Trust and trustworthiness in a sequential bargaining game
We use a two‐person extensive form bargaining game to explore individuals' trusting and reciprocal behavior and how those relate to their scores on a trust survey. In keeping with prior research, we find that the ‘self‐interested’ outcome is rejected by a majority of individuals. People who sco...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of behavioral decision making 2003-12, Vol.16 (5), p.331-340 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 340 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 331 |
container_title | Journal of behavioral decision making |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Chaudhuri, Ananish Ali Khan, Sarah Lakshmiratan, Aishwarya Py, Anne-Laure Shah, Lisa |
description | We use a two‐person extensive form bargaining game to explore individuals' trusting and reciprocal behavior and how those relate to their scores on a trust survey. In keeping with prior research, we find that the ‘self‐interested’ outcome is rejected by a majority of individuals. People who score high on the trust survey are both trusting and are also trustworthy, in that they reciprocate others' trust. But people with low‐trust scores often exhibit trust but are not trustworthy. These ‘inconsistent trusters’ seem to be interested in exploiting the trust and trustworthiness of others in increasing their own payoff. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/bdm.449 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_214692471</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>484684631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-2f2f346ac76e56c06714cba63d3690f009c76a7d4ffb99ec7db344956903369c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M1KAzEUBeAgCtYqvkJw40Km5m8Ss9Rqq1DrpiJ0EzKZpKa2GU2m1L69KSPuXOXC-bg5XADOMRpghMh1Va8HjMkD0MNIygIJgQ9BD91IVlBSimNwktISoZxR1ANyFjephTrUsN1P2ya27z7YlKAPUMNkvzY2tF6vYKXjQvvgwwIu9NqegiOnV8me_b598Dp6mA0fi8nL-Gl4OykMLYUsiCOOMq6N4LbkBnGBmak0pzXlErncIyda1My5SkprRF3RXL_MIc3C0D646PZ-xiZ3Sa1aNpsY8peKYMYlYQJndNkhE5uUonXqM_q1jjuFkdqfReWzqLw3y6tObv3K7v5j6u7-udNFp31q7fef1vFDcUFFqd6mYzXFczKa4aGa0x_-a3EP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214692471</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trust and trustworthiness in a sequential bargaining game</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Chaudhuri, Ananish ; Ali Khan, Sarah ; Lakshmiratan, Aishwarya ; Py, Anne-Laure ; Shah, Lisa</creator><creatorcontrib>Chaudhuri, Ananish ; Ali Khan, Sarah ; Lakshmiratan, Aishwarya ; Py, Anne-Laure ; Shah, Lisa</creatorcontrib><description>We use a two‐person extensive form bargaining game to explore individuals' trusting and reciprocal behavior and how those relate to their scores on a trust survey. In keeping with prior research, we find that the ‘self‐interested’ outcome is rejected by a majority of individuals. People who score high on the trust survey are both trusting and are also trustworthy, in that they reciprocate others' trust. But people with low‐trust scores often exhibit trust but are not trustworthy. These ‘inconsistent trusters’ seem to be interested in exploiting the trust and trustworthiness of others in increasing their own payoff. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-3257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bdm.449</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Bargaining ; Behavior ; Cooperation ; Decision making ; Economics ; Game theory ; Reciprocity ; sequential game ; social values orientation ; Studies ; Trust</subject><ispartof>Journal of behavioral decision making, 2003-12, Vol.16 (5), p.331-340</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-2f2f346ac76e56c06714cba63d3690f009c76a7d4ffb99ec7db344956903369c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-2f2f346ac76e56c06714cba63d3690f009c76a7d4ffb99ec7db344956903369c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fbdm.449$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fbdm.449$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chaudhuri, Ananish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali Khan, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakshmiratan, Aishwarya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Py, Anne-Laure</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Lisa</creatorcontrib><title>Trust and trustworthiness in a sequential bargaining game</title><title>Journal of behavioral decision making</title><addtitle>J. Behav. Decis. Making</addtitle><description>We use a two‐person extensive form bargaining game to explore individuals' trusting and reciprocal behavior and how those relate to their scores on a trust survey. In keeping with prior research, we find that the ‘self‐interested’ outcome is rejected by a majority of individuals. People who score high on the trust survey are both trusting and are also trustworthy, in that they reciprocate others' trust. But people with low‐trust scores often exhibit trust but are not trustworthy. These ‘inconsistent trusters’ seem to be interested in exploiting the trust and trustworthiness of others in increasing their own payoff. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Bargaining</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Reciprocity</subject><subject>sequential game</subject><subject>social values orientation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trust</subject><issn>0894-3257</issn><issn>1099-0771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp10M1KAzEUBeAgCtYqvkJw40Km5m8Ss9Rqq1DrpiJ0EzKZpKa2GU2m1L69KSPuXOXC-bg5XADOMRpghMh1Va8HjMkD0MNIygIJgQ9BD91IVlBSimNwktISoZxR1ANyFjephTrUsN1P2ya27z7YlKAPUMNkvzY2tF6vYKXjQvvgwwIu9NqegiOnV8me_b598Dp6mA0fi8nL-Gl4OykMLYUsiCOOMq6N4LbkBnGBmak0pzXlErncIyda1My5SkprRF3RXL_MIc3C0D646PZ-xiZ3Sa1aNpsY8peKYMYlYQJndNkhE5uUonXqM_q1jjuFkdqfReWzqLw3y6tObv3K7v5j6u7-udNFp31q7fef1vFDcUFFqd6mYzXFczKa4aGa0x_-a3EP</recordid><startdate>200312</startdate><enddate>200312</enddate><creator>Chaudhuri, Ananish</creator><creator>Ali Khan, Sarah</creator><creator>Lakshmiratan, Aishwarya</creator><creator>Py, Anne-Laure</creator><creator>Shah, Lisa</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200312</creationdate><title>Trust and trustworthiness in a sequential bargaining game</title><author>Chaudhuri, Ananish ; Ali Khan, Sarah ; Lakshmiratan, Aishwarya ; Py, Anne-Laure ; Shah, Lisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-2f2f346ac76e56c06714cba63d3690f009c76a7d4ffb99ec7db344956903369c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Bargaining</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Reciprocity</topic><topic>sequential game</topic><topic>social values orientation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trust</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chaudhuri, Ananish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali Khan, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakshmiratan, Aishwarya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Py, Anne-Laure</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Lisa</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of behavioral decision making</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chaudhuri, Ananish</au><au>Ali Khan, Sarah</au><au>Lakshmiratan, Aishwarya</au><au>Py, Anne-Laure</au><au>Shah, Lisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trust and trustworthiness in a sequential bargaining game</atitle><jtitle>Journal of behavioral decision making</jtitle><addtitle>J. Behav. Decis. Making</addtitle><date>2003-12</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>331</spage><epage>340</epage><pages>331-340</pages><issn>0894-3257</issn><eissn>1099-0771</eissn><abstract>We use a two‐person extensive form bargaining game to explore individuals' trusting and reciprocal behavior and how those relate to their scores on a trust survey. In keeping with prior research, we find that the ‘self‐interested’ outcome is rejected by a majority of individuals. People who score high on the trust survey are both trusting and are also trustworthy, in that they reciprocate others' trust. But people with low‐trust scores often exhibit trust but are not trustworthy. These ‘inconsistent trusters’ seem to be interested in exploiting the trust and trustworthiness of others in increasing their own payoff. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/bdm.449</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0894-3257 |
ispartof | Journal of behavioral decision making, 2003-12, Vol.16 (5), p.331-340 |
issn | 0894-3257 1099-0771 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_214692471 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Bargaining Behavior Cooperation Decision making Economics Game theory Reciprocity sequential game social values orientation Studies Trust |
title | Trust and trustworthiness in a sequential bargaining game |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T16%3A07%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trust%20and%20trustworthiness%20in%20a%20sequential%20bargaining%20game&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20behavioral%20decision%20making&rft.au=Chaudhuri,%20Ananish&rft.date=2003-12&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=331&rft.epage=340&rft.pages=331-340&rft.issn=0894-3257&rft.eissn=1099-0771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bdm.449&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E484684631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214692471&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |