AUTONOMY AND INFORMED CONSENT IN NONTHERAPEUTIC BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH

The common law and federal regulations create overlapping legal regimes that require researchers to obtain the informed consent of most human subjects of medical research. The fast-growing field of biomedical research generally, and stem cell research in particular, gives rise to a range of unresolv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:UCLA law review 2007-02, Vol.54 (3), p.605
1. Verfasser: Korobkin, Russell
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 605
container_title UCLA law review
container_volume 54
creator Korobkin, Russell
description The common law and federal regulations create overlapping legal regimes that require researchers to obtain the informed consent of most human subjects of medical research. The fast-growing field of biomedical research generally, and stem cell research in particular, gives rise to a range of unresolved and contested legal issues concerning the extent and implementation of the informed consent requirement. This Article identifies and assesses a series of these: (1) Must researchers obtain the informed consent of participants in nontherapeutic research not covered by federal research regulations? (2) As part of the process, must researchers disclose their financial interests in their projects? (3) Must informed consent be obtained before researchers use tissues stored in tissue banks? (4) Must informed consent be obtained from both gamete donors before research use may be made of a stored human embryo? The Article argues that these questions can be best resolved by focusing the analysis on the core value of subject autonomy that underlies the principle of informed consent. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_214798101</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1229088601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p182t-709385f2bb1998db0f890f5cac286f95f73881d5db34d705bf463b739d3146313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjctOwzAURC0EEqHwDxb7SPf6EdtL47okUmujNFmwquqmXlSIlqb9f4Loao5GRzN3pEAjeImKiXtSAAgsZSXhkTyN4wEAVCV1QZztuxji6pPaMKdNWMR25efUxbD2oZsKGmLoat_aD993jaNvTZyExtklbf3a29bVz-Qhb7_G_cstZ6Rf-M7V5TK-_4nlCTW7lAoM1zKzlNAYPSTI2kCWu-2O6SobmRXXGgc5JC4GBTJlUfGkuBk4ToR8Rl7_d0_n4891P142h-P1_D1dbhgKZTQC8l_pND_B</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214798101</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>AUTONOMY AND INFORMED CONSENT IN NONTHERAPEUTIC BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Korobkin, Russell</creator><creatorcontrib>Korobkin, Russell</creatorcontrib><description>The common law and federal regulations create overlapping legal regimes that require researchers to obtain the informed consent of most human subjects of medical research. The fast-growing field of biomedical research generally, and stem cell research in particular, gives rise to a range of unresolved and contested legal issues concerning the extent and implementation of the informed consent requirement. This Article identifies and assesses a series of these: (1) Must researchers obtain the informed consent of participants in nontherapeutic research not covered by federal research regulations? (2) As part of the process, must researchers disclose their financial interests in their projects? (3) Must informed consent be obtained before researchers use tissues stored in tissue banks? (4) Must informed consent be obtained from both gamete donors before research use may be made of a stored human embryo? The Article argues that these questions can be best resolved by focusing the analysis on the core value of subject autonomy that underlies the principle of informed consent. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-5650</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-1724</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law</publisher><subject>Biomedical research ; Human subjects ; Informed consent ; Law ; Stem cells</subject><ispartof>UCLA law review, 2007-02, Vol.54 (3), p.605</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law Feb 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Korobkin, Russell</creatorcontrib><title>AUTONOMY AND INFORMED CONSENT IN NONTHERAPEUTIC BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH</title><title>UCLA law review</title><description>The common law and federal regulations create overlapping legal regimes that require researchers to obtain the informed consent of most human subjects of medical research. The fast-growing field of biomedical research generally, and stem cell research in particular, gives rise to a range of unresolved and contested legal issues concerning the extent and implementation of the informed consent requirement. This Article identifies and assesses a series of these: (1) Must researchers obtain the informed consent of participants in nontherapeutic research not covered by federal research regulations? (2) As part of the process, must researchers disclose their financial interests in their projects? (3) Must informed consent be obtained before researchers use tissues stored in tissue banks? (4) Must informed consent be obtained from both gamete donors before research use may be made of a stored human embryo? The Article argues that these questions can be best resolved by focusing the analysis on the core value of subject autonomy that underlies the principle of informed consent. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Biomedical research</subject><subject>Human subjects</subject><subject>Informed consent</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Stem cells</subject><issn>0041-5650</issn><issn>1943-1724</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotjctOwzAURC0EEqHwDxb7SPf6EdtL47okUmujNFmwquqmXlSIlqb9f4Loao5GRzN3pEAjeImKiXtSAAgsZSXhkTyN4wEAVCV1QZztuxji6pPaMKdNWMR25efUxbD2oZsKGmLoat_aD993jaNvTZyExtklbf3a29bVz-Qhb7_G_cstZ6Rf-M7V5TK-_4nlCTW7lAoM1zKzlNAYPSTI2kCWu-2O6SobmRXXGgc5JC4GBTJlUfGkuBk4ToR8Rl7_d0_n4891P142h-P1_D1dbhgKZTQC8l_pND_B</recordid><startdate>20070201</startdate><enddate>20070201</enddate><creator>Korobkin, Russell</creator><general>University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20070201</creationdate><title>AUTONOMY AND INFORMED CONSENT IN NONTHERAPEUTIC BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH</title><author>Korobkin, Russell</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p182t-709385f2bb1998db0f890f5cac286f95f73881d5db34d705bf463b739d3146313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Biomedical research</topic><topic>Human subjects</topic><topic>Informed consent</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Stem cells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Korobkin, Russell</creatorcontrib><jtitle>UCLA law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Korobkin, Russell</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>AUTONOMY AND INFORMED CONSENT IN NONTHERAPEUTIC BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH</atitle><jtitle>UCLA law review</jtitle><date>2007-02-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>605</spage><pages>605-</pages><issn>0041-5650</issn><eissn>1943-1724</eissn><abstract>The common law and federal regulations create overlapping legal regimes that require researchers to obtain the informed consent of most human subjects of medical research. The fast-growing field of biomedical research generally, and stem cell research in particular, gives rise to a range of unresolved and contested legal issues concerning the extent and implementation of the informed consent requirement. This Article identifies and assesses a series of these: (1) Must researchers obtain the informed consent of participants in nontherapeutic research not covered by federal research regulations? (2) As part of the process, must researchers disclose their financial interests in their projects? (3) Must informed consent be obtained before researchers use tissues stored in tissue banks? (4) Must informed consent be obtained from both gamete donors before research use may be made of a stored human embryo? The Article argues that these questions can be best resolved by focusing the analysis on the core value of subject autonomy that underlies the principle of informed consent. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Los Angeles</cop><pub>University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-5650
ispartof UCLA law review, 2007-02, Vol.54 (3), p.605
issn 0041-5650
1943-1724
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_214798101
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Biomedical research
Human subjects
Informed consent
Law
Stem cells
title AUTONOMY AND INFORMED CONSENT IN NONTHERAPEUTIC BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T04%3A42%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=AUTONOMY%20AND%20INFORMED%20CONSENT%20IN%20NONTHERAPEUTIC%20BIOMEDICAL%20RESEARCH&rft.jtitle=UCLA%20law%20review&rft.au=Korobkin,%20Russell&rft.date=2007-02-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=605&rft.pages=605-&rft.issn=0041-5650&rft.eissn=1943-1724&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1229088601%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214798101&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true