Choosing a Client/Server Architecture: A Comparison of Two-and Three-Tier Systems

Choosing a Client/Server Architecture: A Comparison of Two-and Three-Tier Systems

The architectural design of a client/server system affects the initial development cost, day-to-day transactional performance, ongoing maintenance costs, and long-term flexibility and scalability of the application. The choice between a two- and three-tier architecture should be based on the scope a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Information systems management 1996, Vol.13 (2), p.7-13
Hauptverfasser: Gallaugher, John M., Ramanathan, Suresh C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Advantages
Client server architecture
Client server computing
Comparative studies
Computer architecture
Computer science
Systems design
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 13
container_issue 2
container_start_page 7
container_title Information systems management
container_volume 13
creator Gallaugher, John M.
Ramanathan, Suresh C.
description The architectural design of a client/server system affects the initial development cost, day-to-day transactional performance, ongoing maintenance costs, and long-term flexibility and scalability of the application. The choice between a two- and three-tier architecture should be based on the scope and complexity of a project, the time available for completion, and the expected enhancement or obsolescence of the system. A three-tier architecture requires more planning and support than a two-tier architecture, but it offers advantages in openness, flexibility, scalability, and integration.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10580539608906981
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_214124289</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>9245299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-f57a28c11b672b53aae89821fb3683f89d5eef1c56fe6eb0f8accfeb4e6cafdb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwFsR9LY2s9lkE_BSFv9BwYN6Dtl0YrdsNzXZVfrtTaknRTzNwPzeY94j5BzoNVBJp0C5pJwpQaWiQkk4ICNQrMhkSdlh2tM9SwA9JicxriiluWJ0RC6rpfex6d4mZlK1DXb99BnDB4bJLNhl06Pth4Cn5MiZNuLZ9xyT17vbl-ohmz_dP1azeWYZK_vM8dLk0gLUosxrzoxBqWQOrmZCMifVgiM6sFw4FFhTJ421DusChTVuUbMxudr7boJ_HzD2et1Ei21rOvRD1LxkUoBQ_4KMA01lQAIvfoArP4QuhdA5FJAXudy5wR6ywccY0OlNaNYmbDVQvatX_6o3aW72mqZzPqzNpw_tQvdm2_rggulsk774W_4FkKF-vQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214124289</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Choosing a Client/Server Architecture: A Comparison of Two-and Three-Tier Systems</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Gallaugher, John M. ; Ramanathan, Suresh C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gallaugher, John M. ; Ramanathan, Suresh C.</creatorcontrib><description>The architectural design of a client/server system affects the initial development cost, day-to-day transactional performance, ongoing maintenance costs, and long-term flexibility and scalability of the application. The choice between a two- and three-tier architecture should be based on the scope and complexity of a project, the time available for completion, and the expected enhancement or obsolescence of the system. A three-tier architecture requires more planning and support than a two-tier architecture, but it offers advantages in openness, flexibility, scalability, and integration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-0530</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-8703</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10580539608906981</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Advantages ; Client server architecture ; Client server computing ; Comparative studies ; Computer architecture ; Computer science ; Systems design</subject><ispartof>Information systems management, 1996, Vol.13 (2), p.7-13</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 1996</rights><rights>Copyright Warren Gorham Lamont Spring 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10580539608906981$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10580539608906981$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,59647,60436</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gallaugher, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramanathan, Suresh C.</creatorcontrib><title>Choosing a Client/Server Architecture: A Comparison of Two-and Three-Tier Systems</title><title>Information systems management</title><description>The architectural design of a client/server system affects the initial development cost, day-to-day transactional performance, ongoing maintenance costs, and long-term flexibility and scalability of the application. The choice between a two- and three-tier architecture should be based on the scope and complexity of a project, the time available for completion, and the expected enhancement or obsolescence of the system. A three-tier architecture requires more planning and support than a two-tier architecture, but it offers advantages in openness, flexibility, scalability, and integration.</description><subject>Advantages</subject><subject>Client server architecture</subject><subject>Client server computing</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Computer architecture</subject><subject>Computer science</subject><subject>Systems design</subject><issn>1058-0530</issn><issn>1934-8703</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwFsR9LY2s9lkE_BSFv9BwYN6Dtl0YrdsNzXZVfrtTaknRTzNwPzeY94j5BzoNVBJp0C5pJwpQaWiQkk4ICNQrMhkSdlh2tM9SwA9JicxriiluWJ0RC6rpfex6d4mZlK1DXb99BnDB4bJLNhl06Pth4Cn5MiZNuLZ9xyT17vbl-ohmz_dP1azeWYZK_vM8dLk0gLUosxrzoxBqWQOrmZCMifVgiM6sFw4FFhTJ421DusChTVuUbMxudr7boJ_HzD2et1Ei21rOvRD1LxkUoBQ_4KMA01lQAIvfoArP4QuhdA5FJAXudy5wR6ywccY0OlNaNYmbDVQvatX_6o3aW72mqZzPqzNpw_tQvdm2_rggulsk774W_4FkKF-vQ</recordid><startdate>1996</startdate><enddate>1996</enddate><creator>Gallaugher, John M.</creator><creator>Ramanathan, Suresh C.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1996</creationdate><title>Choosing a Client/Server Architecture</title><author>Gallaugher, John M. ; Ramanathan, Suresh C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-f57a28c11b672b53aae89821fb3683f89d5eef1c56fe6eb0f8accfeb4e6cafdb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Advantages</topic><topic>Client server architecture</topic><topic>Client server computing</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Computer architecture</topic><topic>Computer science</topic><topic>Systems design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gallaugher, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramanathan, Suresh C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Information systems management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gallaugher, John M.</au><au>Ramanathan, Suresh C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Choosing a Client/Server Architecture: A Comparison of Two-and Three-Tier Systems</atitle><jtitle>Information systems management</jtitle><date>1996</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>7</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>7-13</pages><issn>1058-0530</issn><eissn>1934-8703</eissn><abstract>The architectural design of a client/server system affects the initial development cost, day-to-day transactional performance, ongoing maintenance costs, and long-term flexibility and scalability of the application. The choice between a two- and three-tier architecture should be based on the scope and complexity of a project, the time available for completion, and the expected enhancement or obsolescence of the system. A three-tier architecture requires more planning and support than a two-tier architecture, but it offers advantages in openness, flexibility, scalability, and integration.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/10580539608906981</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-0530
ispartof Information systems management, 1996, Vol.13 (2), p.7-13
issn 1058-0530
1934-8703
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_214124289
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
subjects Advantages
Client server architecture
Client server computing
Comparative studies
Computer architecture
Computer science
Systems design
title Choosing a Client/Server Architecture: A Comparison of Two-and Three-Tier Systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T14%3A14%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Choosing%20a%20Client/Server%20Architecture:%20A%20Comparison%20of%20Two-and%20Three-Tier%20Systems&rft.jtitle=Information%20systems%20management&rft.au=Gallaugher,%20John%20M.&rft.date=1996&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=7&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=7-13&rft.issn=1058-0530&rft.eissn=1934-8703&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10580539608906981&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E9245299%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214124289&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true