a627ba44794c55e657ac81423942596fcd0ad43ab5cada8b4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Animal cognition</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Symonds, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Learning and motivation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Symonds, Michelle</au><au>Hall, Geoffrey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceptual learning in flavor aversion conditioning: Roles of stimulus comparison and latent inhibition of common stimulus elements</atitle><jtitle>Learning and motivation</jtitle><date>1995-05-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>203</spage><epage>219</epage><pages>203-219</pages><issn>0023-9690</issn><eissn>1095-9122</eissn><coden>LNMVAV</coden><abstract>In three experiments, rats received training in which an aversion was established to one flavor and the extent to which this aversion generalized to a second flavor was tested. Experiment 1 showed that nonreinforced preexposure to both flavors resulted in reduced generalization between them. Experiments 2 and 3 demonstrated that this reduction in generalization required the two flavors to be presented on alternate trials during preexposure. Subjects given preexposure consisting of a block of trials with one flavor followed by a block of trials with the other showed the same degree of generalization as subjects given no preexposure. The two schedules of stimulus presentation were equated in the total amount of exposure given to each stimulus, making it unlikely that differences in latent inhibition could be responsible for the difference seen on the test. It is suggested that the opportunity for stimulus comparison offered by the alternating schedule might be important in a process of perceptual learning that is responsible for the reduced generalization.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/0023-9690(95)90005-5</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0023-9690 |
ispartof | Learning and motivation, 1995-05, Vol.26 (2), p.203-219 |
issn | 0023-9690 1095-9122 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_215413427 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Animal cognition Learning Psychology Rodents Sensory perception |
title | Perceptual learning in flavor aversion conditioning: Roles of stimulus comparison and latent inhibition of common stimulus elements |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T14%3A37%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceptual%20learning%20in%20flavor%20aversion%20conditioning:%20Roles%20of%20stimulus%20comparison%20and%20latent%20inhibition%20of%20common%20stimulus%20elements&rft.jtitle=Learning%20and%20motivation&rft.au=Symonds,%20Michelle&rft.date=1995-05-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=203&rft.epage=219&rft.pages=203-219&rft.issn=0023-9690&rft.eissn=1095-9122&rft.coden=LNMVAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0023-9690(95)90005-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4503823%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215413427&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0023969095900055&rfr_iscdi=true |