Dynamic Privatization Policy
This study formulates a two‐period model of mixed oligopoly in which the government privatizes a state‐owned public firm over multiple periods. We introduce the shadow cost of public funding (i.e., the excess burden of taxation). The government is concerned about both the total surplus and the reven...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Manchester school 2019-01, Vol.87 (1), p.37-59 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 59 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | The Manchester school |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | Sato, Susumu Matsumura, Toshihiro |
description | This study formulates a two‐period model of mixed oligopoly in which the government privatizes a state‐owned public firm over multiple periods. We introduce the shadow cost of public funding (i.e., the excess burden of taxation). The government is concerned about both the total surplus and the revenue obtained from the privatization of the public firm. We find that the government may or may not increase the degree of privatization over time depending on the competitiveness of the product market and nationality of private competitors. The government increases the degree of privatization over time if the product market is competitive and the foreign ownership share in private firms is low. Although it adjusts its privatization policy over time, this harms welfare. In addition, this distortion in the ex post incentive leads to too low a degree of privatization in the first period. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/manc.12217 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2154064399</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2154064399</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4367-2fa3d0d700360812984091bcfa4067c721e767494ccf6716c857f60dbeedf7003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j71PwzAQxS0EEqWwMDNUYkNK8TmOLx6r8CkV6ACz5Tq2lCofxW5B4a_HaZg56XQ3_N57eoRcAp1DnNtGt2YOjAEekQlwgYmUGR4f_jQRmItTchbChlKKQrAJubrrW91UZrby1ZfeVT9xu3a26urK9OfkxOk62Iu_OyUfD_fvxVOyfHt8LhbLxPA0RjCn05KWSGkqaA5M5pxKWBunORVokIFFgVxyY5xAECbP0Alarq0t3aCakuvRd-u7z70NO7Xp9r6NkYpBFk14KmWkbkbK-C4Eb53a-qrRvldA1dBeDe3VoX2EYYS_q9r2_5DqZfFajJpfXFpZ5w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2154064399</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamic Privatization Policy</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Sato, Susumu ; Matsumura, Toshihiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Sato, Susumu ; Matsumura, Toshihiro</creatorcontrib><description>This study formulates a two‐period model of mixed oligopoly in which the government privatizes a state‐owned public firm over multiple periods. We introduce the shadow cost of public funding (i.e., the excess burden of taxation). The government is concerned about both the total surplus and the revenue obtained from the privatization of the public firm. We find that the government may or may not increase the degree of privatization over time depending on the competitiveness of the product market and nationality of private competitors. The government increases the degree of privatization over time if the product market is competitive and the foreign ownership share in private firms is low. Although it adjusts its privatization policy over time, this harms welfare. In addition, this distortion in the ex post incentive leads to too low a degree of privatization in the first period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1463-6786</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9957</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/manc.12217</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Manchester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Competitiveness ; Competitors ; Distortion ; Economic models ; Oligopoly ; Ownership ; Privatization ; Taxation ; Welfare</subject><ispartof>The Manchester school, 2019-01, Vol.87 (1), p.37-59</ispartof><rights>2018 The University of Manchester and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2019 The University of Manchester and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4367-2fa3d0d700360812984091bcfa4067c721e767494ccf6716c857f60dbeedf7003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4367-2fa3d0d700360812984091bcfa4067c721e767494ccf6716c857f60dbeedf7003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1535-4165</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fmanc.12217$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fmanc.12217$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sato, Susumu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumura, Toshihiro</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamic Privatization Policy</title><title>The Manchester school</title><description>This study formulates a two‐period model of mixed oligopoly in which the government privatizes a state‐owned public firm over multiple periods. We introduce the shadow cost of public funding (i.e., the excess burden of taxation). The government is concerned about both the total surplus and the revenue obtained from the privatization of the public firm. We find that the government may or may not increase the degree of privatization over time depending on the competitiveness of the product market and nationality of private competitors. The government increases the degree of privatization over time if the product market is competitive and the foreign ownership share in private firms is low. Although it adjusts its privatization policy over time, this harms welfare. In addition, this distortion in the ex post incentive leads to too low a degree of privatization in the first period.</description><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Competitors</subject><subject>Distortion</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Oligopoly</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Privatization</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Welfare</subject><issn>1463-6786</issn><issn>1467-9957</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j71PwzAQxS0EEqWwMDNUYkNK8TmOLx6r8CkV6ACz5Tq2lCofxW5B4a_HaZg56XQ3_N57eoRcAp1DnNtGt2YOjAEekQlwgYmUGR4f_jQRmItTchbChlKKQrAJubrrW91UZrby1ZfeVT9xu3a26urK9OfkxOk62Iu_OyUfD_fvxVOyfHt8LhbLxPA0RjCn05KWSGkqaA5M5pxKWBunORVokIFFgVxyY5xAECbP0Alarq0t3aCakuvRd-u7z70NO7Xp9r6NkYpBFk14KmWkbkbK-C4Eb53a-qrRvldA1dBeDe3VoX2EYYS_q9r2_5DqZfFajJpfXFpZ5w</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Sato, Susumu</creator><creator>Matsumura, Toshihiro</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1535-4165</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Dynamic Privatization Policy</title><author>Sato, Susumu ; Matsumura, Toshihiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4367-2fa3d0d700360812984091bcfa4067c721e767494ccf6716c857f60dbeedf7003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Competitors</topic><topic>Distortion</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Oligopoly</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Privatization</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Welfare</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sato, Susumu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumura, Toshihiro</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Manchester school</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sato, Susumu</au><au>Matsumura, Toshihiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamic Privatization Policy</atitle><jtitle>The Manchester school</jtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>59</epage><pages>37-59</pages><issn>1463-6786</issn><eissn>1467-9957</eissn><abstract>This study formulates a two‐period model of mixed oligopoly in which the government privatizes a state‐owned public firm over multiple periods. We introduce the shadow cost of public funding (i.e., the excess burden of taxation). The government is concerned about both the total surplus and the revenue obtained from the privatization of the public firm. We find that the government may or may not increase the degree of privatization over time depending on the competitiveness of the product market and nationality of private competitors. The government increases the degree of privatization over time if the product market is competitive and the foreign ownership share in private firms is low. Although it adjusts its privatization policy over time, this harms welfare. In addition, this distortion in the ex post incentive leads to too low a degree of privatization in the first period.</abstract><cop>Manchester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/manc.12217</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1535-4165</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1463-6786 |
ispartof | The Manchester school, 2019-01, Vol.87 (1), p.37-59 |
issn | 1463-6786 1467-9957 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2154064399 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Competitiveness Competitors Distortion Economic models Oligopoly Ownership Privatization Taxation Welfare |
title | Dynamic Privatization Policy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T21%3A56%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamic%20Privatization%20Policy&rft.jtitle=The%20Manchester%20school&rft.au=Sato,%20Susumu&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=59&rft.pages=37-59&rft.issn=1463-6786&rft.eissn=1467-9957&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/manc.12217&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2154064399%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2154064399&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |