Comparison of the spatial distribution of ground motion between main shocks and strong aftershocks
Using the ground motion attenuation relation, we calculated and compared the effective peak acceleration （EPA） generated by main shocks and their strong aftershocks of 21 earthquake sequences with Ms≥7 occurred in Chinese mainland and offing of China during 1966-2002. The result shows that EPA of st...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Acta seismologica sinica 2007-05, Vol.20 (3), p.312-318 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 318 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 312 |
| container_title | Acta seismologica sinica |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | 吕晓健 高孟潭 高战武 米素婷 |
| description | Using the ground motion attenuation relation, we calculated and compared the effective peak acceleration （EPA） generated by main shocks and their strong aftershocks of 21 earthquake sequences with Ms≥7 occurred in Chinese mainland and offing of China during 1966-2002. The result shows that EPA of strong aftershocks usually exceed that of main shock for 76.2% earthquake sequences and EPA of more than 50% strong aftershocks are greatly larger than that of main shocks in large area, which suggests that it is necessary to take damage produced by strong aftershock into account in the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and the seismic design. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11589-007-0312-8 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_214846253</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>24540960</cqvip_id><sourcerecordid>1953785561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a354t-ff10db47ddef5a504b1673a3ff65630af140d31eca42ebaaf0319e473acd59153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE9PwzAMxSsEEmPwAbhFXDgV7Cbp2iOa-CdN4gLnyG2TLVvbbEkrxLcnoxwQJz_5_WzZL0muEe4QYHEfEGVRplGmwDFLi5NkhmXJU-RCnEYNAGmJmJ8nFyFsAThkwGdJtXTdnrwNrmfOsGGjWdjTYKlljQ2Dt9U42Mlbezf2DevcT6PSw6fWPevI9ixsXL0LjKIdZ1y_ZmQG7af2ZXJmqA366rfOk4-nx_flS7p6e35dPqxS4lIMqTEITSUWTaONJAmiwnzBiRuTy5wDGRTQcNQ1iUxXRCb-WWoRkbqRJUo-T26nvXvvDqMOg-psqHXbUq_dGFQhSlHIrCgiefOP3LrR9_E4laEoRJ5JHiGcoNq7ELw2au9tR_5LIahj5mrKXB3lMXP1Z3G9iSEcbL9WFdU7Y1utMiEFlDnwb36EgUc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214846253</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the spatial distribution of ground motion between main shocks and strong aftershocks</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>吕晓健 高孟潭 高战武 米素婷</creator><creatorcontrib>吕晓健 高孟潭 高战武 米素婷</creatorcontrib><description>Using the ground motion attenuation relation, we calculated and compared the effective peak acceleration （EPA） generated by main shocks and their strong aftershocks of 21 earthquake sequences with Ms≥7 occurred in Chinese mainland and offing of China during 1966-2002. The result shows that EPA of strong aftershocks usually exceed that of main shock for 76.2% earthquake sequences and EPA of more than 50% strong aftershocks are greatly larger than that of main shocks in large area, which suggests that it is necessary to take damage produced by strong aftershock into account in the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and the seismic design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1000-9116</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1674-4519</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1993-1344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1867-8777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11589-007-0312-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Beijing: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Attenuation ; Earthquake damage ; Earthquake design ; Earthquakes ; Ground motion ; Grounds ; Mathematical analysis ; Seismic activity ; Seismic engineering ; Seismic hazard ; Seismic phenomena ; Spatial distribution ; 地面运动 ; 强余震 ; 比较分析 ; 空间分布</subject><ispartof>Acta seismologica sinica, 2007-05, Vol.20 (3), p.312-318</ispartof><rights>Seismological Society of China 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a354t-ff10db47ddef5a504b1673a3ff65630af140d31eca42ebaaf0319e473acd59153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a354t-ff10db47ddef5a504b1673a3ff65630af140d31eca42ebaaf0319e473acd59153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/86256X/86256X.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>吕晓健 高孟潭 高战武 米素婷</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the spatial distribution of ground motion between main shocks and strong aftershocks</title><title>Acta seismologica sinica</title><addtitle>Acta Seismologica Sinica(English Edition)</addtitle><description>Using the ground motion attenuation relation, we calculated and compared the effective peak acceleration （EPA） generated by main shocks and their strong aftershocks of 21 earthquake sequences with Ms≥7 occurred in Chinese mainland and offing of China during 1966-2002. The result shows that EPA of strong aftershocks usually exceed that of main shock for 76.2% earthquake sequences and EPA of more than 50% strong aftershocks are greatly larger than that of main shocks in large area, which suggests that it is necessary to take damage produced by strong aftershock into account in the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and the seismic design.</description><subject>Attenuation</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Earthquake design</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Ground motion</subject><subject>Grounds</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Seismic hazard</subject><subject>Seismic phenomena</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>地面运动</subject><subject>强余震</subject><subject>比较分析</subject><subject>空间分布</subject><issn>1000-9116</issn><issn>1674-4519</issn><issn>1993-1344</issn><issn>1867-8777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE9PwzAMxSsEEmPwAbhFXDgV7Cbp2iOa-CdN4gLnyG2TLVvbbEkrxLcnoxwQJz_5_WzZL0muEe4QYHEfEGVRplGmwDFLi5NkhmXJU-RCnEYNAGmJmJ8nFyFsAThkwGdJtXTdnrwNrmfOsGGjWdjTYKlljQ2Dt9U42Mlbezf2DevcT6PSw6fWPevI9ixsXL0LjKIdZ1y_ZmQG7af2ZXJmqA366rfOk4-nx_flS7p6e35dPqxS4lIMqTEITSUWTaONJAmiwnzBiRuTy5wDGRTQcNQ1iUxXRCb-WWoRkbqRJUo-T26nvXvvDqMOg-psqHXbUq_dGFQhSlHIrCgiefOP3LrR9_E4laEoRJ5JHiGcoNq7ELw2au9tR_5LIahj5mrKXB3lMXP1Z3G9iSEcbL9WFdU7Y1utMiEFlDnwb36EgUc</recordid><startdate>20070501</startdate><enddate>20070501</enddate><creator>吕晓健 高孟潭 高战武 米素婷</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>W94</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7SM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070501</creationdate><title>Comparison of the spatial distribution of ground motion between main shocks and strong aftershocks</title><author>吕晓健 高孟潭 高战武 米素婷</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a354t-ff10db47ddef5a504b1673a3ff65630af140d31eca42ebaaf0319e473acd59153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Attenuation</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Earthquake design</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Ground motion</topic><topic>Grounds</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Seismic hazard</topic><topic>Seismic phenomena</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>地面运动</topic><topic>强余震</topic><topic>比较分析</topic><topic>空间分布</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>吕晓健 高孟潭 高战武 米素婷</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-自然科学</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Acta seismologica sinica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>吕晓健 高孟潭 高战武 米素婷</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the spatial distribution of ground motion between main shocks and strong aftershocks</atitle><jtitle>Acta seismologica sinica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Seismologica Sinica(English Edition)</addtitle><date>2007-05-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>312</spage><epage>318</epage><pages>312-318</pages><issn>1000-9116</issn><issn>1674-4519</issn><eissn>1993-1344</eissn><eissn>1867-8777</eissn><abstract>Using the ground motion attenuation relation, we calculated and compared the effective peak acceleration （EPA） generated by main shocks and their strong aftershocks of 21 earthquake sequences with Ms≥7 occurred in Chinese mainland and offing of China during 1966-2002. The result shows that EPA of strong aftershocks usually exceed that of main shock for 76.2% earthquake sequences and EPA of more than 50% strong aftershocks are greatly larger than that of main shocks in large area, which suggests that it is necessary to take damage produced by strong aftershock into account in the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and the seismic design.</abstract><cop>Beijing</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s11589-007-0312-8</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1000-9116 |
| ispartof | Acta seismologica sinica, 2007-05, Vol.20 (3), p.312-318 |
| issn | 1000-9116 1674-4519 1993-1344 1867-8777 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_214846253 |
| source | Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Attenuation Earthquake damage Earthquake design Earthquakes Ground motion Grounds Mathematical analysis Seismic activity Seismic engineering Seismic hazard Seismic phenomena Spatial distribution 地面运动 强余震 比较分析 空间分布 |
| title | Comparison of the spatial distribution of ground motion between main shocks and strong aftershocks |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T13%3A44%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20spatial%20distribution%20of%20ground%20motion%20between%20main%20shocks%20and%20strong%20aftershocks&rft.jtitle=Acta%20seismologica%20sinica&rft.au=%E5%90%95%E6%99%93%E5%81%A5%20%E9%AB%98%E5%AD%9F%E6%BD%AD%20%E9%AB%98%E6%88%98%E6%AD%A6%20%E7%B1%B3%E7%B4%A0%E5%A9%B7&rft.date=2007-05-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=312&rft.epage=318&rft.pages=312-318&rft.issn=1000-9116&rft.eissn=1993-1344&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11589-007-0312-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1953785561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214846253&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cqvip_id=24540960&rfr_iscdi=true |