Learning Behavior Analysis of a Ubiquitous Situated Reflective Learning System with Application to Life Science and Technology Teaching

Education research has shown that reflective study can efficiently enhance learning, and the acquisition of knowledge and skills from real-life situations has become a focus of interest for scholars. The knowledge-learning model based on verbal instruction, used in traditional classrooms, does not m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educational Technology & Society 2018-04, Vol.21 (2), p.137-149
Hauptverfasser: Hwang, Wu-Yuin, Chen, Hong-Ren, Chen, Nian-Shing, Lin, Li-Kai, Chen, Jin-Wen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 149
container_issue 2
container_start_page 137
container_title Educational Technology & Society
container_volume 21
creator Hwang, Wu-Yuin
Chen, Hong-Ren
Chen, Nian-Shing
Lin, Li-Kai
Chen, Jin-Wen
description Education research has shown that reflective study can efficiently enhance learning, and the acquisition of knowledge and skills from real-life situations has become a focus of interest for scholars. The knowledge-learning model based on verbal instruction, used in traditional classrooms, does not make use of real-life situations that encourage students to engage in reflective learning. However, by implementing the Ubiquitous Situated Reflective Learning System (USRLS), learners can be provided with real situations, faced in daily life at any time, to encourage them to engage in reflective learning with regard to information pertinent to the class. This study adopted a quasi-experimental design to assess the efficacy of these two learning models. The research subjects were 52 students from two grade 5 classes in one elementary school in the middle part of Taiwan. The USRLS was used for teaching the experimental group, while the traditional oral teaching method was used for the control group. The learning content of fifth-grade life-science technology classes consists of units on burning and rusting in the context of the life sciences and technology. The research results showed that (1) the learning effectiveness of the USRLS is superior to that of the traditional oral teaching model and (2) students in the high-learning achievement (HLA) group are best suited to a text-based self-reflective learning strategy, while students in the low-learning achievement (LLA) group can obtain more help by using a text-based peer-reflective strategy. Students noted that the learning cycle of a situated reflective learning model encouraged them to consider lesson content, helped them review their answers, and enabled them to increase their focus on the concepts and information in the learning task.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2147863278</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A537118908</galeid><airiti_id>P20221223002_N202302140008_00012</airiti_id><ericid>EJ1175350</ericid><jstor_id>26388388</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A537118908</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-ba352126fa9f34927c6988d9c881902134f2c648e8fb1fe22e5a09aec9e3cce43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt-LEzEQxxdR8Kz-CULAJx8q-bXZ7GM9zvOknGLvnpdpOmmnbDe9JHvav8B_2xyVKwVJmJnMfL6BmeRFdSG0MlNdS_myxKIxU2V087p6k9KWc8m14RfVnzlCHGhYs8-4gUcKkc0G6A-JEgueAbtf0sNIOYyJLSiPkHHFfqLv0WV6RPYsXxxSxh37RXnDZvt9Tw4yhYHlwObkkS0c4eCQwbBid-g2Q-jD-lBCcJuif1u98tAnfPfPT6r7L1d3l1-n8-_XN5ez-RRUY_J0CaqWQhoPrVe6lY0zrbWr1lkrWi6F0l46oy1avxQepcQaeAvoWlTOoVaT6sPx3n0MDyOm3G3DGEvHqZNCN9Yo2dgTtYYeOxp8yBHcjpLrZrVqhLAtf6I-_Ycqa4U7cmFATyV_Jvh4JihMxt95DWNK3c3i9px9f2Qxkuv2kXYQD93Vt_KQtar5qb5NOcRnQBpl7dOeVM2xDhQp06nNH5LLMkKpyh_obstBlblpzrntihFS_QWLUqvI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2147863278</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Learning Behavior Analysis of a Ubiquitous Situated Reflective Learning System with Application to Life Science and Technology Teaching</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Hwang, Wu-Yuin ; Chen, Hong-Ren ; Chen, Nian-Shing ; Lin, Li-Kai ; Chen, Jin-Wen</creator><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Wu-Yuin ; Chen, Hong-Ren ; Chen, Nian-Shing ; Lin, Li-Kai ; Chen, Jin-Wen</creatorcontrib><description>Education research has shown that reflective study can efficiently enhance learning, and the acquisition of knowledge and skills from real-life situations has become a focus of interest for scholars. The knowledge-learning model based on verbal instruction, used in traditional classrooms, does not make use of real-life situations that encourage students to engage in reflective learning. However, by implementing the Ubiquitous Situated Reflective Learning System (USRLS), learners can be provided with real situations, faced in daily life at any time, to encourage them to engage in reflective learning with regard to information pertinent to the class. This study adopted a quasi-experimental design to assess the efficacy of these two learning models. The research subjects were 52 students from two grade 5 classes in one elementary school in the middle part of Taiwan. The USRLS was used for teaching the experimental group, while the traditional oral teaching method was used for the control group. The learning content of fifth-grade life-science technology classes consists of units on burning and rusting in the context of the life sciences and technology. The research results showed that (1) the learning effectiveness of the USRLS is superior to that of the traditional oral teaching model and (2) students in the high-learning achievement (HLA) group are best suited to a text-based self-reflective learning strategy, while students in the low-learning achievement (LLA) group can obtain more help by using a text-based peer-reflective strategy. Students noted that the learning cycle of a situated reflective learning model encouraged them to consider lesson content, helped them review their answers, and enabled them to increase their focus on the concepts and information in the learning task.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1176-3647</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1436-4522</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-4522</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palmerston North: International Forum of Educational Technology & Society</publisher><subject>Academic learning ; Active Learning ; Analysis ; Behavior Patterns ; Biological Sciences ; Context Effect ; Control Groups ; Design of experiments ; Educational activities ; Educational environment ; Electronic learning ; Elementary School Students ; Experimental Groups ; Foreign Countries ; Grade 5 ; Learner engagement ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Learning Strategies ; Learning styles ; Learning theory ; Methods ; Outcomes of Education ; Pretests Posttests ; Quasiexperimental Design ; Reflection ; Reflective teaching ; Relevance (Education) ; Science Education ; Science learning ; Situated learning ; Special Issue Articles ; Statistical Analysis ; Students ; Teaching Methods ; Technology Education ; Units of Study</subject><ispartof>Educational Technology & Society, 2018-04, Vol.21 (2), p.137-149</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 International Forum of Educational Technology &amp; Society</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26388388$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26388388$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1175350$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Wu-Yuin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hong-Ren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Nian-Shing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Li-Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jin-Wen</creatorcontrib><title>Learning Behavior Analysis of a Ubiquitous Situated Reflective Learning System with Application to Life Science and Technology Teaching</title><title>Educational Technology & Society</title><description>Education research has shown that reflective study can efficiently enhance learning, and the acquisition of knowledge and skills from real-life situations has become a focus of interest for scholars. The knowledge-learning model based on verbal instruction, used in traditional classrooms, does not make use of real-life situations that encourage students to engage in reflective learning. However, by implementing the Ubiquitous Situated Reflective Learning System (USRLS), learners can be provided with real situations, faced in daily life at any time, to encourage them to engage in reflective learning with regard to information pertinent to the class. This study adopted a quasi-experimental design to assess the efficacy of these two learning models. The research subjects were 52 students from two grade 5 classes in one elementary school in the middle part of Taiwan. The USRLS was used for teaching the experimental group, while the traditional oral teaching method was used for the control group. The learning content of fifth-grade life-science technology classes consists of units on burning and rusting in the context of the life sciences and technology. The research results showed that (1) the learning effectiveness of the USRLS is superior to that of the traditional oral teaching model and (2) students in the high-learning achievement (HLA) group are best suited to a text-based self-reflective learning strategy, while students in the low-learning achievement (LLA) group can obtain more help by using a text-based peer-reflective strategy. Students noted that the learning cycle of a situated reflective learning model encouraged them to consider lesson content, helped them review their answers, and enabled them to increase their focus on the concepts and information in the learning task.</description><subject>Academic learning</subject><subject>Active Learning</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Behavior Patterns</subject><subject>Biological Sciences</subject><subject>Context Effect</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Design of experiments</subject><subject>Educational activities</subject><subject>Educational environment</subject><subject>Electronic learning</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Experimental Groups</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Grade 5</subject><subject>Learner engagement</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Learning styles</subject><subject>Learning theory</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Quasiexperimental Design</subject><subject>Reflection</subject><subject>Reflective teaching</subject><subject>Relevance (Education)</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Science learning</subject><subject>Situated learning</subject><subject>Special Issue Articles</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Technology Education</subject><subject>Units of Study</subject><issn>1176-3647</issn><issn>1436-4522</issn><issn>1436-4522</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt-LEzEQxxdR8Kz-CULAJx8q-bXZ7GM9zvOknGLvnpdpOmmnbDe9JHvav8B_2xyVKwVJmJnMfL6BmeRFdSG0MlNdS_myxKIxU2V087p6k9KWc8m14RfVnzlCHGhYs8-4gUcKkc0G6A-JEgueAbtf0sNIOYyJLSiPkHHFfqLv0WV6RPYsXxxSxh37RXnDZvt9Tw4yhYHlwObkkS0c4eCQwbBid-g2Q-jD-lBCcJuif1u98tAnfPfPT6r7L1d3l1-n8-_XN5ez-RRUY_J0CaqWQhoPrVe6lY0zrbWr1lkrWi6F0l46oy1avxQepcQaeAvoWlTOoVaT6sPx3n0MDyOm3G3DGEvHqZNCN9Yo2dgTtYYeOxp8yBHcjpLrZrVqhLAtf6I-_Ycqa4U7cmFATyV_Jvh4JihMxt95DWNK3c3i9px9f2Qxkuv2kXYQD93Vt_KQtar5qb5NOcRnQBpl7dOeVM2xDhQp06nNH5LLMkKpyh_obstBlblpzrntihFS_QWLUqvI</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Hwang, Wu-Yuin</creator><creator>Chen, Hong-Ren</creator><creator>Chen, Nian-Shing</creator><creator>Lin, Li-Kai</creator><creator>Chen, Jin-Wen</creator><general>International Forum of Educational Technology & Society</general><general>National Taiwan Normal University</general><general>International Forum of Educational Technology &amp; Society</general><scope>188</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Learning Behavior Analysis of a Ubiquitous Situated Reflective Learning System with Application to Life Science and Technology Teaching</title><author>Hwang, Wu-Yuin ; Chen, Hong-Ren ; Chen, Nian-Shing ; Lin, Li-Kai ; Chen, Jin-Wen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-ba352126fa9f34927c6988d9c881902134f2c648e8fb1fe22e5a09aec9e3cce43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Academic learning</topic><topic>Active Learning</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Behavior Patterns</topic><topic>Biological Sciences</topic><topic>Context Effect</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Design of experiments</topic><topic>Educational activities</topic><topic>Educational environment</topic><topic>Electronic learning</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Experimental Groups</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Grade 5</topic><topic>Learner engagement</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Learning styles</topic><topic>Learning theory</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Quasiexperimental Design</topic><topic>Reflection</topic><topic>Reflective teaching</topic><topic>Relevance (Education)</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Science learning</topic><topic>Situated learning</topic><topic>Special Issue Articles</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Technology Education</topic><topic>Units of Study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Wu-Yuin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hong-Ren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Nian-Shing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Li-Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jin-Wen</creatorcontrib><collection>Airiti Library</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Educational Technology & Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hwang, Wu-Yuin</au><au>Chen, Hong-Ren</au><au>Chen, Nian-Shing</au><au>Lin, Li-Kai</au><au>Chen, Jin-Wen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1175350</ericid><atitle>Learning Behavior Analysis of a Ubiquitous Situated Reflective Learning System with Application to Life Science and Technology Teaching</atitle><jtitle>Educational Technology & Society</jtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>137</spage><epage>149</epage><pages>137-149</pages><issn>1176-3647</issn><issn>1436-4522</issn><eissn>1436-4522</eissn><abstract>Education research has shown that reflective study can efficiently enhance learning, and the acquisition of knowledge and skills from real-life situations has become a focus of interest for scholars. The knowledge-learning model based on verbal instruction, used in traditional classrooms, does not make use of real-life situations that encourage students to engage in reflective learning. However, by implementing the Ubiquitous Situated Reflective Learning System (USRLS), learners can be provided with real situations, faced in daily life at any time, to encourage them to engage in reflective learning with regard to information pertinent to the class. This study adopted a quasi-experimental design to assess the efficacy of these two learning models. The research subjects were 52 students from two grade 5 classes in one elementary school in the middle part of Taiwan. The USRLS was used for teaching the experimental group, while the traditional oral teaching method was used for the control group. The learning content of fifth-grade life-science technology classes consists of units on burning and rusting in the context of the life sciences and technology. The research results showed that (1) the learning effectiveness of the USRLS is superior to that of the traditional oral teaching model and (2) students in the high-learning achievement (HLA) group are best suited to a text-based self-reflective learning strategy, while students in the low-learning achievement (LLA) group can obtain more help by using a text-based peer-reflective strategy. Students noted that the learning cycle of a situated reflective learning model encouraged them to consider lesson content, helped them review their answers, and enabled them to increase their focus on the concepts and information in the learning task.</abstract><cop>Palmerston North</cop><pub>International Forum of Educational Technology & Society</pub><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1176-3647
ispartof Educational Technology & Society, 2018-04, Vol.21 (2), p.137-149
issn 1176-3647
1436-4522
1436-4522
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2147863278
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Academic learning
Active Learning
Analysis
Behavior Patterns
Biological Sciences
Context Effect
Control Groups
Design of experiments
Educational activities
Educational environment
Electronic learning
Elementary School Students
Experimental Groups
Foreign Countries
Grade 5
Learner engagement
Learning
Learning Processes
Learning Strategies
Learning styles
Learning theory
Methods
Outcomes of Education
Pretests Posttests
Quasiexperimental Design
Reflection
Reflective teaching
Relevance (Education)
Science Education
Science learning
Situated learning
Special Issue Articles
Statistical Analysis
Students
Teaching Methods
Technology Education
Units of Study
title Learning Behavior Analysis of a Ubiquitous Situated Reflective Learning System with Application to Life Science and Technology Teaching
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T13%3A42%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Learning%20Behavior%20Analysis%20of%20a%20Ubiquitous%20Situated%20Reflective%20Learning%20System%20with%20Application%20to%20Life%20Science%20and%20Technology%20Teaching&rft.jtitle=Educational%20Technology%20%EF%BC%86%20Society&rft.au=Hwang,%20Wu-Yuin&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=137&rft.epage=149&rft.pages=137-149&rft.issn=1176-3647&rft.eissn=1436-4522&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA537118908%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2147863278&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A537118908&rft_airiti_id=P20221223002_N202302140008_00012&rft_ericid=EJ1175350&rft_jstor_id=26388388&rfr_iscdi=true