AUTONOMY AND INFORMED CONSENT IN NONTHERAPEUTIC BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH
The common law and federal regulations create overlapping legal regimes that require researchers to obtain the informed consent of most human subjects of medical research. The fast-growing field of biomedical research generally, and stem cell research in particular, gives rise to a range of unresolv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | UCLA law review 2007-02, Vol.54 (3), p.605 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 605 |
container_title | UCLA law review |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Korobkin, Russell |
description | The common law and federal regulations create overlapping legal regimes that require researchers to obtain the informed consent of most human subjects of medical research. The fast-growing field of biomedical research generally, and stem cell research in particular, gives rise to a range of unresolved and contested legal issues concerning the extent and implementation of the informed consent requirement. This Article identifies and assesses a series of these: (1) Must researchers obtain the informed consent of participants in nontherapeutic research not covered by federal research regulations? (2) As part of the process, must researchers disclose their financial interests in their projects? (3) Must informed consent be obtained before researchers use tissues stored in tissue banks? (4) Must informed consent be obtained from both gamete donors before research use may be made of a stored human embryo? The Article argues that these questions can be best resolved by focusing the analysis on the core value of subject autonomy that underlies the principle of informed consent. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_214798101</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1229088601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p182t-709385f2bb1998db0f890f5cac286f95f73881d5db34d705bf463b739d3146313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjctOwzAURC0EEqHwDxb7SPf6EdtL47okUmujNFmwquqmXlSIlqb9f4Loao5GRzN3pEAjeImKiXtSAAgsZSXhkTyN4wEAVCV1QZztuxji6pPaMKdNWMR25efUxbD2oZsKGmLoat_aD993jaNvTZyExtklbf3a29bVz-Qhb7_G_cstZ6Rf-M7V5TK-_4nlCTW7lAoM1zKzlNAYPSTI2kCWu-2O6SobmRXXGgc5JC4GBTJlUfGkuBk4ToR8Rl7_d0_n4891P142h-P1_D1dbhgKZTQC8l_pND_B</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214798101</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>AUTONOMY AND INFORMED CONSENT IN NONTHERAPEUTIC BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Korobkin, Russell</creator><creatorcontrib>Korobkin, Russell</creatorcontrib><description>The common law and federal regulations create overlapping legal regimes that require researchers to obtain the informed consent of most human subjects of medical research. The fast-growing field of biomedical research generally, and stem cell research in particular, gives rise to a range of unresolved and contested legal issues concerning the extent and implementation of the informed consent requirement. This Article identifies and assesses a series of these: (1) Must researchers obtain the informed consent of participants in nontherapeutic research not covered by federal research regulations? (2) As part of the process, must researchers disclose their financial interests in their projects? (3) Must informed consent be obtained before researchers use tissues stored in tissue banks? (4) Must informed consent be obtained from both gamete donors before research use may be made of a stored human embryo? The Article argues that these questions can be best resolved by focusing the analysis on the core value of subject autonomy that underlies the principle of informed consent. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-5650</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-1724</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law</publisher><subject>Biomedical research ; Human subjects ; Informed consent ; Law ; Stem cells</subject><ispartof>UCLA law review, 2007-02, Vol.54 (3), p.605</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law Feb 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Korobkin, Russell</creatorcontrib><title>AUTONOMY AND INFORMED CONSENT IN NONTHERAPEUTIC BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH</title><title>UCLA law review</title><description>The common law and federal regulations create overlapping legal regimes that require researchers to obtain the informed consent of most human subjects of medical research. The fast-growing field of biomedical research generally, and stem cell research in particular, gives rise to a range of unresolved and contested legal issues concerning the extent and implementation of the informed consent requirement. This Article identifies and assesses a series of these: (1) Must researchers obtain the informed consent of participants in nontherapeutic research not covered by federal research regulations? (2) As part of the process, must researchers disclose their financial interests in their projects? (3) Must informed consent be obtained before researchers use tissues stored in tissue banks? (4) Must informed consent be obtained from both gamete donors before research use may be made of a stored human embryo? The Article argues that these questions can be best resolved by focusing the analysis on the core value of subject autonomy that underlies the principle of informed consent. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Biomedical research</subject><subject>Human subjects</subject><subject>Informed consent</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Stem cells</subject><issn>0041-5650</issn><issn>1943-1724</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotjctOwzAURC0EEqHwDxb7SPf6EdtL47okUmujNFmwquqmXlSIlqb9f4Loao5GRzN3pEAjeImKiXtSAAgsZSXhkTyN4wEAVCV1QZztuxji6pPaMKdNWMR25efUxbD2oZsKGmLoat_aD993jaNvTZyExtklbf3a29bVz-Qhb7_G_cstZ6Rf-M7V5TK-_4nlCTW7lAoM1zKzlNAYPSTI2kCWu-2O6SobmRXXGgc5JC4GBTJlUfGkuBk4ToR8Rl7_d0_n4891P142h-P1_D1dbhgKZTQC8l_pND_B</recordid><startdate>20070201</startdate><enddate>20070201</enddate><creator>Korobkin, Russell</creator><general>University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20070201</creationdate><title>AUTONOMY AND INFORMED CONSENT IN NONTHERAPEUTIC BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH</title><author>Korobkin, Russell</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p182t-709385f2bb1998db0f890f5cac286f95f73881d5db34d705bf463b739d3146313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Biomedical research</topic><topic>Human subjects</topic><topic>Informed consent</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Stem cells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Korobkin, Russell</creatorcontrib><jtitle>UCLA law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Korobkin, Russell</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>AUTONOMY AND INFORMED CONSENT IN NONTHERAPEUTIC BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH</atitle><jtitle>UCLA law review</jtitle><date>2007-02-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>605</spage><pages>605-</pages><issn>0041-5650</issn><eissn>1943-1724</eissn><abstract>The common law and federal regulations create overlapping legal regimes that require researchers to obtain the informed consent of most human subjects of medical research. The fast-growing field of biomedical research generally, and stem cell research in particular, gives rise to a range of unresolved and contested legal issues concerning the extent and implementation of the informed consent requirement. This Article identifies and assesses a series of these: (1) Must researchers obtain the informed consent of participants in nontherapeutic research not covered by federal research regulations? (2) As part of the process, must researchers disclose their financial interests in their projects? (3) Must informed consent be obtained before researchers use tissues stored in tissue banks? (4) Must informed consent be obtained from both gamete donors before research use may be made of a stored human embryo? The Article argues that these questions can be best resolved by focusing the analysis on the core value of subject autonomy that underlies the principle of informed consent. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Los Angeles</cop><pub>University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0041-5650 |
ispartof | UCLA law review, 2007-02, Vol.54 (3), p.605 |
issn | 0041-5650 1943-1724 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_214798101 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Biomedical research Human subjects Informed consent Law Stem cells |
title | AUTONOMY AND INFORMED CONSENT IN NONTHERAPEUTIC BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T04%3A42%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=AUTONOMY%20AND%20INFORMED%20CONSENT%20IN%20NONTHERAPEUTIC%20BIOMEDICAL%20RESEARCH&rft.jtitle=UCLA%20law%20review&rft.au=Korobkin,%20Russell&rft.date=2007-02-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=605&rft.pages=605-&rft.issn=0041-5650&rft.eissn=1943-1724&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1229088601%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214798101&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |