Communication and Cooperation in Public Network Situations

This paper focuses on sharing the costs and revenues of maintaining a public network communication structure. Revenues are assumed to be bilateral and communication links are publicly available but costly. It is assumed that agents are located at the vertices of an undirected graph in which the edge...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of operations research 2005-07, Vol.137 (1), p.117-140
Hauptverfasser: Suijs, Jeroen, Borm, Peter, Hamers, Herbert, Quant, Marieke, Koster, Maurice
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 140
container_issue 1
container_start_page 117
container_title Annals of operations research
container_volume 137
creator Suijs, Jeroen
Borm, Peter
Hamers, Herbert
Quant, Marieke
Koster, Maurice
description This paper focuses on sharing the costs and revenues of maintaining a public network communication structure. Revenues are assumed to be bilateral and communication links are publicly available but costly. It is assumed that agents are located at the vertices of an undirected graph in which the edges represent all possible communication links. We take the approach from cooperative game theory and focus on the corresponding network game in coalitional form which relates any coalition of agents to its highest possible net benefit, i.e., the net benefit corresponding to an optimal operative network. Although finding an optimal network in general is a difficult problem, it is shown that corresponding network games are (totally) balanced. In the proof of this result a specific relaxation, duality and techniques of linear production games with committee control play a role. Sufficient conditions for convexity of network games are derived. Possible extensions of the model and its results are discussed. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10479-005-2249-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_214507122</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>886206821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-f3df633300dcdca721fb5a51f49a2a056d07267b33d56962c21a5c2ba14f453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEFLxDAQhYMouK7-AG_Fe3RmkjRbb1J0FRYV1ntI0wa67jY1aRH_vV3raXjM433wMXaNcIsA-i4hSF1wAMWJZMHlCVug0sQLIVanbAGkJFdCwDm7SGkHAIgrtWD3ZTgcxq51dmhDl9muzsoQ-ibOue2y97Haty57bYbvED-zbTuMf790yc683afm6v8u2fbp8aN85pu39Uv5sOFuQg_ci9rnYiJD7WpnNaGvlFXoZWHJgspr0JTrSoha5UVOjtAqR5VF6aUSS3Yzr_YxfI1NGswujLGbgIZQKtBINJVwLrkYUoqNN31sDzb-GARz9GNmP2byY45-jBS_zadXsw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214507122</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Communication and Cooperation in Public Network Situations</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Suijs, Jeroen ; Borm, Peter ; Hamers, Herbert ; Quant, Marieke ; Koster, Maurice</creator><creatorcontrib>Suijs, Jeroen ; Borm, Peter ; Hamers, Herbert ; Quant, Marieke ; Koster, Maurice</creatorcontrib><description>This paper focuses on sharing the costs and revenues of maintaining a public network communication structure. Revenues are assumed to be bilateral and communication links are publicly available but costly. It is assumed that agents are located at the vertices of an undirected graph in which the edges represent all possible communication links. We take the approach from cooperative game theory and focus on the corresponding network game in coalitional form which relates any coalition of agents to its highest possible net benefit, i.e., the net benefit corresponding to an optimal operative network. Although finding an optimal network in general is a difficult problem, it is shown that corresponding network games are (totally) balanced. In the proof of this result a specific relaxation, duality and techniques of linear production games with committee control play a role. Sufficient conditions for convexity of network games are derived. Possible extensions of the model and its results are discussed. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0254-5330</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9338</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10479-005-2249-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Communication ; Communications networks ; Cooperation ; Cost sharing ; Costs ; Game theory ; Information technology ; Operations research ; Optimization ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Annals of operations research, 2005-07, Vol.137 (1), p.117-140</ispartof><rights>Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-f3df633300dcdca721fb5a51f49a2a056d07267b33d56962c21a5c2ba14f453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-f3df633300dcdca721fb5a51f49a2a056d07267b33d56962c21a5c2ba14f453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suijs, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borm, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamers, Herbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quant, Marieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koster, Maurice</creatorcontrib><title>Communication and Cooperation in Public Network Situations</title><title>Annals of operations research</title><description>This paper focuses on sharing the costs and revenues of maintaining a public network communication structure. Revenues are assumed to be bilateral and communication links are publicly available but costly. It is assumed that agents are located at the vertices of an undirected graph in which the edges represent all possible communication links. We take the approach from cooperative game theory and focus on the corresponding network game in coalitional form which relates any coalition of agents to its highest possible net benefit, i.e., the net benefit corresponding to an optimal operative network. Although finding an optimal network in general is a difficult problem, it is shown that corresponding network games are (totally) balanced. In the proof of this result a specific relaxation, duality and techniques of linear production games with committee control play a role. Sufficient conditions for convexity of network games are derived. Possible extensions of the model and its results are discussed. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communications networks</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Cost sharing</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Operations research</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0254-5330</issn><issn>1572-9338</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNotkEFLxDAQhYMouK7-AG_Fe3RmkjRbb1J0FRYV1ntI0wa67jY1aRH_vV3raXjM433wMXaNcIsA-i4hSF1wAMWJZMHlCVug0sQLIVanbAGkJFdCwDm7SGkHAIgrtWD3ZTgcxq51dmhDl9muzsoQ-ibOue2y97Haty57bYbvED-zbTuMf790yc683afm6v8u2fbp8aN85pu39Uv5sOFuQg_ci9rnYiJD7WpnNaGvlFXoZWHJgspr0JTrSoha5UVOjtAqR5VF6aUSS3Yzr_YxfI1NGswujLGbgIZQKtBINJVwLrkYUoqNN31sDzb-GARz9GNmP2byY45-jBS_zadXsw</recordid><startdate>200507</startdate><enddate>200507</enddate><creator>Suijs, Jeroen</creator><creator>Borm, Peter</creator><creator>Hamers, Herbert</creator><creator>Quant, Marieke</creator><creator>Koster, Maurice</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200507</creationdate><title>Communication and Cooperation in Public Network Situations</title><author>Suijs, Jeroen ; Borm, Peter ; Hamers, Herbert ; Quant, Marieke ; Koster, Maurice</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-f3df633300dcdca721fb5a51f49a2a056d07267b33d56962c21a5c2ba14f453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communications networks</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Cost sharing</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Operations research</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suijs, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borm, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamers, Herbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quant, Marieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koster, Maurice</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of operations research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suijs, Jeroen</au><au>Borm, Peter</au><au>Hamers, Herbert</au><au>Quant, Marieke</au><au>Koster, Maurice</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Communication and Cooperation in Public Network Situations</atitle><jtitle>Annals of operations research</jtitle><date>2005-07</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>117</spage><epage>140</epage><pages>117-140</pages><issn>0254-5330</issn><eissn>1572-9338</eissn><abstract>This paper focuses on sharing the costs and revenues of maintaining a public network communication structure. Revenues are assumed to be bilateral and communication links are publicly available but costly. It is assumed that agents are located at the vertices of an undirected graph in which the edges represent all possible communication links. We take the approach from cooperative game theory and focus on the corresponding network game in coalitional form which relates any coalition of agents to its highest possible net benefit, i.e., the net benefit corresponding to an optimal operative network. Although finding an optimal network in general is a difficult problem, it is shown that corresponding network games are (totally) balanced. In the proof of this result a specific relaxation, duality and techniques of linear production games with committee control play a role. Sufficient conditions for convexity of network games are derived. Possible extensions of the model and its results are discussed. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s10479-005-2249-4</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0254-5330
ispartof Annals of operations research, 2005-07, Vol.137 (1), p.117-140
issn 0254-5330
1572-9338
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_214507122
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Communication
Communications networks
Cooperation
Cost sharing
Costs
Game theory
Information technology
Operations research
Optimization
Studies
title Communication and Cooperation in Public Network Situations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T12%3A28%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Communication%20and%20Cooperation%20in%20Public%20Network%20Situations&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20operations%20research&rft.au=Suijs,%20Jeroen&rft.date=2005-07&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=140&rft.pages=117-140&rft.issn=0254-5330&rft.eissn=1572-9338&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10479-005-2249-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E886206821%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214507122&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true