Hanford waste blending and the value of research: stochastic optimization as a policy tool
A new approach to stochastic, combinatorial optimization is presented through its application to a contemporary policy problem: cleanup of radioactive wastes stored underground at the US Government's Hanford, WA, nuclear fuels processing site. Current plans call for the tank contents to be sele...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis 2001-03, Vol.10 (2), p.87-99 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 99 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 87 |
container_title | Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Johnson, Timothy Lawrence Diwekar, Urmila M. |
description | A new approach to stochastic, combinatorial optimization is presented through its application to a contemporary policy problem: cleanup of radioactive wastes stored underground at the US Government's Hanford, WA, nuclear fuels processing site. Current plans call for the tank contents to be selectively combined prior to their immobilization in glass; such blending of wastes reduces the amount of extra material required for vitrification, therefore, decreasing the costs of processing and disposal. Uncertainty in the tank contents, the error inherent in the glass property models governing vitrification, and the computationally intensive nature of the problem, however, render determination of an optimal tank‐blend assignment a challenge to existing optimization techniques. Previous studies have focused exclusively on minimization of processing and disposal costs, ignoring such policy‐related dimensions as the value of reducing select sources of uncertainty. In addition, the stochastic framework employed by these studies could not guarantee that the glass property requirements (in the guise of model constraints) were met on more than a probabilistic basis. This paper presents a novel stochastic annealing‐nonlinear programming framework that incorporates variance—a proxy for the opportunity costs of reducing uncertainty—as an attribute in its objective function. Compared with conventional mathematical programming algorithms, the new optimization framework is seen to be more robust, flexible, and efficient. The algorithm also facilitates analysis of the trade‐off between minimizing processing and disposal costs, and reducing the expenses of achieving these savings. Specifically, the prediction error of the glass property models is found to be a more significant source of uncertainty than variation in tank component mass fraction estimates, and constraint violations are traced to specific requirements of the glass property models. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/mcda.291 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_215210409</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>356593261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2791-31a4268b409e9136759fa7824e2b61a2fe294e59ba21ed9f1ddded5821e0c12a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10FFLwzAQB_AgCs4p-BGCT750JmnTNr7J1E3YFGQy8SVcm9Rlds1MOuf89GZMBB98ujv4cXf8ETqlpEcJYReLUkGPCbqHOpQIEdE4JfvbnmeRYDQ5REfezwkhOY-TDnoZQlNZp_AafKtxUetGmeYVQ6NwO9P4A-qVxrbCTnsNrpxdYt_acha0KbFdtmZhvqA1tsHgMeClrU25wa219TE6qKD2-uSndtHT7c2kP4xGD4O7_tUoKlkmaBRTSFiaFwkRWoRvMy4qyHKWaFakFFilmUg0FwUwqpWoqFJKK56HiZSUQdxFZ7u9S2ffV9q3cm5XrgknJaOcURI2B3S-Q6Wz3jtdyaUzC3AbSYncBie3wckQXKDRjq5NrTf_OjnuX1_98SYk-Pnrwb3JNIszLqf3AznMnydTwR_lOP4Gow5-cw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215210409</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hanford waste blending and the value of research: stochastic optimization as a policy tool</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Johnson, Timothy Lawrence ; Diwekar, Urmila M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Timothy Lawrence ; Diwekar, Urmila M.</creatorcontrib><description>A new approach to stochastic, combinatorial optimization is presented through its application to a contemporary policy problem: cleanup of radioactive wastes stored underground at the US Government's Hanford, WA, nuclear fuels processing site. Current plans call for the tank contents to be selectively combined prior to their immobilization in glass; such blending of wastes reduces the amount of extra material required for vitrification, therefore, decreasing the costs of processing and disposal. Uncertainty in the tank contents, the error inherent in the glass property models governing vitrification, and the computationally intensive nature of the problem, however, render determination of an optimal tank‐blend assignment a challenge to existing optimization techniques. Previous studies have focused exclusively on minimization of processing and disposal costs, ignoring such policy‐related dimensions as the value of reducing select sources of uncertainty. In addition, the stochastic framework employed by these studies could not guarantee that the glass property requirements (in the guise of model constraints) were met on more than a probabilistic basis. This paper presents a novel stochastic annealing‐nonlinear programming framework that incorporates variance—a proxy for the opportunity costs of reducing uncertainty—as an attribute in its objective function. Compared with conventional mathematical programming algorithms, the new optimization framework is seen to be more robust, flexible, and efficient. The algorithm also facilitates analysis of the trade‐off between minimizing processing and disposal costs, and reducing the expenses of achieving these savings. Specifically, the prediction error of the glass property models is found to be a more significant source of uncertainty than variation in tank component mass fraction estimates, and constraint violations are traced to specific requirements of the glass property models. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1360</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mcda.291</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Cost control ; Decision making models ; Environmental cleanup ; Nuclear fuels ; nuclear waste remediation ; Optimization techniques ; process modeling ; Process planning ; Public policy ; Radioactive wastes ; stochastic optimization ; Studies ; uncertainty ; Viscosity</subject><ispartof>Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis, 2001-03, Vol.10 (2), p.87-99</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2791-31a4268b409e9136759fa7824e2b61a2fe294e59ba21ed9f1ddded5821e0c12a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2791-31a4268b409e9136759fa7824e2b61a2fe294e59ba21ed9f1ddded5821e0c12a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmcda.291$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmcda.291$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Timothy Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diwekar, Urmila M.</creatorcontrib><title>Hanford waste blending and the value of research: stochastic optimization as a policy tool</title><title>Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis</title><addtitle>J. Multi-Crit. Decis. Anal</addtitle><description>A new approach to stochastic, combinatorial optimization is presented through its application to a contemporary policy problem: cleanup of radioactive wastes stored underground at the US Government's Hanford, WA, nuclear fuels processing site. Current plans call for the tank contents to be selectively combined prior to their immobilization in glass; such blending of wastes reduces the amount of extra material required for vitrification, therefore, decreasing the costs of processing and disposal. Uncertainty in the tank contents, the error inherent in the glass property models governing vitrification, and the computationally intensive nature of the problem, however, render determination of an optimal tank‐blend assignment a challenge to existing optimization techniques. Previous studies have focused exclusively on minimization of processing and disposal costs, ignoring such policy‐related dimensions as the value of reducing select sources of uncertainty. In addition, the stochastic framework employed by these studies could not guarantee that the glass property requirements (in the guise of model constraints) were met on more than a probabilistic basis. This paper presents a novel stochastic annealing‐nonlinear programming framework that incorporates variance—a proxy for the opportunity costs of reducing uncertainty—as an attribute in its objective function. Compared with conventional mathematical programming algorithms, the new optimization framework is seen to be more robust, flexible, and efficient. The algorithm also facilitates analysis of the trade‐off between minimizing processing and disposal costs, and reducing the expenses of achieving these savings. Specifically, the prediction error of the glass property models is found to be a more significant source of uncertainty than variation in tank component mass fraction estimates, and constraint violations are traced to specific requirements of the glass property models. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Decision making models</subject><subject>Environmental cleanup</subject><subject>Nuclear fuels</subject><subject>nuclear waste remediation</subject><subject>Optimization techniques</subject><subject>process modeling</subject><subject>Process planning</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Radioactive wastes</subject><subject>stochastic optimization</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>uncertainty</subject><subject>Viscosity</subject><issn>1057-9214</issn><issn>1099-1360</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp10FFLwzAQB_AgCs4p-BGCT750JmnTNr7J1E3YFGQy8SVcm9Rlds1MOuf89GZMBB98ujv4cXf8ETqlpEcJYReLUkGPCbqHOpQIEdE4JfvbnmeRYDQ5REfezwkhOY-TDnoZQlNZp_AafKtxUetGmeYVQ6NwO9P4A-qVxrbCTnsNrpxdYt_acha0KbFdtmZhvqA1tsHgMeClrU25wa219TE6qKD2-uSndtHT7c2kP4xGD4O7_tUoKlkmaBRTSFiaFwkRWoRvMy4qyHKWaFakFFilmUg0FwUwqpWoqFJKK56HiZSUQdxFZ7u9S2ffV9q3cm5XrgknJaOcURI2B3S-Q6Wz3jtdyaUzC3AbSYncBie3wckQXKDRjq5NrTf_OjnuX1_98SYk-Pnrwb3JNIszLqf3AznMnydTwR_lOP4Gow5-cw</recordid><startdate>200103</startdate><enddate>200103</enddate><creator>Johnson, Timothy Lawrence</creator><creator>Diwekar, Urmila M.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200103</creationdate><title>Hanford waste blending and the value of research: stochastic optimization as a policy tool</title><author>Johnson, Timothy Lawrence ; Diwekar, Urmila M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2791-31a4268b409e9136759fa7824e2b61a2fe294e59ba21ed9f1ddded5821e0c12a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Decision making models</topic><topic>Environmental cleanup</topic><topic>Nuclear fuels</topic><topic>nuclear waste remediation</topic><topic>Optimization techniques</topic><topic>process modeling</topic><topic>Process planning</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Radioactive wastes</topic><topic>stochastic optimization</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>uncertainty</topic><topic>Viscosity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Timothy Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diwekar, Urmila M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, Timothy Lawrence</au><au>Diwekar, Urmila M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hanford waste blending and the value of research: stochastic optimization as a policy tool</atitle><jtitle>Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis</jtitle><addtitle>J. Multi-Crit. Decis. Anal</addtitle><date>2001-03</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>87</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>87-99</pages><issn>1057-9214</issn><eissn>1099-1360</eissn><abstract>A new approach to stochastic, combinatorial optimization is presented through its application to a contemporary policy problem: cleanup of radioactive wastes stored underground at the US Government's Hanford, WA, nuclear fuels processing site. Current plans call for the tank contents to be selectively combined prior to their immobilization in glass; such blending of wastes reduces the amount of extra material required for vitrification, therefore, decreasing the costs of processing and disposal. Uncertainty in the tank contents, the error inherent in the glass property models governing vitrification, and the computationally intensive nature of the problem, however, render determination of an optimal tank‐blend assignment a challenge to existing optimization techniques. Previous studies have focused exclusively on minimization of processing and disposal costs, ignoring such policy‐related dimensions as the value of reducing select sources of uncertainty. In addition, the stochastic framework employed by these studies could not guarantee that the glass property requirements (in the guise of model constraints) were met on more than a probabilistic basis. This paper presents a novel stochastic annealing‐nonlinear programming framework that incorporates variance—a proxy for the opportunity costs of reducing uncertainty—as an attribute in its objective function. Compared with conventional mathematical programming algorithms, the new optimization framework is seen to be more robust, flexible, and efficient. The algorithm also facilitates analysis of the trade‐off between minimizing processing and disposal costs, and reducing the expenses of achieving these savings. Specifically, the prediction error of the glass property models is found to be a more significant source of uncertainty than variation in tank component mass fraction estimates, and constraint violations are traced to specific requirements of the glass property models. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/mcda.291</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1057-9214 |
ispartof | Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis, 2001-03, Vol.10 (2), p.87-99 |
issn | 1057-9214 1099-1360 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_215210409 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Algorithms Cost control Decision making models Environmental cleanup Nuclear fuels nuclear waste remediation Optimization techniques process modeling Process planning Public policy Radioactive wastes stochastic optimization Studies uncertainty Viscosity |
title | Hanford waste blending and the value of research: stochastic optimization as a policy tool |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A08%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hanford%20waste%20blending%20and%20the%20value%20of%20research:%20stochastic%20optimization%20as%20a%20policy%20tool&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20multi-criteria%20decision%20analysis&rft.au=Johnson,%20Timothy%20Lawrence&rft.date=2001-03&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=87-99&rft.issn=1057-9214&rft.eissn=1099-1360&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mcda.291&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E356593261%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215210409&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |