The First-Order Approach to Principal-Agent Problems
The first-order approach to principal-agent problems involves relaxing the constraint that the agent choose an action which is utility maximizing to require instead only that the agent choose an action at which his utility is at a stationary point. Although more mathematically tractable, this approa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Econometrica 1985-11, Vol.53 (6), p.1357-1367 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1367 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1357 |
container_title | Econometrica |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Rogerson, William P. |
description | The first-order approach to principal-agent problems involves relaxing the constraint that the agent choose an action which is utility maximizing to require instead only that the agent choose an action at which his utility is at a stationary point. Although more mathematically tractable, this approach is generally invalid. This paper identifies sufficient conditions--the monotone likelihood ratio condition and convexity of the distribution function condition--for the first-order approach to be valid. The Pareto-optimal wage contract is shown to be nondecreasing in output under these same conditions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/1913212 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_214656750</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1913212</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1913212</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-3fe018e0eaf25b12276ef9217365557290b0d34d7ab1a7adae7efb7aec6746d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10F9LwzAQAPAgCtYpfoWigk_Ry6VJmscyNhUG82E-l7S9uo5trUn34Lc3sr0ODo6DH_ePsXsBLyjBvAorJAq8YInIdM4BNV6yBEAgtzrHa3YTwgYAVIyEZas1pfPOh5EvfUM-LYbB965ep2OffvpuX3eD2_Lim_ZjrPtqS7twy65atw10d8oT9jWfrabvfLF8-5gWC16jgZHLlkDkBORaVJVANJpai8JIrZQyaKGCRmaNcZVwxjWODLWVcVRrk-lGywl7OPaNK_0cKIzlpj_4fRxZYjxOaaMgosdzSKDVmcytslE9H1Xt-xA8teXgu53zv6WA8v9v5elvUT4d5SaMvT_L_gBe3WeU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214656750</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The First-Order Approach to Principal-Agent Problems</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Rogerson, William P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rogerson, William P.</creatorcontrib><description>The first-order approach to principal-agent problems involves relaxing the constraint that the agent choose an action which is utility maximizing to require instead only that the agent choose an action at which his utility is at a stationary point. Although more mathematically tractable, this approach is generally invalid. This paper identifies sufficient conditions--the monotone likelihood ratio condition and convexity of the distribution function condition--for the first-order approach to be valid. The Pareto-optimal wage contract is shown to be nondecreasing in output under these same conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9682</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-0262</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1913212</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECMTA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Menasha, Wis: The Econometric Society</publisher><subject>Convexity ; Distribution functions ; Expected utility ; Logical proofs ; Mathematical functions ; Moral hazard models ; Necessary conditions ; Optimization ; Principal agent problem ; Probability distributions ; Risk aversion ; Utility functions</subject><ispartof>Econometrica, 1985-11, Vol.53 (6), p.1357-1367</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1985 The Econometric Society</rights><rights>Copyright Econometric Society Nov 1985</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-3fe018e0eaf25b12276ef9217365557290b0d34d7ab1a7adae7efb7aec6746d63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1913212$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1913212$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,832,27860,27915,27916,58008,58012,58241,58245</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rogerson, William P.</creatorcontrib><title>The First-Order Approach to Principal-Agent Problems</title><title>Econometrica</title><description>The first-order approach to principal-agent problems involves relaxing the constraint that the agent choose an action which is utility maximizing to require instead only that the agent choose an action at which his utility is at a stationary point. Although more mathematically tractable, this approach is generally invalid. This paper identifies sufficient conditions--the monotone likelihood ratio condition and convexity of the distribution function condition--for the first-order approach to be valid. The Pareto-optimal wage contract is shown to be nondecreasing in output under these same conditions.</description><subject>Convexity</subject><subject>Distribution functions</subject><subject>Expected utility</subject><subject>Logical proofs</subject><subject>Mathematical functions</subject><subject>Moral hazard models</subject><subject>Necessary conditions</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Principal agent problem</subject><subject>Probability distributions</subject><subject>Risk aversion</subject><subject>Utility functions</subject><issn>0012-9682</issn><issn>1468-0262</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp10F9LwzAQAPAgCtYpfoWigk_Ry6VJmscyNhUG82E-l7S9uo5trUn34Lc3sr0ODo6DH_ePsXsBLyjBvAorJAq8YInIdM4BNV6yBEAgtzrHa3YTwgYAVIyEZas1pfPOh5EvfUM-LYbB965ep2OffvpuX3eD2_Lim_ZjrPtqS7twy65atw10d8oT9jWfrabvfLF8-5gWC16jgZHLlkDkBORaVJVANJpai8JIrZQyaKGCRmaNcZVwxjWODLWVcVRrk-lGywl7OPaNK_0cKIzlpj_4fRxZYjxOaaMgosdzSKDVmcytslE9H1Xt-xA8teXgu53zv6WA8v9v5elvUT4d5SaMvT_L_gBe3WeU</recordid><startdate>19851101</startdate><enddate>19851101</enddate><creator>Rogerson, William P.</creator><general>The Econometric Society</general><general>George Banta Pub. Co. for the Econometric Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>JILTI</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0A</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19851101</creationdate><title>The First-Order Approach to Principal-Agent Problems</title><author>Rogerson, William P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-3fe018e0eaf25b12276ef9217365557290b0d34d7ab1a7adae7efb7aec6746d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Convexity</topic><topic>Distribution functions</topic><topic>Expected utility</topic><topic>Logical proofs</topic><topic>Mathematical functions</topic><topic>Moral hazard models</topic><topic>Necessary conditions</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Principal agent problem</topic><topic>Probability distributions</topic><topic>Risk aversion</topic><topic>Utility functions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rogerson, William P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 32</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Econometrica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rogerson, William P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The First-Order Approach to Principal-Agent Problems</atitle><jtitle>Econometrica</jtitle><date>1985-11-01</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1357</spage><epage>1367</epage><pages>1357-1367</pages><issn>0012-9682</issn><eissn>1468-0262</eissn><coden>ECMTA7</coden><abstract>The first-order approach to principal-agent problems involves relaxing the constraint that the agent choose an action which is utility maximizing to require instead only that the agent choose an action at which his utility is at a stationary point. Although more mathematically tractable, this approach is generally invalid. This paper identifies sufficient conditions--the monotone likelihood ratio condition and convexity of the distribution function condition--for the first-order approach to be valid. The Pareto-optimal wage contract is shown to be nondecreasing in output under these same conditions.</abstract><cop>Menasha, Wis</cop><pub>The Econometric Society</pub><doi>10.2307/1913212</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-9682 |
ispartof | Econometrica, 1985-11, Vol.53 (6), p.1357-1367 |
issn | 0012-9682 1468-0262 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_214656750 |
source | Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Convexity Distribution functions Expected utility Logical proofs Mathematical functions Moral hazard models Necessary conditions Optimization Principal agent problem Probability distributions Risk aversion Utility functions |
title | The First-Order Approach to Principal-Agent Problems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T00%3A30%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20First-Order%20Approach%20to%20Principal-Agent%20Problems&rft.jtitle=Econometrica&rft.au=Rogerson,%20William%20P.&rft.date=1985-11-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1357&rft.epage=1367&rft.pages=1357-1367&rft.issn=0012-9682&rft.eissn=1468-0262&rft.coden=ECMTA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1913212&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1913212%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214656750&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1913212&rfr_iscdi=true |