Fuzzy knowledge-based modeling and statistical regression in abrasive wood machining
Abrasive machining processes in wood largely determine the surface quality of a product. These processes are highly unpredictable due to variation in tooling and process conditions as well as in wood species considered. Two methods of predicting the performance of abrasive wood machining processes a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Forest products journal 2004-05, Vol.54 (5), p.66-72 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 72 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 66 |
container_title | Forest products journal |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | CARRANO, Andres L TAYLOR, James B YOUNG, Robert E LEMASTER, Richard L SALONI, Daniel E |
description | Abrasive machining processes in wood largely determine the surface quality of a product. These processes are highly unpredictable due to variation in tooling and process conditions as well as in wood species considered. Two methods of predicting the performance of abrasive wood machining processes are considered here. A comparison between non-linear regression modeling and fuzzy knowledge-based modeling is presented. Complex experimental models are developed and empirical studies performed. With data from these studies, several regression models are fitted and a fuzzy knowledge-based model using fuzzy rules is also developed. The abilities of these two models to explain the experimental results are compared and then used to predict experimental results based on process conditions. These predictions are subsequently examined in the context of additional experimental results. The two models are similar in their ability to explain the data and to predict outcomes based upon new inputs. However, the regression model appears to offer improved performance as the size of the data set increases, whereas the fuzzy model appears to offer improved performance when the size of the data set is small. It is concluded that fuzzy models appear most appropriate when subjective and qualitative data are utilized and the number of empirical observations available is small. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_214631647</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A117776301</galeid><sourcerecordid>A117776301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g287t-a5bb724127030347e2c9a19ef529879fa05c0f4ad47b1383031387b6ea188e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1rwzAMhsPYYF23_2AGO3r4I7GSYyn7gsIuvQclUTJ3qd3Z6Ur762doj0MggXhevZKuspnSYHhlNFxnMyFkwSEHfZvdxbgRQkBh1Cxbv-5PpyP7dv4wUjcQbzBSx7a-o9G6gaHrWJxwsnGyLY4s0BAoRusds45hEzDaX2IH75MI2y_rkuo-u-lxjPRwqfNk87JevvPV59vHcrHigyph4lg0DahcKhBa6BxItRXKivpCVSVUPYqiFX2OXQ6N1GViUobGEMqyJK3n2eN57C74nz3Fqd74fXDJsVYyN1qadO8842dowJFq63o_BWwHchRw9I56m9oLKQHAaCET__wPn6KjrW3_FTxdtsCYPtQHdK2N9S7YLYZjLQswaZlC_wGiPnkN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214631647</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fuzzy knowledge-based modeling and statistical regression in abrasive wood machining</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>CARRANO, Andres L ; TAYLOR, James B ; YOUNG, Robert E ; LEMASTER, Richard L ; SALONI, Daniel E</creator><creatorcontrib>CARRANO, Andres L ; TAYLOR, James B ; YOUNG, Robert E ; LEMASTER, Richard L ; SALONI, Daniel E</creatorcontrib><description>Abrasive machining processes in wood largely determine the surface quality of a product. These processes are highly unpredictable due to variation in tooling and process conditions as well as in wood species considered. Two methods of predicting the performance of abrasive wood machining processes are considered here. A comparison between non-linear regression modeling and fuzzy knowledge-based modeling is presented. Complex experimental models are developed and empirical studies performed. With data from these studies, several regression models are fitted and a fuzzy knowledge-based model using fuzzy rules is also developed. The abilities of these two models to explain the experimental results are compared and then used to predict experimental results based on process conditions. These predictions are subsequently examined in the context of additional experimental results. The two models are similar in their ability to explain the data and to predict outcomes based upon new inputs. However, the regression model appears to offer improved performance as the size of the data set increases, whereas the fuzzy model appears to offer improved performance when the size of the data set is small. It is concluded that fuzzy models appear most appropriate when subjective and qualitative data are utilized and the number of empirical observations available is small. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-7473</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-9637</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FPJOAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison, WI: Forest Products Society</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Comparative analysis ; Evaluation ; Exact sciences and technology ; Forest products industry ; Fuzzy logic ; Fuzzy sets ; Knowledge ; Mathematical models ; Mechanical woodworking and drying ; Moisture content ; Polymer industry, paints, wood ; Processes ; Regression analysis ; Studies ; Wood ; Wood. Paper. Non wovens ; Woodworking ; Woodworking machinery</subject><ispartof>Forest products journal, 2004-05, Vol.54 (5), p.66-72</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2004 Forest Products Society</rights><rights>Copyright Forest Products Society May 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15761465$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CARRANO, Andres L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAYLOR, James B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YOUNG, Robert E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEMASTER, Richard L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SALONI, Daniel E</creatorcontrib><title>Fuzzy knowledge-based modeling and statistical regression in abrasive wood machining</title><title>Forest products journal</title><description>Abrasive machining processes in wood largely determine the surface quality of a product. These processes are highly unpredictable due to variation in tooling and process conditions as well as in wood species considered. Two methods of predicting the performance of abrasive wood machining processes are considered here. A comparison between non-linear regression modeling and fuzzy knowledge-based modeling is presented. Complex experimental models are developed and empirical studies performed. With data from these studies, several regression models are fitted and a fuzzy knowledge-based model using fuzzy rules is also developed. The abilities of these two models to explain the experimental results are compared and then used to predict experimental results based on process conditions. These predictions are subsequently examined in the context of additional experimental results. The two models are similar in their ability to explain the data and to predict outcomes based upon new inputs. However, the regression model appears to offer improved performance as the size of the data set increases, whereas the fuzzy model appears to offer improved performance when the size of the data set is small. It is concluded that fuzzy models appear most appropriate when subjective and qualitative data are utilized and the number of empirical observations available is small. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Forest products industry</subject><subject>Fuzzy logic</subject><subject>Fuzzy sets</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mechanical woodworking and drying</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Polymer industry, paints, wood</subject><subject>Processes</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Wood</subject><subject>Wood. Paper. Non wovens</subject><subject>Woodworking</subject><subject>Woodworking machinery</subject><issn>0015-7473</issn><issn>2376-9637</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1rwzAMhsPYYF23_2AGO3r4I7GSYyn7gsIuvQclUTJ3qd3Z6Ur762doj0MggXhevZKuspnSYHhlNFxnMyFkwSEHfZvdxbgRQkBh1Cxbv-5PpyP7dv4wUjcQbzBSx7a-o9G6gaHrWJxwsnGyLY4s0BAoRusds45hEzDaX2IH75MI2y_rkuo-u-lxjPRwqfNk87JevvPV59vHcrHigyph4lg0DahcKhBa6BxItRXKivpCVSVUPYqiFX2OXQ6N1GViUobGEMqyJK3n2eN57C74nz3Fqd74fXDJsVYyN1qadO8842dowJFq63o_BWwHchRw9I56m9oLKQHAaCET__wPn6KjrW3_FTxdtsCYPtQHdK2N9S7YLYZjLQswaZlC_wGiPnkN</recordid><startdate>20040501</startdate><enddate>20040501</enddate><creator>CARRANO, Andres L</creator><creator>TAYLOR, James B</creator><creator>YOUNG, Robert E</creator><creator>LEMASTER, Richard L</creator><creator>SALONI, Daniel E</creator><general>Forest Products Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040501</creationdate><title>Fuzzy knowledge-based modeling and statistical regression in abrasive wood machining</title><author>CARRANO, Andres L ; TAYLOR, James B ; YOUNG, Robert E ; LEMASTER, Richard L ; SALONI, Daniel E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g287t-a5bb724127030347e2c9a19ef529879fa05c0f4ad47b1383031387b6ea188e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Forest products industry</topic><topic>Fuzzy logic</topic><topic>Fuzzy sets</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mechanical woodworking and drying</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Polymer industry, paints, wood</topic><topic>Processes</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Wood</topic><topic>Wood. Paper. Non wovens</topic><topic>Woodworking</topic><topic>Woodworking machinery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CARRANO, Andres L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAYLOR, James B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YOUNG, Robert E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEMASTER, Richard L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SALONI, Daniel E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Forest products journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CARRANO, Andres L</au><au>TAYLOR, James B</au><au>YOUNG, Robert E</au><au>LEMASTER, Richard L</au><au>SALONI, Daniel E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fuzzy knowledge-based modeling and statistical regression in abrasive wood machining</atitle><jtitle>Forest products journal</jtitle><date>2004-05-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>66</spage><epage>72</epage><pages>66-72</pages><issn>0015-7473</issn><eissn>2376-9637</eissn><coden>FPJOAB</coden><abstract>Abrasive machining processes in wood largely determine the surface quality of a product. These processes are highly unpredictable due to variation in tooling and process conditions as well as in wood species considered. Two methods of predicting the performance of abrasive wood machining processes are considered here. A comparison between non-linear regression modeling and fuzzy knowledge-based modeling is presented. Complex experimental models are developed and empirical studies performed. With data from these studies, several regression models are fitted and a fuzzy knowledge-based model using fuzzy rules is also developed. The abilities of these two models to explain the experimental results are compared and then used to predict experimental results based on process conditions. These predictions are subsequently examined in the context of additional experimental results. The two models are similar in their ability to explain the data and to predict outcomes based upon new inputs. However, the regression model appears to offer improved performance as the size of the data set increases, whereas the fuzzy model appears to offer improved performance when the size of the data set is small. It is concluded that fuzzy models appear most appropriate when subjective and qualitative data are utilized and the number of empirical observations available is small. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Madison, WI</cop><pub>Forest Products Society</pub><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0015-7473 |
ispartof | Forest products journal, 2004-05, Vol.54 (5), p.66-72 |
issn | 0015-7473 2376-9637 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_214631647 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Applied sciences Comparative analysis Evaluation Exact sciences and technology Forest products industry Fuzzy logic Fuzzy sets Knowledge Mathematical models Mechanical woodworking and drying Moisture content Polymer industry, paints, wood Processes Regression analysis Studies Wood Wood. Paper. Non wovens Woodworking Woodworking machinery |
title | Fuzzy knowledge-based modeling and statistical regression in abrasive wood machining |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T11%3A25%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fuzzy%20knowledge-based%20modeling%20and%20statistical%20regression%20in%20abrasive%20wood%20machining&rft.jtitle=Forest%20products%20journal&rft.au=CARRANO,%20Andres%20L&rft.date=2004-05-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=66&rft.epage=72&rft.pages=66-72&rft.issn=0015-7473&rft.eissn=2376-9637&rft.coden=FPJOAB&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA117776301%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214631647&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A117776301&rfr_iscdi=true |