Impact of stand density on the quality and value of 35-year-old loblolly pine plantation sawtimber: a case study
This paper provides insights into the impact of stand density on the quality or value of sawtimber from 35-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantation stands. The sample stands had a 70/25 site index (i.e., expected to produce trees with a top height or mean dominant height of 70 ft at 25 yea...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Forest products journal 2009-03, Vol.59 (3), p.62-66 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 66 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 62 |
| container_title | Forest products journal |
| container_volume | 59 |
| creator | Carino, Honorio F Biblis, Evangelos J |
| description | This paper provides insights into the impact of stand density on the quality or value of sawtimber from 35-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantation stands. The sample stands had a 70/25 site index (i.e., expected to produce trees with a top height or mean dominant height of 70 ft at 25 years of age) and an 8- by 8-foot initial spacing. The results of the study revealed that the stand that had two thinning events, at ages 18 and 27, could potentially yield lumber valued at $2.47 per cubic foot of sawtimber, based on first quarter 2008 prices. On the other hand, the stand that had only one thinning event at age 18 could potentially yield lumber valued at $2.53 per cubic foot of sawtimber. The difference of $0.06 or 2.4 percent per cubic foot was found to be significant statistically with a 99 percent level of confidence. Clearly, from the point of view of sawmillers who characterize input sawlog quality in terms of the dollar value of lumber yield per cubic foot, sawtimber from 35-year-old loblolly pine plantation stands that were thinned twice at ages 18 and 27 would not be as desirable as that coming from similar stands which were thinned only once at age 18. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_214626985</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A199193620</galeid><sourcerecordid>A199193620</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-f320t-a00a6365dbe82486a0ff2319dab05278c11647a9408fbc1d88c75415227e252e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkN9r2zAQx83YoFm7v6Giz_XQD0uy9xbC1hUCfdjybM72yVFRJMeSN_LfVyF7WCEc3HF3n-994T4UKy60Khsl9MdiRSmTpa60uCk-x_hKKdVS8VUxPR8m6BMJhsQEfiAD-mjTiQRP0h7JcQF3bs-rP-AWPJNClieEuQxuIC50Ljh3IpP1SCYHPkGyWR3hb7KHDudvBEgPEbPBMpzuik8GXMQv_-ptsfvx_ffmZ7l9eXrerLelEZymEigFJZQcOqx5VSugxnDBmgE6Krmue8ZUpaGpaG26ng113WtZMcm5Ri45itvi4XJ3msNxwZja17DMPlu2nFWKq6aWGSov0AgOW-tNSDP0I3qcwQWPxubxmjUNa4TiNPNfr_A5BjzY_qrg8T9Bt8T8pJhTtOM-xRGWGN_j9xfcQGhhnG1sd784ZYIyJTMjxBtKao4c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214626985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of stand density on the quality and value of 35-year-old loblolly pine plantation sawtimber: a case study</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Carino, Honorio F ; Biblis, Evangelos J</creator><creatorcontrib>Carino, Honorio F ; Biblis, Evangelos J</creatorcontrib><description>This paper provides insights into the impact of stand density on the quality or value of sawtimber from 35-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantation stands. The sample stands had a 70/25 site index (i.e., expected to produce trees with a top height or mean dominant height of 70 ft at 25 years of age) and an 8- by 8-foot initial spacing. The results of the study revealed that the stand that had two thinning events, at ages 18 and 27, could potentially yield lumber valued at $2.47 per cubic foot of sawtimber, based on first quarter 2008 prices. On the other hand, the stand that had only one thinning event at age 18 could potentially yield lumber valued at $2.53 per cubic foot of sawtimber. The difference of $0.06 or 2.4 percent per cubic foot was found to be significant statistically with a 99 percent level of confidence. Clearly, from the point of view of sawmillers who characterize input sawlog quality in terms of the dollar value of lumber yield per cubic foot, sawtimber from 35-year-old loblolly pine plantation stands that were thinned twice at ages 18 and 27 would not be as desirable as that coming from similar stands which were thinned only once at age 18. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-7473</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-9637</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FPJOAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: Forest Products Society</publisher><subject>Age ; By-products ; forest plantations ; Forest products industry ; forest stands ; forest thinning ; forest trees ; Impact analysis ; Lumber ; Lumber industry ; Pinus taeda ; plantation forestry ; Plantations ; Product quality ; Production management ; profitability ; Quality management ; sawlogs ; Sawmills ; spatial distribution ; stand density ; Studies ; Timber ; Timberlands ; Trees ; volume ; wood quality ; yields</subject><ispartof>Forest products journal, 2009-03, Vol.59 (3), p.62-66</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2009 Forest Products Society</rights><rights>Copyright Forest Products Society Mar 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carino, Honorio F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biblis, Evangelos J</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of stand density on the quality and value of 35-year-old loblolly pine plantation sawtimber: a case study</title><title>Forest products journal</title><description>This paper provides insights into the impact of stand density on the quality or value of sawtimber from 35-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantation stands. The sample stands had a 70/25 site index (i.e., expected to produce trees with a top height or mean dominant height of 70 ft at 25 years of age) and an 8- by 8-foot initial spacing. The results of the study revealed that the stand that had two thinning events, at ages 18 and 27, could potentially yield lumber valued at $2.47 per cubic foot of sawtimber, based on first quarter 2008 prices. On the other hand, the stand that had only one thinning event at age 18 could potentially yield lumber valued at $2.53 per cubic foot of sawtimber. The difference of $0.06 or 2.4 percent per cubic foot was found to be significant statistically with a 99 percent level of confidence. Clearly, from the point of view of sawmillers who characterize input sawlog quality in terms of the dollar value of lumber yield per cubic foot, sawtimber from 35-year-old loblolly pine plantation stands that were thinned twice at ages 18 and 27 would not be as desirable as that coming from similar stands which were thinned only once at age 18. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>By-products</subject><subject>forest plantations</subject><subject>Forest products industry</subject><subject>forest stands</subject><subject>forest thinning</subject><subject>forest trees</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Lumber</subject><subject>Lumber industry</subject><subject>Pinus taeda</subject><subject>plantation forestry</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Product quality</subject><subject>Production management</subject><subject>profitability</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>sawlogs</subject><subject>Sawmills</subject><subject>spatial distribution</subject><subject>stand density</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Timber</subject><subject>Timberlands</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>volume</subject><subject>wood quality</subject><subject>yields</subject><issn>0015-7473</issn><issn>2376-9637</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkN9r2zAQx83YoFm7v6Giz_XQD0uy9xbC1hUCfdjybM72yVFRJMeSN_LfVyF7WCEc3HF3n-994T4UKy60Khsl9MdiRSmTpa60uCk-x_hKKdVS8VUxPR8m6BMJhsQEfiAD-mjTiQRP0h7JcQF3bs-rP-AWPJNClieEuQxuIC50Ljh3IpP1SCYHPkGyWR3hb7KHDudvBEgPEbPBMpzuik8GXMQv_-ptsfvx_ffmZ7l9eXrerLelEZymEigFJZQcOqx5VSugxnDBmgE6Krmue8ZUpaGpaG26ng113WtZMcm5Ri45itvi4XJ3msNxwZja17DMPlu2nFWKq6aWGSov0AgOW-tNSDP0I3qcwQWPxubxmjUNa4TiNPNfr_A5BjzY_qrg8T9Bt8T8pJhTtOM-xRGWGN_j9xfcQGhhnG1sd784ZYIyJTMjxBtKao4c</recordid><startdate>20090301</startdate><enddate>20090301</enddate><creator>Carino, Honorio F</creator><creator>Biblis, Evangelos J</creator><general>Forest Products Society</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090301</creationdate><title>Impact of stand density on the quality and value of 35-year-old loblolly pine plantation sawtimber: a case study</title><author>Carino, Honorio F ; Biblis, Evangelos J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f320t-a00a6365dbe82486a0ff2319dab05278c11647a9408fbc1d88c75415227e252e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>By-products</topic><topic>forest plantations</topic><topic>Forest products industry</topic><topic>forest stands</topic><topic>forest thinning</topic><topic>forest trees</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Lumber</topic><topic>Lumber industry</topic><topic>Pinus taeda</topic><topic>plantation forestry</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Product quality</topic><topic>Production management</topic><topic>profitability</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>sawlogs</topic><topic>Sawmills</topic><topic>spatial distribution</topic><topic>stand density</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Timber</topic><topic>Timberlands</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>volume</topic><topic>wood quality</topic><topic>yields</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carino, Honorio F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biblis, Evangelos J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Forest products journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carino, Honorio F</au><au>Biblis, Evangelos J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of stand density on the quality and value of 35-year-old loblolly pine plantation sawtimber: a case study</atitle><jtitle>Forest products journal</jtitle><date>2009-03-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>62</spage><epage>66</epage><pages>62-66</pages><issn>0015-7473</issn><eissn>2376-9637</eissn><coden>FPJOAB</coden><abstract>This paper provides insights into the impact of stand density on the quality or value of sawtimber from 35-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantation stands. The sample stands had a 70/25 site index (i.e., expected to produce trees with a top height or mean dominant height of 70 ft at 25 years of age) and an 8- by 8-foot initial spacing. The results of the study revealed that the stand that had two thinning events, at ages 18 and 27, could potentially yield lumber valued at $2.47 per cubic foot of sawtimber, based on first quarter 2008 prices. On the other hand, the stand that had only one thinning event at age 18 could potentially yield lumber valued at $2.53 per cubic foot of sawtimber. The difference of $0.06 or 2.4 percent per cubic foot was found to be significant statistically with a 99 percent level of confidence. Clearly, from the point of view of sawmillers who characterize input sawlog quality in terms of the dollar value of lumber yield per cubic foot, sawtimber from 35-year-old loblolly pine plantation stands that were thinned twice at ages 18 and 27 would not be as desirable as that coming from similar stands which were thinned only once at age 18. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>Forest Products Society</pub><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0015-7473 |
| ispartof | Forest products journal, 2009-03, Vol.59 (3), p.62-66 |
| issn | 0015-7473 2376-9637 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_214626985 |
| source | Business Source Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Age By-products forest plantations Forest products industry forest stands forest thinning forest trees Impact analysis Lumber Lumber industry Pinus taeda plantation forestry Plantations Product quality Production management profitability Quality management sawlogs Sawmills spatial distribution stand density Studies Timber Timberlands Trees volume wood quality yields |
| title | Impact of stand density on the quality and value of 35-year-old loblolly pine plantation sawtimber: a case study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T17%3A34%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20stand%20density%20on%20the%20quality%20and%20value%20of%2035-year-old%20loblolly%20pine%20plantation%20sawtimber:%20a%20case%20study&rft.jtitle=Forest%20products%20journal&rft.au=Carino,%20Honorio%20F&rft.date=2009-03-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=62&rft.epage=66&rft.pages=62-66&rft.issn=0015-7473&rft.eissn=2376-9637&rft.coden=FPJOAB&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA199193620%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214626985&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A199193620&rfr_iscdi=true |