Attorneys' Fees in Bankruptcy: Toward Further Reform
The adoption of the Bankruptcy Code has gone far to inject uniformity and predictability into the determination of bankruptcy fees. While there may be variations from court to court, it is generally clear what a bankruptcy attorney must do to assure payment. The attorney must: 1. obtain court approv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Commercial law journal 1990-07, Vol.95 (2), p.133 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 133 |
container_title | Commercial law journal |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | McCullough, Ralph C |
description | The adoption of the Bankruptcy Code has gone far to inject uniformity and predictability into the determination of bankruptcy fees. While there may be variations from court to court, it is generally clear what a bankruptcy attorney must do to assure payment. The attorney must: 1. obtain court approval prior to providing any services, 2. carefully document the services performed and the costs incurred, 3. include this full documentation with the fee application, and 4. in general, conform the fee structure to the prevailing practice in other legal fields in the locality. However, court policy in awarding fees has remained inconsistent by arbitrarily slashing fees in adherence to the old "spirit of economy" principle, which weakens the incentive of competitive fees. The use of "lodestar" analysis to determine fees would provide a potentially objective basis for guaranteeing the fair administration of fees. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_214820207</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>282608</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2148202073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDA00DU2MDXlYOAqLs4yMDAwMzAy4mQwcSwpyS_KS60sVldwS00tVsjMU3BKzMsuKi0oSa60UgjJL08sSlFwKy0qyUgtUghKTcsvyuVhYE1LzClO5YXS3AxKbq4hzh66BUX5haWpxSXxWfmlRXlAqXgjQxMLIwMjA3NjohQBAEgEMv4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214820207</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attorneys' Fees in Bankruptcy: Toward Further Reform</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>McCullough, Ralph C</creator><creatorcontrib>McCullough, Ralph C</creatorcontrib><description>The adoption of the Bankruptcy Code has gone far to inject uniformity and predictability into the determination of bankruptcy fees. While there may be variations from court to court, it is generally clear what a bankruptcy attorney must do to assure payment. The attorney must: 1. obtain court approval prior to providing any services, 2. carefully document the services performed and the costs incurred, 3. include this full documentation with the fee application, and 4. in general, conform the fee structure to the prevailing practice in other legal fields in the locality. However, court policy in awarding fees has remained inconsistent by arbitrarily slashing fees in adherence to the old "spirit of economy" principle, which weakens the incentive of competitive fees. The use of "lodestar" analysis to determine fees would provide a potentially objective basis for guaranteeing the fair administration of fees.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-3055</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLAJDT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Commercial Law League of America</publisher><subject>Attorneys ; Bankruptcy ; Compensation ; Due process of law ; Fees ; Fees & charges ; Legislation ; Litigation ; Manycompanies ; State court decisions ; Trustees</subject><ispartof>Commercial law journal, 1990-07, Vol.95 (2), p.133</ispartof><rights>Copyright Commercial Law League of America Summer 1990</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCullough, Ralph C</creatorcontrib><title>Attorneys' Fees in Bankruptcy: Toward Further Reform</title><title>Commercial law journal</title><description>The adoption of the Bankruptcy Code has gone far to inject uniformity and predictability into the determination of bankruptcy fees. While there may be variations from court to court, it is generally clear what a bankruptcy attorney must do to assure payment. The attorney must: 1. obtain court approval prior to providing any services, 2. carefully document the services performed and the costs incurred, 3. include this full documentation with the fee application, and 4. in general, conform the fee structure to the prevailing practice in other legal fields in the locality. However, court policy in awarding fees has remained inconsistent by arbitrarily slashing fees in adherence to the old "spirit of economy" principle, which weakens the incentive of competitive fees. The use of "lodestar" analysis to determine fees would provide a potentially objective basis for guaranteeing the fair administration of fees.</description><subject>Attorneys</subject><subject>Bankruptcy</subject><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>Due process of law</subject><subject>Fees</subject><subject>Fees & charges</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Manycompanies</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Trustees</subject><issn>0010-3055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDA00DU2MDXlYOAqLs4yMDAwMzAy4mQwcSwpyS_KS60sVldwS00tVsjMU3BKzMsuKi0oSa60UgjJL08sSlFwKy0qyUgtUghKTcsvyuVhYE1LzClO5YXS3AxKbq4hzh66BUX5haWpxSXxWfmlRXlAqXgjQxMLIwMjA3NjohQBAEgEMv4</recordid><startdate>19900701</startdate><enddate>19900701</enddate><creator>McCullough, Ralph C</creator><general>Commercial Law League of America</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900701</creationdate><title>Attorneys' Fees in Bankruptcy: Toward Further Reform</title><author>McCullough, Ralph C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2148202073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Attorneys</topic><topic>Bankruptcy</topic><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>Due process of law</topic><topic>Fees</topic><topic>Fees & charges</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Manycompanies</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Trustees</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCullough, Ralph C</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Commercial law journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCullough, Ralph C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attorneys' Fees in Bankruptcy: Toward Further Reform</atitle><jtitle>Commercial law journal</jtitle><date>1990-07-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>133</spage><pages>133-</pages><issn>0010-3055</issn><coden>CLAJDT</coden><abstract>The adoption of the Bankruptcy Code has gone far to inject uniformity and predictability into the determination of bankruptcy fees. While there may be variations from court to court, it is generally clear what a bankruptcy attorney must do to assure payment. The attorney must: 1. obtain court approval prior to providing any services, 2. carefully document the services performed and the costs incurred, 3. include this full documentation with the fee application, and 4. in general, conform the fee structure to the prevailing practice in other legal fields in the locality. However, court policy in awarding fees has remained inconsistent by arbitrarily slashing fees in adherence to the old "spirit of economy" principle, which weakens the incentive of competitive fees. The use of "lodestar" analysis to determine fees would provide a potentially objective basis for guaranteeing the fair administration of fees.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Commercial Law League of America</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-3055 |
ispartof | Commercial law journal, 1990-07, Vol.95 (2), p.133 |
issn | 0010-3055 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_214820207 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Attorneys Bankruptcy Compensation Due process of law Fees Fees & charges Legislation Litigation Manycompanies State court decisions Trustees |
title | Attorneys' Fees in Bankruptcy: Toward Further Reform |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A00%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attorneys'%20Fees%20in%20Bankruptcy:%20Toward%20Further%20Reform&rft.jtitle=Commercial%20law%20journal&rft.au=McCullough,%20Ralph%20C&rft.date=1990-07-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=133&rft.pages=133-&rft.issn=0010-3055&rft.coden=CLAJDT&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E282608%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214820207&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |