Biocide retention variation of southern yellow pine products treated with waterborne preservatives in commercial, pilot plant, or laboratory cylinders
The among-sample retention variability of southern yellow pine (SYP) products was examined for seven sets of dimension and timber lumber treated with CCA-C in various commercial plants with retention based on x-ray fluorescence, and for seven sets of 8-foot 2 by 4's treated with ACQ-D in a pilo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Forest products journal 2004-03, Vol.54 (3), p.85-90 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 90 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 85 |
container_title | Forest products journal |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Schultz, T.P Nicholas, D.D Dalton, T.J Keefe, D |
description | The among-sample retention variability of southern yellow pine (SYP) products was examined for seven sets of dimension and timber lumber treated with CCA-C in various commercial plants with retention based on x-ray fluorescence, and for seven sets of 8-foot 2 by 4's treated with ACQ-D in a pilot plant with retention measured by weight gain. In addition, among- and within-sample variability was determined for one set of small (19 mm by 19 mm by 1016 mm) SYP field stakes treated with CCA-C in a laboratory cylinder with biocide levels measured by x-ray fluorescence, and among-sample variability also determined using weight gain. For the commercially-treated lumber, as the lumber thickness increased the biocide retention (based on the outer shell as per AWPA Standard C2) variability increased. Retention variability for the small field stakes treated to ground-contact level in a laboratory cylinder was lower than the variability of the nominal 2-inch-thick lumber treated to the same target retention in either the commercial facilities or pilot plant. Biocide retention was highly correlated (r2 = 98.1%) to specific gravity for the small field stakes, but specific gravity explained less than 30 percent of the biocide retention for lumber treated in commercial operations. Within-sample variation for the small defect-free stakes averaged 60 percent of the among-sample variation, and the ends of the stakes had a slightly higher biocide retention (8.2%) than the interior sections. The ratio of chromium retention in the earlywood to that in the latewood (E/L ratio) at the ends of field stakes that were air-dried right after treatment was significantly lower than the copper or arsenic E/L ratios, suggesting that chromium migrated to the latewood with free water during air-drying to give an uneven macrodistribution. Biocides in the newer waterborne systems may also undergo this migration to give a nonuniform distribution. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_214628464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A115169796</galeid><sourcerecordid>A115169796</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-f281t-7e7bd93773949f431dbd24aa01950bcd5bc7e31364dc498f371f21315046ce6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM9OAyEQxjdGE2v1GSSeXQMLC-Woxn-JiQf1vGFhaDEUKtA2fRGfV9J6NHOYL5Pf901mjppJRwVvJafiuJlgTPpWMEFPm7OcvzDGoufdpPm5c1E7AyhBgVBcDGijklN7FS3KcV0WkALagfdxi1YuAFqlaNa6ZFQSqAIGbV1ZoG2VaYxpD0CGtKkpG8jIBaTjcglJO-Wva4SPBa28CuUaxYS8qiZVYtohvfMuGEj5vDmxyme4-OvT5vPx4eP-uX19e3q5v31tbTcjpRUgRiOpEFQyaRklZjQdUwoT2eNRm37UAiihnBnN5MxSQWxHKOkx4xq4odPm6pBbT_peQy7DV1ynUFcOHWG8mzHOKtQeoLnyMLhgY0lKzyFAUj4GsK6ObwnpCZei_nva3PzD1zKwdPpfw-XBYFUc1Dy5PHy-d5hQjKXEM8rpL26wj-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214628464</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biocide retention variation of southern yellow pine products treated with waterborne preservatives in commercial, pilot plant, or laboratory cylinders</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Schultz, T.P ; Nicholas, D.D ; Dalton, T.J ; Keefe, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Schultz, T.P ; Nicholas, D.D ; Dalton, T.J ; Keefe, D</creatorcontrib><description>The among-sample retention variability of southern yellow pine (SYP) products was examined for seven sets of dimension and timber lumber treated with CCA-C in various commercial plants with retention based on x-ray fluorescence, and for seven sets of 8-foot 2 by 4's treated with ACQ-D in a pilot plant with retention measured by weight gain. In addition, among- and within-sample variability was determined for one set of small (19 mm by 19 mm by 1016 mm) SYP field stakes treated with CCA-C in a laboratory cylinder with biocide levels measured by x-ray fluorescence, and among-sample variability also determined using weight gain. For the commercially-treated lumber, as the lumber thickness increased the biocide retention (based on the outer shell as per AWPA Standard C2) variability increased. Retention variability for the small field stakes treated to ground-contact level in a laboratory cylinder was lower than the variability of the nominal 2-inch-thick lumber treated to the same target retention in either the commercial facilities or pilot plant. Biocide retention was highly correlated (r2 = 98.1%) to specific gravity for the small field stakes, but specific gravity explained less than 30 percent of the biocide retention for lumber treated in commercial operations. Within-sample variation for the small defect-free stakes averaged 60 percent of the among-sample variation, and the ends of the stakes had a slightly higher biocide retention (8.2%) than the interior sections. The ratio of chromium retention in the earlywood to that in the latewood (E/L ratio) at the ends of field stakes that were air-dried right after treatment was significantly lower than the copper or arsenic E/L ratios, suggesting that chromium migrated to the latewood with free water during air-drying to give an uneven macrodistribution. Biocides in the newer waterborne systems may also undergo this migration to give a nonuniform distribution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-7473</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-9637</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FPJOAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: Forest Products Society</publisher><subject>Arsenic ; Biocides ; chemical control ; chromated copper arsenate ; Chromium ; Comparative analysis ; Copper ; Density ; environmental protection ; Forest products industry ; Influence ; Laboratories ; leaching ; Lumber ; Pesticide residues ; Pinus ; preservative treated wood ; Preservatives ; Retention ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Timber ; water ; Wood preservatives ; Wood products ; wood technology</subject><ispartof>Forest products journal, 2004-03, Vol.54 (3), p.85-90</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2004 Forest Products Society</rights><rights>Copyright Forest Products Society Mar 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schultz, T.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholas, D.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalton, T.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keefe, D</creatorcontrib><title>Biocide retention variation of southern yellow pine products treated with waterborne preservatives in commercial, pilot plant, or laboratory cylinders</title><title>Forest products journal</title><description>The among-sample retention variability of southern yellow pine (SYP) products was examined for seven sets of dimension and timber lumber treated with CCA-C in various commercial plants with retention based on x-ray fluorescence, and for seven sets of 8-foot 2 by 4's treated with ACQ-D in a pilot plant with retention measured by weight gain. In addition, among- and within-sample variability was determined for one set of small (19 mm by 19 mm by 1016 mm) SYP field stakes treated with CCA-C in a laboratory cylinder with biocide levels measured by x-ray fluorescence, and among-sample variability also determined using weight gain. For the commercially-treated lumber, as the lumber thickness increased the biocide retention (based on the outer shell as per AWPA Standard C2) variability increased. Retention variability for the small field stakes treated to ground-contact level in a laboratory cylinder was lower than the variability of the nominal 2-inch-thick lumber treated to the same target retention in either the commercial facilities or pilot plant. Biocide retention was highly correlated (r2 = 98.1%) to specific gravity for the small field stakes, but specific gravity explained less than 30 percent of the biocide retention for lumber treated in commercial operations. Within-sample variation for the small defect-free stakes averaged 60 percent of the among-sample variation, and the ends of the stakes had a slightly higher biocide retention (8.2%) than the interior sections. The ratio of chromium retention in the earlywood to that in the latewood (E/L ratio) at the ends of field stakes that were air-dried right after treatment was significantly lower than the copper or arsenic E/L ratios, suggesting that chromium migrated to the latewood with free water during air-drying to give an uneven macrodistribution. Biocides in the newer waterborne systems may also undergo this migration to give a nonuniform distribution.</description><subject>Arsenic</subject><subject>Biocides</subject><subject>chemical control</subject><subject>chromated copper arsenate</subject><subject>Chromium</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>environmental protection</subject><subject>Forest products industry</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>leaching</subject><subject>Lumber</subject><subject>Pesticide residues</subject><subject>Pinus</subject><subject>preservative treated wood</subject><subject>Preservatives</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Timber</subject><subject>water</subject><subject>Wood preservatives</subject><subject>Wood products</subject><subject>wood technology</subject><issn>0015-7473</issn><issn>2376-9637</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM9OAyEQxjdGE2v1GSSeXQMLC-Woxn-JiQf1vGFhaDEUKtA2fRGfV9J6NHOYL5Pf901mjppJRwVvJafiuJlgTPpWMEFPm7OcvzDGoufdpPm5c1E7AyhBgVBcDGijklN7FS3KcV0WkALagfdxi1YuAFqlaNa6ZFQSqAIGbV1ZoG2VaYxpD0CGtKkpG8jIBaTjcglJO-Wva4SPBa28CuUaxYS8qiZVYtohvfMuGEj5vDmxyme4-OvT5vPx4eP-uX19e3q5v31tbTcjpRUgRiOpEFQyaRklZjQdUwoT2eNRm37UAiihnBnN5MxSQWxHKOkx4xq4odPm6pBbT_peQy7DV1ynUFcOHWG8mzHOKtQeoLnyMLhgY0lKzyFAUj4GsK6ObwnpCZei_nva3PzD1zKwdPpfw-XBYFUc1Dy5PHy-d5hQjKXEM8rpL26wj-w</recordid><startdate>20040301</startdate><enddate>20040301</enddate><creator>Schultz, T.P</creator><creator>Nicholas, D.D</creator><creator>Dalton, T.J</creator><creator>Keefe, D</creator><general>Forest Products Society</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040301</creationdate><title>Biocide retention variation of southern yellow pine products treated with waterborne preservatives in commercial, pilot plant, or laboratory cylinders</title><author>Schultz, T.P ; Nicholas, D.D ; Dalton, T.J ; Keefe, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f281t-7e7bd93773949f431dbd24aa01950bcd5bc7e31364dc498f371f21315046ce6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Arsenic</topic><topic>Biocides</topic><topic>chemical control</topic><topic>chromated copper arsenate</topic><topic>Chromium</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>environmental protection</topic><topic>Forest products industry</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>leaching</topic><topic>Lumber</topic><topic>Pesticide residues</topic><topic>Pinus</topic><topic>preservative treated wood</topic><topic>Preservatives</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Timber</topic><topic>water</topic><topic>Wood preservatives</topic><topic>Wood products</topic><topic>wood technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schultz, T.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholas, D.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalton, T.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keefe, D</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Forest products journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schultz, T.P</au><au>Nicholas, D.D</au><au>Dalton, T.J</au><au>Keefe, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biocide retention variation of southern yellow pine products treated with waterborne preservatives in commercial, pilot plant, or laboratory cylinders</atitle><jtitle>Forest products journal</jtitle><date>2004-03-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>90</epage><pages>85-90</pages><issn>0015-7473</issn><eissn>2376-9637</eissn><coden>FPJOAB</coden><abstract>The among-sample retention variability of southern yellow pine (SYP) products was examined for seven sets of dimension and timber lumber treated with CCA-C in various commercial plants with retention based on x-ray fluorescence, and for seven sets of 8-foot 2 by 4's treated with ACQ-D in a pilot plant with retention measured by weight gain. In addition, among- and within-sample variability was determined for one set of small (19 mm by 19 mm by 1016 mm) SYP field stakes treated with CCA-C in a laboratory cylinder with biocide levels measured by x-ray fluorescence, and among-sample variability also determined using weight gain. For the commercially-treated lumber, as the lumber thickness increased the biocide retention (based on the outer shell as per AWPA Standard C2) variability increased. Retention variability for the small field stakes treated to ground-contact level in a laboratory cylinder was lower than the variability of the nominal 2-inch-thick lumber treated to the same target retention in either the commercial facilities or pilot plant. Biocide retention was highly correlated (r2 = 98.1%) to specific gravity for the small field stakes, but specific gravity explained less than 30 percent of the biocide retention for lumber treated in commercial operations. Within-sample variation for the small defect-free stakes averaged 60 percent of the among-sample variation, and the ends of the stakes had a slightly higher biocide retention (8.2%) than the interior sections. The ratio of chromium retention in the earlywood to that in the latewood (E/L ratio) at the ends of field stakes that were air-dried right after treatment was significantly lower than the copper or arsenic E/L ratios, suggesting that chromium migrated to the latewood with free water during air-drying to give an uneven macrodistribution. Biocides in the newer waterborne systems may also undergo this migration to give a nonuniform distribution.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>Forest Products Society</pub><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0015-7473 |
ispartof | Forest products journal, 2004-03, Vol.54 (3), p.85-90 |
issn | 0015-7473 2376-9637 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_214628464 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Arsenic Biocides chemical control chromated copper arsenate Chromium Comparative analysis Copper Density environmental protection Forest products industry Influence Laboratories leaching Lumber Pesticide residues Pinus preservative treated wood Preservatives Retention Statistical analysis Studies Timber water Wood preservatives Wood products wood technology |
title | Biocide retention variation of southern yellow pine products treated with waterborne preservatives in commercial, pilot plant, or laboratory cylinders |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T08%3A57%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biocide%20retention%20variation%20of%20southern%20yellow%20pine%20products%20treated%20with%20waterborne%20preservatives%20in%20commercial,%20pilot%20plant,%20or%20laboratory%20cylinders&rft.jtitle=Forest%20products%20journal&rft.au=Schultz,%20T.P&rft.date=2004-03-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=90&rft.pages=85-90&rft.issn=0015-7473&rft.eissn=2376-9637&rft.coden=FPJOAB&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA115169796%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214628464&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A115169796&rfr_iscdi=true |